The Nature Of Science And Technology In Ayn Rand's Anthem

768 Words2 Pages

People who think together have no motivation to think at all. This makes it far too easy for a singular force to subdue the masses, which is exactly what happens in Anthem by Ayn Rand. If there is no thinking being done there will never be any change, without change there can be no progress. The nature of science and technology is malleable to the people of the time. There are three condition that affect their progression, all of which need to be meet in order for an acceptable amount of progression to take place.
In Anthem there is a dramatic juxtaposition of the current technological status and scientific understanding enjoyed in this day and age, and the primitive technology and mystical scientific thought in Anthem; there is no known …show more content…

And just like a great civilization it’s future is not succor. It can decline; the only thing left to acknowledge it’s existence is a some ruins, scattered and few. But just like how the renaissance brought back antiquity Equality 7-2521 can bring true knowledge back into his world. He discovers electricity(52-54) and reinvented a new way to deliver light: “We had touched no flint, made no fire. Yet here was light, light that came from nowhere, light from the heart of metal”(59). Anthem conveys the thought that while science and technology can decline, they can never die in the hearts of the curious and willing. That is the true nature of these two magnificent components of the …show more content…

In order for technology to move forward it has to have people that are willing to work for the sake of science, a government that allows progression, and society that demands faster, clearer, more efficient things. That is why the world of Anthem has such a slow technological advancement rate, while there are people who wish to make discoveries and create new things, and there may very well be people who wish there was a way to lift some of their burden off their shoulders, the government has a set up that allows very little progression over a large amount of time. Whenever Equality 7-2521 presents his light to the Council of Scholars they told him “ It took fifty years to secure the approval of all the Councils for the Candle… We cannot alter the Plans again so soon”(74); not only did it take half a century to put something to use that was already invented, but earlier in the book Equality 7-2521 mentions that the discovery of how to make candles was made 100 years ago(24). So if candles were created a 100 year ago and it took 50 years to get them approved that means that they have been in use for 50 years. The Council of Scholars is saying that to go through 50 years of struggle just to enjoy only 50 years of candles and then have to fight once more to get a new creation to get approved intended for the same purpose seems idiotic and not worth their

More about The Nature Of Science And Technology In Ayn Rand's Anthem

Open Document