The Moral Logic Of Survivor Guilt

587 Words2 Pages

When events like terrorist attacks or natural disasters occur, at least a few people are often left alone. Someone, or everyone, in their family has died and they have to pick up the pieces and figure out how to move on. As they struggle to continue with their life they often feel survivor guilt. Survivor guilt is when people who survive an event like 9/11 or the holocaust, where other people died, feel guilty, even though they had no control over what was happening. Many people argue about if people should or should not feel survivor guilt. Some people believe survivors of life threatening situations should feel survivor guilt. Others feel they should not. Survivors of life and death situations should feel survivor guilt. One reason survivors of life and death situations should feel survivor guilt is because it is an indicator of good morals. The article “The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt,” by Nancy Sherman, explores the pros and cons of survivor guilt. In paragraph six it is stated, “Who I am in terms of my character and relationships, and not just what I do, matters morally.” The author is saying that our emotions and our character …show more content…

“The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt,” talks about how people that serve together in the army, navy, etc. feel like family. When one of them dies, the others feel survivor guilt. In this quote it explains why they feel survivor guilt, “The anguish of guilt, it’s sheer pain, is a way of sharing some of the ill fate. It is a form of empathic distress.” Survivor guilt serves as a connection with the deceased; it is a way for the survivor(s) to empathize with those who died. If a person continues with their normal life when someone they know dies, without grieving at all, it is clear something is awry. People should feel survivor guilt because if they don’t they lack the vital empathy all humans should

Open Document