Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
European Union advantages and disadvantages
European Union advantages and disadvantages
Benefits OF EU
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: European Union advantages and disadvantages
The Advantages and Disadvantages of E.U. Enlargement
European union integration and much more the euro are much-debated topics, however, with this there are two different sides that discuss the issue, euro sceptics and the pro Europeans who are for integration have quite different views. The advantages of enlargement are as follows; enlargement is necessary to avoid what is known as a 'two-tier' Europe (rich and poor countries); if and when the 13 new members join in 2004, it will create the biggest single market (which means no quotas or tariffs) in the world, bigger than that of Japan's and America's combined which means that trade between countries would become an easier challenge for all members.
…show more content…
Firstly, most European nation states are too small and if European integration was introduced, the smaller countries can pool resources to create a powerful bloc and this will also help bring economies of scale to the smaller countries. All new members will have to adopt EU policies in order to maintain stability but also to help fight of illegal immigration, bring down the number of drug crimes and national crimes in general. Existing members already provide a great wealth of cultural, economic and political diversity with in each country and with the addition of new members this can be increased by being able to understand new kinds of cultures, the exchange of ideas leads to bigger multi cultural societies. The European union will also now have a stronger role in world affairs, which is strengthened dramatically every time a new member joins. Such areas will include foreign policy, trade policy and in other parts of global governance. The economy of each country will be boosted and latest research shows that …show more content…
It will furthermore become difficult for countries to create consensus with others, as they will both have the power of veto for example in areas of security and trade.
All countries will suffer after joining because it means they no longer have that power of veto especially in areas of agriculture and trade. A flood of cheap workers from the east will come to the western markets looking for work thus increasing demand for jobs, critics believe that even though over 2 million new jobs will be provided, this will not cope with the number of citizens who will be looking for employment in the long term. It will become ever difficult to control asylum seekers mainly because of open borders that allow free movement. The poorer countries will seek financial aid and this will come from the existing members budgets. Lastly, there have been several occasions where inefficiency and corruption have occurred; like money being wasted unnecessarily within the
The benefits of the European Union outweigh the costs. Ever since the end of World War II, countries in the EU have been helped economically, politically, and culturally.
With a GDP of 18.3 trillion US dollars for the EU, that is, a quantity of money and about one trillion dollars higher than the US! (Document A)! According to Document A, the European Union's highest GDP is 3.9 trillion and Germany in the lead! Germany had essentially joined the EU because for more money. There are a lot of benefits of joining the EU, maybe just to have a lot of money, or be a more powerful strong country and not to be a hovel.
In conclusion, the benefits of the UK’s membership in the EU outweigh the costs. The most significant benefit is the access they have to the single market as this has managed to benefit quite Access to single market is aiding this inward investment
In order to be a member of the European Union, an applying nation must first meet the requirements of membership as described in the Copenhagen Criteria. There are geographic, democratic and economic criteria. Geographically, the applying nation must be classified as a European nation, as exemplified by Morocco’s rejection. The applying nation must also have a secure and functional democratic government that only acts in accordance with the law. This means that any citizen should be able participate in the political system and that there are free elections with a secret ballot. The government must also respect human rights and have protection policies for minorities, meaning that a persons’ inalienable rights are protected by law and minority groups can retain their culture and language without discrimination. Economically, a country must have a functional market economy on which it can feasibly support itself and other member nations if need be. The country’s economy needs to be able to compete on a global scale and deal with economic pressures. There are also separate guidelines for countries wanting to convert to the Euro. Finally, countries that want to join must agree to uphold laws and regulations t...
Thomassen, J. 2009. The Legitimacy of the European Union after Enlargement. In: Thomassen, J. Eds. The Legitimacy of the European Union after Enlargement. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 67-86.
Some would say the European Union is the modern day Soviet Union and now with the introduction of the euro, it has succeeded in what the Soviets could not dare to accomplish. How amazing that a single currency could change the fate of Europe and bring it back to a super power that it always was. In order to stand up to the influential nations of this world the European Union did the unthinkable, created the euro. While others would agree, as predicted by many financial analysts, the creation of the euro currency was one of Europe’s greatest accomplishments. The establishment of the European Union (EU) in Europe created an alliance whereby it would be greatly constructive as a nation to be strengthened economically, politically and ideologically, with a one level currency. Hence, the introduction and final association with the euro was established on January 1, 1999. This currency which was used primarily for trade and deficit diminutions was now established as the main foundational monies of all the European countries involved. Through this cooperation and attainment, the European Union gained strength in the economic frontier through consumer and business initiatives and frontiers. Basically, the EU was on the verge of bankruptcy and in order to save this great nation the euro was adopted and procured. Yet many member states did not regard the euro as their main currency, they feared the issues surrounding
EFFICIENCY: This simply means making the most out of available resources. Thus in public administration it could be the provision ...
Uvalic, M. (2002, July). Regional Cooperation and the Enlargement of the European Union: Lessons Learned? International Political Science Review, 23(3), 319-333.
Part B of the assignment I have been asked to write a report on one of the new countries joining the European Union about its economic profile, the impact of enlargement on UK businesses and the implications for the EU Single Market.
These are very exciting times for our country, we are now part of the largest economic community the world has ever seen, opening the doors of opportunity for us, the Irish citizens, everywhere we look. Ireland's membership of the EU is seen by most to be of great benefit to the country as it will solidify the foundations of our economy as well as increase the awareness of Ireland as an investment opportunity for multi national companies; however, some will argue that the change would be detrimental to our nation in the long run.
Justice would never be achieved by having UN peacekeeping. Having to choose a side to support against another side, and this is exactly opposite of the word justice. UN peacekeepers had made huge disasters in operating justice in many situations through history.
Europe has a history of war and conflict that predates living memory and the idea of a united Europe is something that appears repeatedly in that history. Hitler, Napoleon, and the many Roman Emperors all sought a united Europe. Their quests although in many ways motivated by a horrifying desire for power sparked the minds of philosophers and other political thinkers to imagine Europe united in harmony and peace despite national differences. Today we have the European Union which is quite unique. After the horrors, bloodshed, and economic disaster of the twentieth century, in a desire for peace and harmony and economic and political prosperity twenty-seven states have limited their national sovereignty.2 With national interests and ambition still in mind these countries see the European Union and supranational governance and the benefits of peace and prosperity therein as something worthwhile. However, in the history of European integration there has been much conflict and Euroskepticism. Some see unity in diversity and diversity in unity as impossible, and the existence of differentiation in the EU as highly problematic. However, differentiation in the European Union’s integration process is not the hindrance it is often defined as, rather it creates further cooperation in Europe bringing the European Union closer to its objectives of peace, and economic and political growth, resulting in a more effective and efficient bureaucracy. Differentiation in the EU’s integration process has created more successful integration as it allows the nations who wish t...
The enlargement of the European Union (EU) in 2004 and 2007 has been termed as the largest single expansion of the EU with a total of 12 new member states – bringing the number of members to 27 – and more than 77 million citizens joining the Commission (Murphy 2006, Neueder 2003, Ross 2011). A majority of the new member states in this enlargement are from the eastern part of the continent and were countries that had just emerged from communist economies (EC 2009, Ross 2011), although overall, the enlargement also saw new member states from very different economic, social and political compared to that of the old member states (EC 2009, Ross 2011). This enlargement was also a historical significance in European history, for it saw the reunification of Europe since the Cold War in a world of increasing globalization (EC 2009, Mulle et al. 2013, Ross 2011). For that, overall, this enlargement is considered by many to have been a great success for the EU and its citizens but it is not without its problems and challenges (EC 2009, Mulle et al. 2013, Ross 2011). This essay will thus examine the impact of the 2004/2007 enlargements from two perspectives: firstly, the impact of the enlargements on the EU as a whole, and thereafter, how the enlargements have affected the new member states that were acceded during the 2004/2007 periods. Included in the essay will be the extent of their integration into the EU and how being a part of the Commission has contributed to their development as nation states. Following that, this essay will then evaluate the overall success of the enlargement process and whether the EU or the new member states have both benefited from the accessions or whether the enlargement has only proven advantageous to one th...
There are several key components of the European history that have led to the creation of the individual nations within the EU and the larger supranational Institution we call the European Union. As Curtis and Linser (2004) “The European Union is the most important development in European history since World War Two” (Curtis & Linser, 2004, p.4). And I tend to agree that this story line is the most important since it was the starting’s to one of the largest supranational organizations that shaped modern Europe and continues to shape it today. To start the European Union could not have been created without the nations that are part of this supranational organization. Many of the nations that make up the EU have been either long-term super powers, France, United Kingdom or Germany, but also areas plagued with conflict. The conflict is however the more important of the two. The conflict between Germany and the rest of Europe in WW2 was the sparks that created...
The World Trade Organization claims to ‘level the playing field’ for countries and thus promote development, [1] but to what extent do they truly deliver?