Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of assessment in education to a teacher
The importance of assessment in education to a teacher
Does standardized testing have negative effects on education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Educational tools enable students to learn and allow teachers to asses these students, but how is evaluating these students in the same way and even lowering their marks and averaging them out a representation of how well that students are doing and what they are truly capable of achieving. As Albert Einstein once said “Everybody is a genius, but if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid”.
In the same sense, that if a teacher were to judge a student’s intelligence and ability based off their exam score, the teacher may not see what the student’s true potential is. Any teacher is not able to confidently judge a student’s learning experiences through the same style for all the children in their classroom. As students and teachers, they know that each person is different and has different learning styles. Yet when the teacher assess them they do not offer other types of assessments for the students. These standardized tests then give an inaccurate reflection of a student’s progress and learning abilities, in the same way the fishes’ ability is not catered for. If teachers understand that students all learn in a different way, why does the United States insist on examining them in the same way with standardized tests? Instead of having just one standardized test throughout the United States, there should be different forms of assessments that students have the option to take because not every student is the same and should not be tested the as if they are the same.
Teachers have not always been able to test students frequently on class material, unlike modern teachers. The earliest known standardized tests were administered to government job applicants in 7th Century Im...
... middle of paper ...
.... A., & Glass, D. C. (1967). The Social Effects of Standardized Testing in American Elementary and Secondary Schools. Sociology of Education, Vol. 40, No. 2, pg.115-131.
Robert L. Bangert-Drowns, J. A.-L. (1991). Effects of Frequent Classroom Testing. The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 85, No. 2, pg. 89-99.
Mantel, B. (2005). No Child Left Behind. CQ Researcher, Vol. 15, Issue 20.
Is the Use of Standardized Tests Improving Education in America? (2013). Retrieved from ProCon.org: http://standardizedtests.procon.org/
Glaser, S. (1993). Do traditional IQ tests overlook some bright students? Intelligence Testing, Volume 3, Issue 28.
Leviton, H. S. (1967). The Clearing House. A Critical Analysis of Standardized Testing, Pg. 391-395.
Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services. (2004). Assessment for the Diverse Classroom. Florida Department of Education.
Miltich, Matthew. "Standardized Testing and Assessment Do Not Improve Education." Education: Opposing Viewpoints. New York: Greenhaven, 2005. 151-54. Print.
She explains how standardized tests, such as the one her students took, were designed with numerous interference techniques, included questions which were above-grade material, and were administered with inadequate time to answer the questions being presented. Stahlman goes on to express her frustration with a standardized test which was administered to her students by saying "I watched in horror as my precious students, who were gifted poets and writers, inquisitive scientists and mathematicians, lovers of books, remarkable artists, and caring learners, were forced to silently attempt to master a test that was designed to trip them up." (Stahlman 242) The author also states how these standardized tests seem to be high-stakes in nature due to schools being labeled and ranked according to their scores and teachers being rewarded due to their students achievement in these tests. This article serves as one of my stronger arguments for my case compared to my other sources, due to its exemplification of how the proliferation of such tests is alarming and how the standardized testing of students at such a young age is not appropriate due to their cognitive development. The article is also useful in the sense that is provides a valid and sound argument for the opposition of standardized testing. I will be implementing this source into my argumentative essay by providing examples from Stahlman's text on how bizarre standardized testing might seem when it comes to the assessment of students, especially at such a young age. It will also serve as a good source for proving how much of a bearing standardized tests hold on the assessment of not only students but teachers as
Rooks, Noliwe M. "Why Its Time to Get Rid of Standardized Tests." N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2012.
Some students simply do not test well, others try their hardest and still cannot reach the impracticable standards set for them. The individuals who create these tests do not understand the pressures of being a student, or the struggle to answer thirty-five questions in a compressed time period. One test cannot accurately measure the intelligence of a student.
Ruthven, R. (2007, November 7). Is Standardized Testing Hurting Education? Associated Content. Retrieved March 16, 2014, from www.associatedcontent.com/article/438846/is_standardized_testing_hurting_education.html
Since the U.S. Congress passed the No Child Left Behind program, standardized testing has become the norm for American schools. Under this system, each child attending a school is required to take a standardized test at specific grade points to assess their level of comprehension. Parents, scholars and all stakeholders involved take part in constant discussions over its effectiveness in evaluating students’ comprehension, teachers’ competency and the effects of the test on the education system. Though these tests were put in place to create equality, experts note that they have created more inequality in the classroom. In efforts to explore this issue further, this essay reviews two articles on standardized testing. This essay reviews the sentiments of the authors and their insight into standardized examination. The articles provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that standardized tests are not effective at measuring a teacher’s competency because they do not take into account the school environment and its effect on the students.
Evans, Donia. "The Case Against Standardized Tests." The Meridian Star. 24 Nov. 2013. The Meridian Star. 01 Dec. 2013 .
tests were primarily employed as measures of student achievement that could be reported to parents, and as a means of noting state and district trends (Moon 2) . Teachers paid little attention to these tests, which in turn had little impact on curriculum. However, in the continuing quest for better schools and high achieving students, testing has become a central focus of policy and practice. Standardized tests are tests that attempt to present unbiased material under the same, predetermined conditions and with consistent scoring and interpretation so that students have equal opportunities to give correct answers and receive an accurate assessment. The idea is that these similarities allow the highest degree of certainty in comparing result...
Standardized testing scores proficiencies in most generally accepted curricular areas. The margin of error is too great to call this method effective. “High test scores are generally related to things other than the actual quality of education students are receiving” (Kohn 7). “Only recently have test scores been published in the news-paper and used as the primary criteria for judging children, teachers, and schools.”(2) Standardized testing is a great travesty imposed upon the American Public School system.
Sacks, Peter. Standardized Minds: The High Price of America's Testing Culture and What We Can Do to Change It. Cambridge, MA: Perseus, 2000. Print.
Sacks, Peter. "The Toll Standardized Tests Take." National Education Association. 2000. Web. 2 July 2015.
Standardized testing remains to be a major controversial issue for the American society today. Exams are given to students at different levels in their educational career and are supposed to measure their academic knowledge, but are these tests really the best way to evaluate students? There have been numerous alternatives suggested to replace or be used in conjunction with standardized testing.
Peterson, B. & Neill, M. (2014). Alternatives to standardized testing. Rethinking Schools. Retrieved from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/restrict.a sp?path=archive/13_03/assess.shtml
Standardized testing in the United States is not always a common practice. In the Mid-1800s, Horace Mann, an education reformist, developed a test to administer to a group of students. Its purpose was to determine how students were performing at their current level and whether they were capable of proceeding to a higher level of education, although the student’s success on the test had no negative repercussions. These tests were a necessity at that time because the idea of public education was still being molded and these tests were the only means by which student progress could be measured. Within 35 years of the first recorded examination in 1845, testing became the factor which determined whether students were able to be promoted to the next grade.
Solley, B. A. (2012). On Standardized Testing: An ACEI Position Paper. Childhood Education, 84(1), 31-37. Retrieved December 3, 2012, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2007.10522967