Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyze william carlos williams use of force
Analyze william carlos williams use of force
Analyze william carlos williams use of force
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analyze william carlos williams use of force
In the two short stories The Use of Force by William Williams, and The Man in the Well by Ira Sher all have differences, but also have some similarities. While the short story by Williams is about using force to help a child, and Sher’s story is about the kids helping a man get out of a well they both talk about helping someone in need. Both of theses stories do not have a happy outcome and leave the ending open for discussion. Theses two short stories both authors do a good job at being descriptive, and give very detailed information to the reader. Both theses authors discuss the thoughts of little kids and how they react to different situations.The kids in theses two short stories have all the power basically. While it seems to be about …show more content…
Their reaction was to not help the man, however; they could not think of a reason not to help him and the decision was final. “I never want very close to the lip of the well, or I only came to my hands and knees, so that he couldn 't see me”(116). Although none of the kids could ever see this man they didn 't allow it either. The man in the well could still hear the kids playing and having a good time so the man in the well went out on a limb and called out for help. “at first afraid to disobey the voice from the man in the well, we turned around and actually began to walk towards the nearest house”(116). The little kids knew something wasn 't right when they began to get closer to the house. The kids decided to turn around and go back to the well where they would question the man. “What 's your name”(116)? a very simple question, however; the man in the well did not think so and became angry when the kids didn 't have a ladder. The man in the well began to give more options to the children to get him out of the well. The man in the well was no longer asking he was demanding. The kids were very quiet the whole time while standing around the well. The man still asking questions the kids just stood there. The children standing around the well could not even imagine what would would be like trying to it only made matters worse. The man …show more content…
They both have children who have to face a situation. How the kids handle these situations is totally up to them. The kids take matters into their own hands by not allowing to be manipulated by an adult. While in Williams story the little girl is facing a doctor she still does not give in. The little girl does not have to do anything she doesn 't want to, and in the end is forced to do what she doesn 't want to do. In Ser’s short story the kids have the ultimate decision whether or not they will help this man. The kids not informing their parents give them all the power to do whatever they want to do. The kids had some common sense when it came to the man in the well, however; if there was a man down there they left him to die in a way. The kids all around in Sher’s story were intelligent, but should have gone for help whether it was a good idea or not. Both theses short stories everything is in the children 's control. In Williams short story the little girl was defeated, but only by force. Sher’s story the kids had won but also been defeated by the knowledge of knowing there was still a man stuck in a well. In both stories the kids have to deal with their own consequences, because they made the adult decision and that will stay with them the rest of their
These two stories, although written by two different authors present similarities in the characteristics of the main character. Sammy and Tommy are presented with adversity they had previously never faced. Sammy has to decide should he stand up for the girls by quitting and be the hero or should he mind his own business and keep his job. Sammy is forced to quickly make a decision which his boss Lengel feels he made to rashly. “’I don’t think you know what you’re saying,’ Lengel said” (Updike, pg. 146). For Sammy his decision is what he feels he needs to do and he never regrets his choice. Tommy is faced with adversity of a different kind, he has to decide should he believe the teacher and listen to what she is saying or should he, like the other children, think she is strange and a liar. When she loses her job Tommy is forced to make a decision, confront the child who got her fired, or stay quiet and let the matter slide as it is not his problem. For both the boys their actions could be beneficial to them or it could cause them future problems. An example, if Sammy...
The mother and daughter have a very distant relationship because her mother is ill and not capable to be there, the mother wishes she could be but is physically unable. “I only remember my mother walking one time. She walked me to kindergarten." (Fein). The daughter’s point of view of her mother changes by having a child herself. In the short story the son has a mother that is willing to be helpful and there for him, but he does not take the time to care and listen to his mother, and the mother begins to get fed up with how Alfred behaves. "Be quiet don't speak to me, you've disgraced me again and again."(Callaghan). Another difference is the maturity level the son is a teenager that left school and is a trouble maker. The daughter is an adult who is reflecting back on her childhood by the feeling of being cheated in life, but sees in the end her mother was the one who was truly being cheated. “I may never understand why some of us are cheated in life. I only know, from this perspective, that I am not the one who was.” (Fein). The differences in the essay and short story show how the children do not realize how much their mothers care and love
They heard! I was certain of it.” The characters aren’t developed very much in both of the stories, however, their characteristics are different. The main characters in both of the short story are two people, but the protagonist is developed innocent and the antagonist is unrighteous in “Click Clack and Rattle Bag”, “I reached over and tousled his hair.” “I would have pulled away, then, if I could, but small, firm fingers pulled me forward, unrelentingly, into the dark.” show that the young man wants to take care of the kid, but the kid uses his good looks and tone and finally kills the man. And on the contrast, the
...olent incidences contrast in specific details and their fathers personas, both children lose their innocence and gain the experience and knowledge to question life and make logical decisions.
...hts and disputes in LOTF, there was no apologies and compromising. Issues kept on getting worse and worse. Male and female youth are different. Boys don’t like to talk things out. It’s more of fight now, talk later. Girls just like to talk. It can get physical but talking is preferred. Both stories handle youth violence and issues differently.
Every human is given the gift of agency, how we use this gift is quite different depending on the person. In the article, The Man in the Water, we see an unidentified man use his agency for something much larger then himself. This man uses his agency to demonstrate selflessness for those around him. He also elected to show courage and to be a strong leader in dire circumstances.
In both of these stories there are certain characteristics of females that are the same, they are inner strength, obedience, honor and respect, the good of the family is better than the good of the individual.
She considers herself to be a woman highly capable of caring for all the children, yet she still struggles to deal with the stress of everyday financial issues. Williams, on the other hand, lives in a wealthier neighborhood and only has one child. Mr. Williams owns a law firm while Mrs. Williams is a senior manager of a major corporation.... ... middle of paper ...
At the time, the children did not really feel like they were doing anything wrong, but they did know enough to bring the man food and water. Even though they were not going to help him get out of the well, they still wanted to help him in some way. Whenever the man would ask if help was on its way, the children would always lie and tell him help would be there soon. I don’t understand the need these children felt to keep lying to the man. They kept giving him a false sense of hope. The children turned their visits into a game asking the man questions, with the man also asking the children questions. Most of the questions the man asked the children would answer, but the man never answered a question that the children asked him. ‘What’s your name?’ Was the first question that was asked by the children. This question was reoccurring by both the man and the children. People are born into this world nameless and they are strangers. Whe...
story as the corruption of evil takes a prominent role in the story of the two children. The
Both books are told in the first person; both narrators are young girls, living in destitute neighborhoods, who witness the harsh realities of life for those who are poor, abused, and hopeless, although the narrators themselves manage to survive their tough environments with their wits and strength intact. Books are more than simple literary exercises, written merely to amuse or delight their audiences. Both authors attempt to provoke their readers to think about the social issues their novels present.... ... middle of paper ...
In the beginning of both of the pieces of literature, the main character(s) have not had the experience that will shape their values yet. Rather, as time moves forward in the stories, the
The struggles both characters face demonstrate character development and contribute to the themes of the stories. Both short stories prove to be literally effective in that they disclose the main themes at the outset of each story. Although the themes may alter over the course of the stories, they are clearly defined in their respective introductions.
Children literature is a term that refers to the texts written for children. The artist uses creative ways to ensure that children are provided with educational books, touching on a variety of themes. This paper will include comparison of two characters from the two texts, “Hana's Suitcase: A True Story,” authored by Karen Levine and “Charlotte’s Web,” written by E.B. White, with the aim of understanding ways in which problems are solvable as indicated by selected characters.
The children couldn’t accept what they thought was so horrible. There was a lot of ignorance and carelessness portrayed throughout this short story. The theme of ungratefulness was revealed in this story; The author depicted how disrespecting someone can inturn feed you with information you may wish you never knew and how someone can do one wrong thing and it immediately erases all the good things a person did throughout their