Divergent Perspectives: British and American Colonists on Taxation and Representation

306 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: The relationship between britain and American

The American colonists view of  representation, taxation and the relationship between the colonies and mother country were different from the British view. The British and the colonists didn't have the best friendship with each other. Their views of right and wrong were not the same. The British and the colonists view on representation were different. The British thought that representation should be virtual, meaning that there was a member of Parliament to virtually represent the colonies.  Now the colonists view was that it had to be actual representation, meaning that if they were going to be taxed, that they should have actual men from the colonies in London, seated and voting for them. The taxation view between the two was also

Show More
Related

  • No Taxation Without Representation Dbq Analysis

    490 Words  | 1 Pages

    When we hear about the Revolutionary War, one of the most popular phrases to be tied to it is “no taxation without representation,” and was coined from the fact that the colonies were being directly taxed without democratic representation. The fact that the American people did not have representation in Parliament while being taxed was virtually universally disapproved and was an extremely big factor in driving the American people to protect their democratic ideals through war in the years prior to the revolution.

    Read More

  • The Colonies By 1763: A New Society?

    497 Words  | 1 Pages

    Between the settlement at Jamestown in 1607 and the Treaty of Paris in 1763, the most important change that occurred in the colonies was the emergence of a society quite different from that in England. Changes in religion, economics, politics and social structure illustrate this Americanization of the transplanted Europeans.

    Read More

  • Unfair Taxation: Catalyst for the American Revolution

    567 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the war the British and the colonies worked side by side though after problems arose and the British wanted to take over the 13 colonies and gain there territory. British parliament in London also wanted to impose new laws and restrictions. This caused the colonists to feel that their freedom was being limited, though that is not the main cause that caused the tension between Britain and the colonies it was the series of unfair taxes that the British forced the consists to pay. There is many though the ones that are most important are the stamp act that began the protests, the Boston massacre which lead to the Boston tea party and then the intolerable acts, and lastly the first and second continental congress

    Read More

  • The New England Colonies: A Homogeneous Society

    296 Words  | 1 Pages

    The New England colonies developed a close-knit homogeneous society and a thriving mixed economy of agriculture and commerce. They developed this by creating a group called the New England Confederation. This focused on the protection of the people in the colony in the event of enemies trying to attack them. On page 49, it says “The primary purpose of the confederation was defense against foes or potential foes, notably the Indians, the French, and the Dutch.” They created this as a safety net for the New England colonies. Every part of the New England colonies had two votes, it didn’t matter on the size of the colonies. The ran it as their own because the king of the time didn’t care much for the colonies.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Declaration Of Independence

    1745 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this political philosophy the colonies had originally made a charter with the king who set a custom that he was to provide for the defense of the colonially while each colony maintained the right to legislative self-rule. Jefferson would state, “the addition of new states to the British Empire has produced an addition of new, and sometimes opposite interests. It is now therefore, the great office of his majesty to resume the exercise of his negative power, and to prevent the passage of laws by any one legislature of the empire, which might bear injuriously on the right and interest of another” (A Warning to the King: Thomas Jefferson, “A Summary View of the Rights of British-America”, Green, p. 234). In other words, for Americans to preserve the true ancient British constitution, it was vital to establish that parliament did not have authority over them, because they could never be required to give up actual popular consent or governance in the British Parliament. Thomas Hutchinson stated this idea clear, “The king might retain the executive power and also his share of the legislative without any abridgement of our rights as Englishmen, the Parliament could not retain their legislative power without depriving them of those rights, for after removal they could no longer be represented, and their sovereign, sensible of this charter or commissions made provision in every colon for legislature

    Read More

  • Self-government in the Early Colonies

    454 Words  | 1 Pages

    How were the seeds for self-government sown in the early colonies? Why was this important when England started to enforce rules (such as the Intolerable Acts)?  Please give specific examples.

    Read More

  • Primary Differences between Colonial America and England

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    There were a myriad of differences between Great Britain and her American colonies in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but these differences can be divided into three basic categories: economic, social, and political. The original American settlers came to the colonies for varied reasons, but a common trait among these settlers was that they still considered themselves British subjects. However, as time passed, the colonists grew disenfranchised from England. Separated from the king by three thousand miles and living in a primitive environment where obtaining simple necessities was a struggle, pragmatism became the common thread throughout all daily life in the colonies. It was this pragmatism that led the colonists to create their own society with a unique culture and system of economics and politics.

    Read More

  • American Colonies: Contrasting the New England and Southern Colonists

    973 Words  | 2 Pages

    American Colonies: Contrasting the New England and Southern Colonists The New England and Southern Colonies were both settled largely by the English. By 1700, the regions had evolved into two distinct societies. The southern colonies have characteristics that are the antithesis of the New England colonies attributes. New England was colonized for Freedom of Worship and freedom of political thought.

    Read More

  • Britain Vs the Colonies: The American Revolution

    788 Words  | 2 Pages

    An oppressed people will eventually rise against the oppressor regardless of loyalties they may have had in the past to their oppressor. Humans can only withstand so much oppression before eventually reaching a breaking point-a fact the British Empire failed to realize when they took oppressive actions on their colonies that would cause conflict and culminate into the American Revolution. After claiming victory in the French-Indian War, the British decided to implement policies and taxes in the colonies the colonists that the colonists considered illegal due to lack of their consent. While initially, the colonists did attempt more peaceful and logical alternatives to resolve their discontent with the British Empire, eventually more oppressive taxes and violent events culminated to a full Revolution. Before the revolution, the British had incurred debt from the French-Indian War and needed to raise money: they turned to the colonies as a source of income.

    Read More

  • Disagreements Between American Colonists and British Policymakers

    973 Words  | 2 Pages

    The American colonists’ disagreements with British policymakers lead to the colonist’s belief that the policies imposed on them violated of their constitutional rights and their colonial charters. These policies that were imposed on the colonist came with outcome like established new boundaries, new internal and external taxes, unnecessary and cruel punishment, and taxation without representation. British policymakers enforcing Acts of Parliament, or policies, that ultimately lead in the colonist civil unrest, outbreak of hostilities, and the colonist prepared to declare their independence.

    Read More

  • The Sense of Identity and Unity of the Colonists

    707 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the Great War for Empire, the British parliament began carrying out taxes on the colonists to help pay for the war. It was not long from the war that salutary neglect was brought on the colonies for an amount of time that gave the colonists a sense of independence and identity. A farmer had even wrote once: “Here individuals of all nations are melted into a new race of men, whose labours and posterity will one day cause great changes in the world” (Doc H). They recognized themselves as different than the British, so when parliament began passing bills to tax without representation there was an outcry of mistreatment. Edmund Burke, a man from parliament, sympathized with the colonists: “Govern America as you govern an English town which happens not to be represented in Parl...

    Read More

  • A People's History of the United States by Howard Zinn

    1226 Words  | 3 Pages

    Often in history textbooks the British are cast in an evil light, while the American colonists are seen as the underdogs who are fighting against tyrannical rule and striving for freedom for all.... ... middle of paper ... ... This wouldn’t be quite as terrible, but the hypocrisy of promising rights to all, where everyone is created equal and then doing the exact opposite, makes the matter worse. Women, natives, the poor, and blacks had to fight countless years just to be on the same level as their oppressors, with some taking much longer to gain anything close to equality.

    Read More

  • The Relations Between Britain And Its American Colonies

    921 Words  | 2 Pages

    From 1754 to 1763, the French and Indian War took place. This war altered the political, economic, and ideological relations between Britain and its American colonies. It was the last of four North American wars waged from 1689 to 1763 between the British and the French. In these struggles, each country fought for control of the continent with the assistance of Native American and colonial allies. The French and Indian War occurred to end the land dispute between the British and French. Whoever won, in reality, gained an empire. It was a determined and eventually successful attempt by the British to get a dominant position in North America, the West Indies, and the subcontinent of India. Although Britain had won all this land, political, economic, and ideological relations between Britain and its American colonies were totally annihilated.

    Read More

  • British Imperial Policies and Colonial Resistance

    788 Words  | 2 Pages

    A new era was dawning on the American colonies and its mother country Britain, an era of revolution. The American colonists were subjected to many cruel acts of the British Parliament in order to benefit England itself. These British policies were forcing the Americans to rebellious feelings as their rights were constantly being violated by the British Crown. The colonies wanted to have an independent government and economy so they could create their own laws and stipulations. The British imperial policies affected the colonies economic, political, and geographic situation which intensified colonists’ resistance to British rule and intensified commitment to their republican values.

    Read More

  • Tyranny Vs Tyranny

    206 Words  | 1 Pages

    The colonists were not as represented because King George III’s tyranny overtook all decisions. Tyranny was another big decision colonists had to revolutionize. The colonists decided that state sovereignty is better than a strong central government. Through state sovereignty, states had power to tax and control interstate trade. As stated in the Articles of Confederation, each state has a legislature comprised of elected individuals. The national government is weak through the articles because of the powerful state governments. The federal government could not levy taxes or control interstate trade, unlike the British government. Naturally, the federal government was so weak that it couldn’t repay most of its war debts. As a result, the

    Read More

More about Divergent Perspectives: British and American Colonists on Taxation and Representation

Open Document