Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Poem analysis
Initially becoming one of the most dominantly driven characters in the entire piece, Pozzo is a character that exerts fear and pain in the other characters, specifically Lucky. Pozzo exhibits a domineering aura that gives off feelings of superiority, narcissism, and arrogance. While this is evident, such intense feelings manifested through Pozzo’s speech and action serve to compensate for underlying internal conflict with existence and self perception. Creating a false perception of self and the world around him, Pozzo presents a more dominantly driven character in order to compensate for a life of little fulfillment coupled with his ironic mistreatment of Lucky, despite the fact that in the end their lives will amount to the same utter nothingness. …show more content…
Throughout Act 1, much of the speech stated by Pozzo can be condensed down into abuse towards Lucky. Physically, Pozzo created visible marks that encapsulate this abuse, while verbally he says incredibly detrimental words to Lucky. Displaying this idea of verbal abuse perfectly, Pozzo mainly refers to Lucky through an animalistic characterization, saying things like “In reality he carries like a pig” (23), and explicitly calling him “Hog” (30) to his face. Unknowingly employing verbal irony in his statements, it is very ironic that Pozzo is referring to Lucky, a very compliant and civilized individual, as the animal-like one, when in reality it is him that deters closer and closer down the path of evil through animal-like action. Pozzo utilizes such intense and hurtful language to separate himself from Lucky. He wants to believe that he holds a sense of superiority over Lucky, when in reality they are just the same. Bringing the idea of the fate, or outcomes of the characters into the conversation, it is evident that in reality, the two characters, despite the fact that Pozzo believes that he is better than everyone else, specifically Lucky, have the same outcome in the end: utter meaninglessness. Furthering the idea of Pozzo’s wrongly-thought superiority over Lucky, it becomes clear that Pozzo chooses to recognizes the lives of others, just not Lucky’s. Upon introduction to Estragon and Vladimir, Pozzo attempting to make the duo more uncomfortable by stating that they in fact come from the same “God” as he does. Specifically, Pozzo shows his identification by stating “You are human beings none the less” (15). Unfairly, Pozzo deems that Lucky is less of a human being than every other character introduced in the text. In an attempt to pretend that they are not fated in the same way, Pozzo
This story made me frustrated at the way people get forced into a rut that they can’t escape. Jackson Jackson isn’t completely innocent, no one is, but most of his problems were a result from the wrong that others had inflicted upon him. The frustrating part was that He was incapable of getting himself out. He did things like spend money on alcohol and cheese burgers, only to end up throwing it all up and even less money. To me, this story is about redemption. Jackson received grace from people like the good cop, and the pawnbroker. None of his own efforts changed his situation, only the kindness of others changed him. These kind deeds helped reconcile the reality of Jackson’ life and his situation. In a story like this, I always hope for a
A Lucky Child by Thomas Buergenthal is a memoir about his time as a Jewish child in multiple ghettos and death camps in and around Germany during World War II. The author shares about his reunions with family and acquaintances from the war in the years between then and now. Buergenthal wished to share his Holocaust story for a number of reasons: to prevent himself from just being another number, to contribute to history, to show the power and necessity of forgiveness, the will to not give up, and to question how people change in war allowing them to do unspeakable things. The memoir is not a cry for private attention, but a call to break the cycle of hatred and violence to end mass crimes.
Out of all the short stories that were assigned, it can be seen that they have all one thing in common. They all show the realms of violence each of them different. The story “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson is a story where violence is shown in the most barbarous way possible. But with it, the author wants us to understand that violence is abhorrent and “The Lottery” shows that violent behavior can even corrupt the most innocent minds.
Set in 1948 and published in The New Yorker, “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson describes a village ritual of sacrifice. Contrary to the positive feeling associated with the word “lottery,” the story strikes fear into the readers’ hearts as the winner is stoned to death. Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” uses symbolism and genre conventions of a classic dystopian story to show the different ways in which human cruelty can occur.
Winning vast amounts of money can make anyone slaphappy, but unfortunately this type of wager won’t be discussed in Shirley Jacksons “The Lottery.” Jackson catches the reader’s attention by describing a typical day by using words such as “blossoming, clear and sunny skies” to attract the reader into believing a calm and hopeful setting which eventually turns dark. In this short story Jackson tells a tale of a sinister and malevolent town in America that conforms to the treacherous acts of murder in order to keep their annual harvest tradition alive. Jackson exposes the monstrosity of people within this society in this chilling tale. She allows the reader’s to ponder and lead them to believe that the lottery is actually a good thing; till she implements foreshadowing, to hint at the dreadfulness behind the lottery and its meaning. My goal in this paper is to discuss why Jackson’s “The Lottery” is a portrayed as a horror story, and the importance the townspeople used to glorify ritualistic killings, to appease to an unseeable force in return of good harvest for the upcoming year.
There exists a kind of person who can be called by no other name than by “Magnificent Bastard”. They are masters of deception, bloody brilliant, unstoppable in achieving their goals even when it means grinding others into the dust, and yet they have such a flair, such a charming disposition, that they are often admired by even those who are wronged by them. Iago in Shakespeare’s play Othello is one such character. The audience may love or hate him, but either way they must admit that he commands the spot-light. In spite of this, the reason why Iago acts as he does is shrouded in mystery. Even when directly speaking to the audience about his motivations, Iago is not always truthful. In reality, while Iago derives great pleasure from manipulating others, his driving motivation throughout the entire play is his own jealousy; from being unrecognized for his greatness, to an impossible love for Desdemona, and of the virtuous characters all around him.
...er known what it should have been like. His past was laced with rejections and so he never knew how to give anything else but rejection. And so even if he thought he loved her, he was rejecting her. Which brings me to Pecola. Pecola doesn't have much of a past because no one allows her to have any. Everyone is always giving her their past, enforcing restrictions upon her and placing her into categories. Because of this she lives vicariously through these much wanted blue eyes. She is given this offspring of hate and rejection and forced to live in a present more vile than any past of any one particular character.
If you analyze the poem Waiting for Godot you can see the huge parallels between the character of Lucky and Jesus. Lucky, bound with a rope, is the disgraced prisoner, very similar to the story of Jesus as the prisoner of the Romans after Judas turned him in. Pozzo beats, yells at, and spits on Lucky the same way the Roman treated Jesus when they were getting him ready for crucifixion. Lucky carries the burden of Pozzo's bags like Jesus carried his cross, and he is being led to a public event where he will be mocked and scorned the same way the Romans paraded Jesus on the hill where for public scorn. The same way Jesus fell three times under the weight of his burden of his cross, Lucky...
In many instances in literature, the flaws of characters lead into conflicts that arise and that the characters must attempt to overcome over the duration of the storyline. In some cases, the character facing these problems, typically the protagonist, is unable to triumph over such issues. This can cause their major character flaws to overwhelm them, and they can encounter even more troubles or even their own downfall. A comparable situation as the aforementioned is found in the Shakespearean tragedy, Othello, where the character flaws of the protagonist, Othello, cause weakness in his character, which ultimately leads to his downfall and death. One of the flaws that lead Othello to his downfall is the fact that he has very poor judgement, which is indisputably seen through the consistent trust that he finds in Iago. His downfall also occurs due to his overwhelming struggle against jealousy, which materializes primarily from the relationship that his wife has with Cassio. Furthermore, Othello’s insecurities cause weakness in his character, allowing the antagonist of the story, Iago, to use them in order to lead Othello into his downfall. With these faults in his character, it is evident that Othello’s downfall comes about due to his major character flaws.
I will talk about the he five main characters of this play and they are all encased with jealousy in their own way. They are: Iago (the antagonist), Emilia, Bianca, Roderigo and Othello (the protagonist), who all display their sense of jealousy throughout the play. They all find different ways to sustain them. Iago enunciates his jealousy in the beginning of the play. He decides to plot his revenge on those who he feels has done him wrong. The first two jealousies he expresses are of Cassio, because he keeps his job as a lieutenant and gets promoted. He feels this should be his job (e-notes 2011). The second is of Othello; he believes that Othello slept with Emilia (his wife). “It is thought aboard that ‘twixt my sheets” (I.iii.369-370). As he becomes fixed with revenge he speaks by saying, he will not be satisfied “’Til I am evened with him/wife for wife/ At least into jealousy so strong/ that judgment cannot cure (2.1.299-302). In the end Iago is forced to expose his actual nature.
Luhan has always been your typical Good Samaritan—he took part in his school’s volunteering programmes as a child and moved onto organising one of his own as he matured. Never turning a blind eye to the less fortunate, Luhan was the epitome of compassion and sympathy, the person who people generally referred to as those “who still had a shred of humanity left in them”.
Rodrigo’s character serves as an example of true jealousy over love, rather as a facade to cover-up another motivation, as seen with Othello and Iago. He displays a decline in power once wrought with jealousy, rather than the upshot seen in the other two. Iago and Othello take matters into their own
himself comfortable? Let's try and get this clear. Has he not the right to? Certainly he has. It follows that he doesn't want to...He imagines that when I see how well he carries I'll be tempted to keep him on in that capacity...As though I were short of slaves. Despite his miserable condition, Lucky does not seem to desire change. Perhaps he is happy, or maybe not miserable enough. Perhaps, as the compliant Vladimir and Estragon, he cannot envision himself any differently. The relationship between Pozzo and Lucky does not, however, stagnate at this point. The very next day, when the two next appear, the rope between them is significantly shorter so that the now-blind Pozzo may find his way. In this new situation, it is less clear which character leads the other, or if either one is truly in control. As the stage directions read, "Pozzo is blind...Rope as before, but much shorter, so that Pozzo may follow more easily." For the first time in the text, Pozzo is dependent on Lucky for direction; Lucky is dependent on Pozzo for the same reason, though this relationship is one of emotional, rather than physical, dependence. The shortness of the rope, necessary because of Pozzo's blindness, affects their relationship; their new-found closeness makes it difficult for Pozzo to dominate and for Lucky to be truly servile and completely pathetic.
The book Lucky was both enlightening and inspiring in countless ways. It was enlightening to read about a subject that many people shy away from or feel uncomfortable discussing. It was inspiring because it allowed you to read, in a very intimate way, the strengths and weaknesses of one woman as she dealt with the aftermath of being raped. Most importantly, the book Lucky allowed me the opportunity to think and reflect about the victim’s family and friends, statistics involving rape, and the physical/emotional toil the victim under goes.
Throught the play, the characters are shown to be weighed down or traped in prisons created as a result of their own inability to act. With Estragon and Vladimir, it 's their choice/comitment to Godot which devolved into cumpulsive waiting, with only a fuzzy rememberance on why and a detatchment from their sourondings. With Pozzo it 's how he mesures himself compered to the extent of control he has. his watch and the sence of control over time it gives him and his enslavment of Lucky. With Lucky it 's his literal enslavement and comitment to Pozzo which ironicly may give him more freedom because of his awareness of his suroundings such as his imprisonment. Unlike the others, who belive or contimplate weither or not they have any choice, if they are free or not, Lucky has made the concious choice to remain a slave to Pozzo. But like Vladimir and Estragon, his comitment gives him certanty in life.