Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Oil industry effect on the environment
The Impact of the Oil Industry on the Natural Environment essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Oil industry effect on the environment
In the U.S today, many oil companies are fracking, or drilling holes for oil, on our precious land. In the United States, the midwest is where most of the fracking is coming from. The fracking has made the diversity of the local wildlife slim. Many things can be done to improve the environment to help with fracking. Fracking causes our environment to change in bad ways, we have to help stop or lessen it. To frack, people drill holes into our land and stick a tube in the ground. Then they are literally putting harmful liquid into the ground right beside our water lines. Many chemicals are in the liquid, so there is no telling how many harmful chemicals we as humans are inducing into our bodies and also giving to our pets and livestock. The …show more content…
Study shows that fracking is bad for babies. They show that babies born within a 2.5 km radius of fracking zones have an increased risk of low birth weight and health problems. In texas, air pollution from fracking made the health of the texans worsen. The pollution contained hazardous chemicals which people breath in. Breast cancer rates shot up from people living close to the fracking grounds.Symptoms of the civilians included headaches, difficulty breathing, dizziness, and memory loss. These symptoms were from the contaminated air. Because of fracking, many cows had their tails disembodied from them, meaning that they fell off completely. Many animals die every year because of fracking. Plants die from it also. …show more content…
I have devised a plan to help stop. We could rely on coal instead of oil.we could limit the amount of fracking to a minimum. If we limit the fracking, there would be less contaminated air and we could have less sickness around. Another way to lessen the fracking would be to decrease the allowed amount of land that they are allowed to drill. That land would be far from any houses and buildings. Fracking is bad. We need to stop or at least lessen it. Coal is better than oil. There is a list of both good and bad things about fracking. Some of the good are true, but mostly, the bad take over. Fracking helps the U.S economically by limiting the amount of resources that we have to buy from other countries. There are enough fossil fuels underground to make us energy independent. There are also bad things about fracking.
People fear that chemicals may contaminate the water that we drink. Because scientists don’t have to disclose the chemicals they use while fracking, it makes it bad for people to prepare for accidents or emergencies that are caused due to the fracking of our land. According to environmental groups, energy companies allow “resource play hubs” that could totally take away the whole water supply (www.mlive.com)
The efficiently burning shale gas reduces carbon emission from electricity production plants, reducing carbon footprints on the environment. However, the process of hydraulic fracturing uses millions of gallons of pressurized liquid, which contains toxic chemicals, and some of this water is left over undealt with. The air near fracking sites is often also polluted and unsafe for nearby community residents. Injecting millions of gallons of water laced with toxic chemicals into the rock thousands of feet deep can cause earthquakes, causing a safety hazards for all nearby areas. Hydraulic Fracturing makes rare natural gases easily attainable, boosting the economy and reducing carbon emissions.
It is good that the U.S federal government will significantly increase fracking. If the U.S federal government will significantly increase fracking then it will create thousands of jobs and create a better economy. It will also benefit us in a good way because when it creates a better econo...
...Waxmann et al. (2011) 750 different chemicals were used by various oil and gas companies during hydraulic fracturing over a four year period, where a minimum of 29 were identified to contain carcinogens which are listed as hazardous on both the clean air and safe drinking water act. The USEPA (2011) suggested that chemicals used during fracking should be monitored according to specific criteria.
The people who are being asked permission to transform their land into drilling sites for natural gas have more reason to be concerned than most because it will affect them more directly than people who do not live in that specific area (although it does affect people who do not live in the vicinity as well). Although fracking may seem to concern to only a small group of people, it should also concern anyone who cares about doing what is safe for our country's citizens. The truth is, fracking is extremely dangerous, not only because of the negative effects on the environment, but also because it could make people ill.
Fracking can cause harm to people, animals, and nature. When they drill into the ground they are pumping chemicals to extract the gas and oil, and this contaminates the water sources around it. “An editorial on gas extraction from the Marcellus Shale in the Post-Star, a newspaper in Glens Falls, New York, contends, “New York state simply can’t take the risk. There are plenty of places to find fuel. It’s not so easy to find a new water supply for 17 million people.”” (Hydrofracking
Fracking has a detrimental effect on the surrounding environment through pollution and earthquakes. Fracking is the process of extracting natural gas from layers of shale rock deep within the earth. One of the world’s largest plays of natural gas is in the Marcellus Shale, located in the Appalachian basin and extends across New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, West Virginia, eastern Ohio and portions of Kentucky and Tennessee. The “plays” are areas where companies are actively looking for natural gas inside shale rock formations. Plays are drilled for natural gas by hydraulic fracturing in a two step process.
Although there have been no intensive studies on the drinking water that could be linked to fracturing practices, many people believe it could be harmful to anyone that consumes the water. The EPA and other strong environmentalists are pushing towards more strict regulations on fracking. Contrary to that belief Dr. Charles Goat stated, “drilling for natural gas in itself doesn't pose a threat to air and water quality, if it‘s done properly.” Research has also been done that fracking has little to no impact on the groundwater. Companies also use safeguards to reduce the threat of air contamination from fracking engines and compressors. Local communities and fracking companies work together to reduce noise, traffic, and other environmental factors of fracking. Water is often recycled to use in other fracturing procedures. Fracking companies are working to make fracking less hurtful to the environment and to the local community (Energy from Shal...
Conflicting reports make it difficult to discern just how detrimental the practice is to the environment and people. What is known is that fracking uses phenomenal amounts of water, which is becoming a scarce resource in many parts of the country. There is no doubt that the fluid used in the fracking process contains chemicals, and when released into water supplies has negative effects on these sources. Injection of flowback materials into deep wells has been definitively linked to increased seismic activity. Damage to roads due to the high traffic of trucks shipping equipment and product is astronomical. Worldwide, four countries have outright banned the practice and others are waiting for more research to be done before they continue to allow it. A few states know the devastating side effects that come with the practice, and have banned hydraulic fracturing. While there is no doubt that fracking can produce resources that are used by Americans, there is a lot of doubt as to whether it is safe or not. Hopefully, the country will follow those that have banned the practice, and adopt other safer forms of energy
This means one of two things needs to be done, the chemicals needs to be preserved properly or disposed of in the correct manner (Inglesby, Nyquist, Jenks, and, Pinner 34). This produces a problem because the possibility of chemicals contaminating the drinking water used for the nearby cities. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), they have found groundwater pollution that was caused by fracking (Inglesby et. Al. 35). However, oil companies are taking action to change the techniques used by fracking to help prevent contamination. But, according to Tommy Inglesby et. Al. “this area is likely to be the focus of considerably more technological innovation in the future”
I didn't exactly know what fracking was until I saw this film. I now know how badly it was affecting people's daily lives and they couldn't really do much to stop it. These people literally had to build their own water systems to have drinkable water or even water to bath in. Not to mention, they were having severe medical problems, some even having lesions on their brain from these chemicals in the air. Even animals were losing their fur and being affected by the fracking. It is honestly infuriating that people can't even live their lives normally because our country is built on greed. These harmful chemicals are destroying vital parts of our ecosystems, and most people aren't doing anything to stop it. Most people running the oil companies don't even want to discuss the issue, like that isn't suspicious. I know that it's hard to get away from oil altogether, but trying to ignore the issue is only going to make it worse. Whether it be starting small, like using solar energy or converting to biofuel, this world needs to start taking hydraulic fracturing seriously and steer towards finding a solution to stop it for
Natural gas extraction and consumption has risen over the past thirty years. Also known as hydraulic fracturing or fracking, a tremendous amount of uproar is being made in the environmental and political communities. Natural gas use is a great source of energy worldwide, only in America have we had a gold rush affect when it comes to extraction. Natural gas provides less dependence on foreign oil, less need for coal plants, and a more affordable energy source worldwide. There are many advantages to using natural gas but the way in which it is being extracted has caused many people to become sick. The detrimental environmental impacts caused by hydraulic fracturing continue to rise. Not to mention the political pull on big corporations and water quality standards. Currently in the Marcellus shale in Pennsylvania and the Barnett shale in Texas, the air and water quality have diminished over the past years since drilling sites ran rampant. Natural gas is natural in terms of how it came to be, but not natural in how they extract it and the problems it is causing everyone involved. To make aware the dangers of hydraulic fracturing, environmental impacts, water quality and air emissions, must be considered.
Fracking is dangerous to America’s water supply, water quality, and to other resources. Due to fracking America’s water supply and quality could be compromised. Fracking is also a large scale operation. Evidence of how fracking is a large scale operation would be the use of 400 tanker trucks to transport all the
Hydraulic fracturing, or it’s more common name fracking, has been a very debatable topic for decades. Fracking is when chemicals, water and sand are pumped into the ground to break apart rock so that natural gas can be released. Not only is fracking obviously bad for the environment, but it also has many impacts on the people that surround the area. Fracking has short term benefits, but long term consequences and impacts to the entire ecosystem. Fracking that is done today can affect our future generations for many years and generations to come. Although hydraulic fracking may reduce our dependency of oil on other countries and stabilize our economy, fracking has way too many environmental and health impacts; therefore proving that fracking is problematic and should not be an energy resource that countries depend on.
There are many problems with “The entire process of fracking – from drilling a well to transporting waste – endangers our water and the health of our communities” (“Fracking”). The process of fracking contaminates drinkable water and many other resources along with it. When rivers or lakes are contaminated it can lead to the extermination of wildlife in that certain area because they no longer are able to breathe due to the amount of chemicals and waste in their habitat. After an accident with a decent amount of exploding trucks, “Twenty-five families living nearby had to evacuate their homes, one person was injured, and toxic chemicals leaked into a nearby stream” (“Act On Fracking”). Companies involved with fracking should either move away from important resources when drilling or completely stop the operation as a whole.
Fracking is a method of obtaining oil and natural gas from deep areas of the earth by mining very deep into the ground and injecting fluid into the ground at a high pressure in order to fracture the rock. When the rock is fractured, natural gas is released and harvested by large hydraulic fracturing rigs (Brooks, 2013). Though the process is an effective way of obtaining energy sources, it is a highly controversial topic so it is not massively used worldwide. Fracking works great and provides effective results but there is a diverse amount of downsides to the mining technique that have caused many people to take anti-fracking stances. The main argument against fracking is that it comes with environmental downsides, using immense amounts of water, infecting the earth with hazardous chemicals, and leaking methane into the atmosphere. Though many of the environmental downsides of fracking have been proven, the benefits of the energy source outweigh the downsides.