Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Objectives of the law of tort
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Objectives of the law of tort
In this essay I will endeavour to outline what the intended purpose of tort law is in the Irish legal system and how it has come about over centuries. I will include a brief outline of the meaning of tort law and the different kinds of Tort, I will also include a brief summary of the sister laws of tort, that being criminal and contract law.
The word tort is the equivalent of the French word that means ‘wrong’. This word ‘tort’ was derived from the Latin word ‘tortum’, translated this means twisted, crooked or wrong. The term ‘tort’ was first introduced into English law by the Normans. It is widely understood to mean the law of civil liability for wrongfully inflicted injury. This is the literal translation of the word tort but it has many different meanings and purposes in the law and there are many different kinds of torts or ‘wrongs’.
Over the years tort scholars have been divided over what would seem a simple question, what is tort law intended for? The leading answer to this question seems to be that tort law promotes efficient behaviour in society by giving people incentives to take account of costs they impose on others. In other words, tort law can be seen as a means in which an individual who has wronged another has a duty to repair or redress the losses caused by their actions.
Another answer that has been put forward to the question of what tort law is intended for is that tort law aims for corrective justice and enforcing moral responsibility on wrongdoers. This is one of the longest standing theories of the purpose of tort law in that tort law has a role in bringing wrongdoers to compensate those they have injured or who have suffered by their actions.
Over the years these two theories of the intended purpose of to...
... middle of paper ...
...Problem-Solving Behaviour and Theories of Tort Liability’, [1985], 73
Cal. L. Rev. 677
Malone W. S., ‘ Ruminations on the Role of Fault in the History of the Common Law of
Tort’, [1970], Louisiana Law Review
Medieval Sourcebook: The Anglo-Saxon Dooms, Fordham University, 560-975
Perry, Ronen, ‘The Role of Retributive Justice in the Common Law of Torts: A Descriptive
Theory’, [2006] 73 Tenn. L. Rev. 177
Posner, Richard A., ‘Economic Analysis of Law’ (2nd ed. 1977)
Simmons K. W., ‘The Crime/Tort Distinction: Legal Doctrine and Normative
Perspectives’, [2007], Widener Law Review.
McMahon, Bryan M. E., and Binchy, William, ‘A Case Book on the Irish Law of Torts’,
[2005], Butterworth Ireland
Wells, Catherine P., ‘Tort Law as Corrective Justice: A Pragmatic Justification for Jury
Adjudication’, [1990], Boston College Law School
Culver, Keith Charles. Readings in the philosophy of law. 1999. Reprint. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2008. Print.
The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. - Counsel [24] See footnote 22 – but page 61 [25] GEOFFREY, Marshall, Constitutional Theory, Clarendon Law Series, Oxford 1971 Chapter1 – the Law and the constitution, part 3. Dicey’s doctrine and its critics. [26] REGINA v HER MAJESTY'S TREASURY, Ex parte SMEDLEY, [COURT OF APPEAL], [1985] Q B 657, 19 December 1984, (c)2001 The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales [27] MITCHELL, JDB, Constitutional Law, 2nd edition, Edinburgh, W Green & SON LTD, 1968, Convention, page 31 [28] See footnote 22 but page 64
This concludes my summary of lessons gleaned from the course BSL 301 Legal Research, Writing, and Analysis referencing Honigberg, G. "Gilbert Law Summaries: Legal Research, Writing, and Analysis" 10th ed. BarBri Group, 2006.
Bailey Press --------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] (2000) 2 All ER 289, [2] QB 133 [3] (1965) 2 QB 29 [4] 15 Ch D 96 [5] Law Com. No. 164 (1987), para.
after suffering harm from the acts of the other party (Turner, 2013). A tort is a civil wrong
ABSTRACT: Both utilitarians and the deontologists are of the opinion that punishment is justifiable, but according to the utilitarian moral thinkers, punishment can be justified solely by its consequences, while the deontologists believe that punishment is justifiable purely on retributive ground. D. D. Raphael is found to reconcile both views. According to him, a punishment is justified when it is both useful and deserved. Maclagan, on the other hand, denies it to be justifiable in the sense that it is not right to punish an offender. I claim that punishment is not justifiable but not in the sense in which it is claimed by Maclagan. The aim of this paper is to prove the absurdity of the enquiry as to whether punishment can be justified. Difference results from differing interpretations of the term 'justification.' In its traditional meaning, justification can hardly be distinguished from evaluation. In this sense, to justify an act is to say that it is good or right. I differ from the traditional use and insist that no act or conduct can be justified. Infliction of punishment is a human conduct and as such it is absurd to ask for its justification. I hold the view that to justify is to give reason, and it is only a statement or an assertion behind which we can put forth reason. Infliction of pain is an act behind which the agent may have purpose or intention but not reason. So, it is not punishment, but rather statements concerning punishment that we can justify.
Consider and explain the significance of motive and mens rea in the development of criminal liability in Scots law.
Textbook on Torts 8th edition. Michael A.Jones [2] P419. Textbook on Torts 8th edition. Michael A.Jones [3] The Law of Torts. 9th edition.
United Kingdom is a country with a distinctive set of legal system. It is fairly different from other countries having civil law based legal systems. The legal system in the United Kingdom consists of various sources of law, where other civil law based countries rely only on a written set of law. European influences on the English Legal System came much later in near decades. This essay will aim to examine the development of the English Legal System by reviewing applications of various sources of law in the English Legal System furthermore to discuss the recent European influences on the law of England.
In tort law, there are three different kinds of torts, including intentional, negligent, and strict liability. An intentional tort requires that the defendant meant to do a certain action, but not necessarily to harm a person or thing. Negligence is a situation in which harm is caused by accident, and strict liability is where harm is done, but one is responsible without proof of carelessness or blame. In tort cases, the injured party can seek compensatory damages, which could be medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and more. An injured party might also seek punitive damages, which are designed to punish the person at fault or prevent the same thing from happening again.
From the 1990s, the reports that cover the compensation cases increased dramatically in the mass media (Almond, 2004). There is a view that a huge number of tort cases in the ‘compensation culture’ are unjustified and unfair. In the mid-1990s, the term ‘compensation culture’ first appeared in a famous British newspaper (Levin, 1993). Actually, this is an extreme view, which will be criticized in this paper. This essay emphasizes the compensation culture is a myth (Morris, 2007). There are three reasons: Firstly, the data of the tort claims declined in recent years. Secondly, some victims do not receive the compensation or enough compensation that they deserve. Thirdly, the mass media and public organizations created the ‘compensation
Historically, the common law system began in England in the 11th century with the establishment of Kings Courts by William the Conqueror. The courts presided over local disputes where local customs were applied to make decisions. Over time, these customs became rules and were the basis for later courts to make decisions on similar disputes. As the range and type of dispute broadened, so did the range of decisions. The accumulation of judges’
Martine, Elizabeth A., Jonathon, Law. (2006) Oxford Dictionary of Law, 6th Ed, Oxford University Press.
Bar, C. ., Drobnig, U., Alpa, G., & European Commission. (2004). The interaction of contract law and tort and property law in Europe: A comparative study. München: Sellier.
This paper is based loosely upon James C. Quarles’s article “Some Statutory Construction Problems and Approaches in Criminal Law”. In this article James questions the need for strict construction of criminal law in common law countries and whether courts should stick to rule of strict construction. Rule of strict construction of criminal statues has a long history, its origin is not very clear but it is said to have arisen even before the process of construction itself. A certain form of the doctrine might be found in Roman law, but it must have reached to its greatest usefulness in England because of the desirability of mitigating the severity of the early criminal law. Every jurisdiction has a body of criminal law consisting of “shall” and