Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A brief paragraph about the second amendment
A brief paragraph about the second amendment
Gun control can reduce crime essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A brief paragraph about the second amendment
Gun control is one of the hottest and most controversial topics in our society today. “Gun control” is an extensive term that relays to all sorts of restriction on guns. Such as what firearms can be bought and sold, who can have or distribute them, who and where they can be carried, and what duties both the seller and the buyer have to report purchases to the government. Despite the fact that there are strong opinions on both sides of this argument, the facts show guns are involved in most of all violent crimes. Without completely abolishing guns, a big step in lowering gun violence would be taking away high-capacity magazines. A recent Mother Jones study discovered that magazines with a high capacity were used in over 50% of all 62 mass shootings between …show more content…
The second amendment of the constitution is the American’s right to bear arms. Back when the constitution was first written, times were not the same; citizens being armed was a necessity for the safety of the society. The founding fathers of our Constitution couldn’t have imagined the damage the 2nd amendment would do. Too many lives are being lost on a yearly basis because the American governments inability to fully address the problem. In Comparison to many other western regions that have enforced stricter gun laws America viewed as “The Wild-Wild West”. The gun-affiliated death toll throughout the U.S. must come to a turning point. Taking away the right to own guns could result in only criminals having gun access. The important thing to understand is that in a society where a normal citizen and criminals have gun access the likelihood of a law abiding citizen getting shot, when both parties are in possession of a firearm, is more likely than if only criminals have firearms. Firearms being banned could not seem too pleasing as a short-term solution but people must also think outside of their
The Second Amendment states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This statement basically means that people should be able to own guns for their own security and that right should not be taken away. The Second Amendment was added to the Constitution because the creators of the Constitution wanted to make sure that it protected basic rights, including the right to bear arms. It was also added to the Constitution because shortly after it was ratified, James Madison wanted to give more power to the state militia and to give more power to the people to give them the ability to fight back against the Federalists and the tyrannical government they were creating. After fighting off the British, the Second Amendment was created to give citizens the opportunity to fight back against controlling government and protect themselves with their own weapons.
Some people believe that extremely tight gun control laws will eliminate crime, but gun control laws only prevent the 'good guys' from obtaining firearms. Criminals will always have ways of getting weapons, whether it be from the black market, cross borders, or illegal street sales. New gun control laws will not stop them. Since the shootings of Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and Sandy Hook, the frequency of mass shootings has increased greatly. Gun control is not effective as it has not been shown to actually reduce the number of gun-related crimes. Instead of considering a ban of private firearm possession, and violating individual ownership rights, it may be more practical to consider the option of partially restricting firearm access.
Opposing sides have for years fought over the laws that govern firearms. For the purposes of this paper "Gun Control" is defined as policies enacted by the government that limit the legal rights of gun owners to own, carry, or use firearms, with the intent of reducing gun crimes such as murder, armed robbery, aggravated rape, and the like. So defined, gun control understandably brings favorable responses from some, and angry objections from others. The gun control debate is generally publicized because of the efforts of the Pro-Gun Lobby or the Anti-Gun Lobby.
This essay will discuss the pros and cons of gun control. Some U.S. States have already adopted some of these gun control laws. I will be talking about the 2nd amendment, public safety, home safety, and do gun control laws really control guns. I hope after you have read this you will be more educated, and can pick your side of the gun control debate. So keep reading and find out more about the gun control laws that the federal and some state governments want to enforce on U.S. Citizens.
In conclusion, enabling stricter gun control laws will help to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill, criminals, and children and teens. With these laws put into place there will be more assurance of the safety of American citizens. It is not necessary to strip citizens of their right to own a gun, but we should be able to make it harder to get guns. If you are someone with a clear record and using a gun for recreation use, you will have no trouble obtaining a gun. In the long run increase the laws on gun control hurts nobody. Despite historic events where governments seized firearms and killed millions of citizens, today we have a different problem, which is making sure guns are in the right hands.
The Second Amendment “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This timeless phrase, the Second Amendment of the United States’ Constitution, is an enduring example of the principles and ideals that our country was founded on. With this statement, the founders of this country explicitly and perpetually guaranteed the American individual the right to keep and bear arms. An incomparably crucial element of this country‘s origins, the Second Amendment and the rights it guarantees have proved vital to the growth and success of our nation. The Second Amendment has often been the subject of debate, and over the years varying speculations and interpretations of its intended meaning have forced this significant phrase into a controversial spotlight.
Taking into account of the recent shooting sprees, the gun control debate has started again. However, people have contemplated: “Why does America need gun laws” and “Why are so many states disagreeing about the restrictions that need to be put in place for civilians looking to purchase firearms.” The reasoning for such contemplation is that the fluxuating strictness of gun laws have led to several incidences within states that have strict gun laws due to the fact that the perpetrators of these incidences have purchased their firearms either from black markets, or states where the severity of gun control is at minimal levels.
Guns have the ability to protect the user against those who intend to do wrong. There have been multiple accounts of law abiding citizens protecting themselves with firearms. Some cases even involve stopping criminals with possibly illegally obtained firearms. Given both stances, too much gun control will result in misfortune as will too little. Without a perfect balance, lives are at risk. Throughout this paper I will discuss in greater detail the ways in which this balance can be achieved.
The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in the Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation or individuals.
The Second Amendment of the United States protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791 along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. The United States Government should not infringe on those rights by the enforcement of gun control against law-abiding citizens. Gun control does not reduce crime, does not stop criminals from obtaining guns, and does not address the real issue of violent crime. There is no evidence that gun control affects the crime rate.
Every day some news related to gun violence are being heard all over the world. Shooting in driveway, public places, schools, homicide and suicide are some of different types of gun violence. Shooting on people and killing them is a big issue in the world and different comments are provided about that. One of the most important of them is about gun control laws. Stingl (2013) says “The term gun control as it is used in the United States refers to any action taken by the federal government or by state or local governments to regulate, through legislation, the sale, purchase, safety, and use of handguns and other types of firearms by individual citizens.” According to this idea gun control laws should be stricter and people should not be able to have access to guns easily. However, there are many other people who believe this idea is not a good solution and never help. This essay will demonstrate for and against views about the topic. People who agree with this idea consider: firstly, stricter laws will reduce violence and gun control means crime control. Secondly, some research shows people with gun are more at risks of getting shot. Thirdly, guns can always be misused by their owners and finally, stricter law is the best and the faster way to control crime and make community safe. While opponents say first of all, guns are necessary for people safety and protection. Secondly, guns are not the only tools for killing and violence; there are other weapons too and finally, gun ownership is human rights.
Someone just broke into Jake's home. He is on a business trip for his job, and his wife and two kids are at home asleep. The intruders, one armed with an AR-15 assault rifle, and the other with a handgun enter the home. Jake's wife hears the door get kicked in, runs to get the kids and goes to the closet. She dials 911, cops are on the way, but the two men are already in the bedroom, the only thing between Jake's family and two armed men is a thin door. The 8-month old baby screams, alerting the two intruders. The man with the handgun, startled to hear someone home, kicks down the closet door, revealing his helpless wife and kids. The Wife covers up the kids and sits in front of them, hoping to protect them from any harm. The man with the
As the 2nd amendment addressed, “a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.¨ Although the founding fathers agreed that any United States citizen should obtain a firearm for protection, the times from then and society now has transformed and changed tremendously. Gun control measures should be strictly regulated due to amount of harm caused from unregulated controls. As the court ruled out states “owning firearms is not an absolute right: it has upheld both federal attempts to regulate certain weapons and states’ power to enact gun control measures.” Uses of fire arms, not necessarily weapons, become the protection of the home along with the
Have you ever wondered why “fake news”, misinterpreted information, is spread around by the people? The problem can be seen through two scenarios, the peoples fault for misinterpreting information, or the articles fault for providing incorrect information. There is more evidence supporting the fact that it is the articles fault for making fake news. As the new generation acquires fake news, the population will believe in wrong information. The sources are feeding us wrong information, so when a source gives us the correct information we contradict the information and claim it to be false. This is all backed by three liberal sources that have been researched. “Vermont City takes step toward banning assault rifles”, from CNN, is all about
It’s a fact that more guns equal more deaths even if the firearm is legal. Between 1982 and 2012, in the US, there were roughly sixty-two mass shootings. This is an enormous number. The sad thing is that forty-nine of these shootings were made using a legal firearm. Banning guns would automatically make them harder for people with bad intentions to acquire them, the result would be less deaths.