Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relational dialectic critiques
Relational dialectic critiques
Relational dialectic critiques
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relational dialectic critiques
In every relationship there are good and challenging times. These are caused by many different things, but according to the Relational Dialectics Theory every relationship can be determined by the three basic dialectic tensions. These tensions are autonomy (independence) versus connectedness (has a need to belong), novelty (spontaneous) versus predictability, and openness versus closedness. Each person can fall into one of the two categories in each of the tensions. Figuring out which one of these that you fall into will help you understand how well your relationships work.
In my previous relationship, we never dated. In fact, I was the unwilling “other man”. Before I started to develop feelings for my crush, Enzo, I felt like I never needed
…show more content…
He would try to start fights with me by dangling Enzo in front of me on purpose by sitting on his lap whenever I entered a room and playing with his hair while glaring at me. To get a real reaction out of me he started talking badly about me behind my back and accusing me of being a backstabber and a home wrecker. As a blunt, I often speak my mind, regardless of the consequences. I retaliated by flirting back with Enzo because I knew it would bother his boyfriend, which in hindsight, it was probably a best part of the summer. It ended my friendship with they guy because he and I are complete opposites, but it’s alright because he was honestly the blandest person I ever met. With the end of our friendship it resulted with Enzo and I having an even more complicated relationship as our group of friends were forced to take sides, slowly causing us to grow apart to the point where we would be almost reluctant to hang out with each other. The most frustrating part of the situation is when Jose and I would argue about something, even though Enzo knew that I was right and didn’t start it, he would take Jose’s side because they were a “couple”. I confronted a mutual friend about the situation because I wanted to know if she really did set Enzo and his boyfriend regardless of knowing that I liked Enzo. We had a huge argument and she called the boyfriend and put him on speaker while I was in the …show more content…
The tension in the air was so thick you could cut it with a knife. The second I walked in Enzo and “boyfriend” stared me down as he started to get all over Enzo to make me jealous. At this point I did not care. I was past livid, they meant nothing to me. I finally expressed openness with Enzo and told him, “That the hardest part isn’t being here with these people who I should be furious with, especially you. The hardest part is that despite it all, I still love you. I don’t want to do this anymore. If you want to be with your sexually anorexic “boyfriend” who can’t even tell that you’re dying to kiss him or knows the difference between you giving him a high five from holding your hand, so be it; but we can’t be friends. I’m tired of always having to hold back and suppress my feelings because your bubble gum bitch is too damn insecure. I’m tired of you holding me and acting like we have something special when we both know I mean nothing to you. I’m tired of feeling like I need a miracle to bring us back together as friends. You know I’m not spiritual, but when I’m with you, it’s nothing but pure bliss, I think you’re a saint, an angel, you’re my little taste of heaven. You’d give me something to think and talk about when I felt the weight of the world on my shoulders, but now you’re just shit in my head. I don’t deserve this; I’m not going to put up with this nonsense. I have my whole life
Chapters 5 and 6 in Extraordinary Relationships gave a good introduction into new concepts relating to Human Interactions and Relationships. These new concepts give a better idea in understanding relationship patterns and the various emotions that come along with relationships. Two concepts that stood out to me that were discussed throughout the chapter were relationship patterns and relationship emotions. Over time many relationships develop their own unique patterns. In many cases these patterns have been part of the individual all along. Gilbert (1992) states “Usually what people do in a relationship crises is more of the same thing they have been doing, only more intensely and more anxiously” (pg.36). When individuals go through relationship
complicated relationship in that people often carry the baggage of past relationships into the next.
The relationship between the husband and wife seems initially to be perfect. They both show each other expressions of love. There is understanding, harmony, financial security, and good communication between them. The couple spends a lot of time together, discussing future plans, and talking about the good moments they had in the past. However, behind all of this positive interaction between the two of them is something they are both not able
On the way, you will go through the cycle known as “Relational Development,” which is the creating and eventual decline of a relationship. Conflict is something very prominent in relationships and there are many different styles various couples use to fix problems, and the style used is most likely developed because of the person you are and your cultural background. Passive aggression, or crazymakers, are people you might connect with who have different ways of expressing their emotions. Relationships are complicated, but if you can find somebody who truly understands you, somebody that you can let your words sprout out of you like a waterfall, if there is somebody out there like that, then you can be sure that person will cause you some stress, but in the end, it will all be worth
In understanding Relational Cultural Theory (RCT), we will first examine its fundamental assumptions and then critically assess those assumptions. Next, we will evaluate RCT’s assumptions to determine its relevance to the core values of social work. Finally, we will determine the ways RCT can best guide social work practice.
Never become complacent and let my interpersonal relationship becomes stagnant, which can lead to resentment and conflict. Weighing the cost verses the rewards may not always be the solution for my relationship; simply, because the cost may ultimately outweigh the rewards. The need for autonomy can have reverse effects and may not lead to the closeness that’s expected. In, turn the very thing that, I try to be open about in my relationship can inadvertently cause me to protect my feelings in the
Moral Theory and Personal Relationships In his article "The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories," Michael Stocker argues that mainstream ethical theories, namely consequentialism and deontology, are incompatible with maintaining personal relations of love, friendship, and fellow feeling because they both overemphasise the role of duty, obligation, and rightness, and ignore the role of motivation in morality. Stocker states that the great goods of life, i.e. love, friendship, etc., essentially contain certain motives and preclude others, such as those demanded by mainstream ethics.11 In his paper "Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality," Peter Railton argues that a particular version of consequentialism, namely sophisticated consequentialism, is not incompatible with love, affection and acting for the sake of others. In the essays "War and Massacre" and "Autonomy and Deontology," Thomas Nagel holds that a theory of absolutism, i.e. deontology, may be compatible with maintaining personal commitments. The first objective of this paper is to demonstrate that despite the efforts of both Railton and Nagel, consequentialism and deontology do not in fact incorporate personal relations into morality in a satisfactory way.
...." Which is why it is important that both people in the relationship work together to get through the tough times. When you commit to someone you have to be with them through the good and bad times, one shouldn’t just be there only during the good times. Sharing your life with someone is a new and exciting chapter in your life and hopefully the couple will remain supporting and encouraging each other.
In regards to identity and self, I find the argument for the Relational Self to be the most compelling. Adherents state that the only way see ourselves is in relation to others. Taylor stated, “I must acknowledge my belonging before I can understand myself.” Hegel furthers the argument stating that a person is only free and independent when person isn’t captive to his own desires or some external force. I find this view to be the most correct as self, at least in part is defined, by our environment.
Conflict is more than just an argument that manifest itself through yelling and behavior it is a perception that there is something wrong and needs to be fixed or explained. There are many different paths that conflict can take and it all depends on the person and situation. The following is an analysis of a conflict in my own life and how it came to be, the different perceptions involved, and the path we choose to take as the conflict went on.
Personality is defined as the distinct variances in individual patterns of thinking, feeling and behaving. (Rathus, 210) Personality study can be divided into two extensive areas. The first is understanding individual dissimilarities in certain personality characteristics, such as amiability or petulance. The other is understanding how the various parts of a person come together as a whole. There are five general perspectives in psychology, each of which emphasizes different factors in an attempt to understand how a personality develops and relates to others. These are the biological, psychodynamic, social and cultural (or sociocultural), learning, and cognitive perspectives. This paper outlines how each of these perspectives would describe the development and maintenance of a traditional (husband and wife) marital relationship.
The potential problems with equity perceptions could lead to constant struggles within a romantic relationship. The way one partner views the others input could be completely different than it was intended to be. If one side of the relationship feels they put in more effort than their partner does, it could lead to an unbalanced view of each other's intentions. According to the uncertainty reduction theory, we are motivated to figure out why people are the way they are. Once you lower the uncertainty and realize how people behave in a relationship, it may either increase or decrease the equity perception.
The fairy tales say that once upon a time a girl met a boy; they fell in love, and lived happily ever after. Reality is not that simple. Long-term relationships force couples to get to know each other, involve themselves in each others’ worlds, fight through the hard times, and eventually develop deeper connections through distinctive stages of Knapp’s relationship model. Although I have dated the same person for over two years, the stages of our communication make it seem as though I am now dating a different person following dissolution and subsequent repair. However, even the most exhilarating of roller coaster rides develop through a combination of ups and downs, much like the stages of a relationship.
“Relationships are what make up our world today, they shape the ways we see things and the way that we do things, relationships affect how we see the world today”. I believe supporting what your partner does, having a great sum of trust and showing your affections towards your partner is what will make a healthy relationship great.
With great speed, he reaches the handle of my door and tried to force me out of his car. I tried to show my strength so I decided to sit still and to manipulate him to tell me what was on his mind.