The Nuremberg Trials: End The Horrible Period Of The Holocaust

399 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Injustice to the jews holocaust

In a general sense, The Nuremberg Trials were established to end the horrible period of the Holocaust and attempt to provide even a hint of justice to the Jewish community. Beyond that, the trials were established on the idea of deterrence and retribution. Deterrence on a macro level, as were the Nuremberg Trials, allows a society to move on in peace because it constitutes punishing individuals for their actions and further preventing those individuals to commit any wrongful actions again. There is even further deterrence because it may prevent any other individuals from committing the same crimes. Deterrence also aids in providing an overall sense of safety to a community or in this case, to an entire nation. The retribution aspect comes from

Show More
Related

  • The Holocaust: The Witch Hunt On The Holocaust

    293 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Holocaust or the Ha-Shoah in Hebrew meaning ‘the day of the Holocaust and heroism’ refers to the period of time from approximately January 30,1933, when Adolf Hitler became the legal official of Germany, to May 8,1945. After the war was over in Europe, the Jews in Europe were being forced to endure the horrifying persecution that ultimately led to the slaughter of over 6 million Jews with about 1.5 million of them being children as well as the demolition of 5,000 Jewish communities.

    Read More

  • Should Nazi officers be put in jail even with old age?

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    If you have been in a History class you have probably heard of an event that happened after World War Two called the Nuremberg Trials. These trials were conducted by the United States. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson was appointed to lead the trials (Berenbaum). During these trials they charged with Crimes against the Peace, War crimes and Crimes against Humanity (Berenbaum). Many major Nazi leaders committed suicide before officials could hang them or before even being caught. The famous Doctor Goebbels killed his children then him and his wife committed suicide (Berenbaum). Only twelve out of the twenty-two who stood trial were hanged, twelve, while the rest just got prison time. Besides major Nazi officials, Physicians were put on trial, the people who were part of the mobile killing squads, Concentration camp officials, Judges and Executives who sold concentration camps Zyklon B. You can expect that they had many excuses, but m...

    Read More

  • Nazi Prosecution

    1515 Words  | 4 Pages

    "While fighting for victory the German soldier will observe the rules for chivalrous warfare. Cruelties and senseless destruction are below his standard" , or so the commandment printed in every German Soldiers paybook would have us believe. Yet during the Second World War thousands of Jews were victims of war crimes committed by Nazi's, whose actions subverted the code of conduct they claimed to uphold and contravened legislation outlined in the Geneva Convention. It is this legislature that has paved the way for the Jewish community and political leaders to attempt to redress the Nazi's violation, by prosecuting individuals allegedly responsible. Convicting Nazi criminals is an implicit declaration by post-World War II society that the Nazi regime's extermination of over five million Jews won't go unnoticed.

    Read More

  • How did the holocaust end and what happened afterwards?

    1665 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...one of the darkest periods of history, filled with madness and murder. Following the war many people asked why the Jews succumbed to the Nazis like “Lamb at the slaughter”. One cannot forget or ignore the many shows of resistance amongst the Jews such as the Jews who fought in the forest of Eastern Europe and also the Jews who started the uprising in ghettos and in concentration camps. One result of the Holocaust is that the state of Israel was no doubt established because of the Holocaust. As a result of the great catastrophe which occurred to the Jewish people many nations realized that establishing a state was a necessary step for the protection of Jews. With the end of the war and the unconditional surrender, international courts were set up for the quick trials and sentencing of the Nazis for their war crimes against the Jewish people and against all humanity.

    Read More

  • crucible

    1719 Words  | 4 Pages

    The massacre of the Jews during the hail of Hitler was much like the Salem witch trials; both used blame, during the witch trials if someone in the town didn’t like someone they could say they used witchcraft, and they’d be tortured. Just like during the Holocaust, the Jews didn’t do anything wrong but they still got blamed for events they didn’t do, and they were punished, tortured, and killed every day. The witches and the Jews couldn’t explain their selves; they were mistreated, and had no rights like the regular people. Also, the groups were led by one power to exterminate the people being accused, the council led the witch hunt in Massachusetts, and Hitler led the genocide of the Jews. Ultimately, Hitler was successful with the genocide of the harmless Jewish people in Germany, the council in Salem wasn’t as successful, the council tortured and killed many innocent people.

    Read More

  • The Holocaust: The Salem Witch Trials And The Holocaust

    474 Words  | 1 Pages

    People are often afraid of what they do not know. The Salem Witch Trials and the Holocaust were both times when fear overwhelmed the world; hysteria played a major role because it caused most of the horrific events to occur. During the times of the Salem Witch Trials and the Holocaust, fear drove people to act rashly based on fear of the unknown.

    Read More

  • How Did Hitler Get A Fair Trial

    407 Words  | 1 Pages

    During World War 2, the Allies were determined that both Hitler and the men around him should be punished for starting the war. Not long after Hitler became Chancellor, in 1933, he and his Nazi Government began giving policies to subject Jewish people. After lots of debate, it was decided that the fairest way to proceed was the public trial of the men who committed the crimes. Hitler was one of the Nazi officials who was going to be put on trial. Himmler and Goebbels were also going to be put on trial, but they committed suicide at the end of the war. At the trials, 22 individual Nazi officials and seven groups that had carried out the Nazi programs, were placed on trial for their crimes. “The Allies charged the individuals with four types of crimes: conspiracy against peace, crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.” If Hitler would have been at the trials, he would have been charged because he was a Nazi leader. In the trials, 24 Nazi leaders were put on trial, 18

    Read More

  • Justice After War

    1198 Words  | 3 Pages

    Those to be prosecuted were done so because of the brutal “war crimes”, “crimes against peace” and “crimes against humanity” they had committed. The prosecutors were dominated by a large percentage of Jews, who at this time, excusably, had a fervent hatred for the Nazis, since the Nazis had also had a fervent hatred for them. But this just shows how hard it would have been for these prosecutors to not have had revenge govern their thoughts throughout the trial.

    Read More

  • The Holocaust And The Holocaust

    843 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...s of the Holocaust, the Allies held the Nuremberg Trials of 1945-46, which made the horrifying actions of the Nazis known all over. The Ally forces pressured Germany to create a homeland for those who suffered through the Holocaust. Over the decades that followed, ordinary Germans struggled with the Holocaust’s bitter legacy, as survivors and the families of victims tried to regain their property and wealth that was taking away during the Holocaust. In 1953, the German government made payments to individual Jews and to the Jewish people as a way of apologizing for the crimes which were committed by the German people.

    Read More

  • Trials after the Holocaust

    1204 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Holocaust had lasting effects on the relationship between the individual and society. Society put individual Nazis on trial for the actions they took in the Holocaust during World War II. The main trial was the Nuremberg trial and there were other subsequent trials as well. These trials were essential in showing the concern that justice and fairness should prevail for the victims. Therefore, the trials that took place after the Holocaust, especially at Nuremberg, involve and impact society as well as the lives of many people.

    Read More

  • The Nuremberg Trials

    1527 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Nuremberg trial was built up to be the trial of the century. In the word's of Norman Birkett, who served as a British alternate judge: it was "the greatest trial in history" . The four most intriguing characters of this trial were of vast contradiction to each other; there was Herman Georing the relentless leader, Joachim von Ribbentrop the guilty and indecisive follower of Hitler, Hjalmar Schacth the arrogant financial wizard of the Rich and Albert Speer the remorseful head of armament and munitions. Three of the four allies wanted the Nazi leaders to be executed without a trial Winston Churchill said, "They should be rounded up and shot like dog's" but the Americans persuaded the other allies that a trial would be most beneficial from a public relations standpoint, so now with the allies agreed the stage for Nuremberg was set.

    Read More

  • Nuremberg Trials Essay

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the most well-known trials is the Nuremberg trials. The Nuremberg trials were a sequence of 13 trials that took place in Nuremberg, Germany, from 1945 to 1949. According to history.com, “Nuremberg had been the site of annual Nazi propaganda; holding the postwar trials there marked the symbolic end of Hitler’s government.” The people that were going to be charged were Nazi Party Officials, high-ranking military officers, German industrialists, doctors, and lawyers. They were charged with crimes against peace and humanity. The leader of the Nazi’s, Adolf Hitler took his own life before he could be tried. During the trials, the m...

    Read More

  • Judgment at Nuremberg

    477 Words  | 1 Pages

    Judgment at Nuremberg The Nuremberg trials took place between 1945 and 1949 and were used to judge the acts of over a hundred judges accused of committing war crimes. The movie "Trials at Nuremberg" dealt specifically with the justice trials. The justice trials adjudicated the criminal responsibility of judges accused of enforcing immoral, unjust, and inhumane laws set by the Nazi party. =

    Read More

  • Ethics of the Nuremberg Code

    1060 Words  | 3 Pages

    From 1946 to 1947, the Nuremberg War Crime Trials took place, withfifteen of twenty-three German physicians and research scientist-physicians found guilty of criminal human experimentation projects. The trial court attempted to establish a set of principles of human experimentation that could serve as a code of research ethics. The result was the Nuremberg Code, which attempted to provide a natural law-based set of universal ethical principles.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Nuremberg Trials

    2518 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Nuremberg Trials was unethically run and violated the rights of the Nazi leaders who were convicted of committing crimes against humanity. Primarily because the Allies sought to use the trials as a way to remind the Germans, who won the war ‘again’. Thus making it similar to the Treaty of Versailles in (19- ), through implying this notion of “Victors’ Justice”. Nevertheless, the Allies did to an extent ‘try’ to make the tribunal as ethical as possible,

    Read More

More about The Nuremberg Trials: End The Horrible Period Of The Holocaust

Open Document