Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Prostitution on ethics
Essays on legalizing prostitution
Writings of mary wollstonecraft
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Prostitution on ethics
"Marriage is law, and the worst of all laws."(Godwin in Paul 113) is what William Godwin, an 18th century English writer who is also known as "the founder of philosophical anarchism" (Philip), wrote in his Political Justice book. His future-to-become wife, Mary Wollstonecraft, was another English writer whose fame shone after the publication of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Wollstonecraft was one of the first women to come open and sharp against the inferiority shown towards women at her time and no different from Godwin; she also attacked the marriage institute by calling it "legal prostitution" (Tomalin 106). But despite their theories, both of these writers acted different in practice. They both married, and what is astounding is that they married each other. The announcement of the marriage left everybody astonished and not able to understand how the paradox had happened. How could these two intellectual writers, who through their work told the world "Do not marry. Marriage is slavery." marry each other? To be able to understand the causes that led them to oppose their own moral laws, one first needs to know how and why each of them supported their anti-marriage philosophies.
Godwin was a man of reason. "Reason, far more than the affections, guided his actions, and while he sought after One who would satisfy his intellect, he seems to have never felt the need, and therefore never the power of adoration and self-abasement." (Paul 27). Having such a standing, love and passion would never be enough reasons for him to lead a person to marriage. As mentioned at the beginning, he saw marriage as a law, a law that would restrict a person's actions and furthermore impose on him what actions to take. Thus he said: "Whatever our understandings may tell us of the person from whose connection we should derive the greatest improvement, of the worth of one woman, and the demerits of another, we are obliged to consider what is law, and not what is justice.
Add to this that marriage is an affair of property, and the worst of all properties. So long as two human beings are forbidden by positive institution to follow the dictates of their own mind, prejudice is alive and vigorous." (Godwin in Paul 113)
On the other side, Wollstonecraft was probably one of the most passionate women ever. She couldn't stay without loving. The element of love is what gave her and her work life.
The angry tone of Wollstonecraft’s “Vindication of the Rights of Women” significantly contrasts with the cautionary tone of Austen’s “On Making an Agreeable Marriage,” seeking to reform society rather than guide people to live in that society. When Austen describes the drawbacks of loveless marriage, she writes that “Anything is to be preferred or endured rather than marrying without affection” (Austen 72-73). Austen uses “preferred” and “endured” to warn her niece against marrying too quickly, creating a cautionary tone. Moreover, “anything” emphasizes the miserableness of a marriage without affection, beseeching Austen’s niece to verify her love before diving headfirst into a marriage. In contrast, when demonizing the education system, Wollstonecraft
Puchner, Martin. Mary Wollstonecraft. The Norton Anthology of World Literature. 3rd Ed. Volume D. Ed. Martin Puchner. New York: Norton, 2013. 133. Print.
With that case of using marriage as a tool, it is seen in “Henry V” clearly. The personality of King Henry evolves with the idea of marriage, was rather remarkable. Even though in the beginning of Act ...
Mary Wollstonecraft was as revolutionary in her writings as Thomas Paine. They were both very effective writers and conveyed the messages of their ideas quite well even though both only had only the most basic education. Wollstonecraft was a woman writing about women's rights at a time when these rights were simply non-existent and this made her different from Paine because she was breaking new ground, thus making her unique. Throughout her lifetime, Wollstonecraft wrote about the misconception that women did not need an education, but were only meant to be submissive to man. Women were treated like a decoration that had no real function except to amuse and beguile. Wollstonecraft was the true leader in women's rights, advocating a partnership in relationships and marriage rather than a dictatorship. She was firm in her conviction that education would give women the ability to take a more active role in life itself.
A woman was expected to be educated in things that could bring joy to her husband or family, such as drawing, piano, cross-stitch and other domestic crafts. This schooling allowed her to use shallow skills without becoming “overly stimulated by knowledge” (Wollstonecraft, p. 46). Women were to avoid complex subjects such as math and politics (Nightingale, p. 31) to preserve their innocence as moral centers for their homes. According to Wollstonecraft, education was central to a woman’s growth as it "will slowly sharpen the senses, form the temper, regulate the passions as they begin to ferment, and set the understanding to work before the body arrives at maturity” (Wollstonecraft, p. 44). Without this intellectual development, women were unable (or believed themselves unable) to think or act autonomously and left them increasingly dependent on the males in their lives. Wollstonecraft emphasizes the perversion of this dependence by arguing that since women have a soul and were created by God, they were given the same gift of reason as man; therefore they have the ability to educate themselves and produce their own income (Wollstonecraft, p. 47). Any perceived lack of intellect was generated by man and forced upon them so that did not believe themselves capable, furthering a childlike
That is because the economic, religious, and ethnic backgrounds of a community help to set up what is their "social norm" which in turn extends to what is to be viewed as the norm with regards to the family unit. A community which is composed of deeply religious adherents of Mormonism, for example, would hold vastly different opinions on the notion of a married gay couple than would a more secular community. So when it comes to what is to be considered a "good" or "bad" marriage is defined most often by the notions held by those in a community as influenced by their characteristics (Henslin,
that any Christian should not have more than one marriage registered with the state. Such
...to meant, but it was still attainable. Passion rules us all and we obey. What other choice do we have? It’s the source of our finest moments. The joy of love, the clarity of hatred, the ecstasy of grief. It hurts sometimes more than we can bear. If we could live without passion, maybe we'd know some kind of peace. But we would be hollow. Empty rooms, shuttered and dank. Without passion, we'd be truly dead. Wollstonecraft had a passion, to Vindicate Women’s rights. It did take time, and there were many struggles, but she never gave up. In the end, I think not only did she want men and women to understand the complexity of equality and have equality, I think she also wanted to show everyone that if you have a passion for something, go for it. No matter how many people are saying no, you should still go for it. Prove them all wrong, just like Mary Wollstonecraft did.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. "Author's Introduction." Introduction. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Feminism and Women's Studies. Eserver. 19 October, 2011. .
Mary Wollstonecraft was a self-educated, radical philosopher who wrote about liberation, and empowering women. She had a powerful voice on her views of the rights of women to get good education and career opportunities. She pioneered the debate for women’s rights inspiring many of the 19th and the 20th century’s writers and philosophers to fight for women’s rights, as well. She did not only criticize men for not giving women their rights, she also put a blame on women for being voiceless and subservient. Her life and, the surrounding events of her time, accompanied by the strong will of her, had surely affected the way she chose to live her life, and to form her own philosophies.
Fairfax, “Marriage is one of the core values of society. Almost 20 years ago, the well renowned black scholar and psychologist Dr. Na’im Akbar (1991) penned the following: ‘‘marriage is such an important lesson in manhood (womanhood) development. It is no wonder that every society requires some form of it’’ (p. 13).” This coincides with the values that I stated above that were considered important in my culture. Marriage is important to more that my culture obviously but in my culture there is always this well-known quote from the bible: “He who finds a wife, finds a good thing (NKJV Proverbs 18:22). That is basically religion and love in the same
marriage is not caused by a lack of love, or even racial differences, but rather, a
Astell’s and Defoe’s concept of reasons for marriage prove their beliefs that marriage is a misogynistic institution; however, their ultimate reasons for marriage differ since Astell shows that a woman must marry for God, as opposed to Defoe, who proves marriage is for economic gains as a way to survive. Astell begins by saying, “For pray, what do men propose to themselves in marriage? What qualifications do they look after in a spouse? What will she bring? is the first enquiry: How many acres? Or how much ready coin?” (2421). Astell says that the first factor men look for in a woman before marriage is...
“Marriage is like a brand new car: once you take that car off of the car lot the value of it depreciates. Giving homosexuals the right to marry would depreciate the value of marriage and the pride it once carried will be no more. Not only does it do that, but more importantly it goes against God! We must preserve our values and morality for generations to come, for those children being born today and next year.”
The article in Christian Today, Is Interfaith Marriage Always Wrong, Given That The Bible Teaches Us To Not be ‘Unequally Yoked’?, by Mark Regnerus, Naomi Schaefer Riley and Russell Moore (2013) talks about