More handpicked essays just for you.
Colonialism and its impact on african culture
Effect of colonialism on african culture and civilization
Negative and positive impacts of colonialism on african cultures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Many countries in South America are struggling right now and the United States are considering colonizing them. Colonizing South America could help the United States and South America in some ways, but can also hurt them in many others. In the 1870's, European countries colonized Africa, and although it helped Europe in some ways, it hurt both of them in many other. Americans need to take time to think about what is best for the U.S. so they can see the many problems that come with colonizing South America. The United States should learn from Europe's mistakes and not colonize South America because it is not fair to the South American's, and it can cause harm to both Americans and South Americans.
Colonizing South America is not fair to its
…show more content…
Also, both would be introduced to new diseases which would cause both South American and American lives to be in danger. The author of “Things Fall Apart” states “It is estimated that up to 3 million people died as a result of fighting, disease, and starvation during the 30 month conflict” (Things Fall Apart, 2012, P.20). The Africans did not want their land to be taken from them so they fought back, which caused a war between Europe and Africa. The people of South America would fight back also, also causing a war. This would cause many people, both Americans and South Americans to be killed/harmed. When Europe colonized Africa, both continents introduced each other to different diseases that the other was not used to, which caused many people to die of diseases (World History patterns of interaction, 2009, p.784). There are diseases that Americans are used to and diseases that South Americans are used to that would put the other at a big risk. These diseases could seriously harm someone or even kill them. To protect both Americans and South Americans, the United States should not colonize South America although some believe …show more content…
should colonize South America is because they have many resources that could help boost the U.S.’s economy. South America’s climates are different from the U.S.’s climates, so the U.S. could grow many crops that they cannot grow in there (National Geographic, N.D., para.5). Americans can then sell the crops that they grow in South America, which would help them gain a lot more money that would really help the economy. Although this would cause the U.S. to make more money, there are things in South America that would make the U.S. lose money. The author of “World history: Patterns of interactions” states that “These cities, however, often suffer from inefficient transportation and utility systems, pollution, and unregulated residential growth” (National Geographic, N.D., Para. 20). These are just some of the problems that South America has, South America has many problems that would need fixing. The U.S. would have to spend a lot of money to get all of these problems fixed, and that would really hurt the U.S.’s
During the Spanish American war, many people were divided over the topic of imperialism. Ultimately, many benefits came with the US territory expanding. Not only did the US get bigger, but many aspects of our nation improved significantly. American expansion abroad was justified because it helped the military and economy advance greatly.
United States invaded Cuba, Puerto Rico and Philippines not to gain wealth, but for the purpose of getting trades. Americans wanted to project their power to the entire hemisphere and the only way to exercise it is by acquiring republics. Citizens of three countries did not fully acquire the independence they thought they were entitled. Cuba got nominal independence because of Platt Amendment, Puerto Rico became a territory but was not called as citizens of America, and instead they were called Puerto Ricans, while Philippines were denied in statehood. They only had fundamental rights, but United States could govern the country as long as they wanted to. Furthermore, holding the countries from self-government prevent these countries to get the chance to apply what they have learned and adopted from American rule and exercise it for their country’s prosperity.
America was originally colonized because European countries were looking for an easier way to the Indies. This brings forth the thought that colonization made life easier for the Europeans. It brought luxuries and items that were needed to countries that requested them and it encouraged more trade throughout the countries. Though this was advantageous for the Europ...
When one thinks of imperialism they often refer to the concept with very strong feelings. The general population will either agree with it or disagree. There tends to be no middle ground. The best way to look at imperialism is with an impartial mind. If one looks at imperialism with an open mind then they are able to see both the strengths and the weaknesses that it harbors. Throughout history one is most likely able to name several circumstances where imperialism took place and also point out the obvious aftermath of. Imperialism tends to have a greater good behind it, but unfortunately may have been executed poorly.
All in all, over the course of the presidencies of Monroe, Roosevelt, FDR, and Nixon, the U.S. intervened in Latin America numerous times. Now, is it the right thing to do? At those specific points in time, the government thought so. Various arguments can be forged over the suitability of the actions of the U.S. during these times; however, that is a discussion for another time.
The United States of America has always done good even without gaining anything in return.Imperialism at the time was a word that was common among not only politicians but also in the possession of American citizens, this proves that the influence was a major plus to America’s global imperialism and expansionism. The Dominican Republic during the 20th century suffered from being in the temptation of Communism. The U.S was able to occupy the Dominican Republic and because of this their actions were viewed as imperialistic to Americas inhabitants and foreign nations as well. Although some believe that the United States is an imperialistic because of past interaction with the D.R it was not the same case this time around.
In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, Imperialism was a popular trend among the large, powerful countries. Imperialism is defined as “The policy of extending a nation's authority by territorial acquisition or by the establishment of economic and political hegemony over other nations”. Imperialism cannot be said as either good or bad, but as a general rule: If you live in an annexed country, imperialism is not good, if your country annexes smaller ones to gain profit, land, and respect, then imperialism is good. The United States was not much of an imperialistic country until we won the Spanish-American war. As a result of this war, we annexed Guam, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico.
In the 1600’s there was the foundations of representative government. In the 1600’s the colonists came up with something called a democracy. A democracy is a government in which people rule themselves. The colonists had voted for many certain laws. They ruled themselves by using the laws of society. The carter named “Magna Carta” was a character of liberties which was agreed by King John of England, it had made the king obey the same laws as the citizens. Protestantism is a branch within Christianity; this was mostly participated during the 16th century. These were people who had reformed certain practices in the Catholic churches. On November 11, 1620 the Mayflower Compact was signed. The Mayflower Compact is a legal contract which was agreed to have fair laws to protect the good.
The Alliance for Progress program was initially met with open arms by most Latin Americans leaders and immediately boosted U.S. relations throughout the hemisphere.1 The alliance’s charter was signed by all members of the organization except for Cuba at a special meeting at Punta del Este, Uruguay, on August 17, 1961.2 The drafters of the charter emphasized that the twin goals of economic development and social injustice should be pursued simultaneously and that both should be paralleled by efforts to expand political freedom in the hemisphere. One of the most important factors of the program was the promotion of self-help. Under the alliance’s charter, the participating Latin American countries would provide eighty percent of the funding and the remaining twenty would be pledged by external sources, which would be furnished by the United states, other wealthy countries, and a variety of public and private groups. Though created to ensure the improvement of Latin America, there were many dilemmas within the Alliance for Progress. The program was not really an alliance and it did not progress satisfactorily.
American Imperialism began at the start of the 19th Century, but many Americans had different views on whether Imperialism was proper and legal. Many Americans at the turn of the century believed that bringing new nations into the United States was proper, and necessary to improve America. Legally Imperialism violated the Constitution, and it contradicted statements in the Declaration of Independence and Washington 's Farewell Address. American Imperialism was right deemed proper because it involved the idea of Social Darwinism, and it helped improve American Industries. The need to obtain land to increase trading and materials lead to many countries such as England, France, and Germany to take control of most of Africa and Asia for industrial
...atives already living there, but at the same time, we are giving the American citizens more opportunities to expand. Our population is expanding rapidly, but for now, we have more than enough land to accommodate it. There are pros and cons to following the dream of Manifest Destiny, but without it, we would be nowhere near the level of advancement that we have achieved today.
American Expansionism and Imperialism did more bad than good, mostly out of selfish ambition. Because of the problems that happened during the late 1800s, numerous people, both whites and natives, died. They died mainly because of the land. None of the problems would have happened if both sides were patient with each other and understanding, but that is not how history works.
Explain how US policies toward Latin America (such as the Alliance for Progress and Good Neighbor Policy) affected Latin America. In the early 30s, the US wanted to protect its interests in Latin America, and conducted military interventions when their interests were not being respected. When Roosevelt came to power in 1933, he introduced the Good Neighbor Policy, which promised to deal more fairly with Latin America and stop direct interventions. However, the US became preoccupied with containing communism that it supported governments that expressed democratic or anti-Communist principles.
In the 19th and 20th century the Europeans attempted to colonized the continent of Africa, but ended up having setbacks because of disease and lack of transportation. The year is 2030 and America is debating on if they should try to colonize South America like the Europeans did with Africa. The united states should colonize South America because the continent has a lot of valuable resources and the perfect climate for planting crops and grazing animals.
Scholars have debated not only the nature of Iberian colonialism, but also the impact that independence had on the people of Latin America. Historian Jaime E. Rodriguez said that, “The emancipation of [Latin America] did not merely consist of separation from the mother country, as in the case of the United States. It also destroyed a vast and responsive social, political, and economic system that functioned well despite many imperfections.” I believe that when independence emerged in Latin America, it was a positive force. However, as time progressed, it indeed does cause conflict.