Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Individualism vs collectivism
Individualism vs collectivism in society
The role of the government in a business
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Individualism vs collectivism
The source states that by practicing collectivism as a society, individual members will be held back and the strength of the economy will diminish. This statement is very clearly in favour of individualism. It explains that the productive members of society - people who contribute positively to the economy - should not be restricted, but instead given economic freedom. to pursue their self-interests. The source takes on a capitalist perspective, wanting each individual to have the ability to reach their full potential in their productivity, which will in extension benefit the economy as productivity rates will go up. Because of this there will also be more goods available at a reasonable price, which helps decrease inflation and benefit the …show more content…
An example of restrictions put on productive members of society is the foreign worker’s policy in Canada right now. It states that foreign workers can only spend four years working in Canada, and then they have to leave the country for four years before they can come back. And unless they get their permanent resident card in the four years working here, they have no choice but to leave. A good employee contributes positively to society by working hard. By working hard more product is being produced and sold, which means more profit is being made by a business. This profit means that the goods and services will be less expensive, benefitting the economy by decreasing the rate of inflation. For example, a foreign worker comes to Canada and gets a job at a restaurant. They work extremely hard and turn a good profit. The restaurant benefits from their good work ethic, and by extension so does the economy. But after four years of doing a great job the worker is sent back to their home country, and the restaurant is down a good employee. This means their overall profit won’t be as large, and they have to hire, train, and pay somebody new to replace the worker they lost. All of these expenses simply because Canada put a restriction on the amount of time foreign workers can spend in the country. An individual should be allowed to …show more content…
An example of extreme government control is the state of communism that occurred under Stalin’s power. He created multiple radical economic policies that completely reinvented the Soviet Union. By implementing these policies, he became a totalitarian. He tried to use his policies to force society to comply to his communist vision. The restrictions Stalin put in place of businesses were supposed to help industrialize the Soviet Union, to try and get them to the same level of economic stability as other countries that were under the new economic policy. However, it had the opposite effect, destroying the individuality of businesses. He nationalized private businesses, opening them up to other nations. By doing this he thought he was industrializing the Soviet Union, but he was actually destroying the hard work businesses had done to get to the level of privatization and success they had. Some of these businesses were built from the ground up. They were family owned and operated businesses that were helping families survive and pay for the basic necessities. Stalin took them away, stripping these people of their hard work and accomplishments. The restriction on private businesses may have reduced the cost of goods, and helped to industrialized the Soviet Union, but the economy did nothing but suffer. Goods were underpriced, meaning little to no profit was being made. By extension, employees were
Is Canada a nation or has its control just switched empirical hands? As Professor Hutcheson asked, did Canada go from "Colony to Nation or Empire to Empire?" This question has greatly influenced Canada's changing identity since her birth as a British colony with Confederation in 1867 to the present day. The purpose of this essay is to critically analyse the shifting Canadian identities between the years 1890 to 1960. The objective is to illustrate Canada's transforming identity by using the novels The Imperialist by Sara Jeanette Duncan, Barometer Rising by Hugh MacLennan, and Fifth Business by Robertson Davies and to connect the stories of each of these works of fiction to the varying political, economic, and social issues of their times. Each book is written by a prominent author, and portrays an accurate reflection of the demanding political, economic, and social concerns throughout the late nineteen and first half of the twentieth century of Canadian history. All of the novels reflect Canada's peripheral view of the world, as opposed to a central point of view, because throughout its history Canada has always been perceived as a secondary player. As George Grant says in his literary piece Lament for a Nation, Canada is "a branch plant society" , meaning Canada is controlled by another power. The essential question is where has Canada's loyalties traditionally lay and how has this shaped the Canadian identity. The Imperialist by Sara Jeanette Duncan, written in 1904 reflects a very British influenced Canada. At this time, Canada is still a British colony under British rule, and the people of Canada are very content to consider themselves British. The novel predominately ill...
The economy is the one reason why individualism has not progressed in the 20th century. In the new society, the nation itself owns, manages and distributes all the capital. They also organize and produce all of the nation's goods. The nation's wealth is divided evenly between all their citizens and money does not exist anymore, citizen's are given a certain amount of credit that they can spend anyway they like. But there are some good in having the citizen's managing the economy, for instance, they are able to set the supply and demand curves of every product since there is no more competition between companies. There is no more failed business since there is only one centralized industry also
In Canada there is a process to lawmaking that follows the rationalistic model — they are the functionalist view, conflict theory and the ‘moral entrepreneur’ thesis. In this essay, the rationalistic model, will at first, be explained then this paper will inform the reader to the functionalist view, the conflict perspective then the moral entrepreneur theory and what four different Canadian laws follow this theory. The essay will then, finally, explain which law is best understood with reference to the theory that it is linked to in comparison with others.
The individual is the unit on which capitalism is based. Bonds between merchants were based on free competition rather than the need to trade. This liberating system of economy allows the individual to direct his own business. Individualism developed with the gradual transfer of power from large establishments to the individual and his rights and opportunities as a member of society. The importance and power of the individual was not fully realized until ideas were transformed through the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the rise of capitalism. These movements helped Europe realize the latent potential within an individual.
The word collectivism often makes people cringe. Overall, there is a general fear of not being able to make personal decisions in America. According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, collectivism can be defined as; emphasis on collective rather than individual action or identity (“Collectivism”). In Anthem, Ayn Rand describes an extreme collectivist society.
Have you ever wondered which events in Canadian history have been the most significant in shaping Canadian identity? Many significant events in the twentieth century left a lasting legacy for Canada. Canada would not be the culturally rich, prosperous and progressive nation that it is today, without its immigration patterns in the past. World War I (WWI) was also a significant event as it united Canada and left behind a legacy of sacrifice and national pride. Economic development during the post war period contributed to Canadian success nationally and globally. Immigration, WWI and economic development were significant events in Canadian twentieth century history. Each event brought new and powerful
Canada’s political and governmental systems, while much like our own here in the U.S., is rather different and, of course, has its own unique story and parties that clash for control during debates and elections. Much like our country, Canada’s two main political parties are the Liberals and Conservatives, but more have sprung up over the years, and the country has come up from a two party system to the multi party system it calls its own today.
Every country on this Earth has to have its own independence in order to progress, and be able to survive on its own without the help of others. But there will always be times when that country needs the help of its neighbors but to an extent. It is very important for Canada as a growing country to stop relying on the U.S and increase trade with other countries and giving them whatever they want, stop putting decisions in the palms of the U.S, and establish our own defenses. Canadians have always been seen as diverse and independent. If Canadians keep following the ideas of the U.S, Canadians do not deserve that title because Canadians are not being independent.
Nationalism is a political, economic and social ideology, doctrine and practice describing the “advocacy of or support for the interests of one’s own nation”, especially above the interests of other outside nations, individuals, and regions (“Nationalism”). It is a conscious state of mind where individuals believe their duty and loyalty is to the nation-state. It believes that a nation is the most crucial aspect for human social life because it gives a nation a sense of unity by promoting the shared interests and identities of the individuals such as language, race, religion etc. (“Nationalism”). Therefore, the aim of nationalism is to preserve and promote the nation’s culture as opposed to other cultures. Politically, the goal is gaining and
The debate over individualism and collectivism has been the fundamental conflict both in political philosophy and in ethics. Philosophers such as Ayn Rand think that human beings are fundamentally individuals, and that everyone exists for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself. But it is very rare for one to live completely alone by himself. The entire human race would not be able to evolve and reproduce, if humans were individualistic in nature, and each individual needs some form of support from group to enhance its own odds of surviving. Humans naturally are in need of each other to survive, to reproduce, and to protect their offspring. Such needs are innately built into every human being, and
Regionalism is a political ideology based on a collective sense of place or attachment, and is discussed in terms of Canadian society, culture, economy and politics (Westfall, 3). Canada is known internationally as a nation incorporating several multiregional interests and identities into its unification of culture. Its diverse population is comprised of numerous ethnicities, religions, sexual orientations and traditions; and all resides under one federal government. Ever since the founding of Canada, it has developed into regional cleavages and identities, based on various geographical topologies, lifestyles and economic interests (Westfall, 6). It is these characteristics which make it problematic for the federal government to represent all demands of its people on a national level. Regionalism is thus an issue within regards to political proficiency in the Federal government.
“Multiculturalism” entered public speech in the late 1960s and early 1970s in Canada that focused on unique cultural diversity, nationalities, and ethnicity across the nation. Multiculturalism and Immigration are important factors in the development of Canada to attain a strong multicultural example of economic stability, social and political growth which leads to the emergence of Canada’s identity and culture.
Collectivist ideology such as welfare state puts the whole state in an economic hardship because we must rely on one another to be able to stand up. However, in a society that promotes individualism economically, we are able to create individual reliance and basically, “each man for himself.” This promotes each person economic freedom and growth because a capitalistic society that rejects economic collectivism does not require everyone in society to “pitch in” and help those who are not economically stable. By relying on welfare state, you are also relying on the pocket of the people. This makes it harder for the state to achieve economic growth since the money is not circulating around the economy. It is being used by those who cannot support themselves economically. An example of this is the ainti-poverty programs in America. Instead of pulling people out of poverty, it is increasing the federal spending even more. America has spent nearly $20 trillion dollars in attempt to defeat the war on poverty. Since the government is spending so much money on this welfare, it is just giving many people a greater reason to stay on the program. According to the Senate Budget Committee, recipients are making $30/hr per household. Instead of lifting people out, welfare state gives them more reasons to stay and abuse the privilage. This does not
...society must be voluntary only” (Social Darwinism in American Thought, Hofstadter, 50). America is the place to go to make your dreams come true. As an American, you develop the get-more-want-more phenomenon. This means that no matter how much you have, you will never be satisfied. Are you the type to make others dreams come true, or are you the type to go for your dreams at any cost? Do you know who you are, or did you not realize it until you read this essay? There’s nothing wrong with being either one, individual or collective. We tend to go with the more socially acceptable option because we are so obsessed with what the majority thinks that there is not even a split second when we get to decide for ourselves. The next time you wake up in the morning, look in the mirror and decide. Decide who you want to be. Individualist or collectivist, which one are you?
It is human nature to see those who are different and group them into distinct categories. The distinction of Individualism versus Collectivism is one that is currently being studied extensively. On one side, individualism sees individuals as the fundamental unit of a society. Individuals are supposed to be unique, independent, and most importantly, willing to put their own interests above all others. On the other hand, collectivism views the basic building block of society as social groups, stressing the interpersonal bonds between people. Collectivist values dictate that group goals and values have higher precedence than an individual’s. Due to the seemingly polar opposite nature of these ideologies, it is inevitable that they will be compared to see which is more beneficial to the country and its people. Some might point to the success of the US, an extremely individualistic country, in support of individualistic values. They will point to the freedom of choice and diversity that individualism boasts of. Others stress the flaws of the US in response, and while both sides do have their truths, the costs that come with individualistic values are too great to be ignored. Highly individualistic attitudes have caused many large scale problems which have long been identified as difficult to resolve issues. These problems include, but are not limited to, promoting aggressive acts, creating an obsession with social power, and allowing a system of injustice to be born.