Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Reign of Henry the Eighth
The life and impact of Henry VIII
The life and impact of Henry VIII
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Reign of Henry the Eighth
The Reasons Why Henry VII Won the 1485 War Henry had a very weak inheritance claim to the throne, and when he was born in 1457, he was never thought to become King as he was born into a family containing past illegitimate relations. His mother, Margaret Beaufort was only 14 years of age when Henry was born and his father, Edmund Tudor, had died three months earlier. Henry's guardian was appointed to Jasper Tudor, Earl of Pembroke. Henry was only ever thought to live his life as the Earl of Richmond as Henry VI and his son were still alive when he was born and therefore had a much greater claim to the throne than Henry. However, when Edward IV killed them, Henry suddenly became the main Lancastrian claimant to the throne. Although, it was never suspected that he would ever become King. After Edward IV seized power for the second time, Henry and his uncle (Jasper) fled to Brittany in exile. Where they were thought to stay. So even with all these unfortunate circumstances for Henry, how did he ever get the chance to become the King of England? The first time Henry realised he had a chance to the throne was in 1483, when Richard, Duke of Gloucester, proclaimed himself King of England instead of what should have been his brothers' son. Richard was not a popular King. He also had a very weak claim to the throne and was thought to have killed his brothers' (Edward IV) sons in the twin towers, although this was never proven. In becoming King, Richard split his own side (Yorkists) and began to spread rumours about his claim to the throne and about his brothers claim to the throne. This may have also made him less popular as Edward IV was quite a popular King at the time and many wouldn't have liked Richard saying that Edward had actually had no claim to the throne in the first place. Henry therefore changed from being an unlikely claimant to the throne, to a rival of Richard III.
Passage Analysis - Act 5 Scene 1, lines 115-138. Shakespeare’s ‘King Henry IV Part I’ centres on a core theme: the conflict between order and disorder. Such conflict is brought to light by the use of many vehicles, including Hal’s inner conflict, the country’s political and social conflict, the conflict between the court world and the tavern world, and the conflicting moral values of characters from each of these worlds. This juxtaposition of certain values exists on many levels, and so is both a strikingly present and an underlying theme throughout the play.
The Challenges to Henry VII Security Between 1487 and the end of 1499 Henry VII faced many challenges to his throne from 1487 to the end of 1499. These included many rebellions and pretenders to his throne. To what extent was the success he dealt with them differs although the overriding answer is that by the end of his reign he had secured his throne and set up a dynasty, with all challengers removed. Lambert Simnel challenged Henry’s security when Richard Symonds passed him off as Warwick. Simnel was taken to Ireland, which had become the centre of Yorkist plotting.
training when he came to power in 1485, had managed in the time he was
When we look at Henry as a king we have to look in the context of
Henry implemented many methods in order to control the nobility with varying success. Henry sought to limit the power of the nobles as he was acutely aware the dangers of over mighty subjects with too much power and little love for the crown or just wanted a change like Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick who deposed two kings to replace them. Also Henry’s own rise to the throne was helped by nobles dislike towards Richard III. By restricting the nobles Henry wanted to reduce the power of the nobles and possible threats against him and return the nobles from their quasi king status to leaders in their local areas but under the power of the crown.
war often, for the sake of his country, but when he did he put in a
Henry VI had a lot of weaknesses with foreign policy, his inability to make decisions, patronage, Richard duke of York, finance and evil council. With foreign policy he showed weakness in defending his country, after his father Henry VII had conquered land in France, he lost it. He lost Normandy and Gascony in 1451 due to defeat in France. This affected morale and the incomes of nobles because they had lost, reducing their reputation, especially as they had lost some of their own land, and the incomes went down because money was spent on war, so less money was available to give as income. This could have been a reason for the outbreak of conflict because the people would not have been happy with their situation. Henry's next weakness was his inability to make decisions.
throne, and only wanted to find a faster way to obtain that authority, thus he
Peace of London in 1518, the Field of the Cloth of Gold and the Calais
Henry VIII was not raised to become king; his brother was. When Henry took the throne, he had a great education, but no clue about what to accomplish as king and how to do it. Henry was more concerned with his image – he would throw lavish parties to show his luxurious lifestyle, and made few decisions himself concerning governing, instead relying heavily on his councilor...
For hundreds of years, those who have read Henry V, or have seen the play performed, have admired Henry V's skills and decisions as a leader. Some assert that Henry V should be glorified and seen as an "ideal Christian king". Rejecting that idea completely, I would like to argue that Henry V should not be seen as the "ideal Christian king", but rather as a classic example of a Machiavellian ruler. If looking at the play superficially, Henry V may seem to be a religious, moral, and merciful ruler; however it was Niccolo Machiavelli himself that stated in his book, The Prince, that a ruler must "appear all mercy, all faith, all honesty, all humanity, [and] all religion" in order to keep control over his subjects (70). In the second act of the play, Henry V very convincingly acts as if he has no clue as to what the conspirators are planning behind his back, only to seconds later reveal he knew about their treacherous plans all along. If he can act as though he knows nothing of the conspirators' plans, what is to say that he acting elsewhere in the play, and only appearing to be a certain way? By delving deeper into the characteristics and behaviors of Henry V, I hope to reveal him to be a true Machiavellian ruler, rather than an "ideal king".
Henry V is not a simple one as it has many aspects. By looking into
... monarchy and they were afraid. He tried to bypass the senate because he knew they would not agree with him so he just went straight to the assembly on most occasions. The senate feared they would lose their political relevance since he was bypassing them.
his nephew he should be king, but the majority of the French were against Edward