Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Profit maximization and its arguments
Profit maximisation theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Profit maximization and its arguments
Today, it is generally perceived by the public that the single and sole objective of corporations is to maximize profits (Bartlett, 2015), reflected in President Bill Clinton’s radio address in 1996 during which he stated “the most fundamental responsibility for any business is to make a profit”. This belief could be substantiated by the statistic that the profit margins of American corporations have risen from the 1980s to 2008 (Blodget, 2012), shown by the increase in nominal GDP of the United States over the period (Yardeni, Johnson, 2016). Given the above, it could be deduced that most businesses do indeed have a single objective of profit maximization and therefore tend to pursue short-term gains at the expense of all other considerations. …show more content…
This is elaborated in The Corporation, where Joel Baken (2005, p.56) suggests that corporations are evil and pathological institutions due to the fact that managers are inherently righteous people with good intentions but, when in the context of business, will act in what would otherwise be deemed outside of their private lives in a psychopathic …show more content…
The term, in other words, point out that capitalism could be a key driver for both social and economic good (Schwartz, 2013). Corporations practicing conscious capitalism are stakeholder-oriented, led by “values-based leaders” who come across more as a servant than a celebrity, and, although they do continue to view profitability as necessary and desirable, do not pursue these short-term gains at the expense of all other considerations (O’Toole, Vogel, 2011). An example of this in practice would be Container Store who pays their full-time sales employees nearly twice as much the industry average (Schwartz,
A corporation was originally designed to allow for the forming of a group to get a single project done, after which it would be disbanded. At the end of the Civil War, the 14th amendment was passed in order to protect the rights of former slaves. At this point, corporate lawyers worked to define a corporation as a “person,” granting them the right to life, liberty and property. Ever since this distinction was made, corporations have become bigger and bigger, controlling many aspects of the economy and the lives of Americans. Corporations are not good for America because they outsource jobs, they lie and deceive, and they knowingly make and sell products that can harm people and animals, all in order to raise profits.
The terms “conscious” and “capitalism” are seldom used together; however, John Mackey, the Co-CEO of Whole Foods Market, has started a movement known as Conscious Capitalism that has the power to change the way businesses operate. For years, many vilify businesses due to their reputation of merciless methods of earning profits. In fact, the Merriam Webster dictionary defines capitalism as, “an economic and political system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit”. Mackey introduces a new concept and meaning for businesses in his book Conscious Capitalism: Liberating the Heroic Spirit of Business stating that there is a higher purpose for companies than generating profit. Higher purpose, conscious leadership, conscious culture, and stakeholder orientation are the four key tenants of practice to becoming a conscious capitalist company. After attending the trips on the Dallas Study Tour, I was able to witness how various companies operated and how their cultures were aligned with conscious capitalism.
To supply the wants and needs of a consumer, society entrusts wealth-producing resources to the business enterprise.” (Santayana, George. Is The Tyranny Of Shareholder Value Finally Ending? So before we go into greater detail on the different perspectives related to social responsibility, one might question the meaning of social responsibility. It is generally agreed that social responsibility is defined as the business obligation to make decisions that benefit society.... ...
Communism is often seen as something bad and that should be avoided and completely banish in every country. But what people think about communism is often stereotypes and ideas that are not always true. Communism is that everybody is equal in the country, that everybody only gets what they need and nothing more. In a communist society, there are no class divisions, meaning that the people are neither poor or rich, because everybody lives equally.Communist nations make sure that even the poorest will always have food on their tables, get quality education and have access to basic healthcare. When it comes to employment, communism promises jobs for everybody, where they get access to equal opportunities. The hire-and-fire system that is common
Capitalism is an economic system in which the production and distribution are privately owned, the government involvement is minimal,and there is free enterprise. In Capitalism, the means of production are privately owned and operated for profit in a competitive market. Also the economic investment, ownership and profits are all owned by individuals. Under capitalism the state is separated from the economy, which means that the government has no role in business. In other words, everyone works for themselves. The market forces in a capitalist country runs by supply and demand which it determines the price and later on it turns into profits. Supply is the quantity of goods and services a business is willing to sell, while Demand is the quantity of goods and services consumers are willing to buy. Therefore, Capitalism is the best economic system because it rewards the ones that work hard and since the government does not control trade, there is a large variety of goods and creates options for consumers to fit their personal needs.
The economic model states that the only goal of businesses is to maximize profits for the shareholders. The business is not equipped to work with social activities, and they limit its ability to be competitive in a global marketplace. The argument against CSR is that it questions the profit maximization for businesses. Critics argue that CSR distracts businesses from their economic role. Milton Friedman argued that markets should work on their own, and CSR makes markets not sufficient enough and as a result good competition suffers. One of the examples is Walmart and their low prices strategies. The company is aggressive with its suppliers, competitors, and even local municipalities when negotiating tax and financial incentives. These strategies help company maintain their low prices, and therefore satisfy customers. The company has been committed to obeying the law in all of its strategies, and they have been maximizing the shareholders profits within the law. According to Friedman, this company would be socially responsible corporation. Its corporate strategy has achieved several ethical objectives. Society benefits when the company offers a range of products with low prices, the company outsources its services to the most efficient supplier, and attracts more investors. Overall, society benefits from the company’s profit
Corporate governance has undergone tremendous growth in the last decade. Many countries have pronounced corporate governance codes with exemplifies good corporate governance. This recommendations are geared towards achieving transparency and accountability. U.S and U.K views corporate governance solely from the perspective of wealth maximization for shareholders. On the other hand Japanese companies and some other countries has gone further to give corporate governance a broader definition which includes employees, customers, suppliers and shareholders satisfaction.
Moral capitalism can most easily be defined as these corporations; these larger than life entities practice some sort of human quality. This quality is what we as humans consider “moral”. Depending on who you ask these morals vary, but for the most part it means giving back to the community that fuels you. For example if you poison the river by the factory and kill all the towns’ people, you have no one to work in the factory anymore. Given this very basic example I believe that more and more companies should look into adopting forms of this practice. Obviously these fortune 500 companies have one goal in mind, that is to make money, but this doesn’t mean it can’t do things for the workers and the community that it exists in. Look at Jeff Swartz
In order to stay competitive in the global market, Multinational corporations have continued to expand into newer markets. Being responsible and maintaining good relationships with host countries is vital to their success. Multinational Corporations have increased over the years but there are plenty of hurdles to overcome in terms of properly executing their strategy. Political relations between countries where MNCs operate should be stable to avoid problems with production, design and employee turnover. What’s important to keep in mind is that a Multinational corporation cannot be successful if they try to implement new ideas or products without proper research in the market where their products are being made. If a MRC in the U.S is doing business in Japan but tries to create a new technological product for Japan it would be wise to consult with engineers in Japan who are familiar with local trends and knowledge of the market before going ahead with production. That should be considered common sense but there are instances where products are pushed to a market with very little success because the proper research was not done. MRCs need to be more innovative so that they remain competitive in an always-changing global market.
It is known that corporations play a large part in making the world go around. Many times we read, hear or see stories on companies and why something was done a certain way. The film “The Corporation” has given a whole new insight to not only how businesses operate but what motivates them and their decisions that they make to keep their businesses thriving.
The first discussion question posed was, “How does Dr. Friedman characterize discussions on the “social responsibilities of business”? Why (Jennings, 2009, p. 79)? Friedman (1970) characterized the discussions on social responsibilities as one hundred percent unadulterated socialism. Friedman (1970) characterized these discussions in that manner because he felt that a corporate executive should focus solely on making profits and not on social aspects. He mentioned how people who conduct and express themselves in this fashion are positively reinforcing and supporting the actions of individuals that have been weakening the foundational blocks of free society. Friedman (1970) posed a question which was the crux of his 1970 article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits” where he investigated the true contextual meaning of what responsibilities mean to businesses. Friedman describes how businesses cann...
It seems obvious that large corporations have a tendency to ignore the negative effects of their actions in favor of profit. This example, although sensationalized, still says to me that with power comes responsibility. It affirmed my belief that a corporation’s goal cannot be just to provide profit to shareholders, but there must also be an element of social responsibility.
Consider the entrepreneurs Eli Whitney, John Deere and Henry Ford, and the enormous contributions they made to society. No matter how much money they may have earned, it was insignificant compared with the tremendous economic benefits, shared by millions of people, due to the innovation of these great American inventors. Often the greatest criticism of capitalism comes from social visionaries, such as Erich Fromm. He proposes that mankind must cease living in the having mode, concerned only with material wealth and power, to enter the being mode, and abandon their selfishness and greed. Fromm states, "In the having mode of existence my relationship to the world is one of possessing and owning, one in which I want to make everybody and everything, including myself, my property" (12). This view of the having mode would certainly explain the obscenely extravagant impulses of residents of Beverly Hills, California, but would it apply to corporations, whose contributions ultimately raise the standard of living for all?
CSR also encourages the fame of the business enterprises. Ot is a certain that activities which are related to CSR has more priority in the creation of various forms of fame value and reputation of the company which was dissimilar to customers. It was through the pesrception of customers towards these value that can arbitrate the relationship between a company’s CSR activities and its succeeding presentation in finals.