Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on electronic health records solutions
Essay on electronic health records solutions
Introduction to electronic health records
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on electronic health records solutions
Ultimately, the Dutch healthcare system is a very practical system to possible be instituted within the US, but lacks one key aspect that would drastically increase the efficiency of the system. Currently the Dutch health system is attempting to establish complexly electronic file but currently they are not complete and thus the national health system lags behind France and Germany that both have completely electronic health records and payment and thus with over 300,000,000 citizens to coordinate care for, it is more intelligent to have electronic records. This is why France and Germany are slightly more practical for the United States to reduce complexity. To the immediate south-east lies, according to the World Health Organization, the …show more content…
Much like how US healthcare operates today, there is no Gatekeeper system in place in France where citizen are required to be evaluated by a General Practitioner prior to seeing a specialist(). There is however, an incentive for citizen to first see a GP. If the citizen see a GP and then is refereed to ta specialist insurance will cover seventy percent of the bill where if not only sixty percent is covered (Reid 54). Yet, a key issue with the current US system is the fact that it does not possess a gatekeeper system and thus care is often uncoordinated. According to Thomas Bodenheimer in his textbook, Understanding Health Policy, the key task of primary care (thus GPs) is: one, be the first point of contact, two, to be longitudinal, three, to be comprehensive, and fouth, to coordinate the care of the patient. Therefore, if the United States wished to adopt a system similar to the French then it would be intelligent to alter it by adding a gatekeeper like system to properly coordinate the care of patients and thus reduce the total cost of care in the long …show more content…
Healthcare is guaranteed to all eight-two million citizen as well as to visitors and “guest workers legal or not” (Reid 67). The care delivered is completely comprehensive with very small cost to the citizens. Much like how the United States and France currently offer healthcare, employers offer and pay the bulk of the cost (Reid 70). However, unique to the German system patients pay a monthly adjustable fee of fifteen percent of their income (Reid 74). Furthermore at the time of Reid’s book, citizens had to pay the equivalent of $13.00 per quarter before the comprehensive health insurance would kick in (Reid 77). Therefore, this provides a small disincentive for individuals to overuse the service just because it is free while also making it affordable enough that individuals still seek care if they require
An analysis of the US and Canada’s systems reveals advantages and drawbacks within each structure. While it is apparent that both countries could benefit from the adoption of portions of the others system, Canada’s healthcare system offers several benefits over the US system.
While most countries around the world have some form of universal national health care system, the United States, one of the wealthiest countries in the world, does not. There are much more benefits to the U.S. adopting a dorm of national health care system than to keep its current system, which has proved to be unnecessarily expensive, complicated, and overall inefficient.
In comparison, Germany spent slightly more than 11% of GDP (2011) towards healthcare funding. Universal health insurance is available to everybody with an option to purchase private insurance coverage (The U.S. Health Care System: An International Perspective, 2014). Approximately 90% of the population uses the national system in which premiums are income based. The system uses 240 private insurers for a non-profit, competitive system. Insurance costs are significantly less than the U.S. due to cost negotiations for medical facilities, appointments, and prescription medications (Sick Around the World, 2008).
When you take the socialistic perspective towards implementing this system in Canada, you can see the advantages it brings to improving health care. If the government plays a larger role in funding the development of electronic health records for private and smaller organizations the benefits will immediately result in better quality of health care. As shown in a study done by the University of California in San Francisco that focused on expensive costs that make it difficult for smaller practices to incorporate electronic health records, “need policies designed to provide incentives and support services to help practices improve the quality of their care by using EHRs.” (Miller, West, Brown, Sim & Ganchoff, 2005) In this article they explain that electronic health records improve quality of health care, but the costs are too expensive for small practices to incorporate them.
Regardless of technological advancement, life-saving skills and abilities and first-world resources, the outlandish cost of healthcare in the United States far surpasses any other country in the world. From price gouging, to double billing, to overbilling, to inefficient and expensive operations, the United States wastes $750 billion every year through our healthcare system. According to the Institute of Medicine (IOM), $200 billion of that astronomical number is due to nothing more than administrative waste. It is estimated that 15 cents of every dollar spent on healthcare is wasted due to inefficient administrative practices.
Out of all the industrialized countries in the world, the United States is the only one that doesn’t have a universal health care plan (Yamin 1157). The current health care system in the United States relies on employer-sponsored insurance programs or purchase of individual insurance plans. Employer-sponsored coverage has dropped from roughly 80 percent in 1982 to a little over 60 percent in 2006 (Kinney 809). The government does provide...
The regionalized model organizes levels of care into primary care, secondary care, and tertiary care (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2012). Primary care would be general practitioners, who make up the majority of physicians in Great Britain, secondary care would be physicians specializing in areas like internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology and general surgeries (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2012). Tertiary care specialists include cardiac surgeons, immunologists, and pediatric hematologists, and they work at a few highly specialized medical centers (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2012). Hospitals are also organized in a similar fashion, with district hospitals serving local communities, and regional tertiary care medical centers providing highly specialized care services (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2012). While some think that dispersed model of care provides flexibility and convenience, others find the regionalized model of care to be more organized and less expensive (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2012). I have to agree with the supporters of the regionalized model of care because I would rather have a few different doctors look at me and decide on the best course of action than go straight to the cardiac surgeon. Care should be planned for a patient in a way that the patient only receives services that he or she requires, and organizing our health care delivery model in a different way can help us attain cost containment and ensure that the patient does not get unnecessary
Newman, Alex. “Examining Healthcare: A Look Around the Globe at Nationalized Systems.” The New American. 15 Sep. 2008: 10. eLibrary. Web. 04 Nov. 2013.
The U.S. healthcare system is very complex in structure hence it can be appraised with diverse perspectives. From one viewpoint it is described as the most unparalleled health care system in the world, what with the cutting-edge medical technology, the high quality human resources, and the constantly-modernized facilities that are symbolic of the system. This is in addition to the proliferation of innovations aimed at increasing life expectancy and enhancing the quality of life as well as diagnostic and treatment options. At the other extreme are the fair criticisms of the system as being fragmented, inefficient and costly. What are the problems with the U.S. healthcare system? These are the questions this opinion paper tries to propound.
The United States health care system is one of the most expensive systems in the world yet it is known as being unorganized and chaotic in comparison to other countries (Barton, 2010). This factor is attributed to numerous characteristics that define what the U.S. system is comprised of. Two of the major indications are imperfect market conditions and the demand for new technology (Barton, 2010). The health care system has been described as a free market in
The US health system has both considerable strengths and notable weaknesses. With a large and well-trained health workforce, access to a wide range of high-quality medical specialists as well as secondary and tertiary institutions, patient outcomes are among the best in the world. But the US also suffers from incomplete coverage of its population, and health expenditure levels per person far exceed all other countries. Poor measures on many objective and subjective indicators of quality and outcomes plague the US health care system. In addition, an unequal distribution of resources across the country and among different population groups results in poor access to care for many citizens. Efforts to provide comprehensive, national health insurance in the United States go back to the Great Depression, and nearly every president since Harry S. Truman has proposed some form of national health insurance.
Niles, N. J. (2011). Basics of the U.S. health care system. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
In the 1800’s, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Belgium, among others, began to establish “socialized insurance policies” and medical care, which are still in effect today, while at the same time, the United States began to furthe...
In America the affordability and equality of access to healthcare is a crucial topic of debate when it comes to one's understanding of healthcare reform. The ability for a sick individual to attain proper treatment for their ailments has reached the upper echelons of government. Public outcry for a change in the handling of health insurance laws has aided in the establishment of the Affordable Healthcare Law (AHCL) to ensure the people of America will be able to get the medical attention they deserve as well as making that attention more affordable, as the name states. Since its creation, the AHCL has undergone scrutiny towards its effects on the government and its people; nevertheless, the new law must not be dismantled due to its function as a cornerstone of equal-opportunity healthcare, and if such a removal is allowed, there will be possibly detrimental effects on taxes, the economy, and poor people.
It is interesting with how different America’s health care is from everyone else in the world. Most are universal, required to have health care. We are trying to accomplish that in America, but many don’t like being taxed if they don’t have it. There definitely is a lot we can learn from other countries. Overall Switzerland has a great system set up, with the United Kingdom behind them. Japan is also on track. America is definitely trying to make head way, and eventually will. It all comes down to weighing what is most important, cost, quality, or access to health care.