Industrial Farming Essay

1858 Words4 Pages

Industrial Farming There is considerable concern over the growing use of industrial farming and how it affects the overall health of livestock. This discussion will explore how corporate farming negatively affects the lives of animals in the industries process of becoming “cheap meat” for the consumer. Focus will be on the methods used by large corporations unlike organic farmers. The questions that will be addressed is how does corporate farming affect livestock living conditions in an agricultural setting. In particular, discussion will include why animal agriculture is treated inhumanly due to the corporation 's needs to supply the epidemic of exceeding population and wants of profit. However, focus will not be on large businesses itself, …show more content…

Factory farms should discontinue enclosures since they restrict environments for livestocks. For instance, In Christina Salvi, involvement in sustaining and expanding recycling and water reduction in New York, claims that hundreds and thousands of animal are cramped together, using as little space as possible (“ Let Livestock”). Factory farms puts livestock in danger through harsh conditions leaving them without access to natural light for chickens, fresh air and natural movement, which forces them to live in diseased grounds. These living conditions leave them to eat and sleep in their own waste and become agitated for the sole purpose of industries needs to maximize profits through large occupations of animals in small designated areas. Likewise, Ashley Capps, editor and researcher specialized in farmed animal welfare and vegan advocacy, argues 97% of pigs in the U.S are raised indoors (“Bacon”). Warehouse style factory farms pack pigs in by the thousands limiting their ability to perform basic natural behaviors causing them to suffer depression and anxiety. This stereotypical stress causes the behavior of aggression forcing them to be subjected of tail biting. Tail biting forces farmers to cut off their tails without anesthesia instead of increasing the ranges of land for natural mobility. Yet, the USDA would challenge the need for mobility due to the federal regulations in place. In fact, the Department of Agriculture states, in Section 205.239 livestock living conditions, farmers must contain natural maintenance, comfort behaviors and opportunity to exercise. However, the evidence I cited proves conclusively the opposite. For instance, The view of Bruce Friedrich, executive director of The Good Food Institute, reveals battery cages are small wire cages where about 95% of laying hens in the U.S spend their entire lives (“The

Open Document