Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The need to inculcate good moral values among youths
Factors that influence moral development of adolescents
Effect of youth violence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The need to inculcate good moral values among youths
The Link Between Friendship and Moral Development
The study of morality is molded by an intricately linked set of tangential issues each of which has a unique effect on moral development. Friendship and peer groups in particular play an indisputable role in helping to shape the path of moral development in children and adolescents. In evaluating various philosophical and psychological perspectives on morality, two principal arguments emerge concerning the link between friendship and moral development: in the first argument, friendships act as a positive force in fostering moral development, as they provide a background upon which children can formulate their own moral rules and values. In direct contradiction, the second argument espouses friendship and morality as inherently antithetical, relying heavily on the idea that friendship encourages subjectiveness and impartiality. The potential negative influence of peer influence on moral development is perhaps most clearly manifested in the prevalence of aggression and violence in the lives of many children and adolescents. In studying the link between friendship and moral development, then, it is crucial to consider both the positive and negative consequences that peer relations can have on a child’s struggle to develop his own individual sense of morality.
The Definition of Friendship and its Relationship to Moral Development
In exploring the effects of friendship on moral development, particularly in children and adolescents, it is necessary first to establish the ways in which these phenomena are related. Traditionally, friendship and morality have been viewed as separate entities independent of one another; consequently, there is little research pertaining to the specif...
... middle of paper ...
... York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Cairns, Robert and Beverley. Lifelines and Risks: Pathways of Youth in our Time.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Eron, L., Gentry, J., & Schlegel, P. Reason to Hope: A Psycholosocial Perspective on Violence and Youth. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1994.
Friedman, Marilyn. What Are Friends For? London: Cornell University Press, 1993.
Garbarino, James. Lost Boys. New York: The Free Press, 1999.
Henry, David B. "Peer Groups, Families, and School Failure Among Urban Children: Elements of Risk and Successful Interventions." Preventing School Failure, 44:3, 97-105.
Piaget, Jean. The Moral Judgment of the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1932.
Pinderhughes, Howard. Race in the Hood: Conflict and Violence Among UrbanYouth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
In the article “Gentrification’s Insidious Violence: The Truth about American Cities” by Daniel Jose Older, Older places emphasis on the neighboring issue of gentrification in minority, low income communities or as better known as being called the “hood” communities. The author is biased on how race is a factor in gentrifying communities by local governments. Older explains his experience as a paramedic aiding a white patient in the “hood” where he was pistol whipped in a home invasion by a black male. This is an example of black on white crime which is found to be a normal occurrence in the residence of his community. But that is not the case in Older’s situation because that was the first time he has
Wilson, William J. More Than Just Race: Being Black and Poor in the Inner City. New York: Norton & Company, 2009. Print.
Wilson, William Julius. 2010. More than Just Race: Being Black and Poor in the Inner City. New York. W. W. Norton & Company
Expansion into Central Asia begins as early as the year 637 during the time of the Muslim Caliph Omar Ibn Al-Khattab. At the time, the Muslim army leader Al-Ahnaf Ibn Qays (1) in the battles with the Persian empire had pushed the last king of the Sasanian Empire Yazdegerd III all the way back to Amu River near Balkh at the Battle of Oxus River (4). The Amu River is in todays’ Turkmenistan and so is in the western side of Central Asia. The expans...
Douglass’s resistance of oppression was much more direct, both mentally and physically. Due to the 1st first person perspective of his Narrative, his tactics come off much more understandable and justifiable to his largely, White, Northern audience. Throughout the narrative, especially in scene between a master and his aunt, he portrays slaves as helpless victims at the mercy of their sadistic master. Witnessing his master beat his aunt into a bloody pulp, for example, emasculated Douglass because he could not prevent the man from asserting his authority over her. In the scene with Mr. Covey, however, Douglass portrayed violence as an act of reclaiming his manhood. Although the “slave-breaker” manages to overwork and beat Douglass until he nearly had no choice but to recover from his anguish instead of pursuing any education or freedom, his fight against Mr. Covey was a physical manifestation of his inner power and identity that even Mr. Covey could not ignore. The two White perspectives in Benito Cereno depict the violence among the slaves and the Whites as the complete opposite. Although the slaves have clearly proven they are far more intelligent and powerful than the other men have presumed, the White men’s internalized racism prevents them from seeing this aspect and draws their attention towards the physical violence instead. They label themselves as the
Kunen, James S. (1997, July 21). Integration forever? TimeMartin, Abu. & Gavin, Shaun. Urban black male in crisis. Urban black male in crisis http://www.auser.org/Understanding/UrbanBlackMale.html
Homer's two central heroes, Odysseus and Achilles, are in many ways differing manifestations of the same themes. While Achilles' character is almost utterly consistent in his rage, pride, and near divinity, Odysseus' character is difficult to pin down to a single moral; though perhaps more human than Achilles, he remains more difficult to understand. Nevertheless, both heroes are defined not by their appearances, nor by the impressions they leave upon the minds of those around them, nor even so much by the words they speak, but almost entirely by their actions. Action is what drives the plot of both the Iliad and the Odyssey, and action is what holds the characters together. In this respect, the theme of humanity is revealed in both Odysseus and Achilles: man is a combination of his will, his actions, and his relationship to the divine. This blend allows Homer to divulge all that is human in his characters, and all that is a vehicle for the idyllic aspects of ancient Greek society. Accordingly, the apparent inconsistencies in the characterization of Odysseus can be accounted for by his spiritual distance from the god-like Achilles; Achilles is more coherent because he is the son of a god. This is not to say that Achilles is not at times petty or unimaginative, but that his standards of action are merely more continuous through time. Nevertheless, both of Homer's heroes embody important and admirable facets of ancient Greek culture, though they fracture in the ways they are represented.
Hourani, Albert. A History of the Arab Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard UP, 1991. Print.
Throughout the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, Frederick Douglass uses plenty of rhetorical devices to dramatize the events of his life and reveal the truth of slavery to his readers. In one particular chapter, chapter 7, which contains an event that could be considered the turning point of Frederick Douglass’s life, Douglass fully uses his range of rhetorical ability. Although Sophia Auld’s descent into cruelty could be seen as a negative event in Douglass’s life, her actions indirectly led to the awareness of his situation through literacy, and eventually his freedom; both explained by Frederick Douglass through his analytical tone and extensive use of rhetorical devices.
By reaching the stage of early adulthood, we as an individual will undergo cognitive development, moral development and socio-emotional development (Santrock, 2013). When one experiences cognitive development, s/he will be able to acquire the ability to learn, grasp problem solving skills and able to develop decision making skill (Huitt & Hummel, 2003). Kohlberg’s theory of moral development consists of three levels which consists two sub-levels each. The first level is the pre-conventional morality continued by the conventional morality and post-conventional morality (Mcleod, 2011). According to Huitt (2008), by developing socio-emotional skills, one will be able to have a better understanding in managing emotions and will be able to increase
The first aspect of society that influences morality is observation—primarily, what children observe among their families. There are natural gender roles that are stereotypically embodied in a family. For
Today I will be interviewing Baumeister, Gilligan, and Piaget who are some of the most influential psychologists in the field of moral development. I will be interviewing these three so and I have three critical questions in the field of moral development that I would like each to answer. I will then conclude with a brief summary of the similarities and differences between the psychologists I have interviewed.
One of the most persistently asked and perpetually unanswered questions in psychology is the question of morality. What is it, how does it develop, and where does it come from? A basic definition of morality is “beliefs about what is right behavior and what is wrong behavior” (Merriam-Webster). Based on the definition, the question then becomes even more complicated; How do people decide what is right and what is wrong? Research has examined this from many different angles, and two distinct schools of thought have emerged. One centers on the Lockian idea of children as blank slates who must be taught the difference between right and wrong and what it means to be moral, while the other espouses a more Chomskian perspective of a preset system of basic rules and guidelines that needs only to be activated. So what does this mean for humans and humanity? Are we born tabula rasa or are we born with an innate sense of good and evil? For those researching this topic, the question then becomes how to most effectively theorize, experiment and interpret human morality.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: the nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Morality is defined by the rights and wrongs that people have been taught growing up. Childhood is when a person is taught many of their lessons that they carry on for the rest of their life. One of these lessons is the difference between right and wrong, also known as morality. This is a unique subject because the morality taught to children is different for each child. Some of the teachings of right and wrong are similar, such as it is right to say thank you after someone has done something for you, while some of the teachings are different, such as how you should treat another person. The way that the parents teach their children morality will determine how that child will view and define morality. This means that the way people view and define morality can be different depending on the situation in which the person was raised as a child. In the article called “Aristotle’s Ethics,” Aristotle believed that people can have different moral beliefs because of the way that they are raised. This causes tensions in friendships because there is a large gap in moral development. The article says, “If, however, there is a large gap in their moral development (as between a paren...