Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Apollo 11 conspiracy theory essay
Apollo 11 conspiracy theory essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Unfortunately, the Apollo mission to the moon is not fully accepted by all of humanity. There are conspiracies about a lot of information, especially when the information’s source is NASA. Well, when it incorporates the dual missions of LRO and LCROSS the conspiracies are rather amusing. After some research, it seems that the common theory was that the satellite and orbiter were both sent into space as a weapon with a murderous mission instead. This is when critical thinking becomes important because the science behind these conspiracies are slim to none thus, you just can’t believe everything nowadays. For instance, the official statement from NASA about this dual mission was that LCROSS’s impact into a crater would help determine he presence
or absence of water. Now, because LCROSS’s path to the moon ends in a particular crater some conspiracy theorists refused to accept that it had anything to do about searching for water. Therefore, their conclusion was that LCROSS was actually sent carrying a small nuclear device and its intention was to destroy an alien base instead. However, October 2009 LCROSS fulfilled its mission originally announced by NASA. Since the impact sire was located on the dark side of the moon observers could not verify LCROSS carrying a nuclear payload. Of course, even though this even was streamed live some believed the feed was manufactured as a result, the existence of a bomb on LCROSS goes unknown.
As long as there is love, there will be hatred; as long as there is peace, there will be war, and as long as there is a positive side, there is a negative side. During the Second World War, the Nazis were very powerful. Due to the fear of the Nazis, Americans started a project called “The Manhattan Project" in order to build a very deadly weapon that could even blow cities apart. The allied powers were so concerned with Nazi domination, that they never considered the outcomes of creating an atomic bomb which are also positive and negative.
As a result of the successful mission that landed the first men on the moon, called the Apollo 11 mission, many people were inspired to provide commentary on this landing. Although these texts describe unique individual purposes about this landing, they all effectively support their purposes through the use of several rhetorical devices.
The following four texts apart of the Culminating Activity were all related to the Apollo 11 mission in 1969, which had first put a man on the moon. The first article was from the Times of London, and served to describe the events of the moon landing from the astronaut's point of view. The article used anecdotal evidence to describe Aldrin and Armstrong's experience in order to inform the audience of what had occurred, as well as the reactions in several different countries.. The speaker is a from a reputable news source, The Times, and is informing the European audience - as this event was apart of America’s space program, NASA - of the landing as a great success. Although
John F. Kennedy once said, "No nation which expects to be the leader of other nations can expect to stay behind in this race for space...We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard”. The main motive for this quote was to ensure that the United States wanted to beat out the Soviets in the space race. Ever since the Soviets tried to advance on the moon, the United States wanted to be the first successful nation to accomplish the first ever moon landing. At the time, the tension between the United States and the Soviets was very strong because the Cold War just ended and neither nation wanted to lose to each other in the space race. Just as the United States planned their mission to the moon, the Soviets were the very first nation to ever settle on space. The U.S. as well as President Kennedy were shocked to see the Soviets be the first nation to fly in space. The United States had to come up with a plan in order to beat out the soviets, by becoming the very first nation to ever land on the moon. Overall, it is clear that the United States hoaxed the moon landing in order to beat out the Soviet Union in the space race through observations, evidence from a Hollywood studio, and allowing NASA to pull off the Apollo mission.
Decisions are the hardest thing to do, especially considering how Harry Truman decided to drop the US Atomic bombs onto Okinawa and Iwo Jima. The role to end the war with Japan was in his hands, but it would require releasing the most horrendous weapon ever known. Although, there was some controversy over Truman’s decision. Some people say that it was unnecessary to use the Atomic bombs, such as the Federal Council of Churches and the Christian Faith. They stated that: “As American Christians, we are deeply penitent for the irresponsible use already made of the atomic bomb. We are agreed that, whatever be one’s judgment of the war in principle, the surprise bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are morally indefensible. ("8 Primary Pros and Cons of Dropping the Atomic Bomb")” People also
There are many conspiracies that people say have happened at the Roswell crash in the summer of 1947 in Roswell New Mexico. Nobody knows what really happened at the crash in Roswell New Mexico but, many people say that the thing that had crashed there was a UFO and or a flying saucer which mean there being aliens. Even after 50 years the people still do not know what happened and for everybody that doesn’t know were going to go deeper into what really happened. This incident had caused a lot of chaos with the Air force and the people.
Plait, Phil. A. & Co. Fox TV and the Apollo Moon Hoax." Bad Astronomy. 3 Dec. 2001. 6 Dec. 2001 <http://www.badastronomy.com/>.
One of the most controversial decisions that have been made, in the history of the United States, was Harry Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on the two Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The ever so controversial topic of the dropping of the atomic bombs has successfully driven people insane. People feel strongly that this decision was atrocious and unnecessary, while others believe the polar opposite, that it was completely necessary. Some historians argue that the human cost to the Japanese population can never justify the use of such weapons. Other historians see it from an optimistic perspective, that it would not have been moral if atomic weapons had not been used to end the war as quickly as possible. President Harry S.
The fact that the United States resolved to drop an atomic bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan shocked many people, including U.S. citizens. The U.S. chose a brutal weapon when choosing the atomic bomb, as proven by the thousands of deaths it caused. Today, some people still question the motives for such a ruthless choice of weaponry. The atomic bomb, however destructive and questionable, seemed to be the only way to ensure “unconditional surrender” of the Japanese. The atomic bomb was, in fact, “a clear step designated to force Japan’s unconditional surrender;” however, this statement fails to give attention to the larger picture that influenced the U.S.’s decision to use the atomic bomb. By using the atomic bomb before any other nation
On August 6, 1945, the U.S. dropped the world’s first atomic bomb over Hiroshima. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. On August 15th, the Japan announced unconditional surrender in World War II. To this day historians still discuss why the U.S. decided to use the atomic bombs. Orthodox historians argue that the decision to drop the bombs was a military one designed purely to defeat the Japanese. Revisionist historians argue that the bombs were not needed to defeat Japan; the bombs were meant to shape the peace by intimidating the Soviets. After analyzing the documents in The Manhattan Project it has become clear that the U.S. used the bombs during WWII not only to defeat the Japanese, but also to intimidate the Soviet Union
At first, I wasn't sure what to think. When I first saw a Fox story attempting to persuade it's viewers that the moon landing was a hoax, I decided to do some research on this whole hoax theory. After viewing numerous articles and web sites, I concluded the HBs were absolutely wrong! Many of their theories are easily proven wrong and are pretty ridiculous after a little analyzing. Also, it seems pretty outrageous that the government spent billions of dollars on a bunch of crap. How in the world would such a huge conspiracy stay covered up after 30 years with so many people having to be in on it?
Do you believe in the moon landing conspiracy? There are various theories that skeptics have used to attempt to accuse NASA of faking the Apollo moon landings, although all these simple explanations will prove these theories wrong. The moon landing conspiracy was “claimed” to be a hoax since it was the only time the U.S. has ever landed on the moon was under Nixon’s administration, and the reason for this is after we finally made it to the moon the interest for the USSR else to make it there died out just like the flow of money that had been invested into the missions; skeptics attempt to say that it was faked since even with the technological advances we haven’t been back to the moon, but this is easily proven wrong by simply stating that the lower-orbit missions have potential elsewhere for military purposes. When Apollo 11 landed, it was resting on top of a rock with a thin layer of sand. Skeptics wonder why there are numerous footprints of the astronauts while there is no evidence of the lunar module.
I personally believe that the US landed on the moon. I will prove my point throughout this essay by providing evidence, such as proving the facts that don’t support my claim to be wrong, and the facts that support my side to be correct. So those of you on my side here’s some evidence to help you out. Those of you not, keep on reading and you’ll see what I
These past decades, NASA has advanced so far from where we started at from 1958. From that time, we have made countless spectacular achievement NASA is now known for today. From our infamous Moon mission ¨Apollo 11¨, where Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Edwin Buzz Aldrin, went 4 days into space to finally land on the Moon and place the United States in a global stardom of being the first to go to the Moon. Since then, we have improved from what we gathered back from the Apollo mission and advance for the upcoming plans to go to Mars. One of those issues was how to sustain the astronauts in space where there are no chefs, doctors, or a local grocery store to get food from every day. Everything is carefully calculated on what they predict
Since the dawn of human civilization, people have explored almost everywhere around the world in some way, including space. Astronauts have based their job description on research and exploration, which does sounds entertaining, but the hazards and work involved are dangerous itself. Education for these individuals is difficult but worth it if he/she would want to go to space and go research. The work environment is either small or scary depending on what kind of person they are, and might be sick or exciting for some people. Without astronauts and people to explore the boundary of the galaxy, we would be without knowledge of things outside of the people's world, making them beneficial to society .