Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Into the wild character analysis
Into the wild character analysis
123 essay character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Into the wild character analysis
How we view characters largely depends on their motives for action; depending on what aspects of their motives are emphasized, similar characters can be viewed as treacherous fiends or selfless martyrs. A knight fighting to defend his honor can be seen as treacherous and murderous. Similarly, a lawyer can be seen as directive and wise ,but also as manipulative and deceiving. Hagen of Troneck from The Nibelungenlied and Njal Thorgeirsson from Njal’s Saga were both manipulative, held similar relationships, and accepted their deaths. However, their motives in striving towards death differed. Hagen was defined as a murderous knight. Njal was deemed a martyr and redeemer of Iceland. Hagen acted out of pride and jealousy, facilitating his inevitable death at the hands of Kriemhild. In contrast, Njal selflessly gave up his life to end a blood feud that could have consumed Iceland.
Both men held relationships that forced them down a path to certain death. Each of them interacted with the archetypal hero who was brave, valiant, and all-powerful. Hagen deeply hated and envied Siegfried. When Siegfried insulted Queen Brunhild and threatened his influence over King Gunther, Hagen proclaimed his disdain. He declared, “I fancy I shall manage this so well in secret that he will repent of Brunhild’s weeping. I declare that I shall always be his enemy!” (Hatto 118) Hagen was pushed down a path towards certain death because of his jealousy and hatred of Siegfried. Siegfried hurt Hagen’s pride by threatening his power over Burgundy, and thus Hagen murdered him to eliminate the threat to his pride. Hagen’s dark act ultimately caused Kriemhild to seek revenge and execute him.
In contrast, Njal had a loyal and close friendship with ...
... middle of paper ...
...Hagen committed a disgraceful murder and perished in a way unbecoming of knight: at the hands of a woman. In contrast, Njal’s death was a sacrifice, for the good of others. He welcomed his death and surrendered his family in order to prevent an endless civil war in Iceland. Njal went against Icelandic custom of avenging one’s kin. Instead, he adopted a new Christian principle of absolution, accepting insult and assault by his enemies. He proclaimed before he laid down to die, “Bear this bravely and don’t express any fear for its only a brief storm... Have faith that God is merciful, and that he will not let us burn both in this world and in the next” (Cook 220). Njal trusted in God that his martyrdom was for the good all people and would end the blood feud. His acceptance of death and ultimate sacrifice liberated Iceland from self-destruction and damnation.
The saga begins with a callous and wholly unnecessary killing. Sigi, the son of Odin himself kills the thrall Bredi simply because Bredi’s kill from hunting “was larger and better than Sigi’s, which greatly displeased Sigi” (Byock, 35). Sigi is displeased because he thinks himself of higher rank and stock than a thrall. In this
“If the battle takes me, send back this breast-webbing that Weland fashioned and Hrethel gave me, to Lord Hygelac. Fate goes ever as fate must.” Of course we see kings all the time in most novels. Beowulf, the character was supposed to advanced and become one of the strongest men alive. But at the end he fails, we learn that he dies and at last he wasn't really that big. But a doom in a story it's more heart pounding. Especially when a son gets taken away from his father. The call to action. In "Beowulf" the call to action is when the character Beowulf is called in by King Hrothgar. He is brought in to be talked to. Hrothgar's kingdom in the Danes (Denmark) is pounced by the villain/monster of Grendel. Now it is Beowulf's responsibility. The weight on Beowulf's shoulders is to go find Grendel, Grendel's mother and the forever lasting fire breathing dragon. We can relate to the quote above because us readers assume that he will defeat all three and be the best of the best. But Beowulf himself doesn't believe his own lies. He boasts' about him declaring he has the required skills to defeat all three enemies. At
The Johansen showed patriotism to their nation throughout the book. Many of the Johansens had declared that they would even take a bullet for their king, King Christian X. In Number the Stars, Papa tells Annemarie how Danish citizens love their precious and cherished king. He states “Any Danish citizen would die for King Christian, to protect him.” (p.14) Annemarie questioned her parents if they would do the same and they agreed. This shows the Danish people care about their king and will protect him from any danger.
Gunnar and Siegfried have all the physical attributes that lead readers to believe that they have the insurmountable ability to use them to better society; such is the definition of a hero. Heroes are thought to be more extreme and braver than the average human being. They fight for what they see as wrong when no one else will. Heroes understand the sacrifices civilians make to overcome adversity and have experienced the hardships and fought through troubles, thus can relate to the less-fortunate of society. We expect a hero to protect people from harm while maintaining their character and are idolized for their bravery to fight for what they think is right. But does fighting for what is right make ones actions justifiable to correct that wrong or does it inflict more harm than good?
In most works of literature there is an “evil” character that has conflicting interests with the protagonist. This issue may arise in multiple forms including, but not limited to, abuse and manipulation. In this paper we will be discussing the similarities and differences between Shakespeare’s character Iago from Othello and J.K. Rowling’s character Voldemort from the Harry Potter series.
I chose to use ‘The Code of Chivalry’ for my comparisons on literary characters great successes and failures. For my first example, I chose the brave and fearless Beowulf. According to the 19th code of chivalry, one must ‘Destroy evil in all of its monstrous forms,’ and also ‘Exhibit courage in word and deed.’ Beowulf proclaimed to fight the evil Grendel, saying “We shall fight for our lives, foe against foe; and he whom death takes off must resign himself to the judgment of God (1200).” After the battle, the terror-filled Grendel crept away, mortally wounded. Beowulf had upheld this particular code with valor and bravery.
Biography: William Shakespeare's Macbeth tells the story of a man who would be king. And he is the king, because he murders. Him and his wife murder to get their way. This works greatly for them, until they are questioned, and their guilt sets in. The task for this paper was to compare the Macbeth's to two people who did great evil to accomplish good. IE: Adolf Hitler and Osama bin Laden, whom were used in this essay.
...tory over Satan to play a central part in the spread of Christianity among the Vikings, whom looked to Odin and Thor for such attributes.
Wicked, dishonorable, corrupt, villainous, malicious, and vicious all have one thing in common: they define evil. A person or a group of people that display these qualities are often defined as evil beings or creatures. Two people that have many of these characteristics developed within them are Iago from Shakespeare’s Othello and Lucifer from the Bible. Both Iago and Lucifer are developed with many “evil” qualities woven intricately into their character development. The representation of each “evil” characteristic gives them something they have in common, allowing the description and portrayal of both Iago and Lucifer in literature show the audience they share common “evil” characteristics and that they lead to chaos and downfall.
For example, honor manifests itself similarly in each work, but is acted on to a different extent. In both works, honor is clearly a good characteristic to have, and maintaining it is a cornerstone to both societies. Conversely, being shamed in the eyes of society—and thus losing honor—requires retribution. However, in Nibelungenlied, some characters enact any and all means to redeem their lost honor, including unknightly deeds and deceit (such as murdering Siegfried, or Kriemhild's wrath murdering her family), and also have no problem lying in order to gain more honor (the wooing of Brunhilde). In Parzival, however, lost honor can only be met with knightly deeds and repentance to God, and gained honor can only be a product of knightly deeds. In the world of the Nibelungs, repentance to God does not even enter into the equation, as there is no concept of forgiveness interwoven into the story. For example, Kriemhild cannot forgive her brothers for murdering Siegfried—and perhaps rightly so, since they show no signs of remorse, and do not put themselves at God's mercy. Every earthly sin enacted must be...
The play Macbeth by William Shakespeare explores human nature as a loyal soldier named Macbeth discovers his fate to become king, but not have any heirs. He responds to this information by killing the reining king, Duncan. However, before committing murder, he contemplates very hard whether he should murder Duncan, against whom he bears no ill will, and great indecision and doubt marks this process. Macbeth’s reaction to killing Duncan, in which he follows a much darker path, reveals and expresses the multi-faceted quality of human nature. Shakespeare expresses the duality of human nature through pairs of opposites, changes within a character’s mind and personality and through the facades and deception many characters practice.
The actions are pretrade as morally wrong and antisocial. On the other hand, the characters, such as Beowulf live within the moral and social boundaries. The contrast between Grendel and Beowulf turns their conflicts from a fight into a battle between good and evil Grendel hates others and loves evil and suffering. Beowulf is the ideal goodness and his enemy, Grendel, is the personification of evil.
The binary nature of humankind can be easily found in the case of Macbeth, the protagonist of the play. On the one hand, he is noble. As one of Duncan's most glorious generals, he is brave and courageous, trusted and respected. He is a man loved as well as admired by all. In Act I, Scene 2, for example, both the sergeant and Duncan praise Macbeth for his physical and mental bravery, stressing that he "carv'd out his passage" until he is face to face with the enemy general. To Duncan, he is his "valiant cousin" and "worthy gentleman." As a brave general, he does not lack kindness...
One Writer;two tragedies and two really different murderers. William Shakespeare's Hamlet and Macbeth are generally common tragedies. Hamlet and Macbeth successfully deal with the need for royal power and its bad after effects.This essay examines the probable corollary that a tragic villain may possess and or including characteristics that may be on the same passing level with the tragic-heroes. Being hero-villains, Macbeth and Claudius present similarities.Both of them are magnanimous,driven by ambition,suffer internally,lack conscience and smart.
In the play, Macbeth, William Shakespeare addresses the issue of violence in society. Through the storyline of this work, he makes a point that not all violence is the same, as its nature depends on motivations as well as the effect it has on one’s conscience. William Shakespeare’s tragic drama, Macbeth, distinguishes the differences between honorable and dishonorable violence by contrasting circumstances in which Macbeth utilizes his blind ambition to commit brutal acts as a means to an end as each situation has an emotional and psychiatric effect on his character. When Macbeth slaughters the Norwegian soldiers who try to overthrow the king, society deems it honorable violence as Macbeth feels pride and satisfaction for his actions as his