Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of government surveillance
Essay on surveillance improvments
Essay on surveillance improvments
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros and cons of government surveillance
Introduction
Today, electronic surveillance remains one of the most effective tools the United States has to protect against foreign powers and groups seeking to inflict harm on the nation, but it does not go without a few possessing a few negative aspects either. Electronic surveillance of foreign intelligence has likely saved the lives of many innocent people through prevention of potential acts of aggression towards the United States. There are many pros to the actions authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) pertaining to electronic surveillance, but there are also cons. Looking at both the pros and cons of electronic surveillance is important in understanding the overall effectiveness of FISA. [1]
Definition of Electronic Surveillance.
To better understand the topic at hand it is important to understand what electronic surveillance is pertaining to Foreign Intelligence. The definition of “electronic surveillance”, as written is FISA, can be summarized best as acquisition of data from wire or radio communications using “an electronic, mechanical, or other surveillance device”. There are four specific criteria that further define electronic surveillance in more detail also included in FISA under Title 1, Section 101. This section also included definitions for those groups that surveillance may be authorized against. [2]
The Pros of FISA and Electronic Surveillance.
The pros of electronic surveillance are extensive. The ability for agents of the United States Intelligence Community (IC) to intercept and process communications and information from foreign powers, agents of foreign powers, international terrorist organizations, and others who seek to engage in activities with such groups, provides the ...
... middle of paper ...
...ially higher. Like any United States law there is always controversy surrounding it. FISA is no different, and since many people feel that FISA provides the government with the authority to snoop around their private lives it often draws fire from critics. Nothing is perfect, FISA, and specifically the section addressing electronic surveillance, is also guilt of possessing flaws. Unfortunately, these flaws are often more widely publicized and recognized than the advantages than the pros of the act.
Works Cited
1. https://edge.apus.edu/access/content/group/security-and-global-studies-common/Intelligence%20Studies/INTL%20305/Week%204/FISA.pdf
2. Ibid
3. Ibid
4. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-36/subchapter-I
5. https://edge.apus.edu/access/content/group/security-and-global-studies-common/Intelligence%20Studies/INTL%20305/Week%204/FISA.pdf
6. Ibid
The National Security Agency or NSA for short is a United States federal government intelligence organization that is used for global monitoring and collecting data. After the attacks on September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush implemented the NSA’s domestic spying program to conduct a range of surveillance activities inside the United States. There has been a lot of controversy surrounding this program as it allows the NSA to tap into the public’s phone calls, cameras, internet searches, text messages, and many other mediums to seek out individuals that may be potential threats to the security of the general public. Many individuals say that the tactics used by the NSA are unconstitutional as they invade people’s privacy. This is primarily
In times of great terror and panic, the citizens of a nation must decide what they value most: their right to privacy or the lives of the innocent. Government surveillance is criticized, however there are times in a nation’s history where, in order to ensure the safety of their citizens, they must surveill the country for potential hazards that might exist in the world. The government-issued program, COINTELPRO--a series of illegal projects during the twentieth century organized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation--while heavily criticized for its unconstitutional grounds--was justified because it benefitted the nation during a period of upheaval. COINTELPRO is popularly condemned by historians and professors such as Brandeis University Professor of Sociology, David Cunningham, who asserts that the FBI counterintelligence program was only a form of repression that allowed for the government to suppress matters that they consider bothersome (234) This however was not the case. COINTELPRO was necessary because of the great social unrest, individuals posed threats to society, and creating operations that were beneficial to the United States.
The aftereffects of the September 11, 2001 attacks led to Congress passing sweeping legislation to improve the United States’ counterterrorism efforts. An example of a policy passed was Domestic Surveillance, which is the act of the government spying on citizens. This is an important issue because many people believe that Domestic Surveillance is unconstitutional and an invasion of privacy, while others believe that the government should do whatever is possible in order to keep the citizens safe. One act of Domestic Surveillance, the tracking of our phone calls, is constitutional because it helps fight terrorism, warns us against potential threats, and gives US citizens a feeling of security.
We all have heard the quote “Life, Liberty, Land, and the Pursuit to Happiness” and that is the promise of a life here in America. As Americans we pride ourselves on these freedoms that allow us to live everyday. We are one of the only countries that have this promise and it is what draws people from all of over the world to come here. Our founding fathers of the United States of America wrote these words, having no idea the impact that they would have for the rest of this countries history. Those words were the foundation for government, and it wasn’t perfect at first but slowly it matured into what we have today, strong and powerful. To other nations America is seen as the World Power, and a somewhat perfect nation to live in. Unfortunately corruption, scandals and controversies have tainted our once golden glow, and other nations are weary of watching their steps. One of the most controversial elements to our government is the NSA. Hidden in the shadows from American and global knowledge is what the NSA is actually doing and watching out for. Only very recently has the NSA been ripped from the shadows and brought to light what exactly is going on inside those walls. They are “spying” on not only America’s personal data, but foreign leaders as well. The NSA says it’s for the safety for everyone against terrorism and attacks. However, it has gone way to far and violates a constitutional right, privacy. The NSA has overstepped their boundaries, and spying doesn’t seem to make a difference in safety.
Edward Snowden is America’s most recent controversial figure. People can’t decide if he is their hero or traitor. Nevertheless, his leaks on the U.S. government surveillance program, PRISM, demand an explanation. Many American citizens have been enraged by the thought of the government tracing their telecommunication systems. According to factbrowser.com 54% of internet users would rather have more online privacy, even at the risk of security (Facts Tagged with Privacy). They say it is an infringement on their privacy rights of the constitution. However, some of them don’t mind; they believe it will help thwart the acts of terrorists. Both sides make a good point, but the inevitable future is one where the government is adapting as technology is changing. In order for us to continue living in the new digital decade, we must accept the government’s ability to surveil us.
With the introduction of the internet being a relatively new phenomenon, the act of cyber espionage is not something that has been properly acknowledged by society. The American Government has done a stand up job of keeping its methods in the shadows and away from the eyes of its people since its documented domestic surveillance began on October 4th, 2001; Twenty three days after the Twin Towers fell President George Bush signed an order to begin a secret domestic eavesdropping operation, an operation which was so sensitive that even many of the country's senior national security officials with the...
Even with all the unreal evidence, the other side of the camp still has no valid point to whether the domestic surveillance has ever worked. In the end, we live in a world controlled by the NSA spying on everything we do, whether it is phone calls, messages, or emails, or the times that the people had to be censored to be shut down, like Cameron Dambrosio, even with the other people who support this epidemic, all that it matters that the American people wake up and fight for the right speech freely with the risk of being prosecuted. Something as simple as freedom of speech or privacy should have all this controversy, should be more open and debatable.
...on U.S. has access to and how this goes against the civil liberties of the people. Programs like PRISM, MAINWAY, MUSCULAR, Tempora, Boundless Informant and XKeyscore go against the Bill of Right and the US Constitution which clearly states in the fourth amendment that people have the right not to be searched without a proper warrant or valid reasons. The intelligence agencies state that they are doing this to protect U.S. citizens from further terrorist attacks, and even though that may be true, they are also granting access to private information to many people who most likely use it for themselves. It is an unacceptable government behavior since the government was created in order to ensure that the citizens are well treated and that their voice is heard. The agencies have crossed the line, they are going against the civil liberties and they need to be stopped.
The breath-taking expansion of police power that the United States government took after 9/11 now poses as a troubling issue. Americans need to address the issues of government surveillance because it affects t...
One of the many details shown is that mass surveillance has not had an apparent impact on the prevention of terrorism (Greenwald, 2013). Most of the information gathered has not been used to impede a terrorist attack. Surveillance does not protect the rights to life, property and so on from being violated by terrorists. However it gives the citizen...
Law enforcement is now able to use surveillance against crimes. Investigators can gather information when looking into terrorism-related crimes. The gathered information may include chemical-weapons, use of weapons of mass destruction, and terrorism financing. Now, federal agents may follow advanced terrorists who are trained to elude detection. The Act authorizes agents to request court permission to track terrorists. Now, federal agents just need to ask a court for an order to obtain business records on high-profile national security cases. These business records provide the missing information that investigators are looking for to solve these crimes.
The CI has been a means to determine the presence of espionage by citizens of domestic as well as foreign countries. Whether the citizens are private or military has been rendered as immaterial for purposes specific to CI. The implementation of counterintelligence by either by acts of espionage from a citizen source acting on their own or via a government entity can either hurt or help a foreign country or a private citizen. Espionage by a government entity on another government entity via the infiltration of an agent network will likely be of benefit to the underlying national population and in contrast, should CI fall into the wrong hands, may be of potential danger to a underlying national population as well.
However, government agencies, especially in America, continue to lobby for increased surveillance capabilities, particularly as technologies change and move in the direction of social media. Communications surveillance has extended to Internet and digital communications. law enforcement agencies, like the NSA, have required internet providers and telecommunications companies to monitor users’ traffic. Many of these activities are performed under ambiguous legal basis and remain unknown to the general public, although the media’s recent preoccupation with these surveillance and privacy issues is a setting a trending agenda.
" What is monitoring? It is to observe/check the progress of something over a period of time. The first amendment guarantees freedom of expression or the right to say what we want without restriction. This means that we can post anything we want online. It does not guarantee that we will be safe from the repercussions that follow. The U.S. government has the right to MONITOR it. That does not mean that they have the right to change it or stop it from going out. If it is in the interest of international or national or state or local safety they have the ability to stop or change it from happening. The U.S. government has the duty and/or right to monitor its citizens because if it doesn't then the U.S. will fall apart or something potentially very bad could happen and it would be extremely hard to stop before it was too late.
A major reason the U.S. needs to increase restrictions on the type and amount of data collected on individuals from the internet is due to the fact that the United States government can track communications and browsing histories of private citizens without warrant or cause. After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, ...