The Pros And Cons Of US Military Spending

228 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay debate on us military spending

Firstly, the opposers of the current military spending claim that a big part of the US defence spending goes on foreign countries rather than United States itself. They assert that the allegiance on several alliance including NATO and UN has cost USA huge sum of money. That has lead the opposers of excessive military spending raise their voices even for US to pull out of NATO. One of the several opposers of US spending on foreign military aid, even President Donald J Trump has raised his voice against US spending on NATO. Showing out the fact that US spends $664 billion of $918 billion, he said, “ Member nations are still not paying what they should be paying,This is not fair to the people and taxpayers of the United States”(Kottasová ). The

Show More
Related

  • The Positive Effects of the GI Bill

    3380 Words  | 7 Pages

    In 1944 the world was caught in one of the greatest wars of all time, World War II. The whole United States was mobilized to assist in the war effort. As history was being made overseas, as citizens learned to do without many amenities of life, and as families grieved over loved ones lost in the war, two students on BYU campus were beginning a history of their own. Chauncey and Bertha Riddle met in the summer of 1944 and seven months later were engaged to be married. Chauncey was eighteen and a half and Bertha nineteen as they knelt across the altar in the St. George temple five months after their engagement. Little did they know that in just the first years of marriage they would be involved with the effects of a significant historical event, the atomic bomb, as well as government legislation, the GI Bill, that would not only affect the course of their lives but also the course of the entire country.

    Read More

  • ?Letter to Americans? by E. P. Thompson

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    The author doesn’t forget to mention the relationship between USA and NATO. He thinks that Americans welcome NATO as a weapon for America’s affairs, not of the world’s. In his final words, it is suggested that either Europe should invite USA to leave NATO or Europe should expel America from it.

    Read More

  • Military Draft Pros And Cons

    837 Words  | 2 Pages

    The draft is something young men fear and crave. Some fear they will lose everything, die or just not be the same if they get picked. I have met young men who cannot be in the military due to family issues, so the draft would come as a blessing. The draft is also very random, so both of those boys' chances of getting picked is also very slim. The draft reminds me of The Reaping from The Hunger Games, we pick your name out of a bowl and the magic of selection will decide if you go or not. Then your skill set will determine how long you live in battle. May the odds be ever in your favor, and don't forget that you're and accountant and have no hand-eye coordination! There are plenty of volunteers in America that will gladly serve our country if we need more soldiers, I personally think the wars have past their expiration date, and there are other jobs people can do

    Read More

  • Why The Military Should Get Paid More

    588 Words  | 2 Pages

    Manfred, T. (2013, September 5). Two Charts that show how Badly NFL Players Get Paid . Retrieved November 16, 2017, from businessinsider: http://www.businessinsider.com/charts-expose-how-badly-nfl-players-get-paid-2013-9

    Read More

  • History of NATO and Policy Recommendations Towards NATO

    4426 Words  | 9 Pages

    In this paper I will first explain the history of NATO and the United States policy towards it. I will then give three reasonable policy recommendations for the United States towards NATO. This is important because NATO is an organization with a very brief history but it has molded Europe and other countries and has made a safe-haven from war for the past five decades. NATO was spawn out of the Western countries of Europe fearing the expansion of the greedy, hungry Stalin of the Soviet Union which would directly lead to the expansion of communist governments. Also, “in 1949 most of the states of Europe were still enfeebled by wartime devastation, striving for economic recovery, attempting to reestablish shattered political institutions, resettle refugees and recover from the second major upheaval in 30 years.”1 After the second world war Stalin, of the Soviet Union, started to spread his communist government to many Eastern European countries fast. Just a couple years before all of this an alliance was made between many nations called The United Nations. This is where the base idea of NATO came out of. There is a particular article in the United Nation’s charter, article 51, which paved the way. Article 51 read: Nothing in the present charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a member of the United Nations, until the security council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defense shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.2 So, armed with this article, ten European countries turned to the United States and Canada to draft a pledge of mutual security and on April 4, 1949, they all met in Washington to sign the North Atlantic Treaty. The fear that created this alliance could not better be seen than in Winston Churchill’s, prime minister of Great Britain, telegram to President Truman saying: “An iron curtain is being drawn down upon their(Soviet Union) front. We do not know what is going on ...

    Read More

  • Cold War Dbq

    838 Words  | 2 Pages

    This was their idea of how to stop American fears; however, they only grew larger. Not just political cartoons allow us to see this military spending. In a table made by the Statistical Abstract of the United States, Department of Commerce, we can see that from 1949 to 1959, the percent of Americans' budget spent on defense spending increased more than 25%. This was almost entirely due to Eisenhower and his administration's ideas on how to stop these threats. Although America was becoming a country not to mess with, with all of the bombs, Americans were still in immense fear.

    Read More

  • 9/11: A Synthesis Essay

    720 Words  | 2 Pages

    In an article, it explains that “The State Department’s Military Assistance Report on June 8 stated that it approved $44.28 billion in arms shipments to 173 nations in the last fiscal year, including some that struggled with human rights problems. These nations include the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Israel, Djibouti, Honduras, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Bahrain” (Toombs 1). These nations are where ISIS originated from. This is more than likely the reason why there are so many terrorist in the Middle East who are able to do so much damage. By giving these terrorist weapons, we are giving them weapons to kill our people. It makes no sense for the United States to provide weapons to countries who are using them to cause terrorists acts within their own country and other countries as well. If the United States stops providing these people with weapons to kill, we would not have such a problem with terrorists. Also, if we are able to increase our security even more so. Things like “congress federal(izing) airport security by passing the Aviation and Transportation Security Act, which created the Transportation Security Administration” (Villemez 2). We can increase security in our own home by providing funds to the military. They will technologically advance our security through various ways. They have always been making newer and different inventions that prevent future possible terrorist attacks. We can fund the military financially

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Defense Reform

    1435 Words  | 3 Pages

    In addition to strategic deployment, the defense budget should be reformed to allocate more money towards specialized, agile units and counterterrorism efforts. By doing so, the United States would be more efficient in fighting the small terrorist groups that pose such a large threat today. In his article supporting defense reform, Berger points out, “many analysts have pointed out in the wake of the September 11, 2001, attacks, future threats to the United States are likely to come from relatively small terrorist organizations and not from state entities which could not realistically defeat us.” The most prevalent danger regarding military within the continental U.S. is not an invasion by another nation, but rather unexpected acts of terror.

    Read More

  • The Collapse of the Soviet Union

    1019 Words  | 3 Pages

    Also, the Soviet Union’s quest to remain a world superpower cost it dearly, as they were hard pressed to keep up with US defense spending under Ronald Reagan. The “Soviet Union was spending a large percentage of its GNP on the military because of the expansion of US spending” (p.3.fsmitha.com). Th...

    Read More

  • United States Military Policy Analysis

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over the decades there have been numerous occasions in which the US has used its Armed Forces abroad in situations of military conflict or conflicts with or without the support of the people. US needs to fully explore all existing national-level policies and other options prior to the involving of our Military forces.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Budget Cuts

    1253 Words  | 3 Pages

    As many budget cuts occur on the governmental level for myriad of reasons, public education can begin to suffer. As this has started to happen with the trillions of dollars of debt accrued by the United States Government many schools have had to cut non-academic classes from their curriculum to correct for the lack of funds. Some of the classes cut due to these funding cuts are vocational classes such as home economics, cooking, wood/metal shop classes, drivers education, and other such trade education. This lack of vocational education is leading to less rounded citizens coming out of public education. I do not personally believe that funding cuts to public education is ever necessary, if anything we should add funds to public schools as an investment in the future of the country by raising the literacy and overall competency of the average citizen. Of all the ways to solve this problem I decided that vocational school or vocational course integration are the best solutions. Though I lean toward vocational course integration I will address the pros and cons of both approaches to this issue.

    Read More

  • Budget Constraints Of Joint Military

    1618 Words  | 4 Pages

    Joint Publication 1(JP 1) define Joint concepts as “examine military problems and propose solutions describing how the joint force, using military art and science, may operate to achieve strategic goals within the context of the anticipated future security environment. Joint concepts lead to military capabilities, both non-materiel and materiel, that significantly improve the ability of the joint force to overcome future challenges.” For future challenges, we can find some clues form the National Military Strategy of USA (NMS2015). The potential challenges include four plus one (Russia, Iran, North Korea and China plus violent extremist organizations (VEOs)) . It is an unprecedented strategic environment which need to fight different type

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Military Sector

    940 Words  | 2 Pages

    Our country operates under a complex civ-mil relation between two different sides of the government: a civilian sector and a military sector. While Dr. Peter Feaver argues the civilian sector should gain more control over the military, an extreme push to that idea may be detrimental to our government. It is important for the military personnel to enjoy some degree of freedom from the civilian counterparts when in an operation, but a complete disregard of the politicians and their expectations and directions may also be critical to the functioning of our government. It is, therefore, crucial to determine and shape the proper balance between two sides of the government rather than empowering one side too much.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of American Soldiers

    1512 Words  | 4 Pages

    A mercenary is a person, usually a former soldier, who gives up his services to foreign nations for money. Over centuries of fighting, mercenaries have been used by nations to fight their wars. The Ancient Greeks, Romans, Medieval kingdoms, Papal States, and all the way up to the modern United States. Mercenaries are the key to war for many nations, around the world. That is why United States and other nations who are fighting against terrorism are better off using mercenaries.

    Read More

  • Terrorism And The Politics Of Fear Analysis

    1357 Words  | 3 Pages

    In “The U.S. Global Military Empire”, Michael Parenti talks about how the U.S. military has become a primary focus for our nation, even above education. The government continues to pour millions of dollars into our military, even after wars such as the Cold War ends, since America has now taken on the unofficial role of the ‘worlds police’. The funding has extended beyond our military forces to private contractors. There contractors cost much more, and are far less effective, however, the reason they are used is to bypass the protocols and policies that comes with a military strike.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of US Military Spending

Open Document