Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Failures and successes of the weimar republic
Fail of weimar republic
Fail of weimar republic
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Failures and successes of the weimar republic
The new international order established after World War I completely failed to establish a meaningful and lasting peace. These failures involved the Weimar Republic and the mandate system in Africa and the Middle East.
After Germany’s surrender, there was an attempt to create peace by establishing the Weimar Republic. This new government was made up of German liberals and socialists. They were faced with repairing the damage done on the citizens by the war: “ The people were hungry, cold, and dispirited, and the huge reparation payments demanded by France crippled their recovery” (Voyages, 821). The German centrists faced opposition from both the communists and socialist war veterans. When the French occupied the Ruhr Valley in order to seize
…show more content…
The mandate system allowed the great powers to rule over territories such as former German Colonies and Ottoman provinces: In Africa, the Mandate System allowed the French, British, Belgian, and South African governments to take over former German colonies” (Voyages 822). In this process, the French and the British were heavily favored over the African and Arab peoples. This decree was meant to be temporary and last only until the colonies were prepared for individual government. While the Europeans were supposed to help the colonies become individual, they did nothing of the sort: “While the mandate system requires reports to the league of nations showing that they were furthering ‘native rights,’ the Europeans ruled the mandated territories like colonies, doing little or nothing to prepare them for eventual self-determination” (Voyages 822). The Mandate system was corrupted with nationalistic greed. This did not create any sort of lasting …show more content…
Both of these men wanted Russia to move towards a Communist state. They both wanted to illuminate the bourgeoisie and make the entire country revolve around the working class: “From now on there is a new page in the history of Russia, and the present, third Russian revolution shall in its finest result lead to the victory of Socialism” (Sherman 211). Lenin, who was the predecessor of Stalin, treated the people of Russia as his close friends. In his April Theses, he made it clear that he wanted no support for the Provisional Government, as that was one of his decrees. The liberal Provisional Government favored capitalism over socialism. This was neither Lenin nor Stalin’s goal. Stalin went about reforming the Russian government differently after Lenin’s death. Stalin was focused on establishing his socialist envisions by any means necessary: “during the great Purges, Stalin ordered his secret police to arrest many foreign colleagues of Lenin. Anyone who opposed Stalin was considered a traitor and severely punished or executed. This is the opposite of what the Provisional Government
Exploring the Reasons Behind Public's Discontent with the Weimar Government There were a number of reasons why the German people were unhappy with the Weimar government. One of the main reasons for this was the signing of the Treaty of Versailles. The result of this was that Germany has to take the war guilt, Germany had to pay reparations of 6,600 million marks to the allies in particular France, Germany lost its colonies, it lost its air force & tanks, and its soldiers were restricted to 100,000. The Ruhr was demilitarised. Also they lost their colonies and its land was cut up such as the Polish Corridor and Alsace Lorraine.
Liberal Western historians such as Richard Pipes, who himself was an advisor to President Reagan, drew lines of direct continuity between the two leaders, emphasising Lenin’s use of terror and bans on factionalism which allowed Stalin to come to power.... ... middle of paper ... ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] Trotsky, quoted in Stephen F. Cohen – Rethinking the Soviet Experience pp41 [2] Stephen F. Cohen, ‘Bolshevism and Stalinism’ in Tucker, ed., ‘Essays in historical interpretation’ pp12-13 [3] Maxim Gorky, quoted in M. McCauley, ‘Stalin and Stalinism’ pp86 [4] Sheila Fitzpatrick, The Russian Revolution, 2nd edition (1994) pp98 [5] M.N Ryutin, quoted in M. McCauley, ‘Stalin and Stalinism’ pp46 [6] http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1901/witbd/ch02.htm#02_A [7] http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/index.htm [8] Stalin, quoted in ‘From Lenin to Stalin’, Victor Serge, 1937 [9] Richard Pipes, Russia under the Bolshevik regime pp98 [10] Richard Pipes, Russia under the Bolshevik regime pp112
Joseph Stalin became leader of the USSR after Lenin’s death in 1924. Lenin had a government of abstemious communist government. When Stalin came into government he moved to a radical communist society. He moved away from the somewhat capitalist/communist economy of Lenin time to “modernize” the USSR. He wanted to industrialize and modernize USSR. He had overworked his workers, his people were dying, and most of them in slave labor camps. In fact by doing this Stalin had hindered the USSR and put them even farther back in time.
In conclusion, both Lenin and Stalin stood for nearly the same thing, but ended up being quite different in their approaches as to hot to implement the theoretical ideas into the real world. However, while neither man was particularly moral, Stalin especially was evil. But both of them caused famines and wars that caused the deaths of millions of people, not to mention the horrible life of those who survived. I do not believe that Lenin and especially not Stalin realized the goal of the Revolution as they had promised it, and I think that the people of Russia would have been better off if neither Lenin nor Stalin had come to power, and they continued to live under the Tsar.
Richard Bessel’s article stresses the political structure of Weimar Germany as the cause of its failure. Its structure was flawed in numerous ways, all of which contributed to its inevitable failure. First of all, the problems within Germany due to the First World War were massive. This caused economic, political and social problems which first had to be dealt with by the new Weimar government. The loss of the war had left Germany with huge reparations to pay, and massive destruction to repair. In order to gain the capital needed to finance efforts to rebuild, and repay the Allies, the economy had to be brought back to its prewar levels. This was not an easy task.
In the beginning Josef Stalin was a worshiper of his beloved Vladimir Lenin. He followed his every move and did as he said to help establish and lead the Bolshevik party. Much of the early part of his political career was lost due to his exile to Siberia for most of World War I. It wasn’t until 1928, when he assumed complete control of the country were he made most of his success. After Lenin’s death in January 1924, Stalin promoted his own cult followings along with the cult followings of the deceased leader. He took over the majority of the Socialists now, and immediately began to change agriculture and industry. He believed that the Soviet Union was one hundred years behind the West and had to catch up as quickly as possible. First though he had to seal up complete alliance to himself and his cause.
Doom of the Weimar Republic The Weimar Republic was born in the aftermath of the First World War. The creators of the Republic were blamed, ridiculed and labelled for the defeat of Germany during World War One and for accepting the crippling terms of the Treaty of Versailles. Weimar Germany was to have a short, turbulent history.
Several factors contributed to the instability of Germany’s Weimar Republic, such as the new political ideals brought forward and the government’s hunger for war. This could be compared to the many different governments created and dismissed in France’s Revolution towards the end of the 18th century. The new excitement from overthrowing the monarchy and the different opinions about how to run the new government made it very unstable, which is why France jumped from a monarchy to the National Assembly to the Legislative Assembly, and so
But Stalin’s dictatorship increased in strength and by 1938, the purges had made Russian’s so fearful, they were willing to accept the totalitarian ruler instead of the democratic system which had originally been hoped for in the February 1917 revolution. Stalin had also used fear as a motivator for workers and managed to industrialise. Overall the most similarities occur between Alexander III and Stalin due to their repressive actions but although all the Tsars and Stalin depended on central control, it cannot be said that there were more similarities because of the power and support for Stalin’s when his reign ended compared to the weak Tsarist system which Russians felt was not worth saving.
After the death of Lenin, his chief lieutenant Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin fought for control of the country. Stalin was able to win out over Trotsky and gain control of the Russian government. He felt that Lenin and Trotsky’s socialistic ideas were flawed in that they were to wait for other countries to revolt and become socialistic as well. Staling believed that a single country could make socialism .
German people were unused to a democracy and blamed the government “November criminals”, for signing the Treaty of Versailles. From the very beginning, the new Weimar government faced opposition from both sides of the political spectrum. The Left wing Spartacist group, lead by Liebknecht and Luxemburg, looked up to the new Soviet councils in Russia, wanted to place Germany into a similar system.
...nt the works of Marx. The result became a system where emotion triumphed over practicality, and the central message was blurred by the overthrow of the old regime. Thus, Lenin followed Marx in the general ideas of socialism, where everyone was equal under the law, and worked for each other and the common good. While Lenin’s system did manage to create a proletariat class, it also evoked the formation of the corrupt and power hungry Bolshevik Party. With regard to the Populists and Anarchists, Lenin was transformed into a revolutionary who would not stop at anything in the pursuit of Communism. Furthermore, Lenin followed to a lesser extent the Social Democrats and their views on the threat of the peasantry if they were not properly maintained. It is clearly evident that in following other philosophies, Lenin mutated Communism into a form unrecognizable to true Marxism
On November 1923, Hitler decided that he must put an end to the Weimar Government. The government was involved with economic crisis. and the Stresemann had cancelled Germany’s allowance of the Ruhr. On November 8, 1923, Hitler interrupted a conference of the the local government, and announced he was going to take over the government of Bavaria. He and old war hero, Ludendorff, went to the meeting.The Nazis began to take over the building of officials. One day later, the forces of the Weimar government attacked the Nazis back. The police surrounded the Nazis, and killed sixteen of them. The rebellion that Hitler had planned, had not worked. Hitler managed to escape in a car, while Ludendorff and other Nazis, stayed back to fight the police.
The Bauhaus became the most famous art institution in the late 19th century, and was established during the formation of the Weimar Republic. Its innovation of art with industry reflected a new era, even though it only lasted until the Nazis came into power in 1933. Nevertheless, it left its own imprint in which new artist that came into the institution learned new crafts and artistic skills that they applied into their own work. This would eventually lead the institution to influence contemporary artist with modern design, style, architecture, and art. The Bauhaus purpose was to implement all the arts together with industry. However, it had to be appealing and pleasing to the eyes. Their aesthetic work had to reflect simple, linear, geometric,
The introduction of the Weimar Republic to Germany following WWI caused broken political parties and a rebellion throughout the majorities, resulting in the destruction to the country. The Weimar Republic was Germany’s first democracy. It was created in an attempt