Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of multinational corporations
Impact of multinational corporations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of multinational corporations
A corporation is a form of business organization where the firm is a legal entity separate from its owners. As corporations grow and become multinational, their interests and influence extend accordingly. The decisions made by these corporations are always made with a primary goal of increasing profits. Needless to say, the decisions taken by corporations often regard public interests as inferior to their own, so many of their decisions have a calamitous impression on the public. The multinational corporations, Wal-Mart, Nike, and Gap, had negative impact on the world through human rights violations, through their control of the media, and by putting smaller local companies out of business. Corporations are often major violators of human rights. "As human rights advocates begin to address corporate crime, they often do so in the absence of any serious government support. As a result, they are tempted to fall back on voluntary codes of conduct adopted by the corporations themselves. At best, this self-monitoring represents "enlightened self-interest" by companies looking for a stable investment climate. At worst, it is nothing more than a public relations ploy which can set back human rights by providing corporations with cover from public scrutiny. In either case, companies are usually more motivated by their bottom lines, than humanitarian interests. And that makes the free market and its corporate agents rather dubious guarantors of human rights." (Light 1999) Large companies often use or lobby for conditions that result in manipulated international trade pacts and agreements, in order to maximize profits, via things such as cheap labour. (Vander Stichele 1998) This can be seen in the form of sweat shops or child labour in th... ... middle of paper ... ...d to be tighter and the scope of their influence needs to be reduced. References Anderson, Sarah, and John Cavanagh. Top 200: the Rise of Corporate Global Power. Institute for Policy Studies. 2000. 3 June 2006 . Bagdikian, Ben H. The Media Monopoly. 6th ed. Beacon P, 2000. xxxvi. Light, Julie. "Repression, Inc: the Assault on Human Rights." Corpwatch. 4 Feb. 1999. 2 June 2006 . McCann, Lucy, comp. Catalogue of the Archive of the Anti-Apartheid Movement, 1956-98. 2002. Bodleian Library, University of Oxford. 5 June 2006 . McChesney, Robert W. "The New Global Media: It's a Small World of Big Conglomerates." The Nation 11 Nov. 1999. 4 June 2006 . Shaw, Arthur H. The Lincoln Encyclopedia. New York: Macmillan, 1950. Vander Stichele, Myriam. "Towards a World Transnationals Organisation?" WTO Booklet Series Volume 3, Transnational Issue. 30 April 1998.
A corporation was originally designed to allow for the forming of a group to get a single project done, after which it would be disbanded. At the end of the Civil War, the 14th amendment was passed in order to protect the rights of former slaves. At this point, corporate lawyers worked to define a corporation as a “person,” granting them the right to life, liberty and property. Ever since this distinction was made, corporations have become bigger and bigger, controlling many aspects of the economy and the lives of Americans. Corporations are not good for America because they outsource jobs, they lie and deceive, and they knowingly make and sell products that can harm people and animals, all in order to raise profits.
Over the centuries, the media has played a significant role in the shaping of societies across the globe. This is especially true of developed nations where media access is readily available to the average citizen. The media has contributed to the creation of ideologies and ideals within a society. The media has such an effect on social life, that a simple as a news story has the power to shake a nation. Because of this, governments around the world have made it their duty to be active in the regulation and control of media access in their countries. The media however, has quickly become dominated by major mega companies who own numerous television, radio and movie companies both nationally and internationally. The aim of these companies is to generate revenue and in order to do this they create and air shows that cater to popular demand. In doing so, they sometimes compromise on the quality of their content. This is where public broadcasters come into perspective.
More so, this type o view allows Americans to be perceived as being “above the law”, which has caused resentment on the issue of cultural superiority in a socio-economic perspective: “The United States rejects global human rights norms because they embody a different conception of rights—one skewed toward “positive” socioeconomic rights” (Ignatieff, 2005, p.162). This form of American Exceptionalism defines the materialistic view of Americans as neglecting human rights and fair trading policies in corporate dealings around the world. More so, the global business community is forming regional and national alliances to oppose this form of cultural superiority being projected by the
John Baylis, Steve Smith, Patricia Owens (2011) The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
This paper explores the effects of neoliberalism ideology with the help of globalization on the growth and dominance of multinational and transnational corporations over governments. The case of nike etc in what country In particular, the discussion on multinational and transnational corporations that are growing in power and becoming more powerful that the governments.
Globalization’s shift to large scale production has forced companies to move towards localization, or expanding to other nations, and less standardization. Localization allows corporations to monopolize the power over cultures of other nations. In fact according to the World Bank’s World Development Report in 2000, of the world's 100 largest economic entities, 51 are now corporations and 49 are countries (Anderson, Sarah). National governments have lost their grasp on world power. The top corporations now suppress the combined economies of the countries and not to mention control the working conditions of countries they hold much influence over. Allowing these corporations to do as they please, charge what they want, and pay less than expected. After all how else would they be so powerful without excess profit? For example according to one source, 60% of the banana trade is controlled by only 3 companies and the all fami...
Korten, David, 2001. When Corporations Rule The World. Berrett: Koehler Publishers; 2nd edition. pp 21-23.
One of the fundamental roles of the media in a liberal democracy is to critically scrutinise governmental affairs: that is to act as a watchdog of government to ensure that the government can be held accountable by the public. However, the systematic deregulation of media systems worldwide is diminishing the ability of citizens to meaningfully participate in policymaking process governing the media (McChesney, 2003, p. 126). The relaxation of ownership rules and control, has resulted in a move away from diversity of production to a situation where media ownership is becoming increasing concentrated by just a few predominantly western global conglomerates (M...
Shah, A. (2006, May 28). Corporations and Worker's Rights. - Global Issues. Retrieved April 21, 2014, from http://www.globalissues.org/article/57/corporations-and-workers-rights
Baylis, Smith and Patricia Owens. 2014. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations. London.
Science Initiative Group Institute for Advanced Study, 2007, Globalization: Trends and Prospects, Available from: http://sig.ias.edu/files/Egwang-_Welcome.pdf
First of all globalization has led to exploitation of labor. We can’t ignore the fact that ethical aspects of international business deserve special attention. Corruption and engaging in illegal practice to make greater profit is a source of continuing controversy. Sometimes companies go international and move their production to foreign countries so they could employ workers for long hours, at low wages and in poor working conditions (sweat shops). They are also using child labor, the employment of children to a full time work that can be otherwise done by adults all that so they could get out of their responsibility towards their workers by avoiding paying them national insurance …When these multinational firms go abroad they forget all about principles and about human beings and their rights, according to Kent, J., Kinetz, E. & Whehrfritz, G. (2008/March24). Newsweek. Bottom of the barrel. “The dark side of globalization: a vast work force trapped in conditions that verge on slavery”, David, P. Falling of The Edge, Travels through the Dark Heart of Globalization..Nov 2008. (p62) also agrees with them when he explained his concerns about Chinese and Indians t...
It seems obvious that large corporations have a tendency to ignore the negative effects of their actions in favor of profit. This example, although sensationalized, still says to me that with power comes responsibility. It affirmed my belief that a corporation’s goal cannot be just to provide profit to shareholders, but there must also be an element of social responsibility.
Brinkman, June E., and Richard L. Brinkman. "Corporate Power and the Globalization Process." International journal of social economics 29.9/10 (2002): 730-52. Print.
Frank, Barney (1999), “The Correct Approach to Globalization,” Congressional Record, [http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/ap05_comp_govpol_glob_42253.pdf], accessed 17 May 2012.