Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Celebrities have a right to privacy
Privacy and celebrity
The role of media in the life of celebrities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Celebrities have a right to privacy
When it comes to the topic of the private lives of famous people, some of us will readily agree that the private lives of celebrities should be off limits to the media. Where this agreement usually ends, however, some would agree that the private lives of the famous people should not be off limits to the media. This argument doesn’t have a simple resolution because both arguments have valid points. In my point of view I agree and disagree that the private lives of the celebrity should be off limits to the media because celebrities have the right to have a private and not open it up to the world, but then I disagree that the private lives of famous people should be on the media because they are famous for a reason and it keeps the fans entertained. …show more content…
They need to know that whatever they do write can either tear or bring up the celebrity they are talking about. Not many people know that it is hard for the celebrity to be constantly watched by the media and always constantly getting bullied by people that don’t know them at all. Celebrities, have feelings just like the rest of us, they aren’t made of stone at all. A blogger named Haider Ali, he wrote a blog called, “Should the Private Life of Celebrities be off limits,” he talks about how celebrities work so hard to get their name known and when they work hard that their lives would also be well known to the public and you can see how hard celebrities try to disguise themselves trying not to get known by the media. He quotes Fred Allen, “A celebrity is a person who works hard all his life to become known, then wears dark glasses to avoid being recognized” (Ali 1). In other words Allen is trying to say is that even if a celebrity works so hard for their name to get well known for their whole lives become the topic on every gossip magazine and social media, but they try to disguise themselves in hats and sunglasses they try to avoid being noticed by the media so they won’t be the talk on any gossip magazines the next day. On the one hand, I agree with Ali that celebrities work so hard to get to where they are now, but they have to wear …show more content…
For example, an ex-reality television star Heidi Montag from the popular reality television show called ‘The Hills’, she and her husband Spencer Pratt have supposedly called gossip magazines on what is going on with their lives and supposedly their truth on what really happened between Montag and Montag’s ex best friend Lauren Conrad a famous fashion designer. A writer named Jamie E. Nordhaus wrote a book called Celebrities’ Right to Privacy: How Far Should the Paparazzi Be Allowed to go, Nordhaus talks about how celebrities use the media for ‘free publicity’, they always want to get their 15 minutes of fame and want the world to know who they are. Usually their ‘publicity stunt’ that they use can sometimes bring them to higher places or sometimes just leave them where they are now. Nordhaus establishes that, “An argument exists that if celebrities expect to use the press for their personal gain, they should expect to be used by the press in return” (Nordhaus 307). In other words, Nordhaus believes that if the celebrity shouldn’t act dumb pretending that they don’t know that they are using
Part of that is because some people’s perspectives of celebrities allow them think as if they’re on a pedestal and are more important than the average human. When people vision these celebrities as these quintessential people it enable’s their own thoughts and opinions on the celebrity. It’s like brainwashing, these celebrities only show the media what they want, which allows them to put up a whole façade and mask who they truly are. During the O.J Simpson trial it opened more people’s minds to visualize the concept that celebrities have the ability to be just as deranged as the average person, and that we are all equal, but the only difference that’s separates us is the fact that their job is in the lime
These judgements are made because celebrities that do not do try at all to get to where they are now or do not do what other celebrities did. Some celebrities are only famous because of the looks and because the person that they are together in a relationship with is a really famous celebrity. The assumptions and visualization that are made by people about celebrities wearing fancy, expensive clothes and having houses that look like mansions are basically true. When an assumption about celebrities is made by a person or fan about the star it is usually a positive statement and most of the time people make a good statement because they have experience meeting the celebrity or it is seen in the internet. On an online video created by Becca Frucht, a reporter and associate producer, it shows how the celebrity and actor Channing Tatum, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and Andrew Garfield surprises the fans by disguising as another person and by putting on makeup. This action made by celebrities can show that not all celebrities do what they do for fame, because these actors like to make and see fans happy. When a person on social media talks bad about a celebrity that have never met but do it become of the things that are said by others and believe
Marshall P. David (1997). Celebrity Power; Fame in Contemporary Culture. May 16, 2010. Electronically retrieved from
The quandary is that some celebrities can't understand that when one is out in plain view of the public, one cannot reasonably expect privacy. Privacy is a right reserved for when one is in private.
...uld be justifiable to emphasize that a good number of them find it sickening to miss the limelight. . Nonetheless, it goes without mentioning that celebrities get exploited because some gossip stories explore the things that would otherwise be considered to be private.
The deception of media consumers allows for the abuse of economic infrastructures of society. An obsession with celebrities’ lives passifies ordinary people in accepting the stratification of the elite businesses and the ordinary citizens. Though pseudo-events and celebrity worship may not be exactly complementary, the similarities of both leaves the public to be utterly vulnerable unless they begin to critically think for themselves.
The public has been able to have access into celebrities’ private lives thanks to the “paparazzi”. Definitely, celebrities will always be in front of the camera. It comes with the frame. Nevertheless, it does not justify photographing the lives of people at the expense of their privacy. Society always wants to keep an eye on their favorite celebrities’ lives.
Over the last few decades celebrity and fame has changed dramatically, from Alexander the Great to Kim Kardashian. Talent and achievements no longer play a huge role when it comes to our celebrities. “Much modern celebrity seems the result of careful promotion or great good looks or something besides talent and achievement” (Epstein2) with that being said celebrity-creation has blossomed into an industry of its own. Keeping up with all the gossips from breaking up to hooking up, law suits and drama many might come to an agreement that celebrity culture is starting to be the great new art form in our new generation and that it ...
After observing and researching all the sources portraying celebrities I have came into a conclusion that todays society it seems like all we want is to be accepted and we tend to look at other people and judge. Its not right, we all are different and thats what makes the world go round. It would be a pretty boring world if we were all the same. Celebrities deal with this everyday, I think the paparazzi know more about some celebrities lives than they actually do. They judge them for who they are and what they do, it is not right nor fair.
With celebrities all over the media, it is expected that some are idolized by their fans, especially the youths. There nothing wrong with people making celebrities their role models. Celebrity role models can be a positive influence by changing people’s lives and way of thinking for the better. On the other hand, when impressionable kids and teens see their celebrity role models do something that is not morally sound, they will come to think that it is acceptable making it more likely for them to do it. This raises the question: should celebrities be role models? For the most part no. Role models are people that are admired by others for their accomplishments and not their status; however, many celebrities
We are part of a generation that is obsessed with celebrity culture. Celebrities are distinctive. Media and consumers alike invented them to be a different race of super beings: flawless, divine and above all the real moral world. In a 1995 New York Times article “In contrast, 9 out of 10 of those polled could think of something
Much of today’s society seems obsessed on what actors/actress, athletes, and music artist are wearing, eating, who they are marrying, dating, where they are vacationing, what affairs they are having or have had, and how they live their everyday lives. What’s so interesting about this obsession is as a society we are implacable and often place celebrities on a pedestal, only to destroy them when they are illusive or promiscuous. Media outlets are swift to report when celebrities are in trouble but quickly forget all their accomplishments. It’s as if we want them to be perfect but once they are associated with a scandal we embark on destroying their reputation and character. Should society hold celebrities to higher standards just because they are paid millions for endorsements and a craft they worked hard to perfect? Do we as a society have the right to castigate celebrities when they misbehave? Do celebrities have the right to become livid when they are focused on for their immoral behavior? Do they love the media attention only when it benefits them? Before we can answer the above questions, would we, furthermore, can we live our life as a celebrity if given the opportunity?
They want to know everything about them and have a desire for more information. Celebrities should have their right to privacy due to historical/practical rights, their invasion of privacy with paparazzi, and their childrens’ rights to privacy. They are ordinary people just with a famous role in life. Historical/practical rights are one of the biggest issues and it all started back in colonial America. In colonial America, privacy was constrained.
When it comes to the topic of should the private lives of famous people be off limits to the media, most of us will readily agree that no private life should be entirely off limits. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of how the media always finds their way into the life of the artist. Whereas some are convinced that the media should not interfere into the private lives of the celebrity, others maintain that because even if they make a lot of fans happy, they can always live a life of loneliness. I agree that the private lives of a famous person should be off limits to the media because they might have everything in the world but underneath all that they might be living their life melancholy and loneliness.
In previous years, the issue with the paparazzi and media has grown. With the advances in technology, it makes taking and posting photos of celebrities or public figures much easier. The public appears greedy and feels privy to their private lives. Celebrities, or any public figure, have very limited privacy due to the paparazzi and media. The paparazzi and media are also affecting celebrities’ children. Currently, laws are being put in effect to stop this.