The Relationship Between Faith And Truth In Arthur Miller's The Crucible

721 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The relationship between faith and belief

Micah What is faith? What is truth? Not really an easy question to answer. The line between faith and what is true wears very thin making it nearly impossible to answer those questions. Arthur Miller does some remarkable work in The Crucible to try and show the relationship between both faith and truth. Even though he shows us the relationship between them he also show the distinct difference between the two, but is there really a correct answer? Can we really know what the truth is or who has faith? To realise the truth we must start from the bottom and answer what is faith.
Faith is a very complex thing to explain. Whether it be back in 1692 where The Crucible was based or even this very day, faith will always be a touchy subject. Some people have been known to take their faith so much further than it should be. To the extremes if you will, especially back in the 1600’s. When this story was told if you didn’t go to church you were a comrade of the devil. Hale says to Proctor “Mr. Proctor your home is not a church; your theology must …show more content…

If someone’s faith is real and honest. If someone is telling the truth. Or even if someone is lying, are they doing it to save someone else or themselves. Miller also shows this in his play. That just because you may tell a lie does not mean you don’t have faith. It all depends on why you lie, and what the lie is. When Elizabeth lied about Proctor and Abigail not committing adultery she did it to protect Proctor’s name. She did it for the better of someone else, but does that mean she doesn’t have faith? There is a relationship between both faith and truth, but they do not always go hand in hand. Just because someone has faith doesn’t mean they never lie, and just because someone lies doesn’t mean they don 't have faith. Yes, truth and faith are very similar, but they are just as much different as they are similar. It is a nearly impossible thing to

Show More
Related

  • How Did Elizabeth Proctor Judge Unfairly In The Crucible

    260 Words  | 1 Pages

    In The Crucible many people were judged unfairly. It happens to everyone, but in the time of The Crucible people were falsely accused of being a witch, and of doing other crazy things. In Act 2 Elizabeth Proctor was accused by Cheever of stabbing Abigail. Cheever found a poppet with a needle in the stomach at the Proctor house, and it just so happened that Abigail got hurt by a stabbing feeling she felt in her stomach that night. Cheever accused Elizabeth of this even though he has no proof. Elizabeth was judged unfairly which was wrong. No one has a right to judge someone, or jump to conclusion without having proof, or knowing the full story. Elizabeth Proctor was judged Unfairly in Act 2 of The Crucible.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The Crucible And The Minister's Black Veil

    883 Words  | 2 Pages

    People in the Crucible were very Religion which they had woven into the everyday life of Salem. “The parochial snobbery of these people was partly responsible for their failure to convert the Indians. Probably they also preferred to take land from heathens rather than from fellow Christians. At any rate, very few Indians were converted, and the Salem folk

    Read More

  • Overview of The Crucible

    927 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Crucible was a rather strong book, it had battles both internal and external, there were also betrayals and vendettas… but a few stuck strong to their morals of what was wrong, and what was right. After the girl’s acts were, undoubtedly, in the eyes of the law, seen as entirely real, people who would not otherwise have been accused of witchcraft were now eligible to be under Satan’s spell. One John Proctor, saw himself above the nonsense, that witches could not exist in Salem, his wife, his children nor him; But, when Mary Warren said to the court that he used his spirit to drag her into court to testify against the girls, the judges deemed her word more truthful than his. After actively and repeatedly denying the claims, he was sentenced to death, for only a witch could lie in the face of god.

    Read More

  • The Role Of Authority In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

    696 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Crucible by Arthur Miller shows how authority is a characteristic that can easily become a problem throughout a society. Many subjects were addressed in The Crucible such as guilt, hypocrisy, justice, hysteria, and courage. However, the most important subject throughout the play would be the nature of authority. There is a fine line between the concept of having authority and having power. In the book, the authority weakened and led to the antagonist Abigail Williams leading the law as opposed to the law leading Abigail Williams. At the instant that Abigail was granted authority over the townspeople she acted on it in order to have power. Not only is there power that comes with authority, but there is also responsibility which was demonstrated

    Read More

  • The Guilty Characters in Miller's The Crucible

    830 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Salem Witch Trials, Who is Really Guilty? After all of the witch trials in 1692 concluded, a total of 20 people were hanged, all because of people craving attention and personal gain. There are three people depicted in Arthur Miller's The Crucible that are most responsible for this and they are, Abigail Williams, Judge Danforth, and Thomas Putnam. Abigail Williams is mostly responsible for the Salem witch trials because she was the first person to start accusing innocent people of witchcraft.

    Read More

  • A Test of Character in The Crucible by Arthur Miller

    1488 Words  | 3 Pages

    A crucible refers to a harsh test, and in The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, each person is challenged in a severe test of his or her character or morals. Many more people fail than pass, but three notable characters stand out. Reverend John Hale, Elizabeth Proctor, and John Proctor all significantly change over the course of the play.

    Read More

  • Courage, Weakness, And Truth In Arthur Miller's The Crucible

    1171 Words  | 3 Pages

    The statement,“The Crucible is essentially about courage, weakness, and truth,” is proven true numerous times, throughout the play. The Crucible was written by Arthur Miller, about the true events that happened in Salem, Massachusetts, between the years 1692 and 1693. The Salem witch trials consisted of many hangings, lies, and complete mass hysteria. The citizens of Salem followed the religion of Puritanism, and the ideas of predestination. The root of the mass hysteria comes from their belief in the sense that in something happens then it must have been planned by God. In Miller’s portrayal of the story, Abigail Williams was the ringleader of the witch trials, and she used the idea of predestination to cover up her own sins. Abigail was a very manipulative girl and ruined many lives. John Proctor, Mary Warren, and Elizabeth Proctor were just a few of the victims in Abby’s game. John, Mary, and Elizabeth exhibit the traits courage, weakness, and truth, whether it was in a positive or negative way.

    Read More

  • Fear and Manipulation in Arthur Miller's The Crucible

    1015 Words  | 3 Pages

    Fear holds a great control over any mortal human-being through daunting and restricted words, most commonly seen while anyone is under pressure. While being controlled over fear, you may come to realize that you are being manipulated to the possibilities of a threatened punishment and may also be mislead by lies. Arthur Miller’s classic novel, The Crucible takes place in Salem, Massachusetts, where a lot of times fear would be used to control anyone to blame another of witchcraft. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller elucidates this through Elizabeth Proctor, Abigail Williams, and Mary Warren, that fear holds a great torment on the truth.

    Read More

  • Arthur Miller's The Crucible

    1468 Words  | 3 Pages

    Context: This part of the text is included at the beginning of the drama, telling the audience about Salem and its people. The author explains how a theocracy would lead to a tragedy like the Salem witch-hunts. This is the initial setting and is based on the principle that some people should be included and some excluded from society, according to their religious beliefs and their actions. This is basically the idea that religious passion, taken to extremes, results in tragedy. Miller is saying that even today extremes end up bad- communism, like strict puritans, was restrictive and extreme. It only made people suffer.

    Read More

  • The Crucible Trace Analysis

    1471 Words  | 3 Pages

    In a theocratic society, the church is at the top of the societal pyramid. With the church being at the top, they were often the authority of the town or society. Ministers being the head of the church, were the main people to follow the law out. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, in 1692 in Salem, Massachusetts there was a discovery of witchcraft. When they began to struggle with finding all the witches in the town, they call upon Reverend John Hale, a Puritan minister and the witch expert, to help. Hale gladly traveled to Salem to help them with their crisis at hand. Hale was not your classic Puritan minister. Along with attempting to “ purify “ the church, Hale was an “ expert “ in witchcraft. He took pride in

    Read More

  • Human Motives Exposed in The Crucible by Arthur Miller

    1463 Words  | 3 Pages

    Life as a human is dictated by an inborn hunger or purpose, and people, in general, will act on this hunger for their own personal gain in their individual ways. This hunger, be it for wealth, land, love, power, revenge, or pride, can, and will be the undoing or failing of all mankind as Miller so clearly points out in his play 'The Crucible';. This essay will explore the motives of characters within the play and even the motives of Arthur Miller himself and therefore show how conflict stems from certain recognisable human failings including those mentioned above, fear, and hysteria.

    Read More

  • Values and Morality in The Crucible by Arthur Miller

    775 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Crucible by Arthur Miller raises many thought provoking issues throughout the play, including the importance of personal integrity, injustice in society and the rights of the community versus the rights of the individual.

    Read More

  • An Analytical Essay Explaining Why Arthur Miller Wrote The Crucible

    740 Words  | 2 Pages

    Authors often have underlying reasons for giving their stories certain themes or settings. Arthur Miller’s masterpiece, The Crucible, is a work of art inspired by actual events as a response to political and moral issues. Set in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692, The Crucible proves to have its roots in events of the 1950’s and 1960’s, such as the activities of the House Un-American Committee and the “Red Scare.” Though the play provides an accurate account of the Salem witch trials, its real achievement lies in the many important issues of Miller’s time that it dealswith.

    Read More

  • Arthur Miller's The Crucible

    546 Words  | 2 Pages

    Persecution has been a round for sometime and can be traced historically from the time of Jesus to the present time. Early Christians were persecuted for their faith in the hands of the Jews. Many Christians have been persecuted in history for their allegiance to Christ and forced to denounce Christ and others have been persecuted for failing to follow the laws of the land. The act of persecution is on the basis of religion, gender, race, differing beliefs and sex orientation. Persecution is a cruel and inhumane act that should not be supported since people are tortured to death. In the crucible, people were persecuted because of alleged witchcraft.

    Read More

  • Arthur Miller's Purpose for Writing The Crucible

    873 Words  | 2 Pages

    Parallels between Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, and his article Why I wrote the Crucible, can easily support Miller’s reasons for writing this classic play. Miller’s purpose in writing both the play and the article was to emphasize the similarities between the 1692 witch hunt and the 1950’s Red Scare. Miller simply wanted to convey the message of fear over reason, express himself in a new language of old English, to warn of mass hysteria, and most importantly compare his life in the 1950’s to the irrational trial in 1692. Miller’s reasons are numerous, and while they are all stated flat out in his article, they are also clearly stated and understood in the play.

    Read More

More about The Relationship Between Faith And Truth In Arthur Miller's The Crucible

Open Document