Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role the media plays in election essay
Rhetorical analysis of the 3rd presidential debate
Essay on presidential debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role the media plays in election essay
As a people we should keep in mind that, the candidates running for president are very intelligent people who have run successful campaigns. There are two sides to every coin and these two candidates each have their own side of the coin arguing the validity of each. Each side has its own merits and faults, and they have been debated for as long as our nation has stood. Both are valid arguments and we should be conscious of this but one of the candidates does not rise up to the standards of a valid argument. They have based their campaigns on exploiting the public’s fear of the government and appealing to ignorance. They have taken the majestic beauty of America and warped it into a dismal vision. They have divided us on how we view America,
beauteous or hideous. We can not permit this to continue in our politics, as it only serves to distract from pressing issues. In these actions, Donald Trump is very clearly guilty. We as a people should not be proud that this candidate has support let alone that he is the candidate of one of this nation’s major political parties. We should have respect for the voters that have fallen into the trap of his messages but also consider how intentional his manipulation is. Donald Trump is either a charlatan or willfully ignorant of the topics he claims to be knowledgeable of. If he is the latter, I can not claim to know why he has chosen to ignore facts and live in the delusions the conservative conspiracists peddle, however I believe his actions show that he is indeed a swindler of colossal proportions. He is caught in a lie almost every single week and yet continues to do well in the polls. Are we supposed to trust a man who is fact checked live everytime he speaks? I certainly don’t think so. I believe our candidates should be more responsible in their presentation of facts and we should hold them accountable when they are not.
In the United States, the government has been run as a “representative” democracy. With every presidency comes change, however, one thing does not change and that is the State of the Union Address. Every President is tasked with giving a speech to address the state of the country specifically on the economy and the current budget. The speech is supposed to give American citizens a sense of hope, comradery, and belief that the leader of the free world is making every effort to make this country better for all who are apart of it. However, with the newly elected President, during his State of the Union Address he promoted division and intentional attacks towards immigrant in the United States.
It is obvious the Republican Party has no brains. If they elect Donald Trump to run for president, they are going to lose big time. They can blame themselves for being so stupid. The establishment runs the Republican Party. They are the ones who lose major elections. The leadership of the Republican Party shifts the blame to conservative wing of the Republican Party; however, it is the moderate wing of the Republican Party who loses elections. Does John McClain ring a bell? If the Republican Party hopes to win the presidency, they must run a conservative or face another trouncing in the next election. It is that simple. Therefore, the Republicans had better wake up fast if they want to
majority of the states, and those that were on the ballot in a majority of
The Strengths and Weaknesses of the System of Choosing Presidential Candidates It seems reasonable to conjecture that the Achilles' heel of the modern presidency is one of recruitment. The long-winded delegate nomination process could in theory be replaced by a daylong direct election of presidential candidates. Instead, tradition dictates that the presidential race is drawn out quadrennially over the pre-primary, primary, Party Convention and campaign seasons. All four phases influence the outcome of candidate selection and much also depends on campaign finance, the role of the media and the nominees themselves.
Ever since the election season of 1972, presidential primaries have become “the dominant means of selecting the two major party candidates.”i[i] The primary system is one in which the eligible voters of each state do one of the following: 1) Vote for a presidential candidate to run for their party in the general election. 2) Vote for a delegate pledged to vote for a certain candidate at the party’s national convention. As intended, this process would bring the candidate selection processes out into the open and “let the people vote for the candidate of their choice.”ii[ii] On the surface, this may look very democratic (and admittedly, in some instances it was/is), but upon closer examination, it becomes overwhelmingly clear that the candidates are chosen long before the people cast their vote. The culprit: the structure of the presidential primary system.
In the Electoral College system, every state has one electoral vote for each congressman and senator. Congressman is allotted by population and every state has two senators, so Rhode Island, which has basically nobody in it, has three electoral votes. California, with 53 representatives and two senators, has 55 electoral votes. The states choose electors and the electors meet in what is called the Electoral College to pick a president. In practice, nearly every state has passed a law that the electors will all vote for the popular vote winner in their state, but as the Supreme Court said in Bush v. Gore, the people of the United States do not have a constitutional right to pick the president. A state could, if it felt like it, select the electors
Today’s leading news stories range from sports to overseas affairs, and from these Americans must decide what is important to our nation. Governor George W. Bush tries to make this decision a little easier in his announcement of candidacy on June 12, 1999 in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Like most candidates in an election, Bush’s main purpose is to present his ideas to a large audience and convince them that he is the man that can change the presidency. Governor Bush offers his opinion on free trade, our current military power, and drawing a moral line in politics. Bush speaks elegantly to his intended audience, which consists of his loyal supporters and those interested in changing America’s political scene with a “compassionate president.” At the same time he tends to exclude people who haven’t kept up with his agenda or that are not in the market for significant political transformation. Overall, Bush gives sufficient information to back up his claims. Only reading the speech would not indicate this, but exploring his website provides background information and family history, and is all done with a friendly, inviting tone. The effort made by Bush to run and manage this campaign exemplifies a caring and committed candidate and produces an effective rhetorical argument.
Because Donald Trump wanted to become a Presidential Candidate to shake up America and our way of choosing a Commander in Chief he has taken the focus off of other candidates. To me, he has done just that. In turn, he has also showcased a lot of his ignorant behavior and poor attitudes towards others. Eventually, this will affect how America votes; against Donald Trump. Furthermore, Donald Trump lacks a Presidential form of social interaction. This candidate appears to be impatient when others challenge his position on facts versus his opinions. When he dislikes someone politically or personally, Trump uses his popular attack-mode tactics to make his point. Repeatedly Donald Trump fails to be intellectually stimulating as a Presidential Candidate. Often he has a habit of stating his offensive
This is the essay for any person with open-minded views has been begging to write for the sake of their sanity, on the subject. This is due to the fact that incivilities in the media are always present anymore. These, are described in the book, In Your Face Politics, by Diana Mutz. She explains the problems put forth with having views yelled, ranted, and crammed into the face of the public. She, postulates the idea, that these overt opinions cause confrontation, with people that have opposing viewpoints. So with that, given the opportunity to express an opinion on a candidate with opposing viewpoints will give a person great satisfaction. Here is a chance to explain why, Mr. Donald Trump, is a fear mongering, under educated force and what that means for the American public.
In the midst of one of the most controversial presidential elections in history, both political parties are struggling to prove that their candidate is the best choice. Clinton and Trump’s disapproval ratings are very low, but one has to ask, is there really a lesser evil to choose from? While Clinton has had her own fair share of past discrepancies, Trump’s track record proves much more troublesome. Donald Trump has proven to be an untrustworthy presidential candidate because of his misogynistic actions, his racial bias, and his corrupt business history.
Not a day goes past that without hearing about the presidential candidates. The local polls, debates, drama, and the daily attacks people in the political parties. I hear this information whether I want too or not. One can always be up to date when it comes to the upcoming election either on the television news, or radio, and reading about it in the daily newspaper. And the presidential election seems to be what everyone is talking about or using social media to express their own personal sides. Why wouldn’t it be? It’s not like every year we get a new commander and chief. The presidential election is something that Americans looks forward to every four years. People across our nation get to vote and be part of our great democracy in the
There has been a lot of fuss over the issue of illegal immigration. It truly is one of America’s biggest problems, in my opinion. This has been an issue in our country for years and it is about time we resolve the issue. The two of our 2016 candidates had very different views on the situation and both felt very strongly about it.
This presidential election is the first time since 1996 a republican candidate has trailed by fewer than 13 points in Texas, and no Democrat has ever won Texas since Carter in 1976 (Content Display Issues). This election is a crazy one that I will always remember there have been a lot of swings this year mainly because of the new information that we keep finding out from each candidate. This election is wide open for any bodies taking, because every day you see new information about the candidates. You turn on the television and are talking about Clinton’s emails or some lady claiming something about Trump. These are for sure not two of the best candidates for President, but we don’t seem to have another choice. One of these people will be
The presidential nomination process refers to an indirect type of election which registered voters among the United States citizens in all the states including Washington D.C do cast their votes to elect members of the United States Electrical College, popularly called electors. The elected electors then do cast their votes directly in their states which are called electoral votes. The electoral votes are used to elect both the vice president and the president (Steger and Wayne 2012).
Even though this year’s candidates are not the best, they are still well educated people who are able to run our country. For example, Trump is a major business major who knows exactly how to deal with money. The United States alone is drowning right now in million dollars of debt. Some people believe he would help America become great again and help reduce poverty. Hillary has also been around politics nearly her whole life, especially since her husband was former President in 1993 to 2001. Both candidates are either really knowledgeable in politics or with