Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bibliography on gun control
Bibliography on gun control
Gun control and crime prevention
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bibliography on gun control
Guns and crime are two words that people tend to relate, some people say more guns means more crime, and others say less guns is more crime. One thing is for sure, the current gun control measures are not working. Two articles, one by John C Moorhouse and Brent Wanner, another one by William J vizzard, take this topic and convey their own opinion about it. In their article, “Does Gun Control, Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, Moorhouse and Wanner, come to the conclusion that Gun Control doesn’t reduce crime. Moorhouse and Wanner, believe that the current gun control measure fail to make any difference, on the contrary, more crime is increasing gun control. Likewise, “The Current And Future State of Gun Policy In The United …show more content…
In order to support their idea, Moorhouse and Wanner, recall different studies made by researchers on gun control and crime. Actually, the first half of the article is mainly a summary of different studies, you can literally find a research mentioned in every paragraph. The authors want to show that their research doesn’t come from just one study, but quite a few. They even quote studies that show gun control does reduce crime, which is what they are trying to disprove. Moorhouse and Wanner, tend to use the same technique when disproving a study. First, the authors present studies where gun control does show to reduce crime. Then, the authors point out the weakness in the studies. For example Moorhouse and Wanner state that “characteristics of early studies, is the failure to include relevant control variables”. (4). Meaning the studies didn’t take into consideration factors that may contribute to a reduction of crime, factors such as economic and society. Later they state that “Studies…. That do control for social and economic factors find no evidence of gun control reducing violent crime rates”. Later with the same concept, Moorhouse and Wanner, present more studies that take in consideration constant variables, and show that gun control doesn’t reduce
In discussions of Gun Control, one controversial issue has been whether it reduced or increases crime. On the one hand, author Jeffrey Goldberg argues having stricter gun controls could reduce gun violence. On the other hand, author Alex Seitz-Wald thinks increasing civilian gun ownership will not reduce crime. My own view is that if we did have more restrictions to own a gun, we would be more safer and we would have fewer crimes around the world
However, as far as weapons policies go, gun buyback programs have been criticized as an ineffective means of curbing or preventing firearm violence. Thus, one must ask, does the purchase of firearms from private citizens by law enforcement impact the rate of gun crime, or would other means be more effective in combating this type of crime? According to the Journal of Economics, there are more firearms in the United States than people. Furthermore, the majority of homicides are committed with a firearm (Levitt, 2004). This may indicate that the availability of firearms contributes to gun violence.
Moorhouse, John C., and Brent Wanner. "Does Gun Control Reduce Crime or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?" CATO Journal 26.1 (2006): 103-24. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 15 June 2015.
Moorhouse, John C., and Brent Wanner. "Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?." CATO Journal 26.1 (2006): 103-124. Academic Search Premier. Web. 5 Apr. 2014.
This essay will discuss the pros and cons of gun control. Some U.S. States have already adopted some of these gun control laws. I will be talking about the 2nd amendment, public safety, home safety, and do gun control laws really control guns. I hope after you have read this you will be more educated, and can pick your side of the gun control debate. So keep reading and find out more about the gun control laws that the federal and some state governments want to enforce on U.S. Citizens.
If you have ever picked up a handgun whether it ranges from a real gun to even a water gun, you know of how simple it is to use and or operate it within a matter of minutes. You simply enough pick it up, aim it, and squeeze the trigger. The gun does all the rest. The trigger pushes against the sear and the disconnector, this releases the hammer which hits the firing pin that expels the bullet from the cartridge. From a technical viewpoint, this process is almost child 's play. Therein lies the problem. Children have been shown to frequently handle guns, with dire results. According to the Center for Disease Control, 409 kids aged 14 or younger died in 2013 alone as a result of playing with guns (Center for Disease Control “2013, United States
Moorhouse, J.C. and Brent Wanner. “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?” Cato Journal, 26(1), (2006): 103-124. ProQuest. Web. 30 Nov. 2015.
Due to recent shootings in four cities gun control legislation has become a big issue throughout the United States. Government officials have presented legislation for gun control to help reduce mass shootings; however, even with these suggestions for strict gun control twelve states have already passed laws that offer fewer limitations for gun possession. After the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in 2012, Connecticut passed a law to ban gun sales that hold large amounts of ammunition. According to McLeod “in Newtown, Connecticut, the families of ten out of twenty children killed in a December 2012 massacre at the Sandy Hook Elementary School have sued a North Carolina-based gun manufacturer, alleging Remington Outdoor Co.’s Bushmaster
In the second amendments to the U.S. Constitution, it is stated that the right of people to keep and bear arms should never be infringed under any circumstances to ensure the security of a free state. However, it seems that this amendment has been misinterpreted by many Americans since the country has seen many innocent souls falling due to high gun crimes. And that is why I decided to write a research paper to answer one question: a question that states, “To what extents, does strict gun control policies by the governments reduce gun crime rates?” And this writer strongly argues that stricter gun control policies by the governments will reduce gun crime rates significantly. I personally believe my research is very important because it will provide the evidences that leaders around the globe who are struggling to combat the rising gun crime rates needs to take aggressive roles so that no more people has to live in fear of being killed by people with weaponries like handguns.
Guns, Crime, and Freedom states that, no gun law which restricts the right of law-abiding citizens to own guns has been proven to reduce crime or homicides, not even the Brady Law and the “Clinton Crime Bill.” These two laws st...
Crime and guns. The two seem to go hand in hand with one another. But are the two really associated? Do guns necessarily lead to crime? And if so do laws placing restrictions on firearm ownership and use stop the crime or protect the citizens? These are the questions many citizens and lawmakers are asking themselves when setting about to create gun control laws. The debate over gun control, however, is nothing new. In 1924, Presidential Candidate, Robert La Follete said, “our choice is not merely to support or oppose gun control but to decide who can own which guns under what conditions.” Clearly this debate still goes on today and is the very reason for the formation of gun control laws.
Lott R.John, Editorial, “Less Crime: Understand Crime and Gun Control Laws”, Cnn News, 26 Nov, 2013; He claims that gun control laws do not deter crime: gun ownership deters crime. R.Lott’s explanation is that states with the largest increases in gun ownership also have in the largest drop in violent crime. The author purpose is that criminals don't obey the laws, in order to prevent from getting more crime violence. This article was entered to the people with
Every day some news related to gun violence are being heard all over the world. Shooting in driveway, public places, schools, homicide and suicide are some of different types of gun violence. Shooting on people and killing them is a big issue in the world and different comments are provided about that. One of the most important of them is about gun control laws. Stingl (2013) says “The term gun control as it is used in the United States refers to any action taken by the federal government or by state or local governments to regulate, through legislation, the sale, purchase, safety, and use of handguns and other types of firearms by individual citizens.” According to this idea gun control laws should be stricter and people should not be able to have access to guns easily. However, there are many other people who believe this idea is not a good solution and never help. This essay will demonstrate for and against views about the topic. People who agree with this idea consider: firstly, stricter laws will reduce violence and gun control means crime control. Secondly, some research shows people with gun are more at risks of getting shot. Thirdly, guns can always be misused by their owners and finally, stricter law is the best and the faster way to control crime and make community safe. While opponents say first of all, guns are necessary for people safety and protection. Secondly, guns are not the only tools for killing and violence; there are other weapons too and finally, gun ownership is human rights.
If I can fight against something it is going to be gun violence. I would fight against this because a lot of people are getting shot for no good reason. Killing or shooting people is never the answer, it would just get the person who is murdering the other person in trouble. How I would change this is by going on strike to banned the people with unathorized guns. Only people with a permit can use them not everyone. I think this is wrong because people are killing most of the innocent people that didn't do anything. Some of the people get shot by cops but they are mostly the bad guys they are chasing. But some of the officers can be so cold blooded so rude that they just don't even care who they hurt. Like in the movie fruitvale station, Oscar
BANG BANG There he goes, another student dead. All the media is talking about how that one white kid brought a gun to school and shot himself. No one is asking how did he get ahold of that gun. All the parents are panicking and sending their children to homeschool. Now what? There are so many people who are self hypocrites and say so many controversial things and don't understand the meaning of their statements. Every year 4.2 million people are born. But did you know 31.5 thousand people die every year in the US because of gun violence. Now you may say can this even be stopped Is there even a solution? Well did you even know that gun brokers don't even thoroughly check the backgrounds of their customers. For crying out loud they could be