The Pros and Cons of Going to Mars

1358 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The challenger disaster

Negative and Positive Aspects of Going to Mars

Whether it’s Lewis and Clark or Joe Schmoe, humans have always had a tendency to explore their surroundings. This has led humans to explore the earth up and down, uncovering every rock and looking in every hole along the way. However, thousands of years of exploration have led to earth becoming a tapped resource. Humans now may ask the question; where do we go from here? Many answers have been suggested but one answer stands out from the rest, Mars. Nowadays humans view Mars as the next frontier, apparently forgetting that Mars is an eight-month trip, each way. What people don’t realize is how good we have it here on earth; water, all the fossil fuels we need, and a great atmosphere all surround us. Although human travel to Mars may be the American dream, facts show that at this time, the trip is not in our country’s best interest.

NASA has sent humans into orbit, onto the moon, and most recently sent robots to Mars, so if anyone is going to send humans to Mars it will obviously be NASA. The only problem with this is the fact that NASA is in a troubled time right now. Less than six months ago the crash of Columbia shook not only NASA, but the American people as well. The Columbia tragedy brought déjà vu to many people, reminding them of the same horrors sustained through the Challenger crash of 1986. The Columbia crash forces NASA to make sure their next mission is flawless in order to preserve lives and their reputation. Sending a mission to Mars this soon after Columbia would raise much opposition from the public. Following the Challenger crash NASA didn’t fly for 10 years, and when they did fly it was a simple mission, one they had been doing for going on 30 years. A huma...

... middle of paper ...

...r with Iraq is costing the U.S. $5 billion a month”, which has led our country into “the largest budget deficit in history”. The United States simply can’t afford to sponsor a mission to Mars at this time.

At this time, the negatives far outweigh the positives of going to Mars. Us humans have everything we need here on earth. We have a breathable atmosphere, food, water, minerals, and all the fossil fuels we need. Not only do we have everything we need here but also this is where we came from and where our bodies have evolved to live. Sending humans to Mars screws with our genetic makeup, it’s simply not worth it. Although we are natural explorers, we will have to find a way to control that for a while and stick to what we have. Mars is not the next frontier. With all that earth still has to offer, a trip to Mars should not be mankind’s top priority at this time.

Show More
Related

  • Why People Should Not Go To Mars?

    444 Words  | 1 Pages

    People should not go to Mars because it is dangerous, people would never return home and it can have negative changes to people’s bodies in more than just one way, there’s very little water supply, and the environment is harsh. There are so many contrary details about going, so the question stands, why risk it and go to Mars? First of all, anyone who goes to Mars could never return home. We know this because, the text states, “...as long as you don’t mind that you can never return to Earth” (Ross).

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Should We Go To Mars?

    382 Words  | 1 Pages

    Starting with Mars being too dangerous. Colonists could be exposed to radiation which can result in cancer, brain damage, tumors, sickness, or death. Secondly, Mars has a lower gravity than Earth which means over time colonists would lose bone mass, have a weaker immune system, and have a weaker heart and body. Lastly, colonists would be in a closed environment for a long periods of time which could lead to mental problems according to NASA and Mars One.

    Read More

  • Budget Cuts: The Dwindling Future of NASA

    1328 Words  | 3 Pages

    Headed by former NASA ‘Mars Czarr’ Orlando Figueroa, it will put together a framework for funding and planning smaller Mars missions beginning as early as 2018” (Reardon). NASA is fighting for this program and desperately wants to be funded. According to NASA this Mars mission is a top priority for them, and it shows by how hard they are trying to at least start the mission during this decade.

    Read More

  • NASA: Should The Government Fund NASA?

    883 Words  | 2 Pages

    Going to the moon and Mars is excellent, but that’s already been done. Time for something else to happen. If NASA’s budget was increased, it could be pushed to find other habitable planets and new resources to help out here on Earth. With more funding, NASA can build a manned base on the moon while finding a way to Mars.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Privatized Space Exploration

    569 Words  | 2 Pages

    “NASA Should Be about Space,” says that Obama has cut money off NASA, for Earth Science. Even though Earth Science has raised up to 63%, according to “NASA Should Be about Space,” NASA will have not enough money to send people to the moon or Mars. Since space has not controlled by anyone, really, the U.S should start to take into advance to complete mission no man has done back then. The state of Texas is willing to help fund NASA, and hope to find what is needed.

    Read More

  • Life On Mars Essay

    1081 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...egular people, believing that if someone was to go to Mars they might have been able to survive A variety of organic compounds present may mean a life is probable. Also, if the trip to Mars in 2023 turns out to be a positive one, then it will prove to everyone that in the future more and more people will move to this other planet. A lot of people will find it unnecessary to stay on Earth if they can start a new life somewhere else in the galaxy. Even though the trip will have America paying billions and billions of dollars, it truly is worth it. A life on Mars could mean living to an older age and being healthier. The point of going to the Red Planet is to find out if there is a better life somewhere other than on Earth. Just like NASA astronaut, Buzz Aldrin said, humans will most likely reach Mars and when they do humans will turn into a two-planet species.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Colonizing Mars

    632 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mars is our next best hope in life on another planet. Because of science mankind can grow and harvest plants in the modified mars soil, make a thick warm atmosphere, and drink no frozen mars water. Mankind can grow and flourish more as a species with this idea of colonizing mars. With more scientific advancements we can colonize mars and we will colonize mars.

    Read More

  • Space Technolgy Programs

    1157 Words  | 3 Pages

    As a country we need to start investing more money and research into space technology. Programs currently exist for this effort, but the potential for research and progress is limited by a lack of funding; compared to other government funded programs, aerospace funding is pitiful. Continued research in space technology is a necessary step in our growth and development not just as a country but also as entire human race. If we are to achieve this goal, it is necessary to increase funding for space research and technology and consider the possibility of colonizing outer space. If we limit our existence to the planet Earth, and continue to drain the resources on this planet, we will destroy the only home we have.

    Read More

  • NASA is a Waste of Money

    587 Words  | 2 Pages

    A spacecraft en-route to Mars exploded in nineteen sixty-nine by USSR technicians. These failures are taking big chunks out of NASA?s (over-sized) budget, much of which is being funded toward more inevitable failures. They say that you learn from your mistakes, but those mistakes can lead to bigger problems. These expeditions take too much time as they are. It took us just four years to take pictures of the surface of Mars.

    Read More

  • Space Exploration - We Must Explore Mars

    2978 Words  | 6 Pages

    Scientists have dreamt over the possibility that it may be possible to live on another planet. Some think that Mars has that potential to support life, if it's hidden resources are uncovered and exploited to their full potential. There is even evidence that it once contained enough water that it had been possible to hold life. Think about it, what if we could transform it into such a place, even if only our children's children get to see any result? The following will describe Mars, present evidence of ice and water, give possible ideas for the future exploration of Mars, and give reasons for why it is important.

    Read More

  • An Argument Against NASA

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    Having sent the first man to the moon, the country enjoys great pride and improved the nation’s heritage. The Apollo missions that followed ascertained that the country was indeed a leader in space exploration in the quest to understand extraterrestrial life forms. With this milestone, the next step in space exploration would be to send manned flights to other planets. This culminated in the exploration of Mars to investigate the possibility of existence in the planet. Though the explorations are still ongoing, many of the pundits opposed to continued funding of NASA claim that the explorations are a waste of money, which would otherwise be channeled to other ‘more important sectors.’ This has sparked a debate on the importance of NASA’s mandate and elicited mixed feelings from proponents and

    Read More

  • Why Should Humans Explore Space?

    1412 Words  | 3 Pages

    Carl Sagan once said “every planetary civilization will be endangered by impacts from space, every surviving civilization is obliged to become spacefaring--not because of exploratory or romantic zeal, but for the most practical reason imaginable: staying alive... If our long-term survival is at stake, we have a basic responsibility to our species to venture to other worlds.” The National Aeronautics and Space Administration or NASA, is executing Sagan’s words every day. President Dwight D. Eisenhower created NASA in 1958 with the purpose of peaceful rather than military space exploration and research to contribute to society. Just 11 years after the creation, NASA put Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the moon, the first humans to accomplish this feat. NASA’s research and innovation looked promising but it came at a cost. Money, resources, and spacecraft accidents most famously Apollo 13 all hindered NASA’s research. In the 21st century the debate between funding for NASA is at its peak since the birth of the organization in 1958 especially when there are numerous problems throughout the world. Is the money spent on space exploration worth the advantages and advances it contributes to society?

    Read More

  • Why Is Space Exploration Worth The Effort?

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    Not only that, but our population has been growing at an extremely alarming rate. At our current rate, our species may not be able to survive for much longer. This is where space exploration comes in. With the recent discovery of water on Mars, and the finding of Kepler-78b, it is possible that mankind can prolong our existence. The possibility of interstellar travel seems to be an option, or even a necessity, if we wish to continue living.

    Read More

  • Humans Should Explore Space

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    The recent events regarding the NASA Mars probes have renewed the debate of reinstalling manned space missions with the objectives of exploring and landing on foreign worlds such as the moon and the red planet Mars, rather than the use of solely robotic craft and machines. It is my belief that we should return to the days of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, those of manned lunar landings and manned space exploration. Robots simply cannot and should not be allowed to be the sole means of visiting these worlds, nor should humans only be able to witness new findings second hand through the use of computers and machines. It is human nature to be normally curious of one’s surroundings, and it is important that we send one of our own to new worlds. The effects that past missions have had on the world’s people, as well as our political and cultural climates are another valid reason for flesh instead of metal to lay claim to space. Also, the limitless applications and new education that manned flights can bring to us from on site human interactions could lead to another technological and industrial revolution like the original lunar programs had done for us during the Gemini and Apollo programs.

    Read More

  • Advantages of Space Exploration

    1395 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many reasons that space exploration should continue. If Earth ever becomes too overpopulated or over polluted, then perhaps people can move to Mars. The world population in 1970 was approximately 4 billion people, and is currently nearly 6 billion people. The world population in 2015 is estimated to be 7 billion people. There is a possibility that there are useful resources on Mars. Scientists have found ice and some other clues, such as craters, volcanoes, and valleys, that have led them to believe that there was once life on Mars, and they believe that sometime in the future, should planet Earth need to be evacuated, humans will be able to live there (Jakosky 142). Many of the rocks on Mars appear to have been formed by gasses, breathable by humans and other creatures. A process called terraforming will allow astronauts to make use of the resources that are on the planet and create an atmosphere that will support life. One method for terraforming is that scientists would convert the gaseous rocks back into gasses, and use gas-eating organisms to eat the gas, which results in the formation of other gasses. If these organisms continue the cycle, then Mars would have a stable atmosphere for humans to live in (Getz 39).

    Read More

More about The Pros and Cons of Going to Mars

Open Document