Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Prison overpopulation problem in america
Prison overpopulation problem in america
Overcrowding Of Prisons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Prison overpopulation problem in america
Recently, the issue of the militarization of police forces has become a major issue in the media. Following the events in Ferguson, Missouri, and Baltimore, Maryland, the question became very relevant; is it okay for police forces to use military equipment? The debate had two very clear sides with very few in between. The question involves, police use of bayonets, armored vehicles, shields, tear gasses, and gas masks. On Monday, May 18, 2015, in Camden, New Jersey, Barack Obama and his administration, moved to prohibit federal agencies from providing, police officers with certain kinds of military equipment, such as grenade launchers, high-caliber weapons and bayonets. This came after the controversy over a militarized police response to the rioting and unrest last summer in Ferguson, Missouri (Perez, Liptak, & Malloy, 2015). Even with these restrictions, police forces are still able to purchase this baned equipment from private sellers.
This issue of the militarization of police forces and many other issues in criminal justice, such as; mandatory minimum sentences, overcrowded prisons, and bloated criminal justice budgets, have become a bipartisan issue. Jonathan Blanks’s, Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of America 's Police Forces, looks at all these issues, but mostly focuses on the militarization of police forces and the rise of the “warrior cop”. Blanks suggests that the rise of the warrior cop began as far back as patrols in ancient Rome, the shire reeves in medieval England, and the slave patrols in the antebellum south (Blanks, 2014). In the past 40 years, there has been a drastic change from police officers patrolling on foot in neighborhoods, to the aggressive teams of police officers serving warrants on...
... middle of paper ...
...zation of police forces. Some feel that the militarization helps make police forces more successful while other see the militarization of police forces as a negative that is detrimental to the people living in the areas that are affected by the militarization. The recent unrest in Ferguson, Missouri and Baltimore, Maryland has caused the issue the become a hot topic in the media. The Obama administration’s act of prohibiting federal agencies from providing police forces with grenade launchers, high-caliber weapons and bayonets is in response to the outcry from the media about the military equipment used in the unrest in Ferguson and Baltimore. Even with Obama riding police forces of that equipment, the question still remains should police forces still be able to purchase this equipment from private vendors. Should police forces be allowed any police equipment at all?
As taught in the lectures, it is impossible for police officers to win the war against crime without bending the rules, however when the rules are bent so much that it starts to violate t...
However, after reading the article the author noted that police are mandated to enforce civilian law and order, investigate crimes, and strictly follow legal procedures even when in pursuit of chronic and dangerous criminals (Kagoro, 2014). Ideally, it has been argued, there should be strict dividing lines between the police and the military; the former for domestic purposes with the latter protecting citizens from external threats (Kagoro, 2014). In his article on the anti-militarization of the police in the United States, Kurt Andrew Schlichter aptly put it that the military is designed, organized, and equipped to execute rapid, violent and efficient obliteration of the “enemy”-whoever the enemy may be ( Kagoro, 2014). However, the law enforcement is usually modeled after the military and in fact there a large number of police officers who are former military personnel. This was a new criticism of police that was unfamiliar to me in the study of criminal justice but, I found it to be a valid point. The idea of changing the focus of policing to be less of a battlefield and more of a community may be a compelling approach to make interaction with citizens less
One of the most disturbing trends in American policing in recent years has been the militarization of police weaponry and tactics. In his new book, “The Rise of the Warrior Cop”, author Radley Balko traces the roots of American law enforcement from the constables of colonial times to present day SWAT teams and special response units. With the high controversy surrounding the “war on drugs” and the “war on terrorism,” policymakers have signed off on a dangerously aggressive style of policing that too often leads to unnecessary deaths and injuries. Some people say that modern law enforcement is on a collision course with our Bill of Rights and is unconstitutional. In the book “ Rise of the Warrior Cop” the author talks about how modern day policing are adapting mostly all military tactic. These wars are more than just metaphors designed to rally public support and secure all the money they can to support these programs. They change the way we think about what the police do. Wars mean shooting first and asking questions later. Wars require military tactics and weaponry. Wars mean civilian casualties. Are we at war with our own people?
During the seventies in New Jersey created a program that could change life in society. This program occurred only in twenty-eight cities. Government and public officials were excited about this concept. Police officials were not so much. Foot patrol made officers walk in sleet and snow. Assigned foot patrol was a way of punishment for officers. State funding of foot patrol shut the mouths of some people. Silence stopped after the “Police Foundation”(Kelling) put foot patrol to the actual test. To contrary belief this rattled some arguments in the community an...
Many Americans are now applying for a license to carry licensed concealed arms with them. The rate at which licenses are being approved is worrying. This development is concerning law enforcement authorities. Putting so many firearms at the disposal of the public is counterproductive to the gains that are being made on improving security and especially in the cities where incidences of gun crime and violence are on the rise.
USA has divided into two separated nations because of gun ownership. This issue has been questioned in terms of people’s freedom to buy guns and an indiscriminate use of them. In addition, Americans have claimed that they’ve got strong reasons, which allow them be armed as a matter of civic duty. For ...
A growing number of publicized tragedies caused by gun violence have caused a great stir in the American community. Recently, President Barack Obama has made proposals to tighten the regulation of and the restrictions on the possession of weapons in America to lessen these tragedies. Should the legislative branch decide in favor of his proposals, all American citizens who do or wish to own the type of weapons in question or who use current loopholes in existing policy would be directly affected. His proposals, which are to “require background checks for all gun sales, strengthen the background check system for gun sales, pass a new, stronger ban on assault weapons, limit ammunition magazines to 10 rounds, finish the job of getting armor-piercing bullets off the streets, give law enforcement additional tools to prevent and prosecute gun crime, end the freeze on gun violence research, make our schools safer with new resource officers and counselors, better emergency response plans, and more nurturing school climates, [and] ensure quality coverage of mental health treatment, particularly for young people,” have been cause for a large amount of recent debate (whitehouse.gov).
Walker, S., & Katz, C. (2012). Police in America: An Introduction (8th Edition ed.). New York:
“I don’t believe people should be able to own guns. (Obama)” This said prior to Obama’s presidency, in the 1990’s, is still a topic that is constantly questioned today. Many American’s feel the need to seek ownership of weapons as a source of protection; While others believe that private ownership of guns will do nothing more but heighten the rate of violence due to people taking matters into his or her own hands. Philosophy professor Jeff McMahan agrees with Obama’s statement in regard to the ownership of guns. In his New York Times editorial titled “When Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough,” McMahan provides evidence to support his theory of the dangers that quickly follow when allowing the community to own guns legally. McMahan, throughout the text, shows responsible reasoning and allows the reader the opportunity to obtain full understanding and justifies his beliefs properly.
By teaching police officers alternatives to shooting to kill, they experience higher risks with their lives. Police Commissioner, Ray Kelly, said, “It would be "very difficult" to train officers to shoot to wound” (Jacobo, 2016). Police officers are viewed as “predators” and “an occupying army” rather than allies (Valey, 2016). This is a perception that needs to change because it counteracts the mission of police officers
Over the past five years Americans have seen many horrific tragedies related to gun violence. Each of these terrible events has been accompanied with scrutinizing media coverage, and subsequently, a push on government level for increased gun control. On the surface these movements to take away guns from Americans may seem justified because of these events. In reality the federal government is encroaching upon our Second Amendment, the right to bear arms.
Skolnick, J., Fyfe, J. (1993) Above the law: Police and the Excessive use of force. United States: The Free Press
When asked to describe the above-mentioned events, words like horrific, saddening, and terrifying inevitably are among the first to cross one’s mind. The question arises, “Where does the line lie that separates American’s personal freedom from the public’s safety?” The Second Amendment promises, “[…] the right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” But after the recent shootings and scares at the campuses of Purdue and Oklahoma University, one must ponder the idea, “Should America ban assault weapons?” This emotionally charged battle has even reached the White House steps, and is hotly debated by Republicans and Democrats alike. This paper will present a comparative analysis of banning and not banning assault weapons, and will conclude with a discussion in favor of lighter gun control.
The lack of training police officers is causing unnecessary incidents, is it true? Does the lack of Critical thinking, values, Ethics and Understanding the role as a police officer contribute to hire number of incidents? There is a chance that answer to this questions might always be divided, why? Well because officers will tend to defend their side and how the view the problem and the public will also defend their side and how they view the problem, for example most officers would probably say that people do not comply with their orders or the public might outcry because of the use of excessive force, it is most certain that there will never be an agreement on who is wright or wrong. Regardless of the outcome of who is wright
The Web. The Web. 15 Mar. 2014. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. Gul, Zakir, Hakan Hekim, and Ramazan Terkesil. “Controlling Police (Excessive) Force: The American Case.”