Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical teachings in christianity
How ethical dilemmas can be addressed from a biblical perspective
Applying Biblical ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical teachings in christianity
The Relationship Between Biblical Teaching and Ethical Behaviour
All Christians share the belief that the Bible is divinely inspired.
We all turn to it to be challenged and inspired by it, and to expose
ourselves to the divine perspective. For the church the Bible is
normative. That is to say the church places itself under the authority
of scripture. The Biblical definition of ethics is connected with
doctrine and they are not offered apart from a set of guidelines and
teachings of the Bible.
Biblical teaching is the study of good behaviour, motivation, and
attitude in light of Jesus Christ and biblical revelation. The
ultimate standard of Christian conduct is Christ Himself. The goal of
a Christian in their thinking and in their behaviour is to be come
more and more like Christ. Following the claims made by the Books of
the Bible, the message is a contribution to the ongoing and continuous
account about the character and will of God and the description about
the nature and will of God is the proper basis for answering any
ethical questions. The reality is determined on the basis Biblical
judgment.
Whereas Ethical behaviour is system of moral principles by which human
actions and proposals may be judged good or bad and are the rules of
conduct recognised in respect of a particular class of human actions,
including decent principles of an individual. The Bible addresses some
of the discipline that deals with questions such as how should a
person act? What is right and wrong? The Bible sets its own agenda as
it highlights the foundations of all ethics and Gods standard for
human behaviour. Scripture is the final authority in eth...
... middle of paper ...
...ollow both
perspectives on how a person should behave. This is only because that
there are some rules from both sides that l agree and disagree with.
For example l would disagree with the biblical rules on abortion
because l think that abortion should take place in some circumstances
i.e. due to rape as a result the baby might not be wanted or teenage
pregnancy because most teenagers are not ready to become teenage
parents.
As l mentioned above that both ethical behaviour and biblical teaching
establish laws that dictate human behaviour. It is common for the
social laws to conflict with the biblical teaching laws. Because the
way Christians and society appeal to different authorities for what is
right and wrong. Overall they both have similarities and differences
to how a person illustrate declare good behaviour.
There will always be counter arguments but all are refutable. One may ask: what about rape victims, teenage pregnancy and threats to the mother'...
The child could have a serious disorder from something such as the Zika virus and that child or the mother of the child should not be emotionally put through that. I can see the points made by the Pro-live such as abortion is murder, but abortion will most likely stay legalised in most Australian states like it is currently, and it will most likely stay that way. There are variables that could affect her choice. She could be poor, the child could have a birth defect, and so on. Giving her a right to decide whether she should abort the baby it’s entirely her choice. What if the mother was raped or she got pregnant from incest. Would you traumatise this mother with the child of the rapist for 9 months, and would you allow an inbred child that will most likely have a disability and be put through literal
Rape is a despicable crime against women. Opinions are heated, and it seems that everybody has something to say about pregnancy in the case of rape. The woman who suffered from the sexual assault are more likely to experience distress after or during an abortion. When a woman gets raped, it isn’t wanted. If one was in that situation they wouldn’t want to constantly think about the fetus and how and when it occurred. One should not be obligated to go through the particular child birth. Who would want to give birth to a baby that would suffer his or her life not knowing who the father
In these instances, women have no choice in the matter. If the act of sex was not consensual, making her carry a child for nine months is just cruel. Just image yourself in this type of predicament. Imagine the emotional pain of being raped, imagine waking up every day for the next nine months with a child inside your womb that was forcedly put there against your will. By forcing that woman to carry full term and deliver, you are forcing that woman through a great deal of emotional pain as well as physical pain. You are punishing her for having the ability to carry a child and potentially scarring her for the rest of her life. The woman now has to take care of this baby on her own, a baby that is a constant reminder of the horrible crime of which she was a victim. This child will be at many disadvantages before it is even born such as the resentment from its own mother, having no father around, the possibility of mental and physical deformities from being a product of incest, etc. How is this fair to either the mother or the child? It’s not. If you believe a woman should be forced to give birth no matter what, you are saying that a woman’s life is only important until she is pregnant. You are now classifying her as a vessel, not a human life with rights and
Rape is among the more horrific violations of human dignity imaginable. It is a crime committed by the male, not the female—and certainly not by the child it might produce. When rape results in pregnancy, the baby has the same right to life as any child born by mutually loving parents. Only the Nazis would execute a child for the crimes of his or her father.
Whenever a woman becomes pregnant she automatically gains the name and roles of a mother. Whether the pregnancy is intended or not, the baby is still the child of that woman. If the woman has been raped and the baby is not wanted, abortion may seem to be
When women feel as though there is no way out of their pregnancy, they feel as though there is no other option but to terminate. This can harm there bodies and decrease chance for later pregnancy, and results in taking an innocent life. Adoption is a liable option for many reasons. If the pregnant individual researches and interviews couples, the child in consideration can have a better chance at life. If the mother of the child is a teen, they do not have to give up there young
There is also the argument that women who are raped or victims of incest should be forced to carry a child to full term and then give the child up for adoption. Statistics say that 1 in 3 women will be victims of rape or a sexually violent act but does this mean that 33% of women also should be forced to carry their violators child to term? It doesn’t seem fair that a woman loses her feelings of safety and loses her choice to say no and then also has to go through an unwanted pregnancy on top of it.(amplify, 2009)
the mothers' life is at risk and the baby will die anyway. A lot of
Would you describe a dog as capable of being evil? Or a cat? Or a chimpanzee? Most likely you could not. We humans belong to the taxonomic kingdom of Animalia and are therefore animals. Our species has evolved from animals that looked and acted more like the modern chimpanzee than we do. So at what point did we go from being creatures of instinct do developing the concept of morality? A great deal of literature has been written about morality, examples of which can be located in fiction and non-fiction as well as in scientific, theological and philosophical fields. Specific examples include the bible, as well as the writings of Plato (c. 424-348 BCE), Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) and John Steinbeck (1902-1968). Morality is a trait that is developed as a result of practical material situations and experience as exemplified in The Grapes of Wrath, challenged by St. Matthew, but reinforced in the writings of Plato; we humans are born morally neutral.
Many people have different views of what ethical behavior is. Ethical behavior is defined as “Acting in ways consistent with what society and individuals typically think are good values. Ethical behavior tends to be good for business and involves demonstrating respect for key moral principles that include honesty, fairness, equality, dignity, diversity and individual rights (Ethical behavior, 2016).” In this paper, I explored ethical decision making with examples. In addition, I discuss how ethical decision making benefits from a Christian worldview.
“Different cultures have different moral codes”, James Rachels discusses in his article Why Morality Is Not Relative? (Rachels, p. 160). A moral code is a set of rules that is considered to be the right behavior that may be accepted by a group of individuals within a society. Each culture tends to have their own individual standards and moral codes. Moral codes are guidelines laid out by a cultures ancestors. Standards are guidelines set forth by the individual themselves. Standards and morals don’t always have to be the same, but there are instances where they are. The moral codes claim what is “right” and what is “wrong”. Moral codes outline what behaviors individuals are supposed to make. These codes are basically laws, but specifically
A woman who becomes pregnant as a result of either getting rape or incest is the victim of a horribly violent and morally reprehensible crime. But that does not give the woman the right to kill the baby, because they will have to live with reality of knowing that father of the unborn child raped her. If a woman is raped and becomes pregnant by the rapist she has the option of giving the child up for adoption. Adoption is a great option because the baby can be given to an infertile
Many women were punished for being pregnant and were regarded as sex offenders or delinquents. During the 1950's, there were homes were unmarried young women were sent, along with their babies. They were made to stay in these uncomfortable, non-nurturing conditions for months, almost like prison, for the crime of bringing a baby into the world . This was thought to be a solution to any financial burdens the woman and her child might cause (18 Ravoira). More commonly, the young women were sent away to the homes of relatives, etc. to have their babies, and then a hasty adoption was secured. This was to prevent...
the Golden Rule approach. We are told that it is right to be moral. This is an