Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Family role of women
Role of women in family and society
Role Of Woman In The Society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Family role of women
“The Necklace,” by Guy de Maupassant tells the story of a woman whose dreams and beauty don’t fit in the economic class she has married into. Mme. Loisel believes that “family and birth” (33) are the factors that create a significant woman; she resents her place in society and feels “she ha[s] fallen from her proper station” (33). Her husband is almost completely absent in the story while she chases her reveries of wealth and exquisiteness. Through the use of strong diction and characterization, Maupassant’s novella, “The Necklace,” demonstrates the subjective nature of perceived luxury and tendency for humans to measure their own status based upon their possession.
Maupassant begins the story with a long description of Mme. Loisel’s impressive
…show more content…
physical qualities. It is clear, however, from the diction used in the opening paragraphs that Mme. Loisel thinks rather lowly of her lifestyle.
Despite the author’s insistence that “Natural fineness, instinct for what is elegant, suppleness of wit…” is the hierarchy for great women, it’s clear Mme. Loisel still thinks little of her lifestyle merely because of her lack of grandiose luxury. (33) This is obvious when the author describes Loisel’s view that “she was one of those pretty and charming girls who are sometimes, as if by a mistake of destiny, born in a family of clerks.” (33) Using the word “mistake” makes it obvious to the reader that Mme Loisel does not believe she should be subjected to what she perceives as a life of mediocrity. Maupassant also describes, in reference to Mme. Loisel, “she let herself be married to a little clerk at the Ministry of Public Instruction.” (33) Again we can tell by the word choice used that Mme. Loisel has an inherently negative view of her husband and her husband’s social status, judging by the way the marriage is described. The husband is described as a “little” clerk who Mme. Loisel “let” marry her. Using the term “little” for her husband depicts her view of him as someone of little significance and importance. To say she “let” him marry her implies that she thinks he may be less deserving of being her husband, presumably compared to a man of higher …show more content…
status and greater wealth. These views are fitting for a woman who believes she is being devalued by living a life void of great excess. It’s also worth noting how the novella’s diction changes along with Mme Loisel’s attitude and confidence once she puts a fine piece of jewelry on her person. All of the sudden at the ball, while wearing the diamond necklace, Mme. Loisel “was prettier than them all, elegant, gracious, smiling, and crazy with joy.” Maupassant even describes how “all the men looked at her” and “she was remarked by the minister himself.” (36) The words “pretty”, “elegant” and “gracious” all have luxurious connotations and portray the newfound confidence Mme. Loisel has gained simply by applying a piece of jewelry she does not know is a paste. The irony of this is that Mme Loisel does not actually have a valuable object on her person yet simply because she believes herself to be luxurious and flashy in the moment, her entire self-image is transformed. From this the reader can clearly see the way Mme. Loisel bases her happiness and self-worth according to her perception of attained wealth. To further understand the skewed mentality Mme.
Loisel and many others in today’s society posses pertaining to luxury and social status, the dynamic characteristics of Mme. Loisel can be observed throughout the story. During the opening of the novella Mme. Loisel is characterized as discouraged, self-conscious and frustrated. Maupassant characterizes her by saying “she was as unhappy as though she had really fallen from her proper station” and later describing how “she suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born for all the delicacies and all the luxuries.” (33) This is notable because midway through the novella Mme. Loisel’s characteristics seem to completely change once she gets her hands on a necklace to wear out that she perceives as valuable. Mme. Loisel goes from claiming, “there’s nothing more humiliating than to look poor among other women who are rich.” to suddenly remaining “lost in ecstasy at the sight of herself” once she adds her friends expensive looking diamond necklace to her outfit. (35) Maupassant also details how (Mme Loisel) “sprang upon the neck of her friend, kissed her passionately, then fled with her treasure.” (35) This type of affection being shown by Mme Loisel is in great contrast with the disdain and contempt she looked upon her husband with in the earlier pages of the novella. When Mme Loisel is at the ball, Maupassant describes her “forgetting all, in the triumph of her beauty, in the glory of her success, in a sort of cloud of happiness” (36)
Again, this happiness and her perceived feelings of beauty and success draw a huge discrepancy between Mme Loisel’s characteristics in the early stages of the novella versus when she receives a valuable object to wear. This discrepancy makes it obvious that Mme Loisel has based a huge portion of her happiness and self-image based on materials and luxuries. The story of Mme Loisel ends with her losing the borrowed necklace and purchasing a new one to return to its rightful owner only to find out that the necklace was phony jewelry in the first place. This is a very ironic ending considering the changes of characteristics that undertook Mme Loisel as soon as she put on the flashy looking necklace. Despite the legitimate value of the necklace it is still obvious through the diction and characterization used by Maupassant that Mme Loisel is an extremely impressionable young woman whose sense of self worth comes predominantly from how rich and high in status she appears. Many themes can be taken from this story but the easiest to zone in on is that materials and wealth should not dictate men or women’s internal mind states nor their feelings of self-worth. Furthermore this novella questions the idea of luxury itself, leaving the reader to consider whether luxury is an objective trait found just in materials and wealth or if luxury is simply found by viewing the world in a realistic and accepting perspective.
5. (CP) Madame Loisel borrows seemingly expensive necklace to satisfy her arrogance and attend a party that was way above her social class, only to lose it. She has been blessed with physical beauty, but not with the lifestyle she desires. She may not be the ideal protagonist, but she went through a tough time after she lost the necklace and had to make money to replace it.
In “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant the character Madame Loisel was always longing for expensive possessions, larger
At the beginning of the story, “The Necklace” Madame Loisel was young, beautiful, and had a loving husband, but was very concerned about her looks, reputation, and status. She wishes for an elegant upper class life and longs to have much more than she does. The story starts off by telling about the beauty and youthfulness of Loisel, “ She was one of
Guy de Maupassant expresses his theme through the use of situational irony. Guy de Maupassant says, “She suffered endlessly, feeling herself born for every delicacy and luxury. She suffered from the poorness of her house. All these things, of which other women of her class would not even have been aware, tormented and insulted her.”(De Maupassant). She is poor and thinks of herself too much and then he says "but she was as unhappy as though she had married beneath her; for women have no caste or class.”(De Maupassant). She wants more than she can get which will ruin her later in the story. When she lost the necklace by the end of the week they had lost all hope to find it. Loisel, who had aged five years, declared:
Guy de Maupassant’s The Necklace expresses the theme of being spoiled and ungrateful will only make things worse in many ways. Mathilde Loisel is a beautiful woman who is born into a family of poor clerks and feels she has nothing even though she wishes to have the best of everything. At times she can be charming and elegant, but she also possesses the unpleasant traits of being spoiled and ungrateful as shown in the story multiple times.
In the short story, “The Necklace,” a greedy and selfish woman brings financial ruin upon herself and her husband. They go from a comfortable lifestyle in a slightly shabby apartment to an impoverished existence in an attic apartment. Mathilde Loisel was born to a lower middle class French family, but she wished that she could have of noble birth. Her longing for a better life caused her great grief. When she could have been happy with her situation in life, instead she would dream of a grand home and wealthy, dignified friends. When she borrowed a diamond necklace from a friend and lost it at an elegant party, she brought downfall to her husband and herself. Not only does Guy de Maupassant use the necklace as a vehicle for the hard times that the Loisels had to endure, but he also uses it as a symbol to teach a lesson about the repercussions of greed, ruin, and regret.
Instead she married a simple middle class man and lived a middle class life. All the while she dreamed of living the life of the rich. With beautiful gowns and glittering jewelry. Oh how happy she thought she would be. Then one day it happened that she and her husband where invited to a dinner ball. Her husband, Mr. Loisel thought this would make his wife so very happy since this is what she spent all of her time day dreaming of. Here it was, the thing that consumed her finally at her door step, but she was not happy. In fact, Mathilde was even more distraught because it brought to her attention that she had nothing proper to wear. Mr. Loisel sympathized with his wife and knowing he had money set aside for a new shot gun, he gave her 400 francs. This was enough money for a pretty dress, not too fancy, but pretty because he knew this would be a rare occasion.
It is said that “everything that shines isn't gold.” A difficult situation can result a vast illusion that is not what one thought it would be, which leads to disappointment and despair. Just like Guy De Maupassant stories, “The Necklace” and “The Jewel.” In the first story, the protagonist, Mathilde Loisel’s need for materialistic fulfillment causes her hard labor which ends her natural beauty. In the second story, the husband Monsieur Latin ends up living a dreadful life due to the passing of his wife and her admiration for jewels. “The Necklace” and “The Jewel” both share many similarities such as the unconditional love each husband haves toward their wife, the necessity each wife haves towards materialistic greed, the beautiful allurement
From the beginning of the story Mathilde seems to have a chip on her shoulder as if she has been done an injustice because of who she is married to. The time period, in which this story was set, the only way a women could move up the class scale was to marry a man who came from wealth. Ironically, Mme. Loisel’s husband is a clerk just like her father was. She longs to be rich. Her mind is concentrated on being in the social circle and living a life surrounded by everything that is fine and exclusive. She is greedy and unhappy with her modest but still quite tolerable lifestyle. It is illustrated beautifully in the passage where she describes her intolerable “worn out chairs” and “ugly curtains.” In the very next breath she speaks of her “little Breton peasant who does her humble house work” (Maupassant 178). When her husband comes upon the opportunity to go out for an evening to a ball, he assumes his wife would be overjoyed. Instead, she relishes in thoughts of looking poor among the rich. Try as he might there is no pleasing his deprived wife.
Janwillem Van De Wetering says, “Greed is a fat demon with a small mouth and whatever you feed it is never enough.” Guy De Maupassant’s “The Necklace” tells of Mrs. Mathilde Loisel’s longings for the finer things in life. Her desires are so intense she risks her husband’s affections, the friendship of an old chum, and even her mediocre lifestyle to pursue these cravings. One small decision based on an ill-placed desire causes a slow drawn out death of the spirit, body and relationships.
Values are spread all around the world, and many people’s values differ. These can lead to people being judged, or indirectly characterized by other people. In “The Necklace” Mme. Loisel is a beautiful woman with a decent life, and a husband that loves her, and only wants to make her happy. She is not rich but she makes it along, she insists of a better, wealthier life. When her husband gets her invited to a ball, she feels the need for a brand new fancy dress and tons of jewelry. When the couple realizes they cannot afford jewelry as well, they search out to borrow her friend, Mme. Forestiers’ necklace. She comes to notice she no longer has the necklace on when she leaves the ball. This later troubles her, as she has to work for a long time to collect enough money to buy a new necklace. This story describes the relationship between a couple, who have different dreams, and how desires can revamp your life. Guy de Maupassant, the author of “The Necklace” uses literary devices to prove people come before materialistic items.
Around the world, values are expressed differently. Some people think that life is about the little things that make them happy. Others feel the opposite way and that expenses are the way to live. In Guy de Maupassant’s short story, “The Necklace”, he develops a character, Madame Loisel, who illustrates her different style of assessments. Madame Loisel, a beautiful woman, lives in a wonderful home with all the necessary supplies needed to live. However, she is very unhappy with her life. She feels she deserves a much more expensive and materialistic life than what she has. After pitying herself for not being the richest of her friends, she goes out and borrows a beautiful necklace from an ally. But as she misplaces the closest thing she has to the life she dreams of and not telling her friend about the mishap, she could have set herself aside from ten years of work. Through many literary devices, de Maupassant sends a message to value less substance articles so life can be spent wisely.
One of the first characteristics readers see of Mathidle is her longing for a wealthy lifestyle. Since she did not marry a “…rich and distinguished man…,” she regrets marrying her small town man; however, her husband tries to do everything in his power
Guy de Maupassant is a realist whose claim to fame is the style in which he conveys political and socioeconomic themes in his literary publications. He achieves his writing style by putting small unfortunate life events under a spotlight. His literary performance is described in his biography from Cambridge, the writer says “He exposes with piercing clarity the small tragedies and pathetic incidents of everyday life, taking a clear-sighted though pessimistic view of humanity” (Halsey, par. 1). Guy de Maupassant’s story The Necklace is a great representation of the style he uses. In The Necklace the main character Mathilde Loisel a beautiful but impoverished woman married to a clerk is in conflict with her lack of wealth and desire to acquire
In the short story “The Necklace”, the main character, Loisel, is a woman who dreams of greater things in her life. She is married to a poor clerk who tries his best to make her happy no matter what. In an attempt to try to bring happiness to his wife, he manages to get two invitations to a very classy ball, but even in light of this Loisel is still unhappy. Even when she gets a new dress she is still unhappy. This lasts until her husband suggests she borrows some jewelry from a friend, and upon doing so she is finally happy. Once the ball is over, and they reach home, Loisel has the horrible realization that she has lost the necklace, and after ten years of hard labor and suffering, they pay off debts incurred to get a replacement. The central idea of this story is how something small can have a life changing effect on our and others life’s. This idea is presented through internal and external conflicts, third person omniscient point of view, and the round-dynamic character of Loisel. The third person limited omniscient point-of-view is prevalent throughout this short story in the way that the author lets the reader only see into the main character’s thoughts. Loisel is revealed to the reader as being unhappy with her life and wishing for fancier things. “She suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born for all the delicacies and all the luxuries.” (de Maupassant 887) When her husband tries to fancy things up, “she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry which peopled the walls…” (de Maupassant 887) As the story goes on her point of view changes, as she “now knew the horrible existence of the needy. She took her part, moreover all of a sudden, with heroism.” (de Maupassant 891) Having the accountability to know that the “dreadful debt must be paid.” (de Maupassant 891 ) This point-of-view is used to help the reader gain more insight to how Loisel’s whole mindset is changed throughout her struggle to pay off their debts. Maupassant only reveals the thoughts and feelings of these this main character leaving all the others as flat characters. Loisel is a round-dynamic character in that Maupassant shows how she thought she was born in the wrong “station”. “She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was as unhappy as though she had really fallen from her proper station.