Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Use of mobile phones by students
Positive and negative implications of social media
The impact of social media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Use of mobile phones by students
Social media is a web-based tool that allows people to communicate, share interests and activities and consume information. There are many types of social media such as virtual games, publishing websites and communication websites. In “Connectivity and Its Discontents,” Sherry Turkle talks about how technology has taken over communication. In “Mind over Mass Media,” Steven Pinker talks about the growing controversies of technology and media. In “Reality is Broken,” Jane McGonigal talks about how games can bring a change to the world. In “Connectivity and Its Discontents,” Turkle believes that text messaging has become the connection of choice. Whereas in “Mind over Mass Media,” Pinker believes that the internet has increased our brainpower. …show more content…
For instance, when we use social media to communicate with one another and the world we feel more connected and closer. As Turkle states in “Connectivity and its Discontents,” “The technology has become like a phantom limb, it is so much a part of them” (144). Specifically, in “Connectivity and Its Discontents,” it is told how a twenty-one-year old college student prefers to communicate through texting and social media websites instead of using a phone (Turkle 192). To emphasize, when we communicate with people over the phone we cannot see them we are only talking to them. When we communicate through social media, we can see an individual, see what they are doing, and feel like we are right next to them. When we communicate with the world we find people who have the same feelings and interests as ourselves. This is what makes it a personal connection. After all, when you personally connect with someone and learn to understand one another it unites …show more content…
Likewise, social media and technology helps us progress. It has become an advantage to help us learn. Social media and technology provides us with the tools to use information in a convenient and understandable way. According to Pinker, “Knowledge is increasing exponentially” (197). To illustrate, in “Mind over Mass Media,” the author tells the reader that discoveries are multiplying like fruit flies (Pinker 196). In addition, the author also states that the decade in old-fashioned electronics and rock music was the decade in which Intelligence Quotient scores increased (Pinker 196). Not to mention, the author also states that scientists are learning more with the help of Powerpoint (Pinker 196). In today’s world we have a variety of technology, from Powerpoint and the internet to cell phones and Google. Social media and technology provides us with the tools to use information in a convenient and understandable way. All people, including scientists, are using technology as resources to improve their research and theories. Technology and social media have proven to help because more things are being created and new inventions are being discovered. Therefore, our brains are increasing with the help of the internet and information
People have the fundamental desire to maintain strong connections with others. Through logic and reasoning, Sherry states, “But what do we have, now that we have what we say we want, now that we have what technology makes easy?”(Turkle). Face to face conversations are now mundane because of the accessibility to interact at our fingertips, at free will through text, phone calls and social media. Belonging, the very essence of a relationship has now become trivial.
In the article Mind Over Mass Media, Steven Pinker claims that the use of technology enhances our intelligence, despite what critics say, when used in productive ways. Pinker supports his claim by explaining that if electronic media were hazardous to intelligence, the quality of science would be plummeting and that philosophy, history and cultural criticism, are flourishing will the use of the Web. The author’s purpose is persuade readers that new media is allowing mankind to locate information at a faster rate, in order to prevent readers from believing that technology is hurting us. The author writes in an informal tone for technology users.
People deceive themselves that social technology improves human intimacy and help loneness. They think social technology give them opportunities to connect to other even they are far away, and give comfort to them if they need a listener, friend and even lover. Gopnik writes people have causal understanding since they were born by indicating example that “eat more to grow more”. It is the major abilities to make possibilities real. “Once you know how one thing is causally connected to another you can predict what will happen to one thing if you act to change another---you can see what a difference making things different will make. (Gopnik 172) When using social technology, people know that the relationship between it and people themselves help them change to other situation they want. They know phone can help them connect to other but they also understand what might cost them if they continuously pay attention to social technology. But they don’t quit using it because people are allowing it to bring us to places that we don’t what to go.
He feels as if critics need to take a reality check, “When comic books were accused of turning juveniles into delinquents in the 1950s, crime was falling to record lows, just as the denunciations of video games in the 1900’s coincided with the great American crime decline.” He feels that the advances in technology has no affect on our brain’s cognitive functions feels there is no evidence on disabling our learning capabilities. Pinker’s disposition on the positive outcome of technological advances is so profound, he feels it is even correlated with the rise in IQ”s in the modern years. He acknowledges that access to mass media is a powerful tool that can engulf one’s life. Pinker just feels that all humans have self-control and are able to put their phone down when the time is
Carr supports his claims by including personal experiences with the Internet of others. Scott Karp who was literature major in college, admitted to Carr that he has stopped reading books altogether (732). Karp now prefers to read everything online. Karp also questions whether the Internet has changed his course of thinking (Carr, 732). Bruce Friedman explained how he barely has the tolerance for reading long pieces, and skimming is now how he reads (Carr, 732). By Carr discussing changes brought by other technologies, he strengthens the support of his claims. He proves that technology does have a way of affecting us cognitively whether the effect is negative or positive. Carr also proves that as technology advances our mind is modified to according to those advances. “As we use what the sociologist Daniel Bell has called our “intellectual technologies”—the tools that extend our mental rather than our physical capacities—we inevitably begin to take on the qualities of those technologies” (Carr, 737).
However, in spite of Mary Shelly’s warning, it seems man has gone forward with its creation. Yet the result has not been a world of death and destruction, but a world of connectivity and immediate satisfaction. Sherry Turkle writes “we look to the network to defend us against loneliness even as we use it to control the intensity of our connections” (Turkle, 274). Before the postal system it could take months before hearing from someone across the country. In today’s age a text message contains the same thought of reaching a person thousands of miles away, with the added benefit of instant gratification. This instant gratification, in the eyes of Turkle, “redraws the boundaries of intimacy and solitude,” (Turkle, 272). At face value the boundaries of intimacy and solitude are in fact merely human construction, it is impossible to change the mode of communication without changing boundaries. In this case, while some barriers are constructed between humans physically, many more paths open for human interaction on an intellectual level. Perhaps the future is not the interactions of human physically, but the interaction of minds through a common source, such as the
In his article “Mind Over Mass Media” published in the New York times on 2010, the author Steven Pinker, a reputed cognitive scientist, linguist, and psychology professor at Harvard University, analyzes the controversy surrounding the harms that the amount of new forms of media have on the intelligence and attitudes of individuals nowadays. Pinker’s essay provides arguments that put to test the popular discussion about the excessive use of social media and the supposed moral and cognitive declines caused by it. By presenting some logical analyses and studies in the area of psychology, Pinker builds very strong arguments to persuade his readers. In addition, the essay is argumentative and its intended audience is any individual that wants to
“Social media, a web-based and mobile technology, has turned communication into a social dialogue, and dominates the younger generation and their culture. As of 2010, Generation Y now outnumbers Baby Boomers, and 96% of Gen Y has joined a social network” (Qualman 1). Social media now accounts for the number one use of the Internet, and this percentage is rising bigger every day (Qualman). As a consequence, people are becoming more reliant on social media, which has a led to a number of advantageous as well as unfavorable effects. The world is more connected today than it has ever been in the past, and this is all because of growth in technology. What has yet to be determined though
t and telecommunication systems along with mass media, people will hardly be ever refuse from internet, unless a new, more progressive technology emerges. At the moment, the impact of Internet on human brains and the way of thinking is obvious and almost irrevocable but the impact can apparent its effects in a long-run perspective. Works Cited Carr, N. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The Atlantic, 2008. Retrieved on December 1, 2013 from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868/ Carr, N. What’s the Internet Doing to Our Brains?, 2010.
“I didn't know what Facebook was, and now that I do know what it is, I have to say, it sounds like a huge waste of time –Betty White (“Betty White Quotes,” 2014, para. 1).” This quote can be interpreted to fit with several of the social media avenues that many people spend their time on. Day in and day out people post, tweet, share, and pin countless times throughout the world. These different forms of communication were first created for an easier way for people to connect with others. Yet now, so much time is spent on these social sites that it has warped the interactive part and is causing more damage than good. Many are growing a desire and are living for the amount of “likes” they can receive on a post or how many re-tweets they can generate. Instead of going to these outlets to participate in a partial portion of their social lives, people are filling that time with the technological aspect of communication. As White said, this can become an inordinate amount of wasted time and can ultimately grow into further damaging circumstances. These different social media channels can cause emotional harm through disparaging the relationship between friends, conjuring of a narcissistic personality, and the retrogradation of ones self-esteem.
Social networking has increasingly had a huge impact on society. Technology has opened the door to a vast amount of information and to the ability to relay that information to practically anybody at anytime and anywhere. People are constantly checking their email, updating their status on Facebook, sending tweets on Twitter, instant messaging, and texting. The debate of whether the use of social networking is a negative or positive aspect is a continuous one. In the case of Steven Pinker, his essay “Mind over Mass Media” argues that media technologies have a positive effect on mental development. In contrast, Sherry Turkle’s essay “Connectivity and Its Discontents” asserts that technology has a negative effect on interpersonal relationships. Although Pinker makes many excellent points on how technology is improving intelligence and Turkle provides exceptional ideas of how technology is damaging to relationships, neither Pinker nor Turkle provides the best answer to this question due to their lack of credibility and inclusion of logical fallacies. Instead, we should, while aware of the risks and dangers of social networking, use the Internet to its full potential.
“Connected but Alone” In 2012, when the social media, texting, and online communication was on the rise. It was forming modern relationships: with others, and with ourselves. Some people welcomed this change also was looking forward to seeing whatever awaits in the future. However, others could not neglect the fact that this technology is transforming human relations. Modern technology was changing how people relate to each other.
When you think about social media what do you think of. Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest or Vine. Well social media is more than that. Social media is not just Facebook, Instagram or Twitter. Social media is any online website that lets you interact with other people, share photo and information and keeps you updated. Or do you think about how it’s made a positive or negative impact on today’s society. In my personal opinion I think social media has made both positive and negatives impacts on today’s society .Some of the negative impacts are cyberbullying and addiction, and the positive impacts are spreading the word and increasing business sales.
Social media is a controversy topic in today’s society. Some people think that social media destroys human interaction and real life human relationships. While others think that social media is a bless to humanity. Social media makes human interaction much more convenient and much faster than real life human interaction, it makes globalization a reality, it gives a chance for introverted people to express themselves, and it also benefit develop international relationships whether its business or social.
The social media is one of the most common means of communication and pretty much of knowing anything and everything around the world these days, and it is growing very rapidly. It changes and affects each person in a different way, or ways. Some may argue that social media has a bad influence on children and young adults, while most people see that the social media has a more positive effect on them than a negative one. Social media is basically the new way of keeping in touch with everything and everyone, and of even strengthening bonds between each other. This essay will argue that social media has improved communication between people, and has also improved the means of communication between them.