Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Political party polarization
Party polarization essay
Political party polarization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
America is often described as a place of endless opportunity, somewhere dreams actually come to life. Over the centuries the United States has nurtured nearly every nationality in the world. However, due to the growing population of citizens and the lack of empathy, crime rates are on the rise, specifically those that devastate communities and shock the world. Seen as the world’s leading figure in democracy, the United States is suffering from mass violence due to party polarization and irresponsible government officials. Party polarization is commonly viewed as a dividing factor in the United States government and is the root cause of many Congressional issues, such as the inability to pass legislation quickly. This social phenomenon arises …show more content…
when members of society have a set of beliefs that strongly adheres to one political party’s ideology and hold a level of distrust of the other political party. For example, in a study conducted by Dylan Minor in 2015, summarized by Roberta Holland, they survey groups of people to test whether it is belief or taste that drives people to trust others who belong in a different political party.
Minor comes to the conclusion that if one participant shares the same beliefs as another, they are more likely to trust them. Faith in the other political party is important when it comes time for elections because the officials who are voted into office dictate what path the government will move toward. The less likely an electorate trusts a candidate from the other party, the likelier they will vote for a candidate who holds more extreme beliefs from their party. From that point forward, compromise in Congress is almost impossible to reach, limiting the amount of work they are able to get done. For instance, in the aftermath of an act of mass violence …show more content…
there is typically a large public outcry for change, whether it be for gun control or stricter travel security. Because of this deadlock in passing legislation, rarely anything is done in Congress. Furthermore, this delay in introducing new laws allows for even more acts of mass violence to occur in the country without an end point in sight. Party polarization leads to a strong sense of partisanship throughout the whole country, hindering Congress’ ability to work efficiently, therefore threatening the lives of its citizens. The three branches of the United States government are equally important, but the branch most reflective of the American public is the legislative branch.
There are two main theories of how legislators should represent their constituents: the delegate representation, where constituents tell the elected official how to vote and what to vote on, and the trustee representation, where the elected official votes according to what they believe to be best for their constituents. While there are still several legislators who practice the delegate theory of representation, many in Congress practice the trustee theory of representation due to the terrifying power of interest groups. These groups consistently donate large sums of money to legislators who vote in their favor, then those same legislators use that money for their campaign funds. The dependency upon interest groups to pay for campaigning, alongside intense partisanship, plays a crucial role in illustrating why there are not as many laws limiting the purchasing of guns, weapons of mass destruction, or even the consumption of sugar. Furthermore, the act of gerrymandering makes it even more difficult for Congress to pass any new legislation. Congressional districts are redrawn to accurately portray the current population of people living in a specific area based off the most recent census. The states each have different legal measurements and restrictions for redrawing congressional district lines, as outlined in their state
constitution, however, a large majority of the time the lines will be redrawn in favor of the majority party of the state legislature, giving one party a greater advantage than the other (“Who Draws the Maps?”). Gerrymandering is a practice that pervades both major political parties in America. It creates an immense balance in the government because it gives the majority party in the state the opportunity to elect more members of their party into office and to pass legislation that benefits their agenda. Because of this, both sides of the political spectrum distrust each other more, leading to a more polarized party system. Although the United States is a world superpower and a protector of democracy, the government is failing to protect its citizens from mass violence. Through an intense ideological divide between political parties and legislators who are motivated by their own goals, mass death of American citizens is allowed to continue.
8.In order for political success, both sides of the political spectrum must be critically examined in order to omit mistakes and for cultural advancement. Over two hundred years of United States politics have seen many changes. The names of parties may have changed, but the bi-partisan feature of the party-system has not. Republicans and Democrats are our two major partisan groups in present day America. Sometimes there are disagreement amongst party members that lead to dispute and a less concentrated effort. That is the beauty of a democracy, everyone is allowed to put their two cents worth in.
There has been much speculation whether political parties have become too strong in American politics and if that is a good or bad thing. My belief is that political party power in the United States is just about right where I believe that there are some instances where political parties have been in situations where they have too much power and instances where it is moderate. First off, political parties are crucial to our democratic government because it is composed of a group of people that the constituents elect to represent their issues or achieve a common goal. Being part of a group that shares your common interests or goals is more powerful than tackling an issue by your self. It gives you more voice and power in government. Also, political
If you have ever seen the 435 congressional districts on a map you would probably think to yourself that it resembles something similar to one giant jigsaw puzzle. These districts vary in size and certainly in shape. Unlike how county lines are decided within states, the congressional districts change every ten years after the Census is released. Why do they have to change exactly? Well, the answer to that question receives the same frustrating answer heard again and again: It’s politics. The official name for the act of changing congressional lines to benefit a political party is “gerrymandering.” It has been the cause of many debates as well as many negative effects. Gerrymandering has had an unfair advantage in politics throughout history, as it has tarnished the system and should be changed.
In the United States of America, there are a number of national issues that go unresolved and become more of a major issue subsequently. The lack of resolution in some of our nation’s most critical issues is due to the lack of a common ground between opposing political parties. Issues such as healthcare, climate change, abortion, same-sex marriage, taxes and welfare are reoccurring problems in the United States due to congressional gridlock. The cause of congressional gridlock can be attributed to the difference in liberal and conservative views, which can be further examined through some of the nation’s most prominent reoccurring issues such as immigration and gun control.
Every ten years after a census, politicians redraw the district boundaries that determine the house and state legislature. The problem with this system is that the same politicians who redraw the district boundaries are the ones who are being elected by the
The United States of America has engaged in the battle known as political polarization since before its foundation in 1776. From the uprising against the powerful British nation to the political issues of today, Americans continue to debate about proper ideology and attempt to choose a side that closely aligns with their personal beliefs. From decade to decade, Americans struggle to determine a proper course of action regarding the country as a whole and will often become divided on important issues. Conflicts between supporters of slavery and abolitionists, between agriculturalists and industrialists, and between industrial workers and capitalists have fueled the divide. At the Congressional level there tends to be a more prevalent display of polarization and is often the blame of Congress’ inefficiency. James Madison intentionally designed Congress to be inefficient by instating a bicameral legislation. Ambition would counter ambition and prevent majority tyranny. George Washington advised against political parties that would contribute to polarization and misrepresentation in his Farewell Address of 1796. Washington warns, “One of the expedients of party to acquire influence within particular districts is to misrepresent the opinions and aims of other districts.” Today, the struggle to increase power between political parties results in techniques to gain even the smallest marginal gains. To truly understand political polarization, we must examine data collected through a variety of means, the effects of rapidly changing technology, and observe what techniques are used to create such a polarized political system.
In American politics today, many practices exist that greatly harm the American public. One of these dangerous practices, known as gerrymandering, occurs in nearly every state. While some claim that the practice helps America, in reality gerrymandering harms American democracy and safety. Gerrymandering greatly affects society, and must become illegal to insure fair representation, the democratic processes in America continues, and America continues to thrive.
A two-party system is a political system in which only two parties have a realistic opportunity to compete effectively for control. As a result, all, or nearly all, elected officials end up being a member in one of the two major parties. In a two-party system, one of the parties usually holds a majority in the legislature hence, being referred to as the majority party while the other party is the minority party. The United States of America is considered to be a two-party system. A two-party system emerged early in the history of the new Republic. Beginning with the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans in the late 1780s, two major parties have dominated national politics, although which particular two parties has changed with the times and issues. During the nineteenth century, the Democrats and Republicans emerged as the two dominant parties in American politics. As the American party system evolved, many third parties emerged, but few of them remained in existence for very long. Today the Democrats and Republican still remain as the dominant parties. These two parties hav...
Gerrymandering is very essential in our society because it entitles equal representation of seats that represents each district. No state will have too many seats nor too little depending on the census, which is conducted every ten years. Gerrymandering is a method that filters too little representation or too much representation. This term brings a balance of representation to not just the districts, but to the House of Representatives. It is important that each states district has an equal representation because one state can dominant another when it comes to passing, voting, or creating new laws. Our society since the days of our founding fathers spoke about equal representation. However, from reading this issue our society is still struggling with the issue of equal representation.
There is much debate in the United States whether or not there is polarization between our two dominate political parties. Presidential election results have shown that there is a division between the states; a battle between the Democratic blue states and the Republican red states. And what is striking is that the “colors” of these states do not change. Red stays red, and blue stays blue. Chapter 11 of Fault Lines gives differing views of polarization. James Wilson, a political science professor at Pepperdine University in California, suggests that polarization is indeed relevant in modern society and that it will eventually cause the downfall of America. On the contrast, Morris Fiorina, a political science professor at Stanford University, argues that polarization is nothing but a myth, something that Americans should not be concerned with. John Judis, a senior editor at The New Republic, gives insight on a driving force of polarization; the Tea Party Movement. Through this paper I will highlight the chief factors given by Wilson and Judis which contribute to polarization in the United States, and will consider what factors Fiorina may agree with.
Today, political parties can be seen throughout everyday life, prevalent in various activities such as watching television, or seeing signs beside the road while driving. These everyday occurrences make the knowledge of political parties commonly known, especially as the two opposing political parties: the Republicans and the Democrats. Republican and Democrats have existed for numerous years, predominantly due to pure tradition, and the comfort of the ideas each party presents. For years, the existence of two political parties has dominated the elections of the president, and lower offices such as mayor, or the House of Representatives. Fundamentally, this tradition continues from the very emergence of political parties during the election of 1796, principally between Federalist John Adams and Anti-federalist Thomas Jefferson. Prior to this election people unanimously conformed to the ideas of one man, George Washington, and therefore did not require the need for political parties.1 However, following his presidency the public was divided with opposing opinions, each arguing the best methods to regulate the country. Ultimately, the emergence of different opinions regarding the future of the United States involving the economy, foreign relations, ‘the masses,’ and the interpretation of the Constitution, led to the two political parties of the 1790s and the critical election of 1800.
Terror is rising day by day all over the world, and United States is no exception. There have been mass shootings at schools, shopping malls, music concerts and even at a movie theatre. So far, there have been 398 mass shootings recorded only in the past 50 years which resulted in 1996 deaths and 2488 people injured[1]. According to Van Dorn et al., a history of childhood abuse, binge drinking, and male gender are all predictive risk factors for serious violence[2]. The average number of genocides is 7 per year for last 50 years which took 39 lives and 48 person injuries per year[1]. These incidents affect the society on a high rate which in turn contributes for such situations again indirectly.
Gun violence has been and continues to be one of the major problems in American. The U.S. has the highest rate of gun ownership in the world and consequently the highest rate of gun violence and fatalities compared to other developed countries. In a study by the University of Sydney it is estimated that there are 270,000,000 to 310,000,000 guns in the United States. According to the same study in 2010 there were 31,672 fatalities caused by firearms and on the following year the number went up to 32,163. Homicides resulting from guns are high in the United States and they are claiming more than eleven thousand lives every year (Guns in the United States: Firearms, Armed Violence and Gun Law). According to Vision for Humanity, an initiative for the Economics and Peace, the United States is ranked 99 out of 162 countries in the 2013 global peace index, homicide rates and violent crimes are among the various criteria used to determine the ranking (Vision of Humanity). Mass shootings at work places, schools, shopping malls and places of worship are happening in an a...
Violence in America is a problem, and it is a problem that should be addressed. However,
“Political polarization”, the seemingly growing gap between liberals (Democrats) and Conservatives (Republicans), has become something many people use to define American politics today. Political Polarization is significant because it shows why the parties the American public knows today are so opposite of each other and why voters seem to have such a deep hatred for members of the opposing party. It has become such a defining factor that many people may wonder, how did political polarization even come about? Political polarization is caused by a mix of internal factors, including rule changes and teamsmanship, as well as external factors such as gerrymandering and the media.