The Pros And Cons Of Fracking

828 Words2 Pages

Rough Draft

Fracking is killing this earth. Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is a form of drilling into the earth to obtain oil. There are many ways that fracking kills this earth. If fracking continues, Earth as we know it will not be the same. The world will be a healthier place to live if fracking was banned.
First of all, fracking costs a lot of money and requires tons of supplies. Each gas well needs about 400 tanker trucks to carry water and supplies to and from the site. A frack well is the site of fracking (like the hole), and a fracking job is just one frack or one time of sending the drill down the well extracting oil. There are about 500,000 fracking wells in the United States, a fracking site can be fracked 18 times, and 8 million gallons of water are used for one fracking job. By multiplying 500,000 times 8 million times 18, you’ll find out that 72 trillion gallons of water and 360 billion gallons of chemicals needed to run the U.S. current gas wells. If fracking is banned, this money could go towards a better cause to help people. …show more content…

When a fracking project is completed, the fluids (and wastewater that comes back up the well) have to be disposed of somewhere. What do they do with it? They pump it back into disposal wells deep into the ground, which causes the pressure to build-up. According to www.kibin.com, on November 6, 2011 a 5.6 earthquake hit Oklahoma. That was the largest earthquake in Oklahoma’s history. Fracking was the cause of this horrible disaster. Scientists aren’t just worried about disposal wells causing earthquakes, they fear something happening to those disposal wells. Scientists are concerned that if an earthquake happens near one of these disposal wells, it could hurt the well, resulting in hundreds of different chemicals coming out into the ground. If fracking was

Open Document