The Mighty Kuchk The Russian Musical Society

1664 Words4 Pages

In the latter half of the 19th century, Russia faced an identity crisis and sought to find the distinctiveness of the Russian artist. In this period, Russians made efforts to boost nationalism and increase domestic activity in cultural development. The Russian Musical Society achieved this by the creation of the St. Petersburg Conservatory. The contentious curriculum of the conservatory was the reason for the creation of the Mighty Kuchka. The musical habits and practices of both groups will be discussed according to how they represented Russia and the Orient in their music. The St. Petersburg Conservatory addressed the cultural drive for nationalism through an education practice that included Western and Eastern models and created individuality …show more content…

Members of the group include Mily Balakirev (the leader), César Cui, Modest Mussorgsky, Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov, and Alexander Borodin. The group was created in response to the creation of the St. Petersburg Conservatory. They were all mostly self-trained musicians and believed that the conservatory put too much emphasis on studying and producing Western style music. The group emphasized a strive for national character. Along with many others at the time, they were primarily concerned with identity. They distinguished themselves from other Russian composers and Europe as the only ones who could replicate the “oriental element.” In addition to this unifying characteristic, many of the members had diverse musical interests. Mussorgsky believed in musical realism and that “art must mirror the conditions of real life.” Rimsky-Korsakov was influential to the Romantic era through his use of musical imagery. While this group was united in their belief in Russian nationalism, they each had their own interests. They are all notable for their frequent use of oriental or Russian themes and folk songs from across the empire to express musical nationalism. Balakirev was the most reverent and dogmatic in his use of national color. Eventually, in 1871, Rimsky-Korsakov joined the St. Petersburg Conservatory’s staff with the support of Balakirev, who had …show more content…

Petersburg and Moscow Conservatories created the most tension, due to their emphasis on Western styles of music education and the study of Western music. However, these criticisms came at a time when Russians were facing a cultural identity crisis, especially in relation to Western Europe. Therefore, the conservatory was constantly bombarded with inquisitions into its dedication to Russian nationality. Tchaikovsky said, in response to these accusations, that the conservatory should not share the fear of other Russian artists towards “tradition and of the European mainstream” that was deemed as an “other” in Russia and, therefore, avoided. Quickly glancing over the curriculum at the conservatories reveals an evident emphasis on the study of Western regional music styles, including Italy and Germany, and the study of common practice, or Western practice. At a time of cultural tensions, the rise of criticisms can be understood. However, the conservatory provided courses on the study of Russian music and folk culture. In addition, the conservatories and larger school “offered instruction on all orchestral instruments, including harp, as well as theory and composition… music theory, including harmony and instrumentation, solfege, music history, and, for non-pianists, applied piano.” The conservatories offered an intensive musical education to skilled artists but received criticism for its education

More about The Mighty Kuchk The Russian Musical Society

Open Document