Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of traditions in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of traditions in society
The two videos that I like the most from this class was the ted talk name “America’s native prisoners of war” by Aaron Huey, and the documentary “When Your Hands are tied” by Mia Boccella and Marley Shebala. These two videos brought my attention because in the first video which is the ted talk the author of the video is an outsider of the society that he is trying to represent he did not go through the experience that the native people that he is trying to defend went through. In the documentary when your hands are tied this is a little bit more personal I think because this is a documentary where people from the tribe and people that went through all this obstacles are trying to heal themselves. In the ted talk “Americas native prisoners of war” by Aaron Huey this ted talk he begins by saying that at the beginning of this project it was very difficult for him because of his skin color which is white he say that the Lakota people would call him wasichu is a Lakota word that means not Indian but it has another definition which is the ones who takes the best meat for himself. In this video he talks about the unfairness and the treaties that were broken by the Americans. He talks about the false promises that the American people made to the native Indians when they were trying to buy their land. He is goes into detail on how the chief of the tribes were told that if they don’t sign the treaties that are been presented in front of them than their tribe will not have food. He also says why the American Government broke the treaties that they made with the native people because they found a lot of gold in the Lakota territory and they wanted to take over so they can have money and power. I find this a very dirty move because if you are ... ... middle of paper ... ... Benavidez represents todays young who are responsible of bring the native american culture alive with the help of a leader like Talache and the rest of his young community. This for their older generation because of their sircuntances of their time. The Relocation program: the relocation program began on the 1950’s. Some people needed to adjust from the reservation life to the city life and this change was really big for them because they were not use to this kind of life. Retention of Traditionalism: for this young generations is really hard to keep up with the traditions because society has put it in them that in order to be accepted In society they need to blend in they cannot be different, so is hard for the young generation to keep up with their traditionalist side but at the same time be able to do the things that the people in the society they are living do.
When watching this documentary, I was shocked that Native Americans were treated so barbaric at this point in time for simply living a different lifestyle. I am disappointed that anyone thought that withdrawing Native Americans from their reservations and their culture would “convert” them to living a more modern lifestyle. For example, Sally General, a Mush
In the beginning of this speech, he talks about how the “fight” between the Indians and whites was unfair because of the weapons the whites possessed. Despite this, the Indians still believed they had a chance to defend themselves, unfortunately they were no match for the guns. What initiated this fight was the land, belonging to the Indians, that was taken with no regards to the inhabitants. He wanted to explain that Indians were of no harm to the “white society” and wanted to carry on with their own way of life. He feared that Indians will lose their culture and will become similar to whites in a negative sense. Some similarities he lists include lying and hypocrisy, adulterers, lazy, all talk, and
Reading the autobiography of Chief Black Hawk made me realize how giving the Sac tribe actually was compared to as they call it the whites. The Sac Tribe was based on peace and spiritual lifestyle. They were not all for themselves none of them were. If someone they knew didn’t have what they needed but they did, they wouldn’t hesitate to share. That is how all communities should be but unfortunately we aren’t all as giving as the Sac. They were such good people, which make me wonder why the whites were so devious towards them. They could trick them into agreeing to something without even knowing it. The Sacs had great crops so no one in their village went hungry and they made sure of it. All of them hunted even the women which gave them plenty of meat, fruits, and vegetables until the next time to hunt. This village was full of very happy people. They had everything they needed to survive and they were all so close, and they all helped each other out and had each other’s backs at the end of the day. If I had to choose a tribe to be in I would go to the Sac tribe just from reading this autobiography.
Growing up Black Elk and his friends were already playing the games of killing the whites and they waited impatiently to kill and scalp the first Wasichu, and bring the scalp to the village showing how strong and brave they were. One could only imagine what were the reasons that Indians were bloody-minded and brutal to the whites. After seeing their own villages, where...
Lakota Woman Essay In Lakota Woman, Mary Crow Dog argues that in the 1970’s, the American Indian Movement used protests and militancy to improve their visibility in mainstream Anglo American society in an effort to secure sovereignty for all "full blood" American Indians in spite of generational gender, power, and financial conflicts on the reservations. When reading this book, one can see that this is indeed the case. The struggles these people underwent in their daily lives on the reservation eventually became too much, and the American Indian Movement was born. AIM, as we will see through several examples, made their case known to the people of the United States, and militancy ultimately became necessary in order to do so.
With hope that they could even out an agreement with the Government during the progressive era Indian continued to practice their religious beliefs and peacefully protest while waiting for their propositions to be respected. During Roosevelt’s presidency, a tribe leader who went by as No Shirt traveled to the capital to confront them about the mistreatment government had been doing to his people. Roosevelt refused to see him but instead wrote a letter implying his philosophical theory on the approach the natives should take “if the red people would prosper, they must follow the mode of life which has made the white people so strong, and that is only right that the white people should show the red people what to do and how to live right”.1 Roosevelt continued to dismiss his policies with the Indians and encouraged them to just conform into the white’s life style. The destruction of their acres of land kept being taken over by the whites, which also meant the destruction of their cultural backgrounds. Natives attempted to strain from the white’s ideology of living, they continued to attempt with the idea of making acts with the government to protect their land however they never seemed successfully. As their land later became white’s new territory, Indians were “forced to accept an ‘agreement’” by complying to change their approach on life style.2 Oklahoma was one of last places Natives had still identity of their own, it wasn’t shortly after that they were taken over and “broken by whites”, the union at the time didn’t see the destruction of Indian tribes as a “product of broken promises but as a triumph for American civilization”.3 The anger and disrespect that Native tribes felt has yet been forgotten, white supremacy was growing during the time of their invasion and the governments corruption only aid their ego doing absolutely nothing for the Indians.
When one hears the word “relocation”, I assume, they think of taking one thing exactly as it was and placing it in a different location, but placing it as it was and with the same resources. Relocation is a loaded term because before the word relocation came about settlers of early America were forcefully pushing native peoples off their homelands; they just didn’t have the term “relocation”. In 1838 Mireau B. Lamar, president of the Republic of Texas, “initiated a policy of ethnic cleansing to drive all Indians out of Texas.”1(p. 337). “Ethnic Cleansing” is a pretty extreme way of saying relocation, however, that is the exact idea they were implementing. The evolution of words is constant, being that familiar ideas and policies adopt new identities through the adoption of words. This is important to take into consideration because throughout the history of America and its dealing with Indian peoples many policies and agendas have been recycled through just with a different name, they never really stray far from the core objective. The U.S. evolved these words to masks the further harming of the Indians, which was dependent on the perceptions of the public’s view, but usually without the least bit of consideration for these people of whom it will affect.
Native Americans, namely the Cherokees, had been living on the lands of the eventual Americas without European contact for years until the 1700s. After contact was made and America had gained freedom, people like President Andrew Jackson, believed that the Cherokees should be removed from the land that was rightfully the United States’. President Jackson even hired Benjamin F. Curry of Tennessee to help with the removal of the Cherokees from east of the Mississippi River. Curry believed that his job was to try to drive the Cherokees to either want to leave without a second thought or sign a treaty agreeing to America’s terms. Curry’s actions led to the natives of the Cherokee nation’s objections of being removed so miserably. Many complained about how their significant others or children were either forcibly removed or held to get the natives to agree to leave. Some of the natives decided that they would try to fight their way out of being removed, but some, like Rebecca Neugin, a member of the Cherokee nation’s father were persuaded not to resist so that they or their families would not be harmed more than necessary. When some of the Americans, like Evan Jones, saw this, they tried to spread awareness of how the Cherokees were being treated,...
Healing is a relative term. Healing is also a universal term. The question is how these two fundamental parts of human existence related. The key is found in healing hospitals. Now to many, a healing hospital sounds redundant. However, a healing hospital refers not only physical healing, but also an all-around healing environment. This encompassing theory of a healing hospital provides care for physical, emotional, spiritual, and psychological needs for all patients. Instead of discrimination and rejection of religion and faith, it uses these cornerstones of people’s worldview to reinforce their healing process. This is a very biblical aspect of care
Times were very hard for Native Americans during the mid to late 1800s. The reasons for their afflictions could only be blamed upon the United States of America. For thousands of years, Native Americans had roamed around the Americas. There had also been many tribes spread across the West that fought between each other in order to have their land.1 It wasn’t until after reconstruction in the United States, that the white Americans started having ordeals with the Native Americans. The main tribes involved in the conflict starting around 1850 were the Lakota people and the Sioux. The relationship between them can only be remembered for broken treaties and wars. It is true that these tribes had only mind there own business for many centuries for the White Americans. It wasn’t around the 1850’s, that the United States were interested in the gold that was existing in the territories the belonged to the Native Americans. This would be the starting point of what historians call the Indian Wars that would last about half a century. The question is though, why? Why were there so many battles between the United States government and the Native Americans? Why was there so many hatred between them? Finally, who caused the violence? Many historians would believe that the government only wanted to have gold and then leave the Indian’s at peace and that they were the ones that acted irrationally. However, this is in fact a lie. It is genuine that they also wanted to rob them from there identity and who the Native Americans were as people. There was something much more than just gold in the Indian Wars. Although it may seem that the United States government only wanted riches from the Native American’s land, they actually wanted to extract t...
Document 5 of the Council of 1973 states that the federal government had directed U.S. troops to destroy squatters homes and other structures but the commissioners pointed to the existing crops and homes of settlers as justification for U.S. ownership of Indian land. The commissioners had said that the time had come for the Indians to sign over that land to the United States (pg 50). They see this as a go-ahead on taking and controlling the Indian’s land. Thomas Jefferson in the Second Inaugural Address states, “humanity enjoins us to teach them (Indian’s) agriculture and the domestic arts: to encourage them to that industry which alone can enable them to maintain their place in existence and liberally furnish them with the implements of husbandry and household use” (pg 56). He is trying to say that the Indian’s do not know how to survive on their own and that they need the help from the settlers on how to survive, when in reality they have already been surviving for so long without their help. He also tries to domesticate them saying that they “furnished them with the implements of husbandry and household use.” He wants Indian’s to live by the white mans mean of life and not live how they have been living for already so many years. In Andrew Jackson’s State of the Union Address, he shows similarities of wanting to domesticate and change the way the Indians live. He says,
Like many Native American Tribes, the Cherokee were systematically suppressed, robbed, dispossessed, and forced out of their ancestral homelands by Americans. This topic has become really difficult and uncomfortable to talk about for no reason other than embarrassment. We, as Americans, are mortified that our own country would partake in the act of forcibly removing a culture from it’s home. We are mortified that we let this become a socially acceptable way to treat Native Americans; but mostly, we are mortified that we conned the Cherokee Natives into signing an unlawful treaty that forced them to leave their Georgia homeland and move west via the Trail of Tears. The novel, The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears, written by Theda Perdue
48) "we never got the habit of happiness as others know it. It was always as if
...ing revelation of the greed, covetousness, and desire that dwells in humankind. It really makes you think that almost entire races of people were wiped out just for gold and land. This article by Hagen brought back to me the realization of how the American Indians were treated. I am a non-traditional student, so I have studied what happened to the American Indian in other history classes and I am familiar with much of the information in the article, although I did not know that it happened in such a small amount of time
Although we might not all agree on whoever or whatever created the human body, I think we can all agree it is an amazing, self-functioning machine. The ability of the body to maintain a healthy status quo and to heal itself without input is unlike any man made machine in existence. However, with today’s society wanting more and at an ever accelerating rate, the incredible inventions of doctors, engineers and scientists have that work in conjunction with the body to heal is truly amazing. Despite the body’s talent to heal subconsciously, it turns out there is many ways we can affect the process with our current health, both positive and negatively. The human body has programmed ways to recoup and revive damaged cells but in an ever changing world there are many things we can do externally and internally to affect the body’s already amazing process.