A woman newly turned 18, the year in which adulthood begins, stands at a voting booth to make one of the most important decisions of the year: voting for a president. She runs her hands through her damaged, dyed hair and grins; she ticks a mark, voting for a female president. The young woman is unaware of the candidate's policies, her morals; she only knows the candidate is a woman, too powered by rage to even consider voting for a male. Unfortunately, this was not uncommon in our most recent election; many people voted for a president just based on something as trivial to the matter as their sex. Many people have been demanding change in our voting system due to the most recent election, but there are still many that do not know what the Electoral College, a key factor of the process, is or does. …show more content…
The College is a group of many individuals that act and vote as representatives from their respective state; they vote for presidents in accordance to what the state's people desire.
One perspective on this topic is from Elizabeth Deatrick, who wrote "What is the Electoral College;" a separate duo of authors, Jeffrey Bowman and Tracey M. DiLascio add onto the subject with their article, "Counterpoint: Why We Need the Electoral College." The Electoral College should not be reformed nor abolished because it is a system that works as it was first intended by the Founding Fathers, it would cause trouble in the future if we did put through a bill to change it, and despite the arguments from opposing sides that gripe about how unfair it is to small states, it is impossible to deny that without this system, the opinions from small states would be valued at nothing; if anything, the College protects and aids these states. Ultimately, it comes down to this: we should not fix what is not
broken. A nod of their heads and a signing of a document solidifies the creation of the Electoral College; a system that our Founding Fathers set into motion centuries ago, it even stands to this day. To this day, there are still many people, adults and children alike, that do not know what the Electoral College stands for; they wonder why it must exist, why just voting straight for the president would not be so much more effective. However, these people, these Americans, are uneducated and unknowledgeable in such a topic despite their cries for change and abolition. This brings in the wonderings and questioning; what was the Electoral College meant to do, and does it even accomplish its goals? The Electoral College, according to "What is the Electoral College" by Elizabeth Deatrick, was created as a balancing system that would deter political parties, distrust, as well as promoting voting and election based on ability to govern rather than political agenda. However, it is no secret that political parties had formed during that time period. Infact, contrary to popular belief, political parties had started due to two of the Founding Fathers, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. An important part of this event is to remember that correlation is not causation; the forming of political parties was connected to the Electoral College, but the College did not cause political parties. Distrust and suspicion were also troubles that the Fathers worried about; they were not as worried about cases of mudslinging and self-promotion, but of course, there was no possible way for them to predict technology as advanced as what we have now. Campaigning has become vicious and tricky; lies rest left and right, making it near impossible to control. Was this a fault of the Electoral College? Of course not. The fault lies within society itself; there is absolutely no way a system centuries of years old can control such violent manner. Negatives aside, did the Electoral College manage to achieve what they wished to promote, rather than deter? In a way, yes, candidates have typically been voted for based on how they plan to govern, using their political agenda as a tie-in. Despite the electors being able to vote for whoever they wish rather than what the state they represent desires, "Counterpoint: Why We Need the Electoral College" by Jeffrey Bowman and Tracey M. DiLascio mentions that these electors tended to stay loyal, only a few cases have occurred where they had voted otherwise; they were then rightfully deemed "faithless electors" and fortunately, their dishonorable behavior was not enough to turn the tides of the respective election they took part it. Ultimately, the Electoral College has achieved what it was meant to, and still functions; but what would happen if we did reform or abolish the system? How long would it take? Years into our future, decades, scores, centuries, perhaps even millenniums, begin to fully question our election's lifeblood –the Electoral College. They demand change, they demand destruction, they no longer desire the system that stood against time for centuries. The next question begins to ring for these people; when will they see the change they so desperately fight for? Will it take a mere matter of days? Weeks, perhaps? The truth is, reforming such a key part of our system would take much more than a day's worth of discussion and writing; the system itself is ingrained into our history, created specifically to prevent political parties and distrust. Removing the Electoral College would leave us without other key parts and points; it would make smaller states almost worthless, having so few people compared to colossus California and Texas-esque states. Now states that are powerless and taken with a grain of salt, these states are defenseless against the opposing views of the all-mighty United Titans, seething strength and sway. How does this relate to today; if this is a thing that’s only part of a hypothetical future, why does it matter? Bringing the matter into a more present-day scenario, if it were decided that the United States was to rid itself of the Electoral College this very moment, it would still most definitely take years to fully abolish it. Skipping to that time frame, now the College is gone, roughly around the time of the next election. What now? As votes flood in with pride that their vote matters, it's a deep, dark reality that we the people only managed to kill ourselves; we cut the value of the small states down into microscopic pieces, leaving the towering states of California, New York, and other to dominate the polls, immediately swinging us into a leftist spiral, win after win. Despite these vital key reasons as to why we must preserve the Electoral College, some still make a stand and demand change.
Through these almost 2 and a half centuries since the beginning of the Electoral College there has been a large change in population. Since then, the U.S. has grown from a mere 4 million to a looming number of around 300 million people. It is because of this population increase that the Electoral College has become obsolete and is beginning to fail at its duties. Alexander Hamilton was a Federalist and a supporter of the Electoral College who was quoted as saying “It was also desirable to afford as little opportunity as possible to tumult and disorder/ promise an effectual security against this mischief” (Document #1). The College would have prevented tumult and disorder for
The Electoral College system should be scrapped and be replaced with popular vote because it is unfair. By abolishing the Electoral College and replacing it with popular vote, it would represent citizens equally, it would allow citizens to elect their president just as they elect their governors and senators, and it would motivate and encourage citizens to participate in voting.
The Electoral College is an outdated and unrealistic arrangement that caters to eighteenth century federalist America in a way that is detrimental to modern democracy. The electoral college gives too much power to the government, overlooks equal representation, and creates loopholes that do not serve to help America thrive.
Due to the discrepancy between the winner of the popular vote and the winner of the electoral college in the most recent election, there has been a lot of talk about eliminating the electoral college and moving to a direct popular vote. While many people argue for this shift, usually with little knowledge of what a popular vote election would look like, there are also many citizens who are opposed to the idea. In our polarized political climate, this fact is not surprising. Those who support the electoral college defend it by claiming that it is not only constitutional, but it also represents the whole county, and makes for a more certain, legitimate election process.
The Electoral College was created by the framers at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. They believe that it wasn’t a good idea for the people to elect the president directly because they did not trust that voters would have enough information to make a good choice. The Electoral College basically chooses who the next president will be since it takes away our freedom to vote. The Electoral College should be abolished because it’s undemocratic, the small states are overrepresented, and it hurts third parties. The United States of America is a democratic country that is characterized by the equality of rights and privileges.
The United States of America is often touted as the guiding beacon of democracy for the entirety of the modern world. In spite of this tremendous responsibility the political system of the United States retains some aspects which upon examination appear to be significantly undemocratic. Perhaps the most perplexing and oft misunderstood of these establishments is the process of electing the president and the institution known as the Electoral College. The puzzle of the Electoral College presents the American people with a unique conundrum as the mark of any true democracy is the citizens’ ability to elect their own ruling officials. Unfortunately, the Electoral College system dilutes this essential capacity by introducing an election by
Voting is at the center of every democratic system. In america, it is the system in which a president is elected into office, and people express their opinion. Many people walk into the voting booth with the thought that every vote counts, and that their vote might be the one that matters above all else. But in reality, America’s voting system is old and flawed in many ways. Electoral College is a commonly used term on the topic of elections but few people actually know how it works.
In conclusion, the Electoral College should be abolished because small states are unrepresented, there are many flaws in the system, and it is not accurate based on people 's votes. Overall there seems to be no need for it, it was made for the reason that back then they thought it was a simple way of choosing a president, but really it just causes problems and does not represent the candidates or voters fairly. If America is truly about equality and democracy, then they will abolish the Electoral College and let the people have a
The Electoral College today is a very complex system of voting and campaigning. When it was first created, the Framers thought the average citizen of their day was not intelligent enough to know who should be leading their country. So they created the Electoral College which was run by people who knew what they were doing. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent each state and they determine the president. The real question is: Has the Electoral College gotten too far out of hand where it needs to go? The answer is yes. The reasons are because any third party candidate running in the election has no chance of winning any electoral votes. Also, it gives too much power to the big states in electoral votes. Finally, it creates problems on majority electoral votes and equality of smaller states is diminished.
There are some advantages of the Electoral College such as, it preserves the voices of the states with the lowest population. It also favors a two-party system and dissuades third-parties which creates more stability. Even with all these pros I think without an overhaul that we should eliminate the Electoral College. This would simplify this process and more people would get out and
The United States is a privileged country with freedoms and opportunities many countries strive to achieve. People come into the United States in hopes to obtain these rights and make a better life for themselves; they strive to achieve “The American Dream.” Citizens are given the chance to vote, speak their mind, and live according to their desires without prejudice. However, the same government that promises hope has flaws that frustrate the American people; the Electoral College is one topic of debate. Many feel this system is a safe way to regulate who leads the country, while others feel that issues should be left to popular vote.
As the United States of America gets older, so does the presidential election voting system. The argument to change this method of voting has been becoming more and more popular as the years go on. It has been said that the Framers of the Constitution came up with this method because of the bad transportation, communication, and they feared the public’s intelligence was not suitable for choosing the President of the United States. Others say that the Framers made this method because they feared that the public did not receive sufficient information about candidates outside of their state to make such a decision based on direct popular vote. My research on this controversial issue of politics will look into the factors into why the Electoral College exists and if it is possibly outdated for today’s society. It will look into the pros and cons of this voting system, and it will explore the alternative methods of voting such as the Direct Popular vote. Many scholarly authors have gathered research to prove that this voting system is outdated and it does not accurately represent the national popular will. Many U.S. citizens value their vote because they only get one to cast towards the candidate of their choice in the presidential election. Based on the Electoral College system their vote may possibly not be represented. Because of today’s society in the U.S. the Electoral College should be abolished because it is not necessary to use a middle-man to choose our president for us. It is a vote by the people, all of us having one voice, one vote.
The Electoral College should be abolished because the United States today is much more populous and very different than when the founders wrote the Constitution more than two centuries ago (Raasch 1)...
Beginning at the time the Electoral College was put into place, many debated over its pros and cons. As time has gone on, more and more people have begun to show support for a change in the system (Saad 2013). After George W. Bush defeated AL Gore in the 2000 election by losing popular vote, but winning the college, leading to a “legal recount contest”, many began to question the fairness of the college (Cohen, 2010). This marked the “third time in the nation’s history” the less popular candidate has taken office (Longley). However, the Electoral College should remain in place because it ensures the continuation of a Representative Democracy, maintains a two party system, and because currently no plausible plan has been produced as a means of replacement.
Primarily, the current system of voting helps me achieve my American Dream by giving me access to choose the adequate candidate. By choosing the right candidate it provides us with a better future for my family and I. According to the article “Pros and Cons of the Electoral College” it states, “It directs more power to the states. States are given the power to select the delegates to the Electoral College, allowing them to participate in the selection of a president. It maintains the representative form of government, according to the U.S. Election Atlas.” In other words it's trying to say that the states are given the chance to chose the candidate that will become the next president. In addition the article “What are the Advantages and Disadvantages