Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dracula comparison
In the Early years of film one can easily say that Germany lead the way in experimentation, with such striking examples as Dr. Caligari, Nosferatu and Dr. Mabuse the Gambler. How when looking at two of these film, Nosferatu and Dr Mabuse the Gambler one can find a similar theme that run throughout. This theme is that of Weimar’s insecurity about outsiders and otherness different cultures. While both films have different stories at their very simplest both films see someone come into the idyllic lives of the protagonist not only wrecking their lives but the lives of ordinary people as well. It’s worth noting that borth Nosferatu and Dr. Mabuse the Gambler were filmed in the turbulent early 20’s of the Weimar period where Germany was still dealing with the aftermath of the war and outside powers such as France encroaching on German territory and at the same time political unrest had reached its high. With all these changes going on it easy to see why Germany might have felt that outsider were at work trying to remold modern Germany. This is why in these turbulent early years befor the Weimar Golden age we see such strong use of the other/outsider as a stand in for events taken place in Germany
In Nosferatu this take the form of Count Orlok/Dracula who comes from outside Germany, bringing with him death and disease. The most often assumed identity of Orloks otherness in that of the anti-Sematic stereotypical depiction of Jew’s. This comes from Orloks facial characteristics such as his hooked noes, long ears and bushy eyebrows. In addition, Count Orlok brings with him rats that spread the plague, a theme that had leveled against Jews senses the Middle Ages. Orlok represents Jews also played into the idea that Jews and Communi...
... middle of paper ...
...e the Gambler part 1, Directed by Fritz Lang 1922, Youtube Video, 2:02 , Accessed May, 14, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqglLUaOUvc
Dr. Mabuse the Gamble part 2, Directed by Fritz Lang 1922, Youtube Video, 1:54 , Accessed May, 14, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDMJVdWtU8c
Elsaesser, Thomas “No end to Nosferatu” in Weimar Cinema, ed. Noah Isenberg, New York: Columbia University Press, 2009
Gunning, Tom., “Fritz Lang’s Dr. Mabuse, The Gambler (1922) in Weimar Cinema, ed. Noah Isenberg, New York: Columbia University Press, 2009
Nosferatu , Directed by F.W. Murnau 1922, Youtube Video, 1:32 , Accessed May, 14, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBKI5Zb9v14
Rippey, Thefora F., “Rationalizations, Race and the Weimar Response to Jazz”. German Life and Letters, vol. 60 no.1 2007
Tatar, Maria., Lustmord New Jersey, Princeton University Press 1995
The film illustrates the common social and sexual anxieties that the Germans were undergoing at that period of time. It also employs cinematic aesthetics alongside with new technology to create what would be considered as one of Germany’s first sound-supported films. Furthermore, it was the film that popularized its star Marlene Dietrich. The film is also known for combining elements of earlier expressionist works into its setting without becoming an expressionist film itself. It is important also to point out that the visual element has helped to balance the film easily against the backdrop the nightclub lifestyle that Lola leads the professor to fall into.
Calhoon, Kenneth S. “Horror vacui.” Peripheral Visions: The Hidden Stages of Weimar Cinema. Wayne State University Press: Detroit, 2001.
Inherit the Wind. Dir. Stanley Kramer. With Spencer Tracy, Fredrick March, and Gene Kelly. MGM. 1960.
Benjamin, Walter. The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Trans. John Osborne. London: n.p., 1998. Print. fourth
Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. Directed by Stanley Kubrick. Columbia Pictures, 1964.
Wizard of Oz, The. Dir. Victor Fleming. Perf. Judy Garland, Frank Morgan, and Ray Bolger. Warner Bros., 1939.
script, the viewer needs another way to interpret the film. The 1922 silent film Nosferatu
While studying the diabolical figures in the devil, the idea of presenting Dracula came to mind. Dracula represents the devil in many similar ways. Dracula remains as a character in many diabolical movies and films. For instance, Van Helsing provides a good interpret of how Dracula remains noticed in the past and in present day. Although Dracula’s character obtains different views in every movie and film, he plays an important role in Stephen Sommers Van Helsing movie. In the movie, he acts as many different things. Demonstrating both the kind and evil inside, Dracula portrays his character as a mystery. Different views of Dracula throughout the movie include harsh, strong, powerful, evil, the devil, and unstoppable. The studies of Dracula
Lacombe, Lucien (The Criterion Collection), 2006. Video recording. Directed by Louis Malle, France : Optimum World Releasing
Evil features in both ‘Dracula’ and ‘Frankenstein’ but the personification of this evil is different in both novels. A feeling of menace and doom pervades ‘Dracula’ because of his supernatural powers. One feels that he has control of the evil and he has the power to manipulate the environment and people for his own ends. ‘Frankenstein’ centres on the creation of a monster made from parts of dead bodies and the fear created by the monster due to circumstance and the ignorance of society. Also, one feels a certain amount of apprehension that the monster is deserted by his creator and loses control without his support and guidance.
1980. Warner Bros. Directed by Stanley Kubrick. Music by Wendy Carlos and Rcachel Elkind. Cinematography by John Alcott. Editing by Ray Lovejoy. With Jack Nicholson, Shelley Duvall, Danny Lloyd.
Andreas Huyssen. “The Vamp and the Machine: Technology and Sexuality in Fritz Lang’s Metropolis.” New German Critique: and Interdisciplinary Journal of German Studies. (1982)
Brownlow, Kevin 1994, ‘Preface’, in Paolo, C, Burning Passions: an introduction to the study of silent film, British Film Institute, London: BFI, pp. 1-3.
The reason that the two books of Cinema 1: The movement-Image and Cinema 2: The Time-Image are important is Deleuze’s contribution to create a revolutionary argument by inter-cutting between cinema and philosophy. These books show a genuine method of how Deleuze established a creative connection between examples of historical movies such as that of Cecil B. de Mille’s and Nietzsche’s essay on nineteenth-century German historiography (Deleuze, 1983).
Ruffell, Joe. "Rainer Werner Fassbinder." Senses of Cinema. 21 May 2002. Web. 11 May 2011. .