Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of media on society
Impact of media on Society
Effect of media on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of media on society
The Role of the Public Sphere The “public sphere” came from the German word, Öffentlichkeit, translated as “the public”, or the aggregates of speakers and listeners and “the publicness”, or the “state of being publicly visible and subject to scrutiny by the public” (Wessler & Freudenthaler, 2011). The concept of the public sphere has been applied to political and cultural communication that can be both a descriptive and normative connotation (para 1). According Habermas,the most prominent theorist of the public sphere, it is a “virtual or imaginary community which does not necessarily exist in any identifiable space”. But, in its ideal form, it is "made up of private people gathered together as a public and articulating the needs of society …show more content…
Furthermore, he asserts that public debate can be roused by “opinion-forming associations” such as social organizations, churches, groups of grassroots movements, and even groups of concerned citizens to counter the message of the authority (Further reflections on the public sphere, 1992). However, for a public sphere to generate sound opinions, the participants should be able to think critically and are skilled in articulating their stand of the issue on hand. Going back to Duterte’s drug war, who takes part in the public sphere? And, what have they done to challenge Duterte’s dogma on his war against illegal …show more content…
Media outlets, in particular, through its relentless reporting on the drug war, played the roles as “the vehicles for competitive spectacles and the source of news” (Rutherford, 2000, p. 274). To elucidate, the mandate of these media outlets is to provide the public with updates on the issues of greater concerns and in the process, help them make sound decisions that would benefit most of the society. However, their reports may have been contaminated by their desire for publicity, embedded in their pursuit of profit and/or audience domination. Nevertheless, media is still the most influential actor in influencing public opinion. In fact, their pervasiveness became the nagging voice that constantly reminded the government of their responsibilities to the
398).It is also stated that news divisions reduced their costs, and raised the entertainment factor of the broadcasts put on air. (p. 400). Secondly, the media determines its sources for stories by putting the best journalists on the case and assign them to areas where news worthy stories just emanates. (p.400). Third, the media decides how to present the news by taking the most controversial or relevant events and compressing them into 30 second sound-bites. (p.402). finally, the authors also explain how the media affects the general public. The authors’ state “The effect of one news story on public opinion may be trivial but the cumulative effect of dozens of news stories may be important. This shows a direct correlation between public opinions and what the media may find “relevant”. (Edwards, Wattenberg, Lineberry, 2015, p.
Kids start being introduced to drugs at a very young age because the first interaction with them is being told not to do any of them. Most kids have no idea what drugs are until this program is introduced in elementary schools telling kids not to do drugs. In “There’s No Justice in the War on Drugs”, Milton Friedman talks about the injustice of drugs and the harsh reality of being addicted to drugs, and the causes or side effects that come along with them. The author clearly argues the “war on drugs” and uses analysis and data to prove his argument. The author agrees that the use of government to keep kids away from drugs should be enforced, but the use of government to keep adults away from drugs, should not be enforced. The author has a clear side of his argument and the audience can clearly see that. He argues against the “war on drugs” claim that President Richard M. Nixon made twenty-five years ago, he adds ethos, logos, and pathos to defend his argument, and uses a toulmin
“[The war on drugs] has created a multibillion-dollar black market, enriched organized crime groups and promoted the corruption of government officials throughout the world,” noted Eric Schlosser in his essay, “A People’s Democratic Platform”, which presents a case for decriminalizing controlled substances. Government policies regarding drugs are more focused towards illegalization rather than revitalization. Schlosser identifies a few of the crippling side effects of the current drug policy put in place by the Richard Nixon administration in the 1970s to prohibit drug use and the violence and destruction that ensue from it (Schlosser 3). Ironically, not only is drug use as prevalent as ever, drug-related crime has also become a staple of our society. In fact, the policy of the criminalization of drugs has fostered a steady increase in crime over the past several decades. This research will aim to critically analyze the impact of government statutes regarding drugs on the society as a whole.
In 1971 on June 17, President Richard Nixon delivered a special message to the Congress on drug abuse prevention and control. During the presentation, Nixon made it clear that the United States was at war with this idea of drug abuse. What baffled Americans then, and still baffles Americans today, is that we are at war with our own nation with drugs; it is not some foreign affair like the media tends to focus on with Mexico. Nixon stated that at the time of his speech, what was implemented to control drug abuse was not working…“The problem has assumed the dimensions of a national emergency. I intend to take every step necessary to deal with this emergency, including asking the Congress for an amendment to my 1972 budget to provide an additional $155 million to carry out these steps. This will provide a total of $371 million for programs to control drug abuse in America.”(Wolleey and Peters) Since the publicizing of the term “War on Drugs” in 1971, it has been used by many political candidates in elections over the years. In the movie, it was stated, “ every war begins with propaganda …[and] the war on drugs has never been actually on drugs… [Additionally] drug laws are shaped less by scientific facts, but more by political [reasoning].” (Jarecki) The movie, The House I Live In, directly relates to certain themes and terminology that were discussed in Martin and Nakayama’s Intercultural Communication in Contexts book, that have been used in class. Through the analyzing and comparing of The House I Live In and Intercultural Communication in Contexts an individual can begin to localize the ideals behind this everlasting war on drugs; some ideals focus on terms from the text like ethnocentrism, diversity training, and culture while ...
thing as public opinion can be formed (1). It is open for every citizen and can be formed in every
In this paper I will evaluate America's War on Drugs. More specifically, I will outline our nation's general drug history and look critically at how Congress has influenced our current ineffective drug policy. Through this analysis I hope to show that drug prohibition policies in the United States, for the most part, have failed. Additionally, I will highlight and evaluate the influences acting on individual legislators' decisions to continue support for these ineffective policies as a more general demonstration of Congress' role in the formation of our nation's drug policy strategy. Finally, I will conclude this analysis by outlining the changes I feel necessary for future progress to be made. Primary among these changes are a general promotion of drug education and the elimination of our current system's many de-legitimating hypocrisies.
... to be free, we must act free. In our settings in the Philippines, as insignificant as people say it is, rallies and placing information in the social media about political and national issues do make a difference, cause as Marcus said: “ If you stare long enough, they’ll look back”. An example would be what happened with the pork-barrel scam; it was all thanks to the protest and how the news spread in the social media that the trials were urged on; it was because the government realized that they had to give their people answers to their impending questions. Though the trial did not go as the people wanted, there was one thing they were able to get out of it and it was that they’re government weren’t serving them properly anymore. The people realized that it was up to them now as to how to get their lives together and to get themselves out of their impediments.
The authors state, “…spontaneous and organized political response always carries within it the capability of remaking and retaking public space and the public
Shannon, Elaine. “The War on Drugs: A Losing Battle.” Time.com. Time Magazine, 3 Dec. 2010. Web. 18 Dec. 2011. .
Wolf, M. (2011, June 4). We should declare an end to our disastrous war on drugs. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy.consortiumlibrary.org/docview/870200965?accountid=14473
Habermas’ proposition is that public sphere are spaces created through logical communication, that is to allow people from independent fields to have rational debates on common problems, and results in the formation of public opinions to influence or inspect policies. Yahoo News’ commenting section is such a space where people can debate on problems in the articles and by increasing numbers of people posting different contexts of opinions against the problem of the article, create discussion on the news article, thus forming public opinions. Habermas emphasizes public opinion is dependent on the formation of public logic and deliberation, and the public sphere involves two important processes: the transformation of privately-oriented ...
This move made the public sphere to be dominated by the co-operate world and the administration resulting to decline of democracy, individuality and various forms of freedom. This is from the fact that unlike the bourgeois time when public sphere was of good interest to the whole society since they participated in making the decision, with time, the growth of rational and universalistic politics grew. This was as a result of the state using the press for impression rather for passing the information to the public. The public was therefore infuriated by the state of affairs and the reason for the growth of the public sphere, (Habermas, 1989).The growth of the capitalistic economy led to the uneven distribution of resource, and the public were not happy about this as it widened he economic polarity. Public sphere therefore brought up a new form of the public press which was able to listen to the ordinary people and listen to their cries as much as criticizing the governing, (Hauser, 2008). Habermas views the public sphere on structural transformation as a form of manifestation of the contingent issues in the social order. The public sphere is a transformative agent for the growth of a scenario in the society where the public outcry can be focused and discussed and examined. Habermas views the transformation as a form of social disintegration. The public sphere can be disintegrated if the public is not given attention through forums and chances to grow or else becomes then
Uscinski, J. E. (2009). When Does the Public's Issue Agenda Affect the Media's Issue Agenda (and Vice-Versa)? Developing a Framework for Media-Public Influence. Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 90(4), 796-815. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00663.x
The features of media making incorporate both the individual and collective experience provided by different forms of media (7). Through Plunkett’s discussion of civic publicness, he clearly lays out the
The public sphere has been falsely represented as a virtual place where one can share and debate opinions; ...