Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Papers on tracking in schools
Tracking in school pros
Tracking in education pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Papers on tracking in schools
Many young children in school do not realize they are being tracked in until they get older into high school. High school is the time where students are categorized into who is smart enough for advanced courses and who still needs help learning. Through this process there are many positives, including helping high tracking students but also negatives to tracking that effect low tracking students such as minorities and ethnic groups as well. Many educators today are still deciding if tracking should be improved within the program or if schools should detrack altogether.
Tracking has been a part of an American tradition within the education system for years and its purpose is to separate students into groups according to their academic ability (Datnow 687). Students can be placed into different tracks based on curriculum standards, career goals, and academic ability levels. Students get placed in the same groups based on their past scores, motivation and work ethic (Akos). The point of grouping students together is so students with the same academic ability can work together and be at the same level academically, this is supposed to help the students and the teacher. Academic tracking will be more effective and influence a better learning environment for students to succeed in their education. Tracking can especially help high school students as they are figuring out their paths to college and career goals (Akos). The terms ability grouping, homogeneous grouping, and curriculum grouping all have the same concept of placing students into classrooms based off of their academic ability (Datnow 687). Nearly ninety five percent of schools in America use tracking some way in their school (Akos).
Since tracking is such a popular theme i...
... middle of paper ...
... Search Complete. Web. 20 Mar. 2014.
Datnow, Amanda. Cooper, Robert. Education and Sociology: An Encyclopedia. New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 2002. Print.
Lipps, Garth E., et al. "The Association Of Academic Tracking To Depressive Symptoms Among Adolescents In Three Caribbean Countries." Child & Adolescent Psychiatry & Mental Health 4.(2010): 16-25. Academic Search Complete. Web. 6 Mar. 2014.
Mereand-Sinha, Rahul. ""Tracking" is unpopular, but is it good for our children? - Greater Greater Education." "Tracking" is unpopular, but is it good for our children? - Greater Greater Education. N.p., 27 Mar. 2013. Web. 25 Mar. 2014.
Preckel, Franzis, Thomas Götz, and Anne Frenzel. "Ability Grouping Of Gifted Students: Effects On Academic Self-Concept And Boredom." British Journal Of Educational Psychology 80.3 (2010): 451-472. Academic Search Complete. Web. 6 Mar. 2014.
Tracking is where students are identified as gifted or placed in remedial classes. By doing this, students learn about their overall success and achievements in comparison to the other groups. In the documentary, the principal, Rob Gasparello, addresses why their school is not the greatest. He states that their school has a “terrible reputation” and that the numbers do not lie. Looking at the data would assume that the overall success rate is not as high as other schools. By knowing this, it can be detrimental to the students’ education. This can be detrimental because students who attend this high school may start believing that they will never be successful so why bother trying. Other students who do not attend this high school may not have respect for these schools and assume they are better because they believe that they go to a better school. This is an example of inequality in education and studies have shown that while education benefits everyone, it does not benefit everyone equally. An inequality in education mirrors and inequality in
A flexible academic integrated instruction or behavioral support that it’s provided and adjusted to every student need to promote success for all.
Even when low-income schools manage to find adequate funding, the money doesn’t solve all the school’s problems. Most importantly, money cannot influence student, parent, teacher, and administrator perceptions of class and race. Nor can money improve test scores and make education relevant and practical in the lives of minority students. School funding is systemically unequal, partially because the majority of school funding comes from the school district’s local property taxes, positioning the poorest communities at the bottom rung of the education playing field. A student’s socioeconomic status often defines her success in a classroom for a number of reasons.
Michael Oher was from an all-black neighborhood located in the third poorest zip code in the country. By the time he was a sophomore, he’d been to 11 different schools, he couldn’t read or write, and he had a GPA of 0.6. In his first-grade year alone, he missed 41 days of school and ended up repeating both the first and the second grade; he didn’t even go to the third grade. Oher was one of the thousands of children that have been identified as having four or more of the at-risk factors mentioned by the National Center of Education and Statistics (NCES). According to the NCES, poverty and race are high on the list of things that negatively affect students’ ability to succeed at school. Other risk factors include changing schools multiple times and being held back from one or more grades. Oher’s biography, The Blind Side by Michael Lewis, proves how socioeconomic status impacts a child’s academic success because placed in perspective, education is not as important as the hardships of reality.
Currently, many public high schools allow students to select their own classes and in turn, some students enroll in classes far below their intellectual ability. Major problems are down the road should students decide to go on to post-secondary schools. Students should be assessed when entering the 9th grade. Standardized tests should be given to help determine what course of study would be best for a particular student to pursue during their four year high school career.
Kilgore, Sally B. "The Organizational Context of Tracking in Schools." American Sociological Review 56.2 (1991): 189-203. JSTOR. Web. 13 Nov. 2013.
I come from schools where they have no shame on hiding the tracking system from the view of others. The school district calls tracking in two ways, the gifted and talented or on the other hand low achieving. I have been able to be on both sides of the tracking system, when I was a child I was in low achieving classes, and barely learning anything. When I was in my senior year of high school I was in one AP class. At the time I wished that I was seen as smart and talented but in reality would I be happy if I was tracked into the smart classes? Would I have been the person that I turned out to be? I guess I would have not been the hard working person that I came out to be, I would find it hard to get back up when I ever I feel just because I would not know how to deal with the fact that ailing at something or not being good at something is the reason that I never give up so easy. Also because I have a mother that never fell into the views and mentality of human capital, she knew that I could and would make it.
Public schools across the nation are being labeled as low performing schools at a very fast rate. Low performing schools (LPS) are schools that do not meet the required standards that state officials set each year for all schools. These standards may include a certain graduation rate, certain goals for standardize testing, and a limited number of behavior referrals. The majority of public schools do not meet these standards. They often struggle with high dropout rates, low standardize test scores, low graduation rates, and disciplinary problems. These problems can truly hinder the future of these schools and the students attending them, so they are placed on the academically unacceptable list; low performing schools list. Although those problems standout they are forming from smaller problems within the schools. Many of the schools on the low performing list lack in the quality and quantity of teachers and books. This causes students not to meet the expected standards on standardize tests. Low test scores can lead to high dropout rates and low graduation rates. Another small problem they face is overcrowded classrooms which bring along the huge number of discipline problems. It can add to the low test scores because teachers are often interrupted with discipline problems while trying to teach large classes. Students who have trouble grasping the concepts that the teacher is teaching and who are constantly involved in disciplinary cases often dropout of LPS. When public schools lose students the state officials cutback on the schools’ finances that they receive to fund the school.
Some of the “implementation features may need to be adjusted to accommodate the high school context” (Flannery & Sugai, 2009, p.18).Some examples of those areas include “organizational differences, variations in purpose, development considerations, competing initiatives and priorities” (Flannery & Sugai, p.18).At this level it requires more time to correctly implement the system, and requires attention in areas beyond those at the elementary and middle school levels. Those important areas of implementation can be “facilitated by attending to educationally important outcomes for students, data for decision making, evidence-based practices, and active and formal support systems for implementation integrity” (Flannery & Sugai, p.18). The BPSS should be “linked to outcomes that are important to the high school mission” (Flannery & Sugai, p. 18). Where high school greatly differs from elementary and middle school is the “emphasis on postsecondary outcomes”, such as “dropout prevention, diploma achievement, career planning, etc.” (Flannery & Sugai,
The purpose of this paper is to elaborate on the No Child Left Behind Act, and how the accountability of testing subgroup provisions may play a major role on the responsibilities of a student’ education. The paper also focuses on what information parents are receiving to actually know how their student(s) are performing in class and whether each student’s performance is within state compliance with NCLB.
As argued in “Making the Grade,” the No Child Left Behind Act seeks to reduce gaps in testing areas that have allowed kids to advance without having high-quality skills in subjects such as math and reading. By discovering what kids are slipping through the gaps in testing, it will be easier for schools to aid these students and make sure they are not left behind. Other main goals of this act include to find teachers who are not well educated in the subjects they are currently teaching, and to locate those schools who fail t...
Ability tracking is harmful for a number of reasons. The criteria used to group kids are based on subjective perceptions and fairly narrow views of intelligence (Slavin, 1990). Tracking leads students to take on labels, both in their own minds as well as in the minds of their teachers, that are usually associated with the pace of learning (such as "slow" or "fast" learners). Because of this, we...
Sometimes, determining when students are at risk can be a difficult task. The term “at-risk” has been used to describe a particular category of students who, on the basis of several risk factors, are unlikely to graduate from high school (Land, Stringfield, 2002). Yet educators are also confronted with children who have other at-risk conditions. For example, educators will be responsible for working with students who are at risk due to health problems, substance abuse, disabilities, socioeconomic status and other various reasons. These conditions can make students academically at-risk, or in danger of not meeting their educational potential. The use of the term “at-risk” to describe learners is often controversial and deserves consideration, as the at-risk label can convey a negative connotation.
I mentioned earlier that within my own school, we have a problem with segregation between students that take different classes. While not an official program, my school system does have a practice of tracking students together based on achievement levels. Starting in elementary school students tend to grouped based on their academic ability. Often times you will see students of color and students from low-income families in what are often called the “bottom” classes. The students many times are then stuck in the classes that do not have the same high expectations as the one or two classes of our “top” students. Those “top” classes are often times over represented by the white students as well as students from more affluent families. Going back to Orfield, et al (2010), one way to keep this from happening is by “detracking” students (p 25). Oftentimes students are labeled at a young age and sent on track that will carry on all the way through graduation. Minority students, ELL students and students from low income families generally do not test well at young ages and then are put on track of education that has lower expectations than their peers that are from affluent white families. According to Orfield, et al (2010), schools that use detracking strategies for their students often see increased
Many factors affect a student’s choice of staying in school, including but not limited to where they came from, their academic success, and their individual decisions. There are so many effects to this huge epidemic happening to this generation’s students. Although they cannot completely control how their life goes, making education a focus will benefit them greatly in the long run. The students can gain a sense of accomplishment that can boost their self-esteem and confidence later in life. Although school may not be the most fascinating place to go, in the end the effects are worth every minute of it.