Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analytical essays on one day in the life of ivan denisovich
Analytical essays on one day in the life of ivan denisovich
Thesis for one day in the life of ivan denisovich
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Solzhenitsyn’s dynamic prison novella is the product of his time spent in a Stalinist labor camp, where he spent all his days cold and hungry. One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is the vessel that Solzhenitsyn used to explore the various relationships between prisoners, or Zeks, and the omnipotent hunger that runs rampant throughout these labor camps. Solzhenitsyn’s prime mode to develop these relationships is through the development of characters and the plot. Four major characters are used to demonstrate the ways hunger can transform a person: Fetiukov, Aloyshka, Tsezar, and the protagonist, Shukhov. Fetiukov is dehumanized by his constant, animalistic search for sustenance. Aloyshka views his aching belly as a test from his God so that he may strengthen his spiritual relationship. Tsezar uses his abundance of food to manipulate others in the camp. Shukhov drives strength and motivation from his hunger in order to work harder despite the freezing winds of the Siberian winter. Fetiukov: The Jackal In the exposition of the novel, Fetiukov is described by the speaker as having “the last place in his squad” (pg. 13). Obtaining the last place in a squad is to be the least respected and to possess the least dignity out of any other Zek in a squad. Fetiukov is viewed this way because he has lost his dignity and the respect to others by succumbing to uncivilized attempts to satisfy his hunger. For example, Fetiukov was known around the labor camp as “the sort who when he was looking after someone else’s bowl took the potatoes from it” (pg. 14). He was also known for “collecting cigarette butts (he even fished them out of the spittoons, he wasn’t fussy)” (pg. 41). Fetiukov’s constant petty search for food embitters both his fel... ... middle of paper ... ... an exploratory analysis of the possible relationships that form between various individuals and hunger when it is allowed to run rampant. The author explores the degrading nature hunger can have through the character of Fetiukov. Aloyshka represents how some individuals turn their hearts to the heavens in search of a benevolent God in times of adversity. Tsezar symbolizes the wealthy who manipulate the impoverished and malnourished. Lastly, Shukhov is the face of the people that find strength in their most desperate times. Solzhenitsyn uses hunger as a greater metaphor for adversity. His characters not only symbolize the various reactions that human beings have to empty stomach, but to the way individuals either succumb or push through conflict and struggle. Works Cited Solzhenit︠s︡yn, Aleksandr Isaevich. One day in the life of Ivan Denisovich. Penguin, 1998.
While obtaining food seemed to be the entire purpose of life for the people imprisoned in the camps, it often killed more people than it saved. Though focusing on food seemed like a logical thing to do when you are being starved, it was not always very effective in helping people survive. There are many situations in the book illustrating how living for the sole purpose of acquiring food—under any condition—could turn out to be lethal.
Food is essential to basic life. It provides people with the energy to think, speak, walk, talk, and breathe. In preparation for the Jews deportation from the ghettos of Transylvania, “the (Jewish) women were busy cooking eggs, roasting meat, and baking cakes”(Wiesel, 13). The Jewish families realized how crucial food was to their lives even before they were faced with the daily condition of famine and death in the concentration camps. The need for food was increased dramatically with the introduction of the famine-like conditions of the camps. Wiesel admitted that, although he was incredibly hungry, he had refused to eat the plate of thick soup they served to the prisoners on the first day of camp because of his nature of being a “spoiled child”. But his attitude changed rapidly as he began to realize that his life span was going to be cut short if he continued to refuse to eat the food they served him. “By the third day, I (Elie Wiesel) was eating any kind of soup hungrily” (Wiesel, 40). His desire to live superseded his social characteristic of being “pampered”. Remarque also uses his characters to show to how a balanced diet promotes a person’s good health. Paul Bäumer uses food to encourage Franz Kemmerich, his sick friend, “eat decently and you’ll soon be well again…Eating is the main thing” (Remarque, 30). Paul Bäumer feels that good food can heal all afflictions. The bread supply of the soldiers in All Quiet on the Western Front was severely threatened when the rats became more and more numerous.
The short story, “Ivan Fyodorovich Shponka and His Aunt”, explicates the life of a man named Ivan Fyodorovich Shponka. We see him briefly in his young years, followed by his life in the army, and his return to the farm where his strong characterized aunt resides. We can see immediately that this man lives in constant cleanliness and dutiful paranoia; these are some of his desires that he wishes to exhibit to others. We can also see his fears, which reside in the confiscation of his masculinity and independence. This short story has many elements that resemble others in the Nikolai Gogol collection.
In describing the setting, the general locale is the prison in the coldest part of Russia- Siberia, geographically but socially depicting the social circumstances in the prison, but draws analogies to the general social, political and economic circumstances of Russia during the Stalinist era (form 1917 revolution up to 1955). The symbolic significance of the novel and the film (genres) reflects experiences, values and attitudes of the Russian society. The genres reflect the origins of the Russian social disorders and massive counts of political misgivings which watered down real communism in Russia. We are constantly reminded of the social and cultural heritage and originality of Russian ethnic groups through those different levels of meanings
Being one of the greatest Russian writers of 20th century, Aleksander Solzhenitsyn had a unique talent that he used to truthfully depict the realities of life of ordinary people living in Soviet era. Unlike many other writers, instead of writing about “bright future of communism”, he chose to write about everyday hardships that common people had to endure in Soviet realm. In “Matryona’s Home”, the story focuses on life of an old peasant woman living in an impoverished collectivized village after World War 2 . In the light of Soviet’s propaganda of creating a new Soviet Nation, the reader can observe that Matryona’s personality and way of life drastically contradicted the desired archetype of New Soviet Man. Like most of the people in her village,
Dostoyevsky's writing in this book is such that the characters and setting around the main subject, Raskolnikov, are used with powerful consequences. The setting is both symbolic and has a power that affects all whom reside there, most notably Raskolnikov. An effective Structure is also used to show changes to the plot's direction and Raskolnikov's character. To add to this, the author's word choice and imagery are often extremely descriptive, and enhance the impact at every stage of Raskolnikov's changing fortunes and character. All of these features aid in the portrayal of Raskolnikov's downfall and subsequent rise.
There are many parallels and differences between Franz Kafka’s “The Metamorphosis” and "A Hunger Artist". Kafka portrays these differences and similarities very effectively through his utilization of elements such as transformation, dehumanization, and dedication to work. Through his works, Kafka communicates with the reader in such a way that almost provokes and challenges one’s imagination and creativity.
First, Dostoevsky gives the reader the character, Raskolnokov. He is the main character, whom Fyodor uses to show two sides of people their admirable side and their disgusting side. He loves Raskolnokov, which is why Fyodor uses Raskolnokov’s point of view throughout the whole novel. Personally, Fyodor dislikes some of his qualities but understands that all people are plagued with some bad traits, and that Raskolnokv is trying to make emends for some of his wrong doings, i.e. the murder of the pawnbroker and her sister. He knows that what he did was wrong and is willing to suffer for his crime, and he does throughout the whole book with his constant depression. Dostoesky believes in punishment for your crimes, this is why he shows Raskolnokov suffering through most of the novel, to show his great love for penance. Dostoevsky likes the kind giving nature of people; this is why he portrays the main character as a kind, gentle, and giving, person. Often, Raskolnokov thinks only of others benefits such as when he helped Katerina by giving her all his money for Marmelodov, as well as his caring about what happens to his sister with her marriage to Luzhin. Raskolnokov hates Luzhin’s arrogant and pompous attitude, which reflects Dostoevsky’s animosity of the same qualities in people in the real world.
HUNGER: An Unnatural History." Kirkus Reviews 73.12 (2005): 675. Literary Reference Center. Web. 6 Mar. 2014.
The era of eastern and central Europe is a momentous time in modern history. From the beginnings of tsarist Russia to Hitler’s reign in the 1940s, happiness and euphoria have seldom been present in the lives of those who reside there. However, one of these sad souls ended up using his horrific past to move him forward in the writing industry; his name was Franz Kafka. Growing up in Czechoslovakia, he had a tough relationship with his father, which inspired the majority of family relationships in his works, published after Kafka’s death without his permission. He consistently covered and explored human struggle in some of his novels, including “A Hunger Artist”, as well as “In the Penal Colony”. In “A Hunger Artist”, the hunger artist’s profession
Alexander Solzhenitsyn carefully and tediously depicted what life is like in a prison. Ivans monotonous life prompts the reader initially to think that Ivans day is a living death of tedious details. Yet, in truth, Ivan i...
This man is the absolute opposite of everything society holds to be acceptable. Here is a man, with intelligent insight, lucid perception, who is self-admitted to being sick, depraved, and hateful. A man who at every turn is determined to thwart every chance fate offers him to be happy and content. A man who actively seeks to punish and humiliate himself. Dostoyevsky is showing the reader that man is not governed by values which society holds to be all important.
The literal definition of the word hunger plays a rather large role in the book as well as the figurative definition. The prisoners were not being cared for properly by the prison guards. In addition, the prisoners were separated by physical appearance and age. The ones too old to work were sent to be killed in the gas chambers. The people who were fit to work were sent to be enslaved and work under Natzi rule. They were often so malnourished that they became ill, unable to work, and shot because of their inability to work. For example, during the liberation of Buchenwald, the children were fed nothing over the six day liberation. The poor, desperate children had to eat garbage from the kitchen and grass. They ate grass like common animals. There was a large need for sustainable hunger during the Holocaust.
George Orwell’s novel Animal Farm is a great example of allegory and political satire. The novel was written to criticize totalitarian regimes and particularly Stalin's corrupt rule in Russia. In the first chapter Orwell gives his reasons for writing the story and what he hopes it will accomplish. It also gives reference to the farm and how it relates to the conflicts of the Russian revolution. The characters, settings, and the plot were written to describe the social upheaval during that period of time and also to prove that the good nature of true communism can be turned into something atrocious by an idea as simple as greed. This essay will cover the comparisons between Animal Farm and the Russian Revolution. It will also explain why this novel is a satire and allegory to the Revolution that took place in Russia so long ago.
Throughout history, both men and women have struggled trying to achieve unattainable goals in the face of close-minded societies. Authors have often used this theme to develop stories of characters that face obstacles and are sometimes unable to overcome the stigma that is attached to them. This inability to rise above prejudice is many times illustrated with the metaphor of hunger. Not only do people suffer from physical hunger, but they also suffer from spiritual hunger: a need to be full of life. When this spiritual hunger is not satisfied, it can destroy a life, just as physical hunger can kill as well.