The Pros And Cons Of Cosmetic Animal Testing

666 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Animal cruelty cosmetic testing argument

Are Home Pets caged until starvation? Do they get abandoned or mistreated? Do they get tested on? Many advertisements show us how unfortunate animals are that end up in the wrong home. But why is society not being shown the sheer cruelty of Cosmetic Animal Testing?
'Blinded for beauty - Petra' is this something our public has accepted? Or is it that they don't know enough? For Cosmetics, innocent animals are suffering tremendous pain and just because of self-indulgence. It has now become a day-to-day process in the cosmetic industry to test on animals, but unfortunately the public is not shown anywhere near enough information about the topic because of how truly horrific it is.

Testing cosmetics on animals safety and hypo-allergenic properties of products for use by humans. In March 2013, a new European Union law was achieved, that made it illegal to sell animal-tested cosmetics in Europe, even if the testing was done outside Europe. Approximately 100,000-200,000 animals suffer and die just for cosmetics every year around the world. These are rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats, and mice. While dogs and monkeys are never used to test cosmetics anywhere in the world, they are used to test other types of chemicals.

Some of the …show more content…

Companies could easily use thousands of ingredients that have already been approved and had success with testing on humans, which requires no further testing with animals. It would be appealing as the cruelty-free way would be quicker and the outlook would save a lot of money as well.Are Home Pets caged until starvation? Do they get abandoned or mistreated? Do they get tested on? Many advertisements show us how unfortunate animals are that end up in the wrong home. But why is society not being shown the sheer cruelty of Cosmetic Animal

Show More
Related

  • The Pros of Animal Testing

    1427 Words  | 3 Pages

    Albert Sabin, the developer of the polio vaccine once said, “Without animal research, polio would still be claiming thousands of lives each year.” Polio is a deadly disease caused by a virus that spreads from person to person. This infectious disease renders the brain and spinal cord helpless while also ensuring a permanent case of paralysis to the victim. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “…13,000 to 20,000 para-lytic cases were reported annually,” before the 18th century. After the introduction of the polio vaccine, “…a total of 2,525 paralytic cases were reported, compared with 61 in 1965.” This dramatic decrease in the prominence of the polio disease can only be attributed to the success of animal testing. Animal experimentation is used in the research of genetics, drug testing, biology, toxicity testing, cosmetic testing, and many other fields. Despite all of its beneficial traits, animal testing has been wildly controversial over the past decades because of its perceived unethical treatment towards animals. Although animal testing may be deemed unethical by many, it is a form of medical testing that has not only saved lives but has also greatly revolutionized the medical world.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

    1261 Words  | 3 Pages

    The use of animals to test cosmetics is introduced in their article as well. The authors quote a vast amount of credible sources from prestigious universities such as Princeton and from well known animal rights group such as PETA. I will use this as my main source of information.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

    1116 Words  | 3 Pages

    In many parts of the world, animals are being used in laboratories are still suffering and dying to test cosmetics. In

    Read More

  • Ethical Treatment Of Animals: The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    1109 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over the past couple of years many companies of these cosmetic products released that they are against animal testing including LUSH Fresh Handmade Cosmetics, The Body Shop, and many others. There are still companies that still do test with animals; over 250 on PETA’s website. A large percent of these are well-known companies such as Johnson & Johnson, Estee Lauder, Procter & Gamble, L’Oreal, and others that may surprise the consumer. The majority of these companies are producing the same products yet using different animal testing results. This causes the number of test subjects to be substantially larger than what is needed. The number of tests being conducted could be reduced if these companies either become anti animal testing or share results with other companies. This idea might seem like a long-shot since sharing information with their competitors seems ridiculous. If you take a step back from looking at each individual company, you’ll see that they are all conducting similar tests with similar products. Sharing results of these tests with other companies potentially selling similar products, with the same ingredients, will result in a large drop in animal testing (Search for Cruelty-Free

    Read More

  • Ethical Ethics Of Animal Testing

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ts on animals. China is also in the process of decreasing the amount of animal tested products in circulation as well (“Cosmetics and House-Hold Products Animal Testing”). Even though there are alternatives to using animals in this testing, companies in the United States still continue to torture animals for the sake of beauty. There are plenty more ways to experiment with products that do not involve animals in any way, and these tests also produce more reliable information. According to Earth Protect, Tests like this are often cheaper and produce faster results than animal research ever has. For example, there is a model of human cornea tissues that can be subject to eye irritation experiments instead of a rabbit, and there are models of skin cells that can be used for skin irritation tests instead of guinea pigs (“Cosmetic Animal Testing Facts and Alternatives”).

    Read More

  • The Cons of Animal Testing

    1354 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (2013) over one hundred million animals suffer and sometimes die from experiments to test chemicals, drugs, foods, and cosmetics (para 3). Although it is good that the companies are concerned that their products do not harm consumers, the law does not require most of these tests animals endure. Furthermore, these tests do not have accurate results, so the animals may suffer but the product is still sold to the people. While products that burnt bunnies’ eyes away are being marketed to consumers, government agencies are using taxpayers’ hard earned money to fund these horrible, pointless experiments.

    Read More

  • Cosmetic Testing with Animals is Cruel

    1300 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Cruelty of Cosmetic Testing on Animals Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the need to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: We Must Eliminate Animal Testing

    613 Words  | 2 Pages

    Approximately two to four million animals have been used in safety tests. Safety tests are conducted with a wide range of chemicals and products, including drugs, vaccines, cosmetics, household cleaners, and packing materials. This raises issues such as the ethics and humaneness of deliberately poisoning animals, thus harming them, for the sake of marketing a new cosmetic or household product.

    Read More

  • We Must Eliminate Animal Testing for Cosmetics

    1515 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing in Cosmetics

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    Simple household items such as lotions, shampoos and cosmetics aren’t very expensive and are within reach for the public, yet the public is not knowledgeable of the fact that the products that they use everyday are put through a series of tests which involve the use of harmless animals. Several large commercial companies do not make products for animals; they decide that using these harmless creatures for the testing of their products, could be cause to be harmful to animals still go forward with these types of procedures on an everyday basis. Although these animals are unable to defend themselves or signs of any form of consent for the near death procedures, these companies find this as a cheap solution for testing their products before placing them on the market. There are many other alternatives to testing animals such as embryonic stem cell research. Animal experimentation is wrong and it can be avoided but companies which are greedy for money chose not to.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

    1934 Words  | 4 Pages

    They are treated more like lab equipment than a living, breathing species. It is a necessity to increase the regulation of animals in experiments to change the future for these beings. Animals should not be treated the same as a test tube or beaker, they should be treat like the living, breathing specimens that they are. In her book My Point…and I Do Have One, Ellen DeGeneres said “if you want to test cosmetics, why do it on some poor animal who hasn 't done anything? They should use prisoners who have been convicted of murder or rape instead. So, rather than seeing if perfume irritates a bunny rabbit 's eyes, they should throw it in Charles Manson 's eyes and ask him if it hurts” (157). Although there are alternate scientific ways to test products, DeGeneres has a point; why are we harming innocent animals? They have done nothing to us and yet will still inject them with drugs or suffocate them with toxic fumes. If it was absolutely necessary for something to be tested on an actual human I think we should test it on those who have raped or killed innocent people. The world needs to see the tragic treatment of these animals and we need to push for the use of alternate testing

    Read More

  • Cruelty-free Cosmetics

    721 Words  | 2 Pages

    It still comes as a surprise to me that with all the technology in today’s society, we are still relying on animals for cosmetic research. Some people think that it is acceptable and even justified to test on mere animals rather than risk hurting people. So, for these kinds of people, animal testing makes perfect sense. However, in my opinion, animals are living creatures and have the right to live out their lives as nature intended rather than simply surviving in cages while being poked and prodded with whatever scientists fancy. I think it is depressing and sort of grotesque that I am using products that have been tested on animals that are even commonly bred as our pets. So, I began my research to find out what companies still test on animals, why they do so, and what other alternatives they could use in place of animal testing.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Essay

    1015 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animal testing has become extremely costly. Animal testing results are not quick, especially for cosmetics. When testing a product it needs to be continually applied to detect if it’s going to irritate the skin or eyes. This can take days or weeks. During this time you have to keep the animals alive long enough to see the result. Therefore also having to supply food and water costing even more $$$. For example the eye irritant test involving rabbits to see how a product or chemical will react on human eyes cost around 1,800$ while the alternative in vitro method only cost 1,400$. Not only is the alternative more accurate but its much more cost effective and over time those 400$ will add up. Another common example is the skin sensation test, which is where a product is placed on a shaved animals skin to see how it reacts. The cost for the animal test is 6,000$ and the alternative is only 3,000$. That is a lot of money that could be used to make the product better or for the company to keep.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Effects

    1345 Words  | 3 Pages

    We are turning a blind eye to the misery of these animals by continuing to remove ourselves from the reality of their suffering. Today, the majority of the cosmetic products that hit the market aren't tested on animals, but various experiments are still conducted on unwilling creatures. Unfortunately, researchers have found many gruesome experiments that risk or even kill the animals in question. Those animals are submitted to inhumane experiments in order to make people more appealing. Forgetting that they can also feel and comprehend what pain feels like. Animal experimentation results in millions of animals being mistreated or sacrifice in an attempt to discover remedies, as well as, inconsequential research for cosmetic purposes. However,

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Cosmetic Animal Testing

    1749 Words  | 4 Pages

    Cosmetic animal testing has been a controversial topic for decades but has recently gained more attention from the media due to oppositional organizations such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). Those in favor of animal experimentation make the argument that they are taking animals’ lives to save humans’, but is it really necessary to subject animals to torturous conditions or painful experiments in the name of science? Animal experimentation needs to be abolished because it is unethical and selfish to destroy an animal 's life.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Cosmetic Animal Testing

Open Document