Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negatives of women in the military
Negatives of women in the military
Women in the armed forces intro to essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negatives of women in the military
Are you willing to help serve our country? You are going to be reading about the pro and cons about women in combat. supporters of women in combat believe that women should serve in combat because women are just as competent as men. Critics of women in combat believe that women are more emotional than men because the way our brains work. Studies found that women feel pain, make social decisions, and cope with stress differently.
Who are we to stop women from protecting our country? Supporters of women in combat believe that the Exclusion Policy should not be allowed. “The exclusion policy institutionalized the unequal treatment of women,” according to a Washington law firm (Zucchino). This states that Washington recognizes the policy; the policy basically establishes the inequality treatment of women in combat. In the military, serving in combat positions like the infantry remains crucial to career advancement. Women have long said that by not recognizing their real service, the military has unfairly held them back. There has been many discussion about discrimination. Yet there is still discrimination on the most basic topic; women and men equality. Although women are achieving the same standards as men and having the same training; the military is holding women back for no reason. In 1994, the Pentagon ruled that women are restrained from artillery, armor, infantry, and many other combat duty, although many females always find themselves in combat. Still, hundreds of women has served in these problems. But still they are doing their job with all these restrictions. With the help of government it may not only help discrimination in combat, but everywhere else in the world as well. Army Col. Ellen Haring mentioned, "’There was ...
... middle of paper ...
...omen are already in combat zones. But, yet the still want to keep moving up into the infantry. Where fighting and hand to hand killing happens.
In conclusion there is a lot of discussion on women in combat. I, personally believe that women should be in combat because every women is as capable as every men. Women has been discriminated by their gender for a while now, there has to be an end to this. If a woman is willing to help serve her country and want to be in combat, who are we to stop them. Not everyone is willing to risk their life for their nation. The more people willing to help the better. Men have a small vision, they only focus on what they are meant to do. Whereas to women, we are able to think/look outside the box. One of my favorite quotes about women is,“A women is like a teabag. It’s only when she is in hot water that you know how strong she is.”
The military is trying to find new ways to recognize the fact that women now fight in the country’s wars. In 2011 the Military Leadership Diversity Commission recommended that the Department of Defense remove all combat restrictions on women. Although many jobs have been opened for women in the military, there is still 7.3 percent of jobs that are closed to them. On February 9, 2012, George Little announced that the Department of Defense would continue to reduce the restrictions that were put on women’s roles. The argument that “women are not physically fit for combat” is the most common and well-researched justification for their exclusion from fighting units. It has been proven if women go through proper training and necessary adaptations, they can complete the same physical tasks as any man. Though there seem to be many reasons from the exclusion of women in the military, the main ones have appeared to be that they do not have the strength to go through combat, would be a distraction to the men, and that they would interrupt male bonding and group
In the Upfront Magazine Article “Women Warriors”, author Rebecca Zissou told the story of two women who recently graduated the Army’s Ranger School, but whether they would be able to serve alongside their fellow male graduates was unknown. Zissou also delved into the issue of whether or not women should be allowed to serve in combat positions. However, I believe that women should be allowed to serve in combat positions in the U.S. armed forces.
Men have always been looked upon as the leading sex. Looking back through history women have been the ones who take care of the home and children, while men are the ones who work and go to war. However in recent years there’s no doubt that women have become much more equal in the work force. Nevertheless men are still the ones who are forced to fight our wars when the time calls for it. Many think that women should be entirely equal to men having their choice to be drafted taken away but the fact is that they are physically at a disadvantage, too emotionally oriented, and the increase of female presence would have a more negative impact in the military in the way of social interactions.
Should women serve in combat positions? The Combat Exclusion Law has dealt with this question since the 1940’s. As time continues, the question remains. The military has increased the percentage of females allowed to be enlisted and commissioned in the services as well as increasing the positions allotted to them (Matthews, Ender, Laurence, & Rohall, 2009). Keenan posits “women have served with distinction in … the Revolutionary War…as volunteer nurses and were only occasionally in the direct line of fire…four nurses evacuating 42 patients while the Germans bombed their field hospital…” (the DoD Combat Exclusion Policy) pg. 21.
Some people say that women should be in the draft because nowadays, men and women should be considered equal. With the advancement of equality in the American society, these people argue that the armed forces should not be excluded from the growing new reputation America is trying to get. Hence, those who support women being apart of the draft argue this point. According to “Update: Women in the Military”, women have become way more involved in the army (1). From this, supporters of women joining the draft argue that their involvement in the draft should also reflect on their increasing involvement in the army. However, those who are opposed women being apart of the draft argue that equality within men and women is an unrealistic mindset. This is proven in the New York Times with Catherine Rampell’s when she writes “Women earn 92.2 cents on the dollar of what men earn” (1). This is a statistic from 2011 that shows people that complete equality between men and women has still not fully been reached. Furthermore, those opposed women and the draft argue that if America has not completely reached full equality within the genders, then neither should the army. Both of these articles bring up good points about why women should either be in the draft or not in the draft.
Many people today believe that women should go into combat and everything will be fine. Well, that is not true. If a woman goes into hand-to-hand combat, she will create many problems for her team, which results to her team losing the battle. If you think women should not go into hand-to-hand combat, read on and find out why.
Today I will inform you why I think that women should fight on the front lines with men. In 2011 there were 203,000 women serving in the USA military. So women are already serving in the military so why not let them go on the front lines? I believe that women should be able to serve on the front lines along-side men If the women is already in-listed they already took that first step.
With a woman in combat, it would keep our service larger. (Sisters in Arms RSS, 2009). Men take up 67%, with woman serving 22% of all of the military in the United States of America today. (Sisters in Arms RSS, 2009) Imagine if that percentage of woman got larger. It would push the men to be better than them, equally making our nations military larger. Therefore, if we have more military, we have more defense for this
Like with any modern point of contention, it is important to understand the history. Since as early as the revolutionary war, women have been active participants in the U.S. military. From nursing soldiers to cross-dressing and actually fighting, women have played a crucial
Many agree, that in certain military occupations, women can function at the same level as men. The controversy about having women fighting with men in wars is the fact that they have a different physical structure, deal with stress and emotions differently , are more susceptible to injury and just don't have the killer instinct necessary to get the job done. Although the last statement might appear to be a stereotype, most women would not be capable of supporting the demanding rigors of war-like situations. It would be a great mistake to allow women in these stressful and dangerous situations.
Many people think that women should serve in combat for these reasons. Women create diversity and diversity is good, and it should be fair. If women can meet the standards then they should be allowed to join. However, others disagree about women in the military. They believe that allowing
There is a rising political issue in the United States which revolves around the idea of women in combat. In my own opinion, the cons of adding women into combat roles outways the few pros. Although it seems like an obvious case of inequality between men and women, it is unfortunately backed up by numerous studies and tests that studied women in combat units. Women should be able to and can still serve for the United States military, however the possible risks of fraternization and lowering the standards of the military are too high.
During my time overseas, I served with several women on numerous combat missions. I will agree there are certain combat roles that are perfect for women to execute. I have watched them excel in these positions, serving bravely with the men around them on the
Recently, women participation in combat has become a controversial issue between people. Some people believe that women are weaker than men emotionally so, it is difficult for them to join the combat, while others claim that there must be equality between men and women so, women should be given the same opportunity. In reality, women should not be allowed to have a combat roles in military in their home country because women are physically weak and they have domestic duties.
Should women be allowed in the military? My answer was at first a resounding “no.” However, once I started my research, my opinion changed. In 1948, Congress passed the combat exclusion law that prohibited women in the Air Force, Marines, and Navy to hold combat positions; however, the Army can assign these duties as they see fit (Schroeder). Some people assume that Americans are not ready to see a woman wounded or killed in war; however, there are female police officers that are wounded or killed daily (Schroeder). How can we rationalize that a woman has the right to die protecting our local communities but not our country? If a person chooses to be in a combat field, and can pass the physical demands required, gender should not be an issue. The arguments of physical differences and cohesion among the troops are valid arguments but not substantial enough to prevent women from serving in frontline combat roles within the military.