The Man Who Was Almost A Man Essay

1010 Words3 Pages

Written by Richard Wright, The Man Who Was Almost a Man takes places in the 1960s. The text shows the economic differences between two social classes. The story revolves around Dave Saunders, a seventeen-year-old teenager, who wants the world, or in this case, the base, to recognize his manhood. Under Marxist lens of interpretation, the readers can see the consequences of commodity fetishism, and the effects of alienation.
The economic base of The Man Who Was Almost a Man is a farming community where both the farm owner and the farm workers are dependent of each other. In How to Interpret Literature, Robert Dale Parker, states that “the new class of capitalist merchants, the bourgeoisie, exploited the class of workers, the proletariat” (Parker, …show more content…

Like any teenager, Dave pleads with his mother to let him have some money. What makes Dave’s case different, is that he’s asking his mother for his own money. Meaning, that all the money that he earns by working at the farm, he never sees it. Dave has no control over his earnings and has to literally beg for his money; “but Ma, Ah wans a gun. Yuh kin lemme have two dollahs outta mah money. Please, Ma. I kin give it to Pa.... Please, Ma! Ah loves yuh, Ma” (Wright, 3). Dave goes as far as to try to manipulate his mother by saying his father can have it. The fact that Dave would go as far as to involve his father, shows the distrust his mother has, and the belief that Dave is still not mature …show more content…

He tries to cover it up, but he fails. His family, and other workers try to question him about it, but he makes up a lie. It’s not until Hawkins asks, that Dave breaks down, and tells the truth. Without realizing it, Dave is experiencing interpellation, which is “the engine that reproduces taken-for-granted (unconscious) cultural assumptions… preventing radical change” (Parker, 235). Throughout the story, Dave has always answered back to Hawkins no matter the circumstance. Dave wants to be recognized as a man, yet he lets himself be interpellated by Hawkins. It’s this interpellation that forbids him from ever leaving the proletariat, and ever becoming a man. In fact, Hawkins is more than happy with this happening, and tells Dave’s father to, “just let the boy keep on working and pay me two dollars a month” (Wright, 5). This is enforcing the economic, and social divide between the proletariat and the

Open Document