Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Prohibition era and modern war on drugs
Prohibition era and modern war on drugs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Prohibition era and modern war on drugs
The numerous parallels between the prohibition of alcohol and the current drug war are uncanny. The Women’s Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) and the Anti-Saloon League (ASL) were the primary groups leading the prohibition movement. Both groups represented large non-partisan voting blocks and were founded in deep religious beliefs that blamed alcohol for much of society’s problems. They specialized in high pressure tactics and effectively ousted politicians who didn’t vote accordingly. In fact, the term “pressure group” was proudly coined by the ASL’s leader, Wayne Wheeler. These groups were shameless and limitless propagandists. “Ethics be hanged,” said William Eugene “Pussyfoot” Johnson, one of the most aggressive members of the ASL. Johnson literally bribed newspapers from across the nation to print news articles under his pseudonym, “C.L. Trevitt, Literary …show more content…
Agent.” Likewise, Mary Hunt of the WCTU had her way with the nation’s school boards. Hunt’s “Scientific Temperance Instruction” was inserted into public school textbooks nationwide and as many as 50% of public school textbooks needed an unofficial approval by Hunt. The “Scientific Temperance Instruction” indoctrinated students with claims such as “when alcohol passes down the throat it burns off the skin, leaving it bare and burning.” In addition, students read, “Nearly 3,000 infants are smothered yearly in bed by drunken parents.” Some textbooks even claimed that alcoholics could spontaneously combust. The prohibition movement began as a moral issue, but it transitioned into fuel for bigotry and racial hatred. A former Congressman from Alabama, Richmond Pearson Hobson, labelled prohibition as the “last stand of the great white race.” He also introduced the first federal attempt at prohibition in 1914. He said, “If a peaceable red man is subjected to the regular use of alcoholic beverage, he will speedily be put back to the plane of the savage. The government long since recognized this and absolutely prohibits the introduction of alcoholic beverage into an Indian reservation. If a negro takes up regular use of alcoholic beverage, in a short time he will degenerate to the level of the cannibal. No matter how high the stage of evolution, the result is the same.” The ASL clearly incentivized his open racism because he was the highest paid public speaker on behalf of their organization. Hobson drew large crowds and his rhetoric fell right in the line with the Jim Crow aspirations of the Ku Klux Klan, which also publicly supported the prohibition movement. The open bigotry within the prohibition movement wasn’t limited to the Deep South. Many in the north supported this propaganda and the timing coincided with a massive influx of immigrants of Italian, German, and Eastern European heritage. For instance, some prohibition handouts mentioned that “Dagos, who drink excessively, live in a state of filth and use the knife on the slightest provocation.” In addition, Purley Baker of the ASL asserted that Germans “eat like gluttons and drink like swine.” That kind of anti-immigrant, in particular German, message gained even more traction during World War I. Wayne Wheeler of the ASL called the Brewers Association the “enemy in the home camp” and their pamphlets warned of “treasonable liquor trade.” Wheeler, along with some politicians, publicly implored the government to investigate Anheuser-Busch and some other Milwaukee manufacturers because of their German background. Prohibition went into effect in 1920 with the 18th Amendment, the Volstead Act, but it wasn’t welcomed by all. The various ethnic groups that were lambasted through propaganda tended to be ones most targeted with the new law. In turn, New York City had protests in the streets with Irish, Germans, Italians, and African Americans together waving American flags and holding signs, such as “We’re American Citizens, Not Inmates” and “We Prefer Brewers of Beer to Brewers of Bigotry.” On the other hand, prohibition was welcomed by big business with hopes of better productivity from their workers. Accordingly, a prominent prohibitionist writer and speaker Reverend Justice Edwards proclaimed, “They will enjoy better health; they can perform more labor; they will live longer.” The Rockefellers, Carnegies, and Henry Ford were strong prohibitionists. Ford even enforced a “no drink, no saloon” rule. He believed, “Prohibition is a moral issue. For it is economically right. We now know that anything which is economically right is also morally right.” He went so far as to send inspectors into the homes of workers suspected of drinking alcohol. He even suggested that the military should help enforce prohibition. However, the industrialists didn’t foresee the rebellious response and cultural changes that ensued.
Prohibition went into effect at a contradictory time when American individualism and the economy were advancing. The prohibitionists or “drys” had promised that the nation’s moral compass would improve with prohibition; instead it led to nationwide rebellion and disrespect for the law. For instance, a San Francisco jury nullified a case against a bootlegger; in fact, they drank the evidence from the trial. As a sign of the times, a prohibition administrator Col. Ira L. Reeves once lamented, “I do not know of a single agent on my force who was accepted by the community in which he lived as a welcome neighbor and citizen in whom people could place confidence.” Likewise, Michael A. Lerner, author of Dry Manhattan: Prohibition in New York City, pointed out how the stigma attached to an arrest dissipated during prohibition and even became a badge of honor for many people. In addition, NASCAR’s origins are based in the prohibition period, as people paid to watch bootleggers race away from prohibition
agents.
“Last Call,” provides the answers and explanations to these two questions and the historical viewpoint on the Prohibition Era. Daniel Okrent, who has authored four other books and is the first public editor of The New York Times, views Prohibition as one clash in a larger war waged by small-town white Protestants who felt overwhelmed by the forces of change that were sweeping their nation. He explains that this is a theory that was first proposed by the historian Richard Hofstadter more than five decades ago. Though many books and historical accounts have been written about Prohibition since then, Okrent offers an original account, which shows how its advocates combined the nativist fears of many Americans with legitimate concerns about the...
During the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, many saw alcohol as a cause of instability among communities. To counteract the effects of alcohol on American society, The Temperance Movement, Prohibition Party and many others sought to enact anti-liquor laws that would prohibit the sale, manufacture, and transportation of alcohol. On January 19, 1920, the Eighteenth Amendment had taken effect and a nationwide ban on alcohol was enacted. This was thought of as a solution to the many problems that America had at the time, but it only made matters worse. The American society had been greatly affected by the Eighteenth Amendment in many negative aspects such as increasing crime and violence, worsening the economy, and much more.
The book “Last Call,” by Daniel Okrent, provides an interesting insight into, as he describes it the “triumphant failures” of prohibition, and the bold display of ignorance that defined the policies governing its enactment, enforcement, and eventual downfall. Okrent takes us into the debates waged between what he repeatedly refers to as wet and dry Americans. Okrent’s remarkably original account, shows readers how the prohibition supporters integrated native fears of immigration, ignorance, and stereotypes in a movement that would in time shaped a decade and even resulted in an unprecedented failure in an amendment of the American Constitution.
The United States and our government has been shaped entirely from its past. We have learned right from wrong, what has worked and what has failed. The 1920s was a time in our country where the government created a law that upset the people. This decade is often referred to as The Roaring 20’s, The Jazz Age, The Prohibition Era, The Cocktail Era, etc. All these names perfectly describe this time, but it was also a time to learn from the mistake of creating a law that prohibited alcohol. This law played such a huge role in the decade, and has been forever remembered. The Great Gatsby is a romance novel that also hints on the time of prohibition. F. Scott Fitzgerald talked greatly about alcohol and the part it took in The Roaring 20 's. Though
Prohibition perhaps best illustrates the contradictions in American society and politics during this period. Supported by those who looked to the government for ‘moral regulation’ leading the way to ensure. that people led clean, wholesome lives, it anticipated the role of government expanding private life to an unparalleled degree. Prohibition originated in rural and small town America, a crusade. against intoxicating liquor inspired by the poverty, misery.
Prohibition not only failed in its promise to curb the social problem created by alcohol. It actually promoted s...
During the duration of this paper, I will discuss an issue that has been controversial for over a century; prohibition and how it has effected, currently effects, and will, most likey, continue to effect American society. The aspects that I choose to address from this issue are political, historical, they make you wonder, and they should effect anyone who reads this paper. For decades, the American government has had a restriction or ban on drugs and alcohol. Also for decades, these restrictions have been met with resistance from our society. In the early twentieth century, from 1920 through 1933, it was the prohibition of alcohol. A corrupt time, in which, so called, "criminals" and law makers both manufactured and sold bootlegged alcohol. There was high demand then and everyone was in it for the money, everyone. A time which proved to be a failed attempt by the government to take away what is now one of the United States' top commodities. During the 1970's President Richard Nixon started an ongoing "war on drugs" and every president since Nixon has continued this fight to, somehow, rid the entire country of illicit drugs. Today, a few states have taken a new approach to one of these drugs and eyebrows are being raised to the war on drugs all together. States, such as, California, Washington, and Calorado have loosened their tight grip on prohibiting marijuana and even have medical marijuana dispenseries. This idea has been proven to have boosted those economies, and it has allowed people with cancer to use a medication that actually gives them comfort. However, marijuana is still illegal. Why would we restrict the nation from something that beneficial...
Anytime when a controversial topic or ruling people through out the country form groups to help educate their fellow citizens about their views. According to the Ohio State University prohibition website, two main groups are credited with the help of putting Prohibition into la...
Nowadays, the modern problem that closely mirrors the Prohibition is the war on drugs. Their illegal manufacture and sale is similar to the manufacture and sale of alcohol during the Prohibition. History repeats itself. Works Cited for: Currie, Stephen. Prohibition.
The hopes of the prohibitionist were dreams of a healthier and more successful nation. Their dreams were spun from the idea of shutting out the alcohol industry and enforcing large industries and stressing family values. The eighteenth amendment consisted of the end of sales, production, transportation, as for importation and exportation of intoxicating liquors. Their imaginations were large and very hopeful. The prohibitionists felt that alcohol is a slow poison of their community. They felt that if the liquor industry was shut out that Americans would spend their hard earned money in the clothing, food, and shoe industries therefore boosting the American economy. Many felt, “Seeing what a sober nation can do is indeed a noble experiment and one that has never yet been tried, (Crowther, 11) Prohibition was a test of the strength of the nation and an attempt at cleaning up societies evils. These reformers denounce alcohol as a danger to society as well as to the human body. Some ethnic hopes of prohibition was to regulate the foreigners whose backgrounds consisted on the use of alcohol for religious purposes. And try to enforce an American valued society upon them. Many reformists felt that ending the use of alcohol would protect American homes and families. They felt that alcohol use was the root of their family’s destruction. Many women felt that their husbands would waste a lot of their income on the purchase of alcohol and not on family needs. Alcohol was often known as a “poison, or sin”. Another hope for the eighteenth amendment was to reduce the crime and death rate. Many people felt that drunkenness was the cause of many of the nations crimes. Prohibitionist felt very passionately on their cause and were often called “dry’s.” They felt their battle was justified and that, “it is manifest destiny that alcohol will not survive the scrutiny,”(Darrow and Yarros, 20).
"The Prohibition Era." The Prohibition Era. Historic Patterson, 22 Mar. 2013. Web. 26 Feb. 2014.
In this paper I will evaluate America's War on Drugs. More specifically, I will outline our nation's general drug history and look critically at how Congress has influenced our current ineffective drug policy. Through this analysis I hope to show that drug prohibition policies in the United States, for the most part, have failed. Additionally, I will highlight and evaluate the influences acting on individual legislators' decisions to continue support for these ineffective policies as a more general demonstration of Congress' role in the formation of our nation's drug policy strategy. Finally, I will conclude this analysis by outlining the changes I feel necessary for future progress to be made. Primary among these changes are a general promotion of drug education and the elimination of our current system's many de-legitimating hypocrisies.
The Prohibition was started in the 1920s when the 18th Amendment was ratified. This leads to many disruptions in America. The 18th Amendment caused many people to become upset with the government. The 18th Amendment was the prohibition of alcohol but was this Prohibition really good for this country? This research paper will tell the positives and negatives of the Prohibition and the overall effect on the country. There are many arguments to both oppositions. This paper will be focusing more on the negative points of the argument. The Prohibition was put into effect on January 16 1920. There was very few people that supported The Prohibition. US leader and temperance movement groups supported it. Many People opposed the Prohibition including, the average citizen, teenagers, and the mafia.
By the turn of the century, temperance societies were a common fixture in communities across the United States. Women played a strong role in the temperance movement, as alcohol was seen as a destructive force in families and marriages. In 1906, a new wave of attacks began on the sale of liquor, led by the Anti-Saloon League (established in 1893) and driven by a reaction to urban growth, as well as the rise of evangelical Protestantism and its view of saloon culture as corrupt and ungodly. In addition, many factory owners supported prohibition in their desire to prevent accidents and increase the efficiency of their workers in an era of increased industrial production and extended working hours. (History.com Staff)
Many Americans, religious leaders, and political leaders saw alcohol as the key to all that was evil, a curse on the nation. Significant numbers of people believed that the consumption of alcoholic beverages presented a serious threat to the integrity of their most vital foundations, especially the family (“Prohibition” 846).