Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the impact of Renaissance
Essay on the prince by niccolo machiavelli
Analyzed by Niccolo Machiavelli
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the impact of Renaissance
The Protestant Reformation and Catholic Reformation included various individuals who each had an impact throughout the 16th and 17th century. Such figures included Machiavelli, Pope Leo X, Henry VII, Martin Luther, and others contributed at this time also. Machiavelli wrote The Prince, a novel on political power on how a prince should use his authority. He dedicated his work of literature to the Medici family, specifically to the Magnificent Lorenzo de Medici . Machiavelli wrote The Prince at the time he was exiled from Italy which proves he took advantage of the time which made him an effective writer. In Machiavelli’s work he presents his beliefs of what an ideal prince should have as traits. Some qualities Machiavelli states are that man is flawed, a prince needs to be prepared for any circumstance, and a prince must be respected . Pope Leo X was a controversial figure at the time for his decision of selling indulgences. This action caused various consequences including the Protestant Reformation. Using Machiavelli’s theories, the statement “The Catholic Reformation was outwardly Machiavellian in its response to the Protestant Reformation while the actions of Protestants was implicitly Machiavellian” is valid when viewing Martin Luther, Henry VIII, and the Council of Trent.
Martin Luther established in 95 theses against the Catholic Church in reference to indulgences in October 1517. Lutheranism falls under the Protestant Reformation against the church however, any person who left the Catholic Church was known as a protestant. The corruption of the Church began when priests had concubines and the papacy required money. To make the Christians confident that they were forgiven of their sins the papacy began to sell indulgences...
... middle of paper ...
...sthetics when speaking about the Catholic Church. Martin Luther knew man was flawed with sin but implicitly is Machiavellian when Pope Leo X did not represent the proper aesthetics to meet the 5 qualities of being a prince. Henry VIII was also implicitly Machiavellian since he gained respect of Europe by breaking off from the papacy. This created fear amongst European countries as England was ruled all under one ruler. The Council of Trent was outwardly Machiavellian by being prepared for the Protestant Reformation and maintaining its political gain. With rewriting the Church doctrine the Council answered the Protestant’s criticism which led to the Vatican having more power of Europe. Overall, Machiavelli had an important impact to the way government was seen in the 16th and 17th century till today where his concepts apply to the modern day government.
The Protestant Reformation was a period of time (1500-1700) where there became a change in Western Christendom. This reformation was caused by the resentment from the people because the Catholic Church abusing their powers for political and economic advances. In this time the church was selling pardons for sin and indulgences to forgive sins, decrease days spent in purgatory and save the dead from damnation. The reformation was when people became more aware with the back hand dealings with the church and men like Martin Luther and John Calvin created their own churches to what they believed was not corrupt unlike the church. Unfortunately there many consequences as far at the Roman Catholic church attempting to bring people back to the church,
Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, Niccolo Machiavelli, and Martin Luther greatly influenced people’s views on the church as well as the state. Without their thoughts and writings the Protestant Revolution wouldn’t have had the same impact, if it had any impact at all. The ideas from these scholars influenced people to break away from the Catholic Church, revolt against leadership, and create new religions such as Lutheranism. These actions changed the course of history and religion
In the end, although they come from two very different ends of the spectrum, free will and the secular state are places of common ground for Machiavelli and Luther, which is supported by their similar views of human nature and the order of how things should be. It is interesting that when each of their viewpoints is applied to the Catholic Church, it reveals a very different view of the Catholic Church; although Machiavelli would view it positively and Luther negatively, the juxtaposition truly emphasizes the success of Machiavelli's strategies. Although Luther's work did have an impact on the Church, it still continues to thrive. It is interesting that for two authors who have many similar views there would be a serious conflict in this area.
By the turn of the sixteenth century, the Italian Renaissance had produced writers such as Danté, Petrarch, Boccaccio and Castiglione, each with ideas rooted in the revival of Greek and Roman Classics, localization of the Christian traditions, idealistic opinions of women and individualism. From these authors spread the growth of the humanistic movement which encompassed the entirety of the Italian rebirth of arts and literature. One among many skeptics, including Lorenzo Valla, who had challenged the Catholic Church fifty years earlier in proving the falsity of the Donation of Constantine, Niccolò Machiavelli projected his ideas of fraudulence into sixteenth century Italian society by suggesting that rulers could only maintain power through propaganda, as seen with the success of Ferdinand of Aragon in Spain circa 1490. Today, the coined term Machiavellian refers to duplicity in either politics or self-advancement. Unlike most philosophers of the sixteenth century, Machiavelli wrote from the perspective of an anti-Humanist; he criticized not only the Classics and the Catholic Church, but also encouraged the deceitful use of religion and hated the humanist concepts of liberty, peace and individualism.1
The protestant reformation of 16th century had both: immediate and long term effects. Thus, we can see that it was a revolution of understanding the essence of religion, and of what God is. The protestant reformation is said to a religious movement. However, it also influenced the economical, political and social life of people. The most global, short term effect of the reformation was the reevaluation of beliefs, and, as a result, the loss of authority of the Holy Roman Empire. The long term effects were: the emergence of new heretical movements, the declining of papacy, thus the reevaluation of people’s view on the church and life values.
Machiavelli?s model for his ideal prince was Cesare Borgia, also known as Duke Valentino and son of Pope Alexander VI. He believed Cesare Borgia possessed all the qualities of a prince destined to rule and maintain power in his state. He believed that politics has a morality of its own. There is no regard of justness or unjustness, of cruelty or mercy, of approval or humiliation, which should interfere with the decision of defending the state and preserving its freedom. Therefore, the ruler/prince's single responsibilit...
Machiavelli seemed to give a certain amount of respect to the religious rulers of the time and throughout history. He made a great number of comments about the way in which these rulers manipulated the people through religion. It's as if he was laughing at the people for being so ignorant as not to realize the way they'd been manipulated. Furthermore, it is as if he was congratulating the rulers for being smart enough to con the people with the fear of a higher being. "Numa, finding the people ferocious and desiring to reduce them to civic obedience by means of the arts of peace, turned to religion as the instrument necessary above all others for the maintenance of a civilized state, and so constituted it that there was never for so many centuries so great a fear of God as there was in this republic". (Mac. p 139) For lack of a better word, Machiavelli is basically calling Numa's intentions a 'crock'. Religion claims to be good in nature. However, in this situation it was used for population control. "…its citizens were more afraid of breaking an oath than breaking the law, since they held in higher esteem the power of God than the power of man". (Mac. p 139) This is a great quote because it illustrates Machiavelli's view on religion perfectly; he believed that it was a tool to control the masses from the beginning of religion. Why should anyone listen to an ordinary man?
Machiavelli wants a prince to place himself above his subjects, act deceptively whenever necessary, but also maintain the front of a religious man. This appearance would allow the prince to manipulate the church in Florence if believed and done well, thereby granting the prince ultimate power. This idea, combined with the other two, make Machiavelli appear exceptionally audacious and distinctive. This courageous move allows Machiavelli the possibility of becoming famous, with little risk of repercussion — especially since he ensures to protect himself with cautious humility intertwined throughout his
The Protestant Reformation was one of the greatest schisms ever to happen to the Roman Catholic Church. The Catholic Church as complete dominion over the religious of Europe, and such power corrupted the church. Money and power were the only things that concerned the church’s attention during this time. Indulgences were a way for the church to gain a considerable amount of income by offering whoever paid the ability to bypass purgatory. This greed was soon exposed by written pieces like the Ninety-Five Theses and Lazarillo de Tormes which portrayed the Church’s greed as hypocritical to the teachings that they preach.
The Reformation was a decisive period in the history not only for the Catholic Church, but also for the entire world. The causes of this tumultuous point in history did not burst on the scene all at once, but slowly gained momentum like a boil that slowly festers through time before it finally bursts open. The Reformation of the Church was inevitable because of the abuses which the Church was suffering during this period. At the time of the Reformation, a segment of the Church had drifted away from its mission to bring Christ and salvation to the world. Throughout the Middle Ages, the Church had gradually become weaker because of abusive leadership, philosophical heresy, and a renewal of a form of the Pelagian heresy.
The Protestant Reformation of the sixteenth century is one of the most complex movements in European history since the fall of the Roman Empire. The Reformation truly ends the Middle Ages and begins a new era in the history of Western Civilization. The Reformation ended the religious unity of Europe and ushered in 150 years of religious warfare. By the time the conflicts had ended, the political and social geography in the west had fundamentally changed. The Reformation would have been revolutionary enough of itself, but it coincided in time with the opening of the Western Hemisphere to the Europeans and the development of firearms as effective field weapons. It coincided, too, with the spread of Renaissance ideals from Italy and the first stirrings of the Scientific Revolution. Taken together, these developments transformed Europe.
The renaissance and the reformation were two of the most significant changes in history that has shaped our world today. Both of these great time periods are strikingly similar in some ways and totally different in others. This is because the renaissance was a change from religion to humanism whether it is in art or literature; it is where the individual began to matter. However, the reformation was,” in a nutshell,” a way to reform the church and even more so to form the way our society is today. The first half of this paper will view the drop in faith, the economic powers, and the artistic and literary changes during the renaissance, while the second half will view the progresses and changes the church makes during the reformation.
Machiavelli’s works supported whst he called the new prince. A new prince is someone who could rise to power versus and old prince who is simply born into power. This challenged monarchies and the church. It was the English that were really responsible for the negative reputation of Machiavelli. His works threatened their very structure of government with ideal that anyone can simply raise to power by being tactical and crafty. Modern day scholars see no need to fear the works of Machiavelli because they regard the prince as simply a book on trickery that exposes the
After Niccolò Machiavelli was suspected of conspiring in a plan to restore the republic, he was exiled back to his Father’s land in San Casciano, there he wrote The Prince. Although The Prince was not published until after Machiavelli’s death in 1527, he dedicated his newly written work to Lorenzo di Piero de’ Medici (1492-1519), grandson of Lorenzo de’ Medici (1449-92) as a gift to regain favor with the Florentine ruler, and to once again work in a political office. After The Prince’s publication, The Prince was not well-received. It was believed to be an evil book, most likely because Machiavelli did the “immoral” and challenged rulers to value virtue not by morality but by overall effectiveness. Machiavelli justified his carefully tailored
During the Renaissance, Machiavelli created one of the most influential works of literature, The Prince. He lays out a set of guidelines that he trusts will make any ruler a successful one. With his life experiences and education, Machiavelli thought that he understood the driving forces behind a successful rule, gathering the attention of the new ruling Florentine family, the Medici. Machiavelli was articulating only what he believed that the current rulers wanted to hear, so that he could win back their favour. Getting away from the accepted norms of Renaissance political writing, Machiavelli challenged the notions of government and how one should rule; claiming that in order to be successful, a ruler must be capable to act against things