Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pro life vs pro choice
Pro life vs pro choice
Morality and society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pro life vs pro choice
Abortion is the termination of the unborn. There are three different types of abortion spontaneous, therapeutic and elective. Spontaneous abortion is a miscarriage, therapeutic abortion is an abortion for medical purposes. Elective abortion is any other type of abortion that’s not spontaneous or therapeutic. Elective is the one that we’re concerned with.
On the matter of abortion the legal and moral aspects of it are completely different. The legal matter is the point that the state should intervene. The moral matter is whether the unborn deserves any moral consideration. Moral status is moral implications for how you treat particular things. An inanimate object does not possess a moral status, human beings and animals do.
…show more content…
The first is that an abortion is morally acceptable at any time and for any reason. The second is that an abortion is morally acceptable under most conditions. The third is that an abortion is almost never morally acceptable except under extreme conditions or circumstances. The last one is that an abortion is never acceptable under no reason. There are many arguments that have been made regarding abortion. I will give four examples of arguments that have been made. The first is the argument of “Potentiality”. Which states that every human being has a right of life. That the unborn is potentially a human being. Therefore, it has the right to life, making abortion immoral. The issue in this argument is that potential is not actual.
The second argument I’ll write on is the “bodily rights” argument. This argument states that every woman has rights and anatomy over her own body, the unborn being part of her body. Therefore, that the mother has the rights and anatomy over the unborn. Concluding that abortion is moral. The issue with this argument is whether or not the unborn rights are based solely on
…show more content…
This states that every human being has a right to realize their future, the unborn is a being. The unborn has the right to realize their future and abortion deprives them from it. Abortion therefore being immoral. The issue with this argument is that the future is uncertain, so these are assumptions.
When asked directly about the legality of abortion, 55% of adults in the U.S say that it should be legal in all cases, compared with 40% who say it should be illegal all of the time. In both cases, these figures have remained relatively stable for at least two decades.
Whether or not the unborn should be protected is an issue that people have different views on. Many people believe that life begins at conception. The people who argue that even the earliest form of life has the same rights as a human being, normally oppose abortion at any part of the pregnancy. Other people claim that the unborn is not a person until the time of birth. Such views, held by these people, suggests that the unborn has no rights to be protected. An in-between point of view maintains that the unborn rights begin at the point of growth, which is the point at which a fetus can survive outside the mother 's
There are many factors that are taken into consideration when determining if abortion is morally permissible, or wrong including; sentience of the fetus, the fetuses right to life, the difference between adult human beings and fetuses, the autonomy of the pregnant woman, and the legality of abortion. Don Marquis argues that abortion is always morally wrong, excluding cases in which the woman is threatened by pregnancy, or abortion after rape, because fetuses have a valuable future. Mary Anne Warren contends that late term abortions are morally permissible because birth is the most significant event for a fetus, and a woman’s autonomy should never be suspended.
Anderson brings up point after point to support his opinion on pro-choice abortion. Anderson writes about how the government should have no say in a woman’s decision to abort even if she is past the first trimester: “Pregnancy and motherhood affect every aspect of a woman’s life - public and private, emotional and physical - and Roe v. Wade confirmed that it was an invasion of privacy for the government to step in and make reproductive decisions on a woman’s behalf” (Anderson, 2015). Anderson explains how he believes a woman who decides to have an abortion does it because it will negatively affect their life in a way that will be changed forever. The article goes on to explain some reasons why women choose to have abortions. To back up his
In my previous essay, I argued that abortion is immoral, but can be countered against depending on the person and the situation given. My view has now changed to where abortion is morally permissible under certain circumstances. This change of views occurred after reading Warren, Thomson, and Marquis' arguments throughout the course. Coming from a family and culture that shames a person who favors abortion, I solely believed abortion was immoral until taking this class. I wanted to clarify that my view on abortion is morally permissible if the pregnancy was affecting the mother’s wellbeing, financial stability, or if she does not feel prepared or lacks education to care for a child.
In order for the pro-life argument to be valid, it must have both a true premise and true conclusion. It falls short of validity by assuming that a fetus up to 22 weeks old is a person, and has its own rights independent of its host, or what we often refer to as its mother. First we must recognize the subtle, yet extremely important distinction between a human being and a person. It is obvious that a fetus is a member of the human ...
The standard argument against abortion claims that the fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. Thomson shows why this standard argument against abortion is a somewhat inadequate account of the morality of abortion.
Twenty-one percent of all U.S. pregnancies end in abortion (“Induced ABortion in the United States). Abortion is murdering defenseless babies who would‘ve otherwise had a happy life with a couple that is unable to have their own child. Is killing an innocent person ever moral?
...ther’s sovereignty over her body outweigh the right of an unborn child to live. The answers to these questions are very diverse as a result of the diversity of the American society. With the issue of abortion, one’s attitude toward it is going to be based on many things such as religious background and personal morals. There is no black and white answer to the abortion issue. Luckily we live in a country where we are able to decide for ourselves whether something is morally right or wrong. Thus, ultimately, the choice is ours. As with the many other ethical issues which we are faced with in our society, it is hard to come to a concrete answer until we are personally faced with that issue. All we can do is make an effort to know all of the aspects which are involved so that we may be able to make a sound decision if we were faced with this problem in our own lives.
Abortion is a voluminous topic today all around the world. Differing viewpoints on abortion are recognized in politics, religion, and throughout the general population. There is a small amount of people who are nonchalant on the subject. Women have abortions for many different reasons and according to certain groups these reasons are either justified or not. Everyone tends to have their own articulated opinion, and many vocalize tenaciously what they believe. Pro-life individuals along with religion are sanguine that abortion is ethically and morally erroneous. Whereas those who are pro-choice say that abortion is inconsequential and the mother’s choice is more important than the fetus. Reasons to not get an abortion include risks involved in receiving an abortion. In some cases death can occur. However, there are other alternatives to abortion. For example, raising the child and adoption.
There are a lot of debates surrounding the term, “Abortion.” Some believe that abortion is a choice, while others groups like conservatives believe that it is a Sin, and should be illegal. Individuals have their own reasons to why they want to get an abortion, and that should not be limited by legislators. Abortion should be legal because it is the individual right whether to have a baby or not regardless of their situation. The second reason is in the case of rape and incest, the third reason is, whether the individual is capable of caring for the baby.
Moral status means that there are moral implications to how you treat a particular thing (if, in this situation, should the fetus be treated like a human being and not an object to dispose.) There may be no moral implications to a piece of paper, but there are moral implications to a human being. The question that leads up is, while there is a clear difference between the two, there is a question of what is the reason that we treat one thing as valuable over another. Is the reason we treat one thing as more valuable over another is because one can speak our language, or because one has a heartbeat while the other is practically lifeless? The problem of moral status is central to the question of abortion.
Abortion may appear ethical or unethical depending on various viewpoints and circumstances. The fetus is considered a person and bringing it to term may be unethical as the act is considered as murder. In some situations, the mother may require to terminate a pregnancy for her bodily autonomy (Johnston, 2003). In such positions, the resolution to terminate a pregnancy may be argued as the most ethical choice. The mother is also considered to having a reasonable level of ethical responsibility to the fetus, because she did not take enough precaution to ensure avoiding conception (Cline, 2014). The mother’s ethical responsibility to the fetus may not be enough to deprive her choice of abortion; it...
In conclusion, women have the right to have abortions and to not have abortions. They have the right because it’s their body and it’s unfair to deny any woman that right without knowing the circumstances or situation. At the end of the women have to do what’s best for them and that unborn child and if they don’t have the necessary tools and lifestyle for them and the baby. Advocates of abortion believe that abortion is seriously wrong but it’s the women’s the decision not theirs, they have the right.
Arguments against abortion are generally based on humanity, on the belief that an abortion is the iniquitous killing of an unborn child. The groups of people who are against abortion believe that the life begins as soon as the egg is fertilized with the sperm. Therefore, it is like murdering an innocent life in a mother's womb. They think that the human embryos should have the right to live and experience this wonderful world.
There are many ethical issues that are discussed among society. A major ethical issue in society today is the debate on whether abortion is morally acceptable. Abortion is defined as “the termination of pregnancy before the embryo or fetus is able to live outside the uterus” (Abortion 1). There are two major sides to the debate on abortion. These are pro-life and pro-choice. Pro-life believes that abortion is unethical and is the equivalent of murdering someone. Pro-choice is for abortions and believes that the mother should have to right to decide if they want to have the child or not.
The argument of a women’s choice is invalid as it is also a women’s choice to have sex and this is a consequence of her choice that she must live with. Some say that adoption is not a valid option because it takes away the women’s choice. The fact that since the unborn baby is dependent on the mother that is a part of the women’s body thus it is her choice. Some say that the physiological problem to carry the child after having to endure rape or incest is too much so the women should be able to have an abortion. It is the civil right for a woman to do with her body what she wants. Lastly they claim of the teenage pregnant is not an option for women as most cannot afford it, in addition requiring time to take off of school that is necessary for